Network Formation During Disasters: Exploring Micro-Level Interorganizational Processes and the Role of National Capacity

References

• Abou-Bakr, A. J. (2012). Managing disasters through public–private partnerships. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, D. P. (2012). Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. S., Butts, C., & Carley, K. (1999). The interaction of size and density with graph-level indices. Social Networks, 21 (3), 239–267. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00011-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew, S. A. (2010). Adaptive versus restrictive contracts: Can they resolve different risk problems? In R. C. Feiock, & J. T. Scholz (Eds.), Self-organizing federalism (pp. 91–113). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, S. A., & Carr, J. B. (2013). Mitigating uncertainty and risk in planning for regional preparedness: The role of bonding and bridging relationships. Urban Studies, 50 (4), 709–724. doi:10.1177/0042098012455718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew, S. A., & Hawkins, C. V. (2013). Regional cooperation and multilateral agreements in the provision of public safety. The American Review of Public Administration, 43 (4), 460–475. doi:10.1177/0275074012447676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atouba, Y., & Shumate, M. (2010). Interorganizational networking patterns among development organizations. Journal of Communication, 60 (2), 293–317. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01483.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednar, J. (2009). The robust federation: Principles of design. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boin, A., & ‘T Hart, P. (2010). Organising for effective emergency management: Lessons from research. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69(4), 357–371. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2010.00694.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass, D. J. (1995). A social network perspective on human resources management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13(1), 39–79.
   Google Scholar
• Brattberg, E., & Sundelius, B. (2011). Mobilizing for international disaster relief: Comparing US and EU approaches to the 2010 Haiti earthquake. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 8(1). doi:10.2202/1547-7355.1869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brower, R. S., & Magno, F. A. (2011). A “third way” in the Philippines. International Review of Public Administration, 16(1), 31–50. doi:10.1080/12264431.2011.10805184
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butts, C. T. (2008). Social network analysis: A methodological introduction. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11 (1), 13–41. doi:10.1111/ajsp.2008.11.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S. O., & Brower, R. S. (2006). When practice matters more than government plans: A network analysis of local emergency management. Administration Society, 37 (6), 651–678. doi:10.1177/0095399705282879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comfort, L. K. (1999). Shared risk: Complex systems in seismic response (1st ed.). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Comfort, L. K. (2007). Asymmetric information processes in extreme events. The December 26, 2004 Sumatran earthquake and tsunami. In D. E. Gibbons (Ed.), Communicable crises: Prevention, response, and recovery in the global arena (pp. 84–137). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Comfort, L. K., Boin, A., & Demchak, C. C. (2010). Designing resilience: Preparing for extreme events. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Comfort, L. K., & Haase, T. W. (2006). Communication, coherence, and collective action: The impact of hurricane Katrina on communications infrastructure. Public Works Management & Policy, 10 (4), 328–343. doi:10.1177/1087724x06289052
   Google Scholar
• Comfort, L. K., McAdoo, B., Sweeney, P., Stebbins, S., Siciliano, M. D., Huggins, L. J., & Krenitsky, N. (2011). Transition from response to recovery: A knowledge commons to support decision making following the 12 January 2010 Haiti earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 27 (S1), S411–S430. doi:10.1193/1.3633342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comfort, L. K., Oh, N., & Ertan, G. (2009). The dynamics of disaster recovery: Resilience and entropy in hurricane response systems 2005–2008. Public Organization Review, 9 (4), 309–323. doi:10.1007/s11115-009-0098-3
   Google Scholar
• Comfort, L. K., & Okada, A. (2013). Coping with catastrophe: “Black swan” in Northeastern Japan, March 11, 2011. In N. Kapucu, C. V. Hawkins, & F. I. Rivera (Eds.), Disaster resiliency: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 258–270). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Curnin, S., & Owen, C. (2014). Spanning organizational boundaries in emergency management. International Journal of Public Administration, 37 (5), 259–270. doi:10.1080/01900692.2013.830625
   Google Scholar
• Curnin, S., Owen, C., Paton, D., Trist, C., & Parsons, D. (2015). Role clarity, swift trust and multi-agency coordination. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 23 (1), 29–35. doi:10.1111/1468-5973.12072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, D., Krackhardt, D., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2007). Sensitivity of mrqap tests to collinearity and autocorrelation conditions. Psychometrika, 72 (4), 563–581. doi:10.1007/s11336-007-9016-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DesRoches, R., Comerio, M., Eberhard, M., Mooney, W., & Rix, G. J. (2011). Overview of the 2010 Haiti earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 27 (S1), S1–S21. doi:10.1193/1.3630129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerfel, M. L., Chewning, L. V., & Lai, C.-H. (2013). The evolution of networks and the resilience of interorganizational relationships after disaster. Communication Monographs, 80 (4), 533–559. doi:10.1080/03637751.2013.828157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerfel, M. L., Chih-Hui, L., & Chewning, L. V. (2010). The evolutionary role of interorganizational communication: Modeling social capital in disaster contexts. Human Communication Research, 36 (2), 125–162. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01371.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drabek, T. E., & McEntire, D. A. (2002). Emergent phenomena and multiorganizational coordination in disasters: Lessons from the research literature. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 20 (2), 197–224.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., Lee, I. W., & Park, H. J. (2012). Administrators’ and elected officials’ collaboration networks: Selecting partners to reduce risk in economic development. Public Administration Review, 72 (s1), S58–S68. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02659.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., & Scholz, J. T. (2010). Self-organizing federalism: Collaborative mechanisms to mitigate institutional collective action dilemmas. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, R. V., & Fernandez, R. M. (1989). Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociological Methodology, 19, 89–126. doi:10.2307/270949
   Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104 (5), 1439–1493. doi:10.1086/210179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haase, T. W. (2009). Administrative resilience: Evaluating the adaptive capacity of administrative systems that operate in dynamic and uncertain conditions ( Thesis). University of Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Handcock, M. S., Hunter, D. R., Butts, C. T., Goodreau, S. M., & Morris, M. (2008). Statnet: Software tools for the representation, visualization, analysis and simulation of network data. Journal of Statistical Software, 24 (1), 1–11. doi:10.18637/jss.v024.i01
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henry, A. D., Lubell, M., & McCoy, M. (2011). Belief systems and social capital as drivers of policy network structure: The case of California regional planning. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21 (3), 419–444. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Kapucu, N. (2006). Interagency communication networks during emergencies: Boundary spanners in multiagency coordination. The American Review of Public Administration, 36 (2), 207–225. doi:10.1177/0275074005280605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapucu, N., Arslan, T., & Collins, M. L. (2010). Examining intergovernmental and interorganizational response to catastrophic disasters: Toward a network-centered approach. Administration & Society, 42 (2), 222–247. doi:10.1177/0095399710362517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapucu, N., Augustin, M.-E., & Garayev, V. (2009). Interstate partnerships in emergency management: Emergency management assistance compact in response to catastrophic disasters. Public Administration Review, 69 (2), 297–313. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01975.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapucu, N., & Demiroz, F. (2011). Measuring performance for collaborative public management using network analysis methods and tools. Public Performance & Management Review, 34 (4), 549–579. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576340406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapucu, N., & Garayev, V. (2011). Collaborative decision-making in emergency and disaster management. International Journal of Public Administration, 34 (6), 366–375. doi:10.1080/01900692.2011.561477
   Google Scholar
• Kapucu, N., & Hu, Q. (2014). Understanding multiplexity of collaborative emergency management networks. The American Review of Public Administration. doi:10.1177/0275074014555645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapucu, N., Hu, Q., & Khosa, S. (2014a). The state of network research in public administration. Administration & Society. Advance Online Publication. doi:10.1177/0095399714555752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapucu, N., Hu, Q., & Khosa, S. (2014b). The state of network research in public administration. Administration & Society. doi:10.1177/0095399714555752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapucu, N., & Liou, K. T. (Eds.). (2014). Disaster and development examining global issues and cases. New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., Steijn, B., & Edelenbos, J. (2010). The impact of network management on outcomes in governance networks. Public Administration, 88 (4), 1063–1082. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01826.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koliba, C., Meek, J. W., & Zia, A. (2011). Governance networks in public administration and public policy. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krackhardt, D. (1987). Qap partialling as a test of spuriousness. Social Networks, 9, 171–186. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(87)90012-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M. Berger (Ed.), Freedom and control in modern society. New York, NY: Van Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., Lee, I. W., & Feiock, R. C. (2012). Interorganizational collaboration networks in economic development policy: An exponential random graph model analysis*. Policy Studies Journal, 40 (3), 547–573. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00464.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Scholz, J., Berardo, R., & Robins, G. (2012). Testing policy theory with statistical models of networks. Policy Studies Journal, 40 (3), 351–374. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00457.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, D. A., Moody, J., Diehl, D., Smith, J. A., & Thomas, R. J. (2014). Network ecology and adolescent social structure. American Sociological Review, 79 (6), 1088–1121. doi:10.1177/0003122414554001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, 66, 33–43. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00664.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1995). Swift trust and temporary groups. In R. M. Kramer, & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166–195). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nolte, I. M., & Boenigk, S. (2011). Public–nonprofit partnership performance in a disaster context: The case of Haiti. Public Administration, 89 (4), 1385–1402. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01950.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ospina, S. M., & Saz-Carranza, A. (2010). Paradox and collaboration in network management. Administration & Society, 42 (4), 404–440. doi:10.1177/0095399710362723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. H., & Rethemeyer, R. K. (2014). The politics of connections: Assessing the determinants of social structure in policy networks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, 349–379. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, S. E., Eller, W. S., Gall, M., & Gerber, B. J. (2013). The core and periphery of emergency management networks. Public Management Review, 15 (3), 344–362. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.769849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, U., Boin, A., & Comfort, L. K. (2001). Managing crises: Threats, dilemmas, opportunities. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Saz-Carranza, A., & Ospina, S. M. (2011). The behavioral dimension of governing interorganizational goal-directed networks—Managing the unity-diversity tension. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21 (2), 327–365. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumate, M., Fulk, J., & Monge, P. (2005). Predictors of the international HIV–aids ingo network over time. Human Communication Research, 31 (4), 482–510. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00880.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siciliano, M. D., & Wukich, C. (2015). Network features and processes as determinants of organizational interaction during extreme events. Complexity, Governance & Networks, 2 (1), 23–44.
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B. (2011). Statistical models for social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 37 (1), 131–153. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2013). National response framework. Retrieved from http://www.fema.gov/national-response-framework
   Google Scholar
• Varda, D., Forgette, R., Banks, D., & Contractor, N. (2009). Social network methodology in the study of disasters: Issues and insights prompted by post-Katrina research. Population Research and Policy Review, 28 (1), 11–29. doi:10.1007/s11113-008-9110-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waugh, W. L. (2007). Emac, Katrina, and the governors of Louisiana and Mississippi. Public Administration Review, 67, 107–113. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00819.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waugh, W. L., & Streib, G. (2006). Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Administration Review, 66, 131–140. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00673.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wukich, C. (2014). Professional capital: Standards of professional performance that underlie interorganizational cooperation. Public Administration Quarterly, 38 (4), 134–164.
   Google Scholar
• Wukich, C., Johnson, D. J., & Siciliano, M. D. (2015). Managing for resilience across multiple scales of action in Joplin, Missouri. In D. C. Downey (Ed.), Cities and disasters (pp. 173–205). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wukich, C., & Robinson, S. E. (2013). Leadership strategies at the meso level of emergency management in networks. International Review of Public Administration, 18 (1), 41–59. doi:10.1080/12294659.2013.10805239
   Google Scholar