The Institutional Settings for the Development of Public Services through State-Owned Enterprises in Brazil

References

• Alexius, S., & Örnberg, J. C. (2015). Mission(s) impossible? Configuring values in the governance of state-owned enterprises. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(4/5), 286–306. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-08-2015-0151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, E. L. F., de Oliveira, P. V., & Losekann, L. (2015). ‘Impactos da contenção dos preços de combustíveis no Brasil e opções de mecanismos de precificação’ (Oil prices restrictions in Brazil and alternative mechanism of pricing). Revista De Economia Política, 35(3), 531–556. doi:10.1590/0101-31572015v35n03a09
   Google Scholar
• Belloc, F. (2014). Innovation in state-owned enterprises: Reconsidering the conventional wisdom. Journal of Economic Issues, 48(3), 821–848. doi:10.2753/JEI0021-3624480311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, M. G. (2015). Canadian state-owned enterprises: A framework for analyzing the evolving Crowns. Policy studies, 36(2), 133–156. doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2014.1000843
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. (2000). Designing social research – the logic of anticipation. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Blatter, J., & Blume, T. (2008a). Co-variation and causal process tracing revisited: Clarifying new directions for causal inference and generalization in case study methodology. Qualitative Methods, Spring, 29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Blatter, J., & Blume, T. (2008b). In search of co-variance, causal mechanisms or congruence? Towards a plural understanding of case studies. Swiss Political Science Review, 14(2), 315–356. doi:10.1002/spsr.2008.14.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozec, R., & Dia, M. (2007). Board structure and firm technical efficiency: Evidence from Canadian state-owned enterprises. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1734–1750. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton, G. D., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Stan, C., & Xu, K. (2015). State-owned enterprises around the world as hybrid organizations. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), 92–114. doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. (1994). Essays on economics and economists. London, UK: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. (1998). The new institutional economics. The American Economic Review, 88(2), 72–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denhardt, R. (2000). Theories of public administration (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace & Company.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doshi, K. (2000). Privatization of state-owned enterprises in México. International Journal of Public Administration, 23(5–8), 667–676. doi:10.1080/01900690008525480
   Google Scholar
• Earl, P. E., & Potts, J. (2011). A nobel prize for governance and institutions: Oliver Williamson and Elinor Ostrom. Review of Political Economy, 23(1), 1–24. doi:10.1080/09538259.2011.526291
   Google Scholar
• Erakovic, L., & Powell, M. (2006). Pathways of change: Organizations in transition. Public Administration, 84(1), 31–58. doi:10.1111/padm.2006.84.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (Ed.). (2002a). Modern organizations: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger/Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (2002b). Organization theory: From pre-classical to contemporary and critical theories— an overview and appraisal. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Modern organizations: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 19–62). Westport, CT: Praeger/Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (2002c). Emergent Theories of Organization: An Overview and Analysis. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Modern organizations: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 63–96). Westport, CT: Praeger/Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (forthcoming). The American administrative state: Institutionalization and globalization.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? The American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–354. doi:10.1017/S0003055404001182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2007). Is there a (Viable) crucial-case method? Comparative Political Studies, 40(3), 231–253. doi:10.1177/0010414006290784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenewegen, J., Kerstholt, F. T. S., & Nagelkerke, A. G. (1995). On integrating new and old institutionalism: Douglass North building bridges. Journal of Economic Issues, 29(2), 467–475. doi:10.1080/00213624.1995.11505684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., Papenfuss, U., & Tremblay, M. (2015). Corporate governance and accountability of state-owned enterprises: Relevance for science and society and interdisciplinary research perspectives. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(4/5), 274–285. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-09-2015-0166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, E. (2001). Beyond the property rights approach: Welfare policy and the reform of state-owned enterprises in China. Development and Change, 32(1), 129–150. doi:10.1111/dech.2001.32.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2009). Implementing public policy – an introduction to the study of operational governance (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, F. Z. Y., & Lin, G. C. S. (2013). Placing the transformation of state-owned enterprises in North-east China: The state, region and firm in a transitional economy. Regional Studies, 47(4), 563–579. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.584862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, S. M. (1990). The new institutionalism: What can it learn from the old? Industrial Relations, 29(2), 316–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, T. E., & Jorgensen, P. D. (2009). Policy knowledge, policy formulation, and change: Revisiting a foundational question. The Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 141–162. doi:10.1111/psj.2009.37.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kankaanpää, J., Oulasvirta, L., & Wacker, J. (2014). Steering and monitoring model of state-owned enterprises. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(7), 409–423. doi:10.1080/01900692.2013.858355
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers, B. E. A. (2014). The management of change in public organizations: A literature review. Public Administration, 92(1), 1–20. doi:10.1111/padm.12040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. (2009). A comparison of China’s state-owned enterprises and their counterparts in the United States: performance and regulatory policy. Public Administration Review, 69(Special Issue), S46–S52. doi:10.1111/puar.2009.69.issue-s1
   Google Scholar
• MacCarthaigh, M. (2011). Managing state-owned enterprises in an age of crisis: An analysis of Irish experience. Policy Studies, 32(3), 215–230. doi:10.1080/01442872.2011.561688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matei, A. P. E. A., Ten Caten, C. S., Zouain, R. N. A., & Sant’Anna, Â. M. O. (2015). ‘Análise do impacto dos projetos de interação entre a UFRGS e a PETROBRAS (Impact analysis of projects between Rio Grande do Sul Federal University and Petrobras). Gestão & Produção, 22(4), 789–804. doi:10.1590/0104-530X25298-14
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira Filho, M. L., & Abadía, J. M. M. (2013). ‘El desempeño económico financiero y responsabilidad social corporativa: Petrobras versus Repsol’. Contaduría Y Administración, 58(1), 131–167. doi:10.1016/S0186-1042(13)71201-4
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387. doi:10.1080/14719030600853022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oström, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oström, E. (2007). Institutional rational choice – an assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 21–64). Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Oström, E. (2008). The challenge of common-pool resources. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50(4), 8–21. doi:10.3200/ENVT.50.4.8-21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oström, E., Cox, M., & Schlager, E. (2014). The institutional analysis and development framework and an introduction to the social-ecological system framework. In P. Sabatier, & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed., pp. 267–305). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paz, M. J. (2015). Institutional change and state-owned enterprises reflections from the petrobras case study. Public Management Review, 17, 791–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2009). Bureaucracies remember, post-bureaucrat organizations forget? Public Administration, 87(2), 198–218. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.01738.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis: A comparative analysis – new public management, governance, and the Neo–Weberian State (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, S. A. (2015). Debate – development alternatives. Development and Change, 46(4), 855–874. doi:10.1111/dech.2015.46.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. (Eds.). (2014). Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, C. (2015). The sustainable economics of Elinor Ostrom: Commons, contestation and craft. Environmental Politics, 24(1), 163–165. doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.976468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvestre, H. C., & Araújo, J. F. (2012). Public private partnership/private finance initiative in Portugal: Theory, practice and results. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(2), 316–339. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576360208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. (2012). Multiple-case study methods in governance-related research. Public Management Review, 14(1), 67–82. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.589618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. (1999). Quis custodite ipsos custodes? Challenge, 42(6), 26–67. doi:10.1080/05775132.1999.11472129
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R. (2010). Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(1), 14–20. doi:10.1177/1056492609347564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suleiman, E. (2003). Dismantling democratic states. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, C. (2011). Theories of performance – organizational and service improvement in the public domain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tõnurist, P., & Karo, E. (2016). State owned enterprises as instruments of innovation policy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 87, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. (1998). The institutions of governance. The American Economic Review, 88(2), 75–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2009). Case study research – Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar