Innovation Policy as Performativity—the Case of Sweden

References

• Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D., & Cox, R. H. (2011). Introduction. ideas and politics. In D. Béland & R. H. Cox (Eds.), Ideas and politics in social science research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 80(8), 1513‒1522. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunerhjelm, P., Eklund, K., & Henrekson, M. (2012). Ett ramverk för innovationspolitiken: Hur göra Sverige mer entreprenöriellt? Stockholm, Sweden: Samhällsförlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. (2013). Categories of analysis and categories of practice: A note on the study of Muslims in European countries of immigration. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36 (1), 1–8. doi:10.1080/01419870.2012.729674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L. (1998). Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy. Theory and Society, 27, 377–409. doi:10.1023/A:1006871114987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daigneault, P.-M. (2014). Reassessing the concept of policy paradigm: Aligning ontology and methodology in policy studies. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(3), 453‒469. doi:10.1080/13501763.2013.834071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleon, P., & Martell, C. R. ((2006). The policy sciences: Past, present, and future. In G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds), Handbook of public policy (pp. 31–47). London UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (2011). Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: identification of systemic problems (or failure). Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(6), 1725–1753.
   Google Scholar
• Eklund, M. (2007). Adoption of the innovation system concept in Sweden. Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University Studies in Economic History.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, A. (2005). Samhandling för innovationsledd tillväxt. VINNOVA Rapport, 2005, 07.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2004). The triple helix and the rise of the entrepreneurial university. In K. Granding, N. Wormbs & S. Widmalm (Eds.), ‘Science and industry nexus. History, policy, implications’ (pp. 277–304). Sagamore Beach, MA: Science and History Publications.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). State of the innovation union. Brussels, Belgium: DG for Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specializations (RIS 3). Brussels, Belgium: DG for Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, J., Miller, K. J., & McTavish, D. (2012). Co-governance or meta-bureaucracy? Perspectives of local governance ‘partnership’ in England and Scotland. Policy & Politics, 40(3), 405‒422. doi:10.1332/147084411X581907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation. Research Policy, 4(5), 702‒713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuglsang, L. (1993). Technology and new institutions: A comparison of strategic choices and technology studies in the United States, Denmark and Sweden. Copenhagen, Denmark: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, B. (2009). National innovation system: The system approach in historical perspective. Science, Technology & Human Values, 34, 476‒501. doi:10.1177/0162243908329187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275‒296. doi:10.2307/422246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2011). Ideas and the construction of interests. In D. Béland & R. H. Cox (Eds.), Ideas and politics in social science research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H., & Sabatier, P. A. (1993). The study of the public policy process. In P. A. Sabatier & H. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.), Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach (pp. 1–9). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. (2007). Reforming public services in the UK: Bringing in the third sector. Public Administration, 85(4), 1003‒1022. doi:10.1111/padm.2007.85.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1984/2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lagendijk, A. (2001). Three stories about regional salience: ‘Regional worlds’, ‘political mobilisation’ and ‘performativity’. Zeitschrift Für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 45(1), 139‒158. doi:10.1515/zfw.2001.0009
   Google Scholar
• Lagendijk, A., & Varró, K. (2013). European innovation policies from RIS to smart specialization: A policy assemblage perspective. In E. G. Caravannis & G. M. Korres (Eds.), The innovation union in Europe: A socio-economic perspective on EU Integration. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Laranja, M., Uyarra, E., & Flanagan, K. (2008). Policies for science, technology and innovation: Translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting. Research Policy, 37(5), 823‒835. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, C. A., & Andersen, J. G. (2009). How new economic ideas changed the Danish Welfare State: The case of neoliberal ideas and highly organized social democratic interests. Governance, 22(2), 239‒261. doi:10.1111/gove.2009.22.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavén, F. (2008). Organizing innovation: How policies are translated into practice. Göteborg, Sweden: BAS Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lovering, J. (1999). Theory led by policy: The inadequacies of the ’New Regionalism’ (illustrated from the case of Wales). International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23 (2), 379‒395. doi:10.1111/ijur.1999.23.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London, UK: Pinter Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument and persuasion in the policy process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1995). Democratic governance. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013). Modern regional innovation policy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. doi:10.1093/cjres/rst007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010). OECD innovation strategy: Getting a head start on tomorrow. Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012). OECD Territorial Reviews: Skåne, Sweden 2012. Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, B. (2008). The development of a new swedish innovation policy: A historical institutional approach. CIRCLE paper no. 2008/02. Lund, Sweden: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & King, D. S. (2005). The politics of path dependency: Political conflict in historical institutionalism. The Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1275‒1300. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00360.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regional Government of Skåne. (2009). Skåne’s Innovation Capacity – An Action Plan for a More Innovative Skåne (Skånsk Innovationskraft – Handlingsplan för ett mer innovativt Skåne).
   Google Scholar
• Regional Government of Skåne. (2011). An International Innovation Strategy for Skåne (En internationell innovationsstrategi för Skåne). Kristianstad, Sweden: Skåne Research and Innovation Council (FIRS) & Sounding Board for Innovation in Skåne (SIS).
   Google Scholar
• Regional Government of Skåne and VINNOVA. (2009). Building the Innovative Capacity in Skåne: Reflections and Recommendations from the International Peer Review (internal document).
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, `translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387‒420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valaskivi, K. (2012). Dimensions of innovationism. In P. Nynäs, M. Lassander, & T. Utriainen (Eds.), Post-secular society. London, UK: Transaction.
   Google Scholar