Predictors of an Effective Performance Measurement System: Evidence from Municipal Governments in Turkey

References

• Ammons, D. N. (2002). Performance measurement and managerial thinking. Public Performance & Management Review, 25 (4), 344–347. doi:10.1080/15309576.2002.11643669
   Google Scholar
• Ammons, D. N. (2013). Signs of performance measurement progress among prominent city governments. Public Performance & Management Review, 36 (4), 507–528. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576360401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammons, D. N., & Rivenbark, W. C. (2008). Factors influencing the use of performance data to improve municipal services: Evidence from the North Carolina benchmarking project. Public Administration Review, 68 (2), 304–318. doi:10.1111/puar.2008.68.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ates, H., & Cetin, D. (2004). Kamuda performans yönetimi ve performansa dayalı bütçe [Performance management and performance-based budgeting in public administration]. In M. Acar & H. Ozgur (Eds.), Çağdaş Kamu Yönetimi II [Contemporary Public Administration II] (pp. 255–284). Ankara, Turkey: Nobel.
   Google Scholar
• Barzelay, M., & Armajani, B. J. (1992). Breaking through bureaucracy: A new vision for managing in government. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63 (5), 586–606. doi:10.1111/puar.2003.63.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, E., & Wang, X. (2000). Performance measurement in U.S. counties: Capacity for reform. Public Administration Review, 60 (5), 409–420. doi:10.1111/puar.2000.60.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G. (1993). Measurement and meaningful management. Public Productivity and Management Review, 17 (1), 31–44. doi:10.2307/3381047
   Google Scholar
• Burke, W. W., & Litwin, G. H. (1992). A causal model of organizational performance and change. Journal of Management, 18 (3), 523–545. doi:10.1177/014920639201800306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. New York, NY: LEA Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• de Lancer Julnes, P. L., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adopting and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61 (6), 693–708. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Haboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, S., & Rainey, H. G. (2006). Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 66 (2), 168–176. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00570.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folz, D. H., Abdelrazek, R., & Chung, Y. (2009). The adoption, use, and impacts of performance measures in medium-size cities: Progress toward performance management. Public Performance & Management Review, 33 (1), 63–87. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576330103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G. (1999). The repositioning of American public administration. Political Science and Politics, 32 (4), 701–711. doi:10.1017/S1049096500056547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryer, K., Antony, J., & Ogden, S. (2009). Performance management in the public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 22 (6), 478–498. doi:10.1108/09513550910982850
   Google Scholar
• Guney, A., & Celenk, A. (2010). Europeanization and the dilemma of decentralization: Centre-local relations in Turkey. Journal of Balkan & Near Eastern Studies, 12 (3), 241–257. doi:10.1080/19448953.2010.506810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guven, A. (2012). Belediyelerde performans denetimi ve algılanması üzerine bir araştırma [A research on performance audit and perception in municipalities]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Häggroth, S. (2013). Leading change by including stakeholders. Public Administration Review, 73 (4), 550. doi:10.1111/puar.12095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatry, H. P. (2006). Performance measurement: Getting results (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A. T. (2006). Accounting for the value of performance measurement from the perspective of Midwestern mayors. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16 (2), 217–238. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzer, M., & Yang, K. (2004). Performance measurement and improvement: An assessment of the state of the art. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70 (1), 15–31. doi:10.1177/0020852304041228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69 (1), 3–19. doi:10.1111/padm.1991.69.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoontis, P., & Kim, T. (2012). Antecedents to municipal performance measurement implementation: A case study of two New Jersey municipalities. Public Performance and Management Review, 36 (1), 158–173. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576360108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard, D. W. (2010). How to measure anything: Finding the value of “intangibles” in business (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, O. E. (2012). Public management and administration: An introduction (4th ed.). London, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Kapucu, N. (2010). Governance reforms: Comparative perspectives. Ankara, Turkey: International Strategic Research Organization (ISRO) Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kapucu, N., & Palabiyik, H. (2008). Turkish public administration: From tradition to modern age. Ankara, Turkey: International Strategic Research Organization (ISRO) Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kapucu, N., Volkov, I., & Wang, X. (2011). Best practices of best performers: Evidence from the Florida sterling council award winners. Public Performance & Management Review, 34 (3), 397–419. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576340304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kosecik, M., Kapucu, N., & Sezer, Y. (2003). Becoming an effective public manager in the global world: District governors in Turkey. D. E. University Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal, 18 (1), 105–129.
   Google Scholar
• Koseoglu, O. (2005). Belediyelerde performans yönetimi [Performance management in municipalities]. Turk Idare Dergisi [Journal of Turkish Administration], 447, 211–234.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. L., & Frahm, K. K. (2010). The changing nature of accountability in administrative practice. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 37 (1), 137–148.
   Google Scholar
• Mausolff, C., & Spence, J. (2008). Performance measurement and program effectiveness: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Public Administration, 31 (6), 595–615. doi:10.1080/01900690701640929
   Google Scholar
• Melkers, J., & Willoughby, K. (2005). Models of performance-measurement use in local governments: Understanding budgeting, communication, and lasting effects. Public Administration Review, 65 (2), 180–190. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00443.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2005). Why and how do state governments adopt and implement “Managing for Results” reforms? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15 (2), 219–243. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2006). Managing for results in state government: Evaluating a decade of reform. Public Administration Review, 66 (1), 77–89. doi:10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nalbandian, J., O’Neill, R., Wilkes, J. M., & Kaufman, A. (2013). Contemporary challenges in local government: Evolving roles and responsibilities, structures, and processes. Public Administration Review, 73 (4), 567–574. doi:10.1111/puar.12059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., & Streib, G. (1999). Performance measurement in municipal government: Assessing the state of the practice. Public Administration Review, 59 (4), 325–335. doi:10.2307/3110115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollanen, R. M. (2005). Performance measurement in municipalities: Empirical evidence in Canadian context. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18 (1), 4–24. doi:10.1108/09513550510576125
   Google Scholar
• Ridley, C. E., & Simon, H. A. (1938). Measuring municipal activities. A survey of suggested criteria and reporting forms for appraising administration. Chicago, IL: International City Managers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rivenbark, W. C., & Kelly, J. M., (2003). Management innovation in smaller municipal government. State and Local Government Review, 35 (3), 196–205.
   Google Scholar
• Sagbas, I., Caliskan, A., Hazman, G. G., & Erin, M. Z. (2011). Yerel Yönetimlerde Performans Ölçümü: Teori ve Türkiye Uygulaması [Performance measurement in local governments: Theory and Turkish Practice]. Ankara, Turkey: Seckin.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar, J. I., & Martínez, C. L. (2013). Adoption of performance measurement: Evidence of Mexican municipalities. International Journal of Public Administration, 36 (11), 754–767. doi:10.1080/01900692.2013.794833
   Google Scholar
• Sanger, M. B. (2008). From measurement to management: Breaking through the barriers to state and local performance. Public Administration Review, 68, S70–S85. doi:10.1111/puar.2008.68.issue-s1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezen, S. (2011). International versus domestic explanations of administrative reforms: The case of Turkey. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77 (2), 322–346. doi:10.1177/0020852311399229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streib, G., & Poister, T. (1999). Assessing the validity, legitimacy and functionality of performance measurement systems in municipal governments. American Review of Public Administration, 29(2), 107–123. doi:10.1177/02750749922064300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. (2006). Performance measurement in Australian and Hong Kong government departments. Public Performance & Management Review, 29 (3), 334–357. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576290305
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Ministry of Interior. (2014). Belediyeler [Municipalities]. Retrieved from http://www.migm.gov.tr/IstatistikiBilgiler.aspx?DetayId=1
   Google Scholar
• Van de Welle, S. (2008). Comparing the performance of national public sectors: Conceptual problems. International Journal of Productivity & Performance Management, 57 (4), 329–338. doi:10.1108/17410400810867535
   Google Scholar
• Wan, T. (1995). Analysis and evaluation of health care systems: An integrated approach to managerial decision making. Baltimore, MD: Health Professions Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. (2010). Performance analysis for public and nonprofit organizations. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Holzer, M. (2006). The performance-trust link: Implications for performance measurement. Public Administration Review, 66 (1), 114–126. doi:10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Hsieh, J. (2007). Managerial effectiveness of government performance measurement: Testing a middle-range model. Public Administration Review, 67 (5), 861–879. doi:10.1111/puar.2007.67.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., & Wu, J. (2013). Are the “Bigger Fish” caught? China’s experience of engaging citizens in performance measurement system. Public Administration Quarterly, 37 (2), 144–181.
   Google Scholar