Investing in People: Toward a Co-Possibility Model for Citizen Engagement

References

• Adams, G., & Balfour, D. (2009). Administrative evil. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, C. (2007). Publics and markets: What’s wrong with neo-liberalism. In S. Smith (Ed.), The handbook of social geography (pp. 187–205). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bendix, R. (1952, June). Social stratification and political power. American Political Science Review, 46, 357–375. doi:10.2307/1950834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biller, R. (1979). Toward public administration rather than an administration of publics: Strategies of accountable disaggregation to achieve human scale and efficacy, and live within the natural limits of intelligence and other scarce resources. In R. Clayton., & W. Storm (Eds.), Agenda for public administration (pp. 151–172). Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourgon, J. (2008). The future of public services. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 4, 390–404. doi:10.111/j147-8500.2008.005974
   Google Scholar
• Box, R. C. (2014a). Public service values. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Box, R. C. (2014b). Critical public administration. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff, D., & Klauss, R. (1985). Managerial roles for the social development management. Public Administration and Development, 5, 140–151. doi:10.1002/pad.4230050205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J., & Eissweiller, P. (Eds.). (1987). Shared power. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Brudney, J., & England, R. E., (1983). Toward a definition of the coproduction concept. Public Administration Review. 43, 59–65. 10.23071975300
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C. (1997). Nationalism and the public sphere. In J. Weintraub., & K. Kumar (Eds.), Public and private in thought and practice (pp. 75–102). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, T. L. (2001). An ethic of citizenship for public administration. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, A. P., & Lane, M. P. (1994). Strategic perspectives analysis: A procedure for participatory and political social impact assessment. Society and Natural Resources, 7(3), 253–267. doi:10.1080/08941929409380863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, J. E., & Walker, G. (1996). Collaborative learning. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 12, 71–102. doi:10.1016/0195-92559600003-0
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, K. (1979). Public administration and the critique of domination. Administration and Society, 11, 379–384. doi:10.1177/009539977901100105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. (2006). Deliberative global politics. Cambridge, England: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• European Institute of Public Participation. (2009). Public participation in Europe. Research report. London, England
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2009). Democracy and expertise. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foil, L. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational Learning. Academy of Management, 10, 803–13. doi:10.5465/AMR.1985.4279103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1973). Retracking America. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1976). Social learning: A model for policy research. Environment and Planning Annual, 8, 927–940.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66, 66–75. doi:10.1080/1471903100378940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerzi, E. (2007). Sustainability and public participation: Toward an inclusive model of democracy. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 3, 325–393. doi:n/a
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E. (1982). Political theory and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoggett, P. (2005). A Service to the public: The containment of ethical and moral conflicts by public bureaucracies. In P. De Gay (Ed.), The values of bureaucracy (pp. 165–190). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, B. (2011). Citizens’ engagement in policymaking and the design of public services research paper, No 1.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, B. (1996). Differences, dilemmas and the politics of home. In S. Benhabib, (Ed)., Democracy and Difference (pp 257-278). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hummel, R. (2007). The bureaucratic experience. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, H. (1976). The bureaucratization of the world. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., & Moore, M. (2004). Institutionalized co-production: Unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. Journal of Development Studies, 40, 31–49. doi:1080/00220380410001673184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, T. (2010). Citizens, co-producers, customers, clients, or captives? Public Management Review, 12, 439–446. doi:1080/14719030000007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. (2002). The transformation of governance. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kiljn, E., & Kopperjan, J. (2000). Public management and policy networks. Public Management, 2, 135–138. doi:10.1080/14719030000007
   Google Scholar
• Kirlin, J. (1979). Adapting the intergovernmental fiscal system to the demands of an advanced economy. In G. Tobin (Ed.), The changing structure of the city (pp. 77–104). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Korten, D. (1980). Community organization and rural development. Public Administration Review, 40, 480–512. doi:10.1007/s102799900102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korten, D. (1984). Strategic organization and people-centered development. Public Administration Review, 44, 338–349. doi:10.1080/0029195908542823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuentzel, W., & Ventriss, C. (2012). Social psychological barriers to communicative rationality: A critical look at public participation. In H. L. Schachter, & K. Yang (Eds.), The state of citizen participation in America (pp. 415–444). New York: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, C. H. (1984). Citizenship and service delivery: The promise of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 44, 178–187. doi:10.1111/puar1092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, N. (1949). Power and administration. Public Administration Review, 9, 257–264. doi:10.2307/972337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, N. (1962). An institutional framework for the development of responsible citizenship. In C. Press (Ed.), The polity (pp. 180–192). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Lovell, C. (1981). Evolving local government dependency. Public Administration Review, 41, 72–89. doi:10.2307/975463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, M. (2004). Citizen participation in the neighborhood context: A new look at co-production of local public goods. Political Science Quarterly, 57, 231–244. doi:1177/10591290405700205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcraft, J. (2004). Participation and sustainable development: Modes of citizen, community and organizational involvement. In W. Lafferty (Ed.), Governance for sustainable development (pp. 162–189). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, D. (1973). On learning to plan – And planning to learn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mitlin, D. (2007). Urban social movements in southern town and cities Poverty Research Center, Working Paper 64, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Mitlin, D. (2008). With and beyond the state: Co-production as a route to political influence, power, and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization, 10, 349–364. doi:10.1177/09524780809117
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (1992). Democratic citizenship and the political community. In C. Mouffe (Ed.), Dimensions of radical democracy: Pluralism, citizenship, community (pp. 70–82). London, England: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, H., & Ventriss, C. (1985). Public health in a retrenchment era. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nance, E., & Ortolano, L. (2007). Community participation in urban sanitation. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26, 284–302. doi:1177/0739456X06295028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Economic Foundation. (2008). Co-production: A manifesto for growing the economy. London, England.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J., & Clarke, J. (2009). Publics, politics, and power: Remaking the public in public services. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J., & Sullivan, H. (2004). Public participation and collaborative governance. Journal of Social Policy, 33, 203–223. doi:10.1177/09250770401900402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrom, P. C., & Starbuck, W. H. (1984). To avoid organizational crisis unlearn. Organizational Dynamics, 12, 53–65. doi:10.1177/0818726708095710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakenson, R., Ostrum, E., Ostrum, V., & Wilson, R. (1981). Consumers as Coproducers of Public Services: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9, 1001–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perrow, C. (1979). Complex organizations. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2005). Governing complex societies: Trajectories and scenarios. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1969). Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pylikzillig, L. M., & Tomkins, A. J. (2011). Public engagement for informing science and technology policy: What do we know, what do we need to know, and how will we get there? Review of Policy Research, 28, 197–216. doi:10.111/j1541-1338.2011.00489X
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, A. G. (1981). The new science of organizations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redford, E. S. (1969). Democracy in the administrative state. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, R. (1988). Tales of a New America. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, R. (1990). Public management in a democratic society. Prentice, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. (1997). Understanding governance: Networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. (2004). Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. American Review of Public Administration, 31, 315–353. doi:10.1177/027507400429288
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. (1987). Of market failure and third party government. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 16, 29–49. doi:10.1177/089776408701600104
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. (2003). Enacting democracy. Political Studies, 51, 161–179. doi:10.111/147-9248.00418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saward, M. (2005). Governance and the transformation of political representation. In J. Newman (Ed.), Remaking governance (pp. 179–196). Bristol, England: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people. Hinesdale, IL: Dryden Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. (1971). Beyond the stable state. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. G., & Hart, D. (1979). Organizational America. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C. (2005a). Public-private partnerships and hybridity. In G. Ferli (Ed.), Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 347–370). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C., Matthews, R., & Smith, F. (2005b). The public governance of collaborative spaces: Discourse, design, and democracy. Public Administration, 83, 573–596. doi:10.111/j0033-3298.2005.00463X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, E. (2012). Governance networks as a frame for inter-demoi participation and deliberation. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 14, 509–532. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806340401
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. (1985). Efficiency and social learning. Policy Studies Review, 34, 484–496. doi:10.111/j1541
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (1996). Reconstructing citizenship. Urban Studies, 33, 1499–1523. doi:10.1080/002408966772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. (1973). Society’s frontiers for organizing events. Public Administration Review, 33, 327–35. 10.23071975112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventriss, C. (2002). Rethinking rationality. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 25, 131–136. doi:n/a
   Google Scholar
• Ventriss, C., & Kuentzel, W. (2005). Critical theory and the role of citizen involvement in environmental decision making. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 8(4), 520–540.
   Google Scholar
• Ventriss, C., & Luke, J. (1988). Organizational learning and public policy: Towards a substantive perspective. American Review of Public Administration, 15, 337–357. doi:10.1177/027507408801800402
   Google Scholar
• Wolin, S. (1960). Politics and vision. New York: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Pandey, S. K. (2011). Further dissecting the black box of citizen participation: When does citizen involvement lead to good outcomes. Public Administration Review, 76, 880–892. doi:10.1111/j.1540-210.2011.02417X
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar