Transparency and Public Value—Analyzing the Transparency Practices and Value Creation of Public Utilities

References

• Bauhr, M., & Grimes, M. (2014). Indignation or resignation: The implications of transparency for societal accountability. Governance, 27(2), 291–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellver, A., & Kaufmann, D. (2005). Transparenting transparency initial empirics and policy applications. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=808664.
   Google Scholar
• Benington, J., & Moore, M. H. (Eds.). (2010). Public value: Theory and practice. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S. (2010). Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 377–383. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, S. (2011). Great governance in small societies: Effective public sector practices in small-scale democracies. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Berenschot.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, S. (2012). Success nonetheless: Making public utilities work in small-scale democracies despite difficult social capital conditions (Phd thesis). University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Fine Licht, J. (2014). Policy area as a potential moderator of transparency effects: An experiment. Public Administration Review, 74(3), 361–371. doi:10.1111/puar.12194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2013). Infotopia: Unleashing the democratic power of transparency. Politics & Society, 41(2), 183–212. doi:10.1177/0032329213483107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goertz, G., & Mahony, J. (2012). A tale of two cultures. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodsell, C. T. (2010). Mission mystique: Belief systems in public organizations. London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. (2011). Being transparent or spinning the message? An experiment into the effects of varying message content on trust in government. Information Polity, 16(1), 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. (2012). Transparency and trust. An experimental study of online disclosure and trust in government ( PhD thesis). Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Meijer, A. J. (2014). Effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: Evidence from an online experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24 (1), 137–157. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillebrandt, M. Z., Curtin, D., & Meijer, A. (2014). Transparency in the EU council of ministers: An institutional analysis. European Law Journal, 20(1), 1–20. doi:10.1111/eulj.2014.20.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, P. (2000). Democracy and governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance (pp. 13–35). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Heald, D. (Eds.). (2006). Transparency, the key to good governance? (No. 135). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard–measures that drive value. Harvard Business Review, 70, 71–79. January–February.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J., & Klijn, E. H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks: A network approach to problem solving and decision making. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martina, I. S. (2009). Regulation in splendid isolation: A framework to promote effective and efficient performance of the electricity industry in small isolated monopoly systems. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J. (2012). The do it yourself state: The future of participatory democracy. Information Polity, 17(3–4), 303–314.
   Google Scholar
• Michener, G., & Bersch, K. (2013). Identifying transparency. Information Polity, 18(3), 233–242.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. H. (2013). Recognizing public value. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oostindie, G. J., & Sutton, P. K. (2006). Small scale and quality of governance: A survey of the scholarly literature, with special reference to the Caribbean. Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties.
   Google Scholar
• Oostindie, G., & Sutton, P. (2006). Good governance and small islands states. Leiden, The Netherlands: KITLV.
   Google Scholar
• Page, S. B., Stone, M. M., Bryson, J. M. & Crosby, B. C. (2015). Public value creation by cross-sector collaborations: A framework and challenges of assessment. Public Administration, 93, 715–732. doi:10.1111/padm.12161
   Google Scholar
• Pasquier, M., & Villeneuve, J.-P. (2007). Organizational barriers to transparency: A typology and analysis of organizational behaviour tending to prevent or restrict access to information. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(1), 147–162. doi:10.1177/0020852307075701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy-sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C., & Rihoux, B. (Eds.). (2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (pp. 87–122). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. (2005). Spin control and freedom of information: Lessons for the United Kingdom from Canada. Public Administration, 83(1), 1–23. doi:10.1111/padm.2005.83.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. (2006). Blacked out: Government secrecy in the information age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schnackenberg, A. K. & Tomlinson, E. C. (2014). Organizational transparency: A new perspective on managing trust in organization-stakeholder relationships. Journal of Management. doi:10.1177/0149206314525202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2012). Introduction: Collaborative innovation in the public sector. Innovation Journal, 17(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management a new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbot, C. (2010). Theories of value: Organizational and service improvement in the public domain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H. (1997). The tyranny of light: The temptations and the paradoxes of the information society. Futures, 29 (9), 827–843. doi:10.1016/S0016-3287(97)00035-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Heijden, J. (2015). The role of government in voluntary environmental programmes: A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. Public Administration, 93, 576–592. (Online on 6 January 2015). doi:10.1111/padm.12141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, I., & Shearer, H. (2011). Appraising public value: Past, present and futures. Public Administration, 89(4), 1367–1384. doi:10.1111/padm.2011.89.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar