Trust Matters: Distrust in an External Evaluation of a Public Sector Program

References

• Anderson, L., & Austin, M. (2012). Auto-ethnography in leisure studies. Leisure Studies, 31 (2), 131–146. doi:10.1080/02614367.2011.599069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbier, J. (1999). Inter-governmental evaluation: Balancing stakeholders’ expectations with enlightenment objectives? Evaluation, 5, 373–386. doi:10.1177/135638999400830075
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Ner, A., & Halldorsson, F. (2010). Trusting and Trustworthiness: What are they, how to measure them and what affects them. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 64–79. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2009.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bluhm, L. H. (1987). Trust, terrorism and technology. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 333–341. doi:10.1007/BF00382889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon, S. D., & Holmes, J. G. (1991). The dynamics of interpersonal trust: Resolving uncertainty in the face of risk. In R. A. Hinde, & J. Groebel (Eds.), Co-operation and pro-social behaviour (pp. 190–211). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2007). Assessing the quality of local governance: A case study of public services. Public Money & Management, 27, 293–300. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9302.2007.00597.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. (2003). Performing for the public: Evaluation, evidence and evangelism in social policy. Proceedings of the social policy association annual conference, held 15–17 July 2013 at University of Teesside, Middleborough
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. (2004). Dissolving the public realm? The logics and limits of neo-liberalism. Journal of Social Policy, 33 (1), 27–48. doi:10.1017/S0047279403007244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, N. A. D., & Mannion, R. (2006). Conceptualisations of trust in the organisational literature. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 20 (5), 417–433. doi:10.1108/14777260610701795
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coulson, A. (2007). The Evaluator: Inquisitor, comrade or spy? Local Economy, 2 (4), 229–236. doi:10.1080/02690948808725907
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, L. (1996). Personal ethnography. Communication Monographs, 63 (2), 158–170. doi:10.1080/03637759609376384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, J. G. (2011). Researching workplace spiritualization through auto/ethnography. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 8 (2), 143–164. doi:10.1080/14766086.2011.581813
   Google Scholar
• Davies, I. C. (1999). Evaluation and performance management in government. Evaluation, 5 (2), 150–159. doi:10.1177/13563899922208896
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, G., & Hartog, D. N. D. (2006). Measuring trust inside organisations. Personnel Review, 35 (5), 557–588. doi:10.1108/00483480610682299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, O. N. (2002). Use of evaluations and the evaluation of their use. Evaluation, 8 (4), 433–439. doi:10.1177/13563890260620621
   Google Scholar
• Fiol, C. (2003). Organising for knowledge based competition. In S. Jackson, M. Hitt, & A. Denise (Eds.), Managing knowledge for sustainable competitive advantage. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, J., Christie, C., & Mark, M. M. (2009). Evaluation in action. London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Grey, C., & Garsten, C. (2001). Trust, control and post-bureaucracy. Organization Studies, 22 (2), 229–250. doi:10.1177/0170840601222003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson, F. (2006). Organizational use of evaluations: governance and control in research evaluation. Evaluation, 12 (2), 159–178. doi:10.1177/1356389006066970
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, C. A. (1981). Can an evaluator be neutral? Innovations in Education & Training International, 18 (2), 100–102. doi:10.1080/0033039810180207
   Google Scholar
• Henry, G. T. (2000). Why not use? In V. J. Caracelli, & H. Preskill (Eds.), The expanding scope of evaluation use: New Directions for Evaluation (Vol. 88, pp. 85–98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, G. T., & Mark, M. M. (2003). Beyond Use: Understanding evaluation’s influence on attitudes and actions. American Journal of Evaluation, 24 (3), 293–314. doi:10.1177/109821400302400302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: the connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20 (2), 379–403. doi:10.5465/AMR.1995.9507312923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., & Wilkinson, I. F. (2013). The dynamics and evolution of trust in business relationships, industrial. Industrial Marketing Management, 42 (3), 455–465. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B., Kavanagh, D., Morgan, M., & Norton, P. (2007). Politics UK (6th ed.). Essex, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, J. (2015). Autoethnography and reflective practice: Reconstructing the doctoral thesis experience. Reflective Practice, 16 (5), 677–687. doi:10.1080/14623943.2015.1071247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust new relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), 438–458. doi:10.5465/AMR.1998.926620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, J. J. C. (1980). What is an evaluator? British Journal of Teacher Education: International Research and Pedagogy, 6 (3), 196–202. doi:10.1080/0260747800060303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, M., & Hargie, O. D. W. (2001). Evaluating evaluation: Implications for assessing quality. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 14 (7), 317–327. doi:10.1108/09526860110409081
   Google Scholar
• McKie, L. (2003). Rhetorical spaces: Participation and pragmatism in the evaluation of community health work. Evaluation, 9 (3), 307–324. doi:10.1177/13563890030093005
   Google Scholar
• Moorman, C., Deshpandé, R., & Zaltman, G. (1992). Factors affecting trust in market research relationships. Journal of Marketing, 57 (1), 81–101. doi:10.2307/3172742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouzas, S., Henneberg, S., & Naudé, P. (2007). Trust and reliance in business relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 41 (9/10), 1016–1032. doi:10.1108/03090560710773327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. (2013). Evaluation in Government. Retrieved from http://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/10331-001-Evaluation-in-government_NEW.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. (2002). Modernising government: New labour, policy and society. London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, N. (2007). Evaluation and trust. In S. Kushner, & N. Norris (Eds.), Dilemmas of engagement: Evaluation and the new public management (pp.139–153), advances in program evaluation, Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (1998). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, I. (2000). Evaluation in complex policy systems, Evaluation, 6 (4), 433–454. 10.1177/13563890022209415
   Google Scholar
• Schulberg, H. C., & Jerrell, J. M. (1979). The evaluator and management. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. (1999). Qualitative Evaluation. London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I., & Faulkner, A. (2006). Practitioner evaluation at work’. American Journal of Evaluation, 27 (1), 44–63. doi:10.1177/1098214005284968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, E. (2008). Evaluation: Critical for whom and connected to what? Evaluation, 14 (2), 249–257. doi:10.1177/1356389007087542
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. (2005). Governing through evidence: Participation and power in policy evaluation. Journal of Social Policy, 34 (4), 601–618. doi:10.1017/S0047279405009177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, T. J. (2011). Ethnography, reality and trust: The vital need for studies of ‘how things’ work in organizations and management. Journal of Management Studies, 48 (1), 202–217. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H., Murphy-Graham, E., & Birkeland, S. (2005). An alternate route to policy influence: How evaluations affect D.A.R.E. American Journal of Evaluation, 26 (1), 12–30. doi:10.1177/1098214004273337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wond, T. Macaulay, M. (2010). Evaluating local implementation: An evidence-based approach. Policy and Society, 29 (2), pp. 161–169. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar