Accountability and Performance Management: The Norwegian Hospital, Welfare, and Immigration Administration

REFERENCES

• Anderson, B., Curristine, T., & Merk, O. (2006). Budgeting in Norway. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 6(1), 8–43. doi:10.1787/budget-v6-art2-en
   Google Scholar
• Askim, J. (2015). The role of performance management in the steering of executive agencies: Layered, imbedded, or disjointed? Public Performance and Management Review, 38(3), 365–394. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1006463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, G., & Hood, C. (2006). What’s measured is what matters: Targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Administration, 84(3), 517–538. doi:10.1111/padm.2006.84.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezes, P., Fimreite, A. L., Le Lidec, P., & Lægreid, P. (2013). Understanding organizational reforms in the modern state: Specialization and integration in Norway and France. Governance, 26(1), 147–175. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01608.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binderkrantz, A. S., Holmand, M., & Korsager, K. (2011). Performance contracts and goal attainment in government agencies. International Public Management Journal, 14(4), 445–463. doi:10.1080/10967494.2011.657116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston, J., Martin, J., Pallot, J., & Walsh, P. (1996). Public management: The New Zealand model. Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2008). Managing performance. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G., & Peters, B. G. (2004). What is available and what is missing in the study of quangos? In C. Pollitt, & C. Talbot (Eds.), Unbundled government. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. doi:10.1111/eulj.2007.13.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breivik, B. (2010). Mål- og resultatstyring i praksis. En studie av styringsdialogen mellom Arbeids- og inkluderingsdepartementet og Arbeids- og velferdsdirektoratet (Working Paper 09/2010). Bergen, Norway: Rokkan Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Byrkjeflot, H., Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2014). The many faces of accountability: Comparing reforms in welfare, hospitals and migration. Scandinavian Political Studies, 37(2), 171–195. doi:10.1111/scps.2014.37.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2001). New public management. The transformation of ideas and practice. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066. doi:10.1111/puar.2007.67.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2011). Complexity and hybrid public administration – Theoretical and empirical challenges. Public Organization Review, 11(4), 407–423. doi:10.1007/s11115-010-0141-4
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2014). Performance and accountability – A theoretical discussion and an empirical assessment. Public Organization Review, 15(2), 207–225.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., & Ramslien, A. R. (2006). Styring og Autonomi. Organisasjonsformer i norsk utlendingsforvaltning (Steering and autonomy. Organizational forms in Norwegian Immigration Administration). Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., & Stigen, I. (2006). Performance management and public sector reform: The Norwegian hospital reform. International Public Management Journal, 9(2), 113–139. doi:10.1080/10967490600766987
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M. (2012). How bureaucratic structure matters: An organizational perspective. In B. G. Peters, & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, L., & Segal, J. E. (2000). Measuring issue salience. American Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 66–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2010). The blame game. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P. (2014). New public management and public accountability. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Rolland, V. (2013). Agencification and Corporatization in Norway. 1947–2011. International Journal of Public Administration, 36(9), 659–672. doi:10.1080/01900692.2013.791311
   Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Rubecksen, K. (2006). Autonomy and control in the Norwegian civil service: Does agency form matter? In T. Christensen, & P. Lægreid (Eds.), Autonomy and regulation. Coping with agencies in the modern state. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Rubecksen, K. (2007). Modern management tools in state agencies: The case of Norway. International Public Management Journal, 10(4), 387–413. doi:10.1080/10967490701683586
   Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Rubecksen, K. (2008). Performance information and performance steering. In S. van der Walle, & W. van Dooren (Eds.), Utilizing public sector performance information. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1983). Organizing political life. What administrative reorganization tells us about government. American Political Science Review, 77, 281–297. doi:10.2307/1958916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Local Government and Modernization. (2014, May 7). Mer tillit skal gi bedre offentlig sektor [More trust for a better public sector] [Press release]. Oslo, Norway: KMD.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2006a). Ambiguity in policy lessons: The agencification experience. Public Administration, 84(4), 1029–1050. doi:10.1111/padm.2006.84.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2006b). Managing for results in state government: Evaluating a decade of reform. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 77–89. doi:10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Directorate for Public Management and eGovernment. (2012). Uavhengig eller bare uavklart? Organisering av statlig myndighetsutøvelse (Report 2012: 7). Oslo, Norway: Difi.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Government. (2013). Overview of state employment by March 1st 2013 [Oversikt over ansatte i staten]. Retrieved January 22, 2015, from https://www.regjeringen.no/nb/aktuelt/oversikt-over-ansatte-i-staten/id732734/
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Government Agency for Financial Management. (2011). Styringsdokumenta instruks for økonomi- og verksemdsstyring og tildelingsbrev frå departement til verksemd: Eksempelsamling med kommentarar (Report 01/2011). Oslo, Norway: DFØ.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Social Science Data Service. (2015). The Norwegian state administration database. Retrieved January 22, 2015, from http://www.nsd.uib.no/polsys/en/civilservice/
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, S. K., Coursey, D. H., & Moynihan, D. P. (2007). Organizational effectiveness and bureaucratic red tape: A multimethod study. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(3), 398–425. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576300305
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2003). Performance audit in Western Europe: Trends and choices. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14(1/2), 157–170. doi:10.1006/cpac.2002.0521
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2008). Time, policy, management: Governing with the past. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2013). The logics of performance management. Evaluation, 19(4), 346–363. doi:10.1177/1356389013505040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Dan, S. (2013). Searching for impacts in performance-oriented management reforms: A review of the European Literature. Public Performance & Management Review, 37(1), 7–32. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576370101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., Talbot, C., Caulfield, J., & Smullen, A. (2004). Agencies: How governments do things through semi-autonomous organizations. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rolland, V. W., & Roness, P. G. (2011). Mapping organizational change in the state: Challenges and classifications. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(6), 399–409. doi:10.1080/01900692.2011.572693
   Google Scholar
• Rubecksen, K. (2010). Autonomy. control and tasks in state agencies. Comparisons and relationships ( PhD Thesis). Department of Administration and Organization Theory, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behaviour. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van De Walle, T., & Cornelissen, F. (2014). Performance reporting. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2010). Performance management in the public sector. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeeten, F. H. M. (2008). Performance management practices in public sector organizations: Impact on performance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(3), 427–454. doi:10.1108/09513570810863996
   Google Scholar
• Verhoest, K. (2005). Effects of autonomy, performance contracting, and competition on the performance of a public agency: A case study. Policy Studies Journal, 33(2), 235–258. doi:10.1111/psj.2005.33.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoest, K., Roness, P. G., Verschuere, B., Rubecksen, K., & MacCarthaigh, M. (2010). Autonomy and control of state agencies: Comparing states and agencies. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracies – What government agencies do and why they do it. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar