Constitutional Dynamics in the European Union: Success, Failure, and Stability of Institutional Treaty Revisions

References

• Ad hoc Committee for Institutional Affairs. (1985). Report to the European council. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, 29–30 March 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, D. (2004). The unseen hand in treaty reform negotiations: The role and influence of the council secretariat. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 408–439. doi:10.1080/rjpp13501760410001100279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, D., & Christiansen, T. (2007). Introduction: Political agency in the constitutional politics of the European union. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(8), 1163–1166. doi:10.1080/13501760701656395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, D., & Mazzucelli, C. (2007). Leadership in the big bangs of European integration. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Behnke, N., & Benz, A. (2008). The politics of constitutional change between reform and evolution. The Journal of Federalism, 39(3), 213–240. doi:10.1093/publius/pjn039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz, A. (2007). Verfassungsreformen in bundesstaaten – fallstricke und auswege. Zeitschrift Für Staats- Und Europawissenschaften, 5(3–4), 469–496. doi:10.1515/zfse.5.3-4.469
   Google Scholar
• Benz, A., & Knüpling, F. (Eds.). (2012). Changing federal constitutions: Lessons from international comparison. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Budden, P. (2002). Observations on the single european act and the relaunch of Europe: A less intergovernmental reading of the 1985 intergovernmental conference. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(1), 76–97. doi:10.1080/13501760110104181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T., Duke, S., & Kirchner, E. (2012). Understanding and assessing the maastricht treaty. Journal of European Integration, 34(7), 685–698. doi:10.1080/07036337.2012.726009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T., Falkner, G., & Joergensen, K. (2002). Theorizing EU treaty reform: Beyond diplomacy and bargaining. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(1), 12–32. doi:10.1080/13501760110104154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T., Joergensen, K., & Wiener, A. (2001). The social construction of Europe. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T., & Reh, C. (2009). Constitutionalizing the European Union. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, R. (1998). The European parliament’s role in closer eu integration. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Dinan, D. (2007). Governance and institutional developments: Coping without the constitutional treaty. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(2), 67–87. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00736.x
   Google Scholar
• European Council (1985). Note of the dutch delegation, CONF-RGEM 30/85, 14 October 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2005). A rationalist-institutionalist explanation of endogenous regional integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(2), 273–290. doi:10.1080/13501760500044017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2007). Evaluating the forces of interstitial institutional change. West European Politics, 30(2), 405–415. doi:10.1080/01402380701239962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finke, D. (2009). Challenges to intergovernmentalism: An empirical analysis of EU treaty negotiations since maastricht. West European Politics, 32(3), 466–495. doi:10.1080/01402380902779055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finke, D. (2013). Reforming international institutions: The domestic origins and conditional logic of governmental reform preferences. International Studies Quarterly, 57(3), 288–302. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.39.s1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finke, D., König, T., Proksch, S., & Tsebelis, G. (2012). Reforming the European union: realizing the impossible. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N., & Stone Sweet, A. (2001). Institutionalizing the treaty of rome. In A. Stone Sweet, W. Sandholtz, & N. Fligstein (Eds.), The institutionalization of Europe (pp. 29–55). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golub, J. (2007). Survival analysis and European union decision-making. European Union Politics, 8(2), 155–179. doi:10.1177/1465116507076428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grauvogel, J., & Von Soest, C. (2014). Claims to legitimacy count: Why sanctions fail to instigate democratisation in authoritarian regimes. European Journal of Political Research, 53(4), 635–653. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, M., & Stubb, A. (2001). The treaty of Nice – negotiating a poisoned chalice? Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(1), 5–23. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.39.s1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, E. (1968). The uniting of Europe. political, social, and economic forces 1950-1957. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, A. (2007). Explaining institutional change in Europe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, A. (2015). Covert Integration in the European union. In J. Richardson, & S. Mazey (Eds.), European Union: Power and Policy-making (pp. 351–370). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hertz, R., & Leuffen, D. (2011). Too big to run? Analyzing the impact of enlargement on EU decision-making. European Union Politics, 12(2), 193–215. doi:10.1177/1465116511399162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hug, S. (2013). Qualitative comparative analysis: How inductive use and measurement error lead to problematic inference. Political Analysis, 21(2), 252–265. doi:10.1093/pan/mps061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hug, S., & König, T. (2002). In view of ratification: Governmental preferences and domestic constraints at the amsterdam intergovernmental conference. International Organization, 56(2), 447–476. doi:10.1162/002081802320005531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junge, D., König, T., & Luig, B. (2014). Legislative gridlock and bureaucratic politics in the European union. British Journal of Political Science. Published online 09 Juni 2014. doi:10.1017/S0007123414000027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, T. (2008). Analysing the process of EU legislative decision-making. to make a long story short. European Union Politics, 9(1), 145–165. doi:10.1177/1465116507085960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, T., Daimer, S., & Finke, D. (2008). The treaty reform of the EU: Constitutional agenda-setting, intergovernmental bargains and the presidency’s crisis management of ratification failure. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(2), 337–363. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, F., & Vanhoonacker, S. (Eds.). (1992). The intergovernmental conference on political union: institutional reforms, new policies and international identity of the European community. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, S. R., & Szatrowski, A. (2014). Qualitative comparative analysis in critical perspective. Sociological Methodology, 44(1), 1–79. doi:10.1177/0081175014532763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggetti, M., & Levi-Faur, D. (2013). Dealing with errors in QCA. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 199–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, A. (2010). Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA) and model specification: Benchmarks for future csQCA applications. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(2), 138–158. doi:10.5172/mra.2010.4.2.138
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1998). The choice for Europe: Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parízek, M., Hosli, M., & Plechanovová, B. (2015). Avoiding paralysis: The eastern enlargement and the council of the European Union. Journal of European Integration, 37, 6. doi:10.1080/07036337.2015.1034276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. (1987). The comparative method. moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of Berkeley, CA: California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry. Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C., & Rihoux, B. (2004). Replies to commentators: Reassurances and rebuttals. Qualitative Methods, 2(2), 22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Reh, C. (2007). Pre-cooking the european constitution? The role of government representatives in EU reform. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(8), 1186–1207. doi:10.1080/13501760701656411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. (2009). Configurational comparative methods. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, W., & Stone Sweet, A. (Eds.). (1998). European integration. and Supranational Governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. (1988). The joint-decision trap: Lessons from German federalism and European integration. Public Administration, 66(3), 239–278. doi:10.1111/padm.1988.66.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., Rittberger, B., Bürgin, A., & Schwellnus, G. (2006). Conditions for EU constitutionalization: A qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(8), 1168–1189. doi:10.1080/13501760600999482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C., & Wagemann, C. (2010). standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 397–418. doi:10.1163/156913210X12493538729793
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences. A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q., & Rohlfing, I. (2014). Case studies nested in fuzzy-set QCA on sufficiency formalizing case selection and causal inference. Sociological Methods & Research. doi:10.1177/0049124114532446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaaning, S. E. (2011). Assessing the robustness of crisp-set and fuzzy-set QCA results. Sociological Methods & Research, 40(2), 391–408. doi:10.1177/0049124111404818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slapin, J. (2008). Bargaining power at Europe’s intergovernmental conferences. testing institutional and intergovernmental theories. International Organization, 62(1), 131–162. doi:10.1017/S0020818308080053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiem, A. (2014). Mill’s methods, induction, missing data and measurement error in qualitative comparative analysis: A comment on hug (2013). Qualitative & Multi-Method Research, 12(2), 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players. How political institutions work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaisey, S. (2014). Comment QCA works—when used with care. Sociological Methodology, 44(1), 108–112. doi:10.1177/0081175014542083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar