The Adoption of Outcome-Related Performance Indicators in External Reporting: An Empirical Study

References

• Ammons, D. N. (1995). Overcoming the inadequacies of performance measurement in local government: The case of libraries and leisure services. Public Administration Review, 55(1), 37–47. doi:10.2307/976826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammons, D. N., & Rivenbark, W. C. (2008). Factors influencing the use of performance data to improve municipal services: Evidence from the North Carolina benchmarking project. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 304–318. doi:10.1111/puar.2008.68.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azen, R., & Walker, C. M. (2011). Categorical data analysis for the behavioral and social sciences. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–606. doi:10.1111/puar.2003.63.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, E., & Wang, X. (2000). Performance measurement in US counties: Capacity for reform. Public Administration Review, 60(5), 409–420. doi:10.1111/puar.2000.60.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C., & Rivenbark, W. C. (2012). A comparative analysis of performance management systems: The cases of Sicily and North Carolina. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(3), 509–526. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576350307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco, H., Lennard, J., & Lamontagne, S. (2011). Annual reporting and accountability by municipalities in Canada: An empirical investigation. Accounting Perspectives, 10(3), 195–224. doi:10.1111/j.1911-3838.2011.00024.x
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G. (1990). The history of the productivity movement. Public Productivity and Management Review, 1, 53–89. doi:10.2307/3380523
   Google Scholar
• Bourdeaux, C. (2006). Do legislatures matter in budgetary reform? Public Budgeting & Finance, 26(1), 120–142. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5850.2006.00841.x
   Google Scholar
• Bourdeaux, C., & Chikoto, G. (2008). legislative influences on performance management reform. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 253–265. doi:10.1111/puar.2008.68.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G., Gould–Williams, J., Law, J., & Walker, R. (2002). Plans, performance information and accountability: The case of best value. Public Administration, 80(4), 691–710. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G., & Law, J. (1991). Accountability and local authority annual reports: The case of Welsh district councils. Financial Accountability & Management, 7(3), 179–194. doi:10.1111/fam.1991.7.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., & Law, J. (2005). Setting public service outcome targets: Lessons from local public service agreements. Public Money & Management, 25(4), 253–260. doi:10.1080/09540962.2005.10600128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brignall, S., & Modell, S. (2000). An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the ‘new public sector’. Management Accounting Research, 11(3), 281–306. doi:10.1006/mare.2000.0136
   Google Scholar
• Cavalluzzo, K. S., & Ittner, C. D. (2004). Implementing performance measurement innovations: Evidence from government. Accounting. Organizations and Society, 29(3), 243–267. doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00013-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. (1996). For positivist organization theory. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313–327. doi:10.2307/2392145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folz, D. H., Abdelrazek, R., & Chung, Y. (2009). The adoption, use, and impacts of performance measures in medium-size cities. Public Performance & Management Review, 33(1), 63–87. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576330103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, D. G., & Frederickson, H. G. (2006). Measuring the performance of the hollow state. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frumkin, P., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2004). Institutional isomorphism and public sector organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 283–307. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. R. (1974). Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces, 4(3), 28–36. doi:10.1287/inte.4.3.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galera, A. N., Rodríguez, D. O., & López Hernández, A. M. (2008). Identifying barriers to the application of standardized performance indicators in local government. Public Management Review, 10(2), 241–262. doi:10.1080/14719030801928706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A. (2005). Performance measurement: Test the water before you dive in. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(2), 255–266. doi:10.1177/0020852305053884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A., & Bouckaert, G. (1996). Organizational performance and measurement in the public sector: Toward service, effort and accomplishment reporting. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Hatry, H. P. (1972). Issues in productivity measurement for local governments. Public Administration Review, 32(6), 776–784. doi:10.2307/974636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, C. J. (2002). Outcomes–based performance management in the public sector: Implications for government accountability and effectiveness. Public Administration Review, 62(6), 712–725. doi:10.1111/puar.2002.62.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A. T.-K., & Ni, A. Y. (2005). Have cities shifted to outcome-oriented performance reporting?—A content analysis of city budgets. Public Budgeting & Finance, 25(2), 61–83. doi:10.1111/j.0275-1100.2005.00361.x
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, N. S., & Anderson, R. (1995). The use of performance information in external reporting: An empirical study of UK executive agencies. Financial Accountability & Management, 11(1), 1–17. doi:10.1111/fam.1995.11.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, R. W. (1984). Economic incentives and the choice of state government accounting practices. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(1), 126–144. doi:10.2307/2490704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jan van Helden, G., Johnsen, Å., & Vakkuri, J. (2008). Distinctive research patterns on public sector performance measurement of public administration and accounting disciplines. Public Management Review, 10(5), 641–651. doi:10.1080/14719030802264366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsen, Å. (2005). What does 25 years of experience tell us about the state of performance measurement in public policy and management? Public Money and Management, 25(1), 9–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julnes, P. D. L., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 693–708. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kravchuk, R. S., & Schack, R. W. (1996). Designing effective performance-measurement systems under the government performance and results act of 1993. Public Administration Review, 56(4), 348–358. doi:10.2307/976376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S. (2010). Performance measurement in European local governments: A comparative analysis of reform experiences in Great Britain, France, Sweden and Germany. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(2), 331–345. doi:10.1177/0020852310372050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laswad, F., Fisher, R., & Oyelere, P. (2005). Determinants of voluntary Internet financial reporting by local government authorities. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(2), 101–121. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2004.12.006
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1–47. doi:10.2307/2391211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton, A., McKevitt, D., & Millar, M. (2000). Developments: Coping with ambiguity: Reconciling external legitimacy and organizational implementation in performance measurement. Public Money & Management, 20(3), 13–20. doi:10.1111/1467-9302.00218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., Willoughby, K., & Arnett, S. (2011). Performance budgeting in the American States what’s law got to do with it? State and Local Government Review, 43(2), 79–94. doi:10.1177/0160323X11407523
   Google Scholar
• Martí, C., Royo, S., & Acerete, B. (2012). The effect of new legislation on the disclosure of performance indicators: The case of Spanish local governments. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(13), 873–885. doi:10.1080/01900692.2012.686032
   Google Scholar
• May, P. (1993). Mandate design and implementation: Enhancing implementation efforts and shaping regulatory styles. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 12(4), 634–663. doi:10.2307/3325344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P. J., & Burby, R. J. (1996). Coercive versus cooperative policies: Comparing intergovernmental mandate performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15(2), 171–201. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199621)15:2<>1.0.CO;2-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, S. (2009). Institutional research on performance measurement and management in the public sector accounting literature: A review and assessment. Financial Accountability & Management, 25(3), 277–303. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2009.00477.x
   Google Scholar
• Modell, S., & Grönlund, A. (2007). Outcome-based performance management: Experiences from Swedish central government. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(2), 275–288. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576310206
   Google Scholar
• Modell, S., Jacobs, K., & Wiesel, F. (2007). A process (re) turn?: Path dependencies, institutions and performance management in Swedish central government. Management Accounting Research, 18(4), 453–475. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2006.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2006). Managing for results in state government: Evaluating a decade of reform. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 77–89. doi:10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). The big question for performance management: why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 849–866. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyhan, R. C., & Marlowe, H. A., Jr. (1995). Performance measurement in the public sector: Challenges and opportunities. Public Productivity & Management Review, 18(4), 333–348.
   Google Scholar
• Ongaro, E. (2009). Public management reform and modernization: Trajectories of administrative change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9), 833–848. doi:10.1287/mnsc.25.9.833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin, B. (1998). Effective use and misuse of performance measurement. American Journal of Evaluation, 19(3), 367–379. doi:10.1177/109821409801900308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., & Streib, G. (1999). Performance measurement in municipal government: Assessing the state of the practice. Public Administration Review, 59(4), 325–335. doi:10.2307/3110115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2006). Performance management in practice: A comparative study of executive agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 25–44. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., Bouckaert, G., & van Dooren, W. (2009). Measuring government activity. Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Propper, C., & Wilson, D. (2003). The use and usefulness of performance measures in the public sector. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(2), 250–267. doi:10.1093/oxrep/19.2.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., & Turner, C. (1969). The context of organization structures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(1), 91–114. doi:10.2307/2391366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. (1994). The hollowing out of the state: The changing nature of the public service in Britain. The Political Quarterly, 65(2), 138–151. doi:10.1111/poqu.1994.65.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridley, C. E., & Simon, H. A. (1937a). Measuring police activities. Public Management, 19(5), 134–139.
   Google Scholar
• Ridley, C. E., & Simon, H. A. (1937b). Technique of appraising standards. Public Management, 19(2), 46–49.
   Google Scholar
• Ríos, A.-M., Benito, B., & Bastida, F. (2013). Determinants of central government budget disclosure: An international comparative analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 15(3), 235–254. doi:10.1080/13876988.2013.798449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivenbark, W. C., Roenigk, D. J., & Noto, L. (2013). Navigating efficiency and effectiveness relationships across local government services: Another step toward strategic resource management. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 25(4), 675–692.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., Alcaide Muñoz, L., & López Hernández, A. M. (2013). Determinants of financial transparency in government. International Public Management Journal, 16(4), 557–602. doi:10.1080/10967494.2013.849169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romzek, B. S. (2000). Dynamics of public sector accountability in an era of reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66(1), 21–44. doi:10.1177/0020852300661004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, C., Stanley, T., & Nelson, M. (2002). Accountability disclosures by Queensland local government councils: 1997–1999. Financial Accountability & Management, 18(3), 261–289. doi:10.1111/1468-0408.00153
   Google Scholar
• Saliterer, I., & Korac, S. (2013). Performance information use by politicians and public managers for internal control and external accountability purposes. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(7), 502–517. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2013.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493–511. doi:10.2307/2392880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano-Cinca, C., Rueda-Tomás, M., & Portillo-Tarragona, P. (2009). Factors influencing E-Disclosure in local public administrations. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(2), 355–378. doi:10.1068/c07116r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C. (2000). Changing images of the state: Overloaded, hollowed-out, congested. Public Policy and Administration, 15(3), 3–19. doi:10.1177/095207670001500302
   Google Scholar
• Steccolini, I. (2004). Is the annual report an accountability medium? An empirical investigation into Italian local governments. Financial Accountability & Management, 20(3), 327–350. doi:10.1111/j.0267-4424.2004.00389.x
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management a new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57. doi:10.1177/0275074005282583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thynne, I. (2003). Making sense of organizations in public management: A back-to-basics approach. Public Organization Review, 3(3), 317–332. doi:10.1023/A:1025393600859
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W. (2005). What makes organisations measure? Hypotheses on the causes and conditions for performance measurement. Financial Accountability & Management, 21(3), 363–383. doi:10.1111/fam.2005.21.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Van Helden, G. J., & Johnsen, A. (2002). A comparative analysis of the development of performance-based management systems in Dutch and Norwegian local government. International Public Management Journal, 5(1), 75–95.
   Google Scholar
• Van Thiel, S., & Leeuw, F. L. (2002). The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(3), 267–281. doi:10.1080/15309576.2002.11643661
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., & Berman, E. (2001). Hypotheses about performance measurement in counties: Findings from a survey. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 403–428. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1978). Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. Accounting Review, 102(1), 112–134.
   Google Scholar
• Wholey, J. S. (1999). Performance-based management: Responding to the challenges. Public Productivity & Management Review, 22(3), 288–307. doi:10.2307/3380705
   Google Scholar
• Wholey, J. S., & Hatry, H. P. (1992). The case for performance monitoring. Public Administration Review, 42(6), 604–610. doi:10.2307/977173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. W. (2004). Evolution of performance measurement until 1930. Administration & Society, 36(2), 131–165. doi:10.1177/0095399704263473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimbush, E. (2011). Implementing an outcomes approach to public management and accountability in the UK—Are we learning the lessons? Public Money & Management, 31(3), 211–218. doi:10.1080/09540962.2011.573237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J. L. (1977). The municipal accounting maze: An analysis of political incentives. Journal of Accounting Research, 15, 107–144. doi:10.2307/2490636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar