Public Resource Allocation through Grassroots Democratic Institutions: Evidence from Assam, India

References

• Aars, J., & Cristensen, D. (2013). Education and political participation: The impact of the Educational environment. Annual meeting paper; American Political Science Association (APSA). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstractid=2300666
   Google Scholar
• Alsop, R. J., Krishna, A., & Sjoblom, D. (2000). Are gram panchayats inclusive? Report of a study conducted in Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh. Social Development Unit, World Bank, Washington DC. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.203.2310&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baez, J. E., Camacho, A., Conover, E., & Zárate, R. A. (2012). Conditional cash transfers, political participation, and voting behavior. Policy Research Working Paper 6215, The World Bank. Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Network Poverty, Gender and Equity Group. Retrived from http://ftp.iza.org/dp6870.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bardhan, P. (1996). Efficiency, equity and poverty alleviation: Policy issues in less developed countries. The Economic Journal, 106(438), 1344–1356. doi:10.2307/2235526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhan, P., Mitra, S., Mookherjee, D., & Sarkar, A. (2011). Political participation, clientelism and targeting of local government programs: Analysis of survey results from rural West Bengal, India. Discussion Paper 171, Institute of Economic Development (IED), Department of economics, Boston University, USA. Retrived from http://people.bu.edu/dilipm/wkpap/IPDVolumearticle.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2000). Capture and governance at local and national levels. American Economic Review, 90(2), 135–139. doi:10.1257/aer.90.2.135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2005). Decentralizing antipoverty program delivery in developing countries. Journal of Public Economics, 89(4), 675–704. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2006). Decentralisation and ccountability in infrastructure delivery in developing countries. The Economic Journal, 116, 101–127. Retrived from http://people.bu.edu/dilipm/wkpap/IPDVolumearticle.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, T., Pande, R., Rahman, L., & Rao, V. (2004). Decentralization in India: A survey of south Indian panchayats. Working paper, London School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Besley, T., Pande, R., & Rao, V. (2005). Participatory democracy in action: Survey evidence from south India. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3, 2–3. doi:10.1162/jeea.2005.3.2-3.648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, N., & Jairath, V. K. (2012). Social movements, ‘popular’ spaces, and participation: A review. Sociological Bulletin, 61(2), 43–63. doi:10.1177/0038022920120205
   Google Scholar
• Blair, H. (2000). Participation and accountability at the periphery: Democratic local governance in six countries. World Development, 28(1), 21–39. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00109-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Cayeros, A., Magaloni, B., & Ruiz-Euler, A. (2013). Traditional governance, citizen engagement, and local public goods: Evidence from Mexico. World Development, 53, 80–93. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Census. (2011). Assam population census data 2011. Retrieved from http://www.census2011.co.in/census/state/assam.html
   Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, R., & Duflo, E. (2000). Women as policy-makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica, 72(5), 1409–1443. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00539.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, R., & Duflo, E. (2001). Women’s leadership and policy decisions: Evidence from a nationwide randomized experiment in India. NBER Working Paper No. 8615, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, UK. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/G4F7d5
   Google Scholar
• Crook, R., & James, M. (2000). Democratic decentralization. OED Working Paper Series No. 11, The World Bank, Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://lnweb90.worldbank.org/oed/oeddoclib.nsf/DocUNIDViewForJavaSearch/2365D3D73FE619D8525697700729143/$file/Demcratc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication, and democracy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dollar, D., Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2001). Are women really the “fairer” sex? Corruption and women in government. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization Economic & Organization, 46(4), 423–429. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00169-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreze, J., & Sen, A. (2002). India Development and participation. India: Oxford Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Duflo, E. (2012). Women empowerment and economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(4), 1051–1079. doi: 10.1257/jel.50.4.1051. Stable URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/23644911. Accessed: 26-05-2017 13:19 UTC.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Election Commission of India (ECI). (2014). Electoral statistics pocket book 2014. Election Commission of India, Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi-110001. Retrived from http://eci.nic.in/eci_main1/current/Electoral%20Statisitics%20Pocket%20Book%202014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Faguet, J. P. (2003). Decentralization and local government in Bolivia: An overview from the bottom up. Working Paper No.29 ISSN 1740-5815. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/JpvMDU
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, S. E. (1985). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), 891–913. doi:10.2307/2111186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, S. E. (1987). The effects of participation on political efficacy and political support: Evidence from a West German Panel. The Journal of Politics, 49(2), 441–464. doi:10.2307/2131308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossas, E., & Velasco, F. (2005). Local government in Spain. In N. Steytler (Eds.), The place and role of local government in federal systems (pp. 95–122). Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Galasso, E., & Ravallion, M. (2005). Decentralized targeting of an anti- poverty programme. Journal of Public Economics, 89(4), 705–727. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galston, W. A. (2001). Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 217–234. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaviria, A., Panizza, U., & Wallack, J. S. (2003). Economic, social and demographic determinants of political participation in Latin America: Evidence from the 1990s. Working paper, September 2003, Inter-American Development Bank. Retrived from http://www.iadb.org/res/files/Participation_2004_GPS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gosh, A. (1992, November 14). Federalism, democracy and decentralisation. Economic and Political Weekly, 27(46), 2453–2455. Retrived from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4399115
   Google Scholar
• Green, K. (2005). Decentralization and good governance: The case of Indonesia. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/18097/.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, A. M., & Swank, D. H. (1992). Politics, institutions, and welfare spending in industrialized democracies, 1960–82. The American Political Science Review, 86(3), 658–674. doi:10.2307/1964129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., & Quintelier, E. (2013). Political participation in European countries: The effect of authoritarian rule, corruption, lack of good governance and economic downturn. Comparative European Politics, 12(2), 209–232. doi:10.1057/cep.2013.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, L. D., Hargreaves, J. R., & Huttly, S. R. A. (2008). Issues in the construction of wealth indices for the measurement of socio-economic position in low-income countries. Emerg Themes Epidemiol, 5, 3. doi:10.1186/1742-7622-5-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kam, C. D., & Palmer, C. L. (2008). Reconsidering the effects of education on political participation. The Journal of Politics, 70(3), 612–631. doi:10.1017/S0022381608080651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khwaja, A. I. (2004). Is increasing community participation always a good thing? Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2–3), 427–436. doi:10.1162/154247604323068113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, G. G. (2017). Does the labour market explain lower female schooling in India? The Journal of Development Studies, 35. doi:10.1080/00220389808422554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, G. G., & Unni, J. (2010). Education and Women’s labour market outcomes in India. Education Economics, 9. doi:10.1080/09645290110056994
   Google Scholar
• Krishna, A. (2006). Poverty and democratic participation reconsidered: Evidence from the local level in India. Comparative Politics, 38(4), 439–458. doi:10.2307/20434011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulipossa, F. P. (2004). Decentralisation and democracy in developing countries: An overview. Development in Practice, 14(6), 768–779. doi:10.1080/0961452042000284003
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, N. (2007). Pro -poor targeting and participatory governance: Evidence from central India. Discussion Paper 176, Institute of Economic Development (IED), Department of economics, Boston University, USA. Retrived from http://www.bu.edu/econ/files/2012/11/dp176.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, H., & Seal, A. (2005). Local government: Still a junior government? The place of municipalities within the Canadian federation. In N. Steytler (Eds.), The place and role of local government in federal systems (pp. 27–46). Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Libonati, M. E. (2005). State Constitutions and Local Government in the United States. In N. Steytler (Eds.), The place and role of local government in federal systems (pp. 11–26). Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Lipton, M., & Ravallion, M. (1993). Poverty and policy. Working paper, Policy Research Department, The World Bank, WPS 1130. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/885101468766532174/pdf/multi0page.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, W., & Kc, S. (2011). Global human capital: Integrating education and population. Science, 333(6042), 587–592. doi:10.1126/science.1206964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manacorda, M., Miguel, E., & Vigorito, A. (2011). Government transfers and political support. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(3), 1–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyata, S., Minot, N., & Hu, D. (2009). Impact of contract farming on income: Linking small farmers, packers, and supermarkets in China. World Development, 37(11), 1781–1790. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondak, J. J., & Halperin, K. D. (2008). A framework for the study of personality and political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 335–362. doi:10.1017/S0007123408000173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan, D. (1995). The contribution of people’s participation: Evidence from 121 rural water supply projects. ESD Occasional Paper Series 1. World Bank. Retrived from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/274861468767096877/pdf/multi-page.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Olken, B. A. (2010). Direct democracy and local public goods: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. American Political Science Review, 104(2), 243–267. doi:10.1017/S0003055410000079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, S. A. (2014). Corruption and political participation a multilevel analysis. Working paper series 2014:12 QOG The Quality Of Government Institute, Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg. Retrieved from http://www.qog.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1502/1502082_2014_12_arkhede-olsson.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Panday, P. K. (2009). Does globalization affect media role in a democratic country? Bangladesh perspective. Journal Media and Communication Studies, 1(2), 033–042. Retrieved from http://www.academicjournals.org/jmcs
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Pernthaler, P., & Gamper, A. (2005). Local government in Austria. In N. Steytler (Eds.), The place and role of local government in federal systems (pp. 65–82). Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, M. (2015). Education and political participation. British Journal of Political Science, 45(3), 689–703. doi:10.1017/S0007123413000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pop-Eleches, C., & Pop-Eleches, G. (2012). Targeted overnment spending and political preferences. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 7(3), 285–320. doi:10.1561/100.00011017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G. (1986). American voter turnout in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review, 80, 17–43. doi:10.2307/1957082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. A., & Verdier, T. (2013). The political economy of clientelism. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 115(2), 260–291. doi:10.1111/sjoe.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samarakoon, S., & Parinduri, R. A. (2015). Does education empower women? Evidence from Indonesia. World Development, 66, 428–442. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, C. (2005). Constitutional recognition of local government in Australia. In N. Steytler (Eds.), The place and role of local government in federal systems (pp. 47–64). Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. K., & Ingraham, P. (1984). The impact of political participation on social policy adoption and expansion: A cross-national, longitudinal analysis. Comparative Politics, 17(1), 107. doi:10.2307/421740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, R. W., & Winters, M. S. (2008). Political participation and quality of life. Research Department, Working Papers (638), Inter-American Development Bank. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Steytler, N. (2005). Local government in South Africa: Entrenching decentralisated government. In N. Steytler (Eds.), The place and role of local government in federal systems (pp. 183–212). Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Toritto, B. C. (2005). Constitutional reform: Local government and the recent changes to intergovernmental relations in Italy. In N. Steytler (Eds.), The place and role of local government in federal systems (pp. 149–168). Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Victoria, S. (2012). Incentivizing participation increases political information: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Political Science Association, annual meeting paper. Retrieved from SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=2109000
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S., & Yang, Y. (2007). Grassroots democracy and local governance: Evidence from rural China. World Development, 35(10), 1635–1649. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2000). Overview of rural decentralization in India (Volume 1). Washington, DC, USA: World Bank.
   Google Scholar