Bureaucracy, Post-Bureaucracy, or Anarchy? Evidence from the Italian Public Administration

References

• Ahn, M. J., & Bretschneider, S. (2011). Politics of E-government: E-government and the political control of bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 414–424. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02225.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, D., Lewis, J. M., & Considine, M. (2011). How politicians and bureaucrats network: A comparison across governments. Public Administration, 89(4), 1274–1292. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01890.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, H. P. (2004). Culture governance: Governing self-reflexive modernity. Public Administration, 82(1), 157–190. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00389.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, A. M. (2006). Transforming public services – Transforming the public servant? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(6), 556–568. doi:10.1108/09513550610686627
   Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M. (1955). The dynamics of bureaucracy: A study of interpersonal relations in two government agencies. Illinois, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bode, I., & Dent, M. (2014). Converging hybrid worlds? Medicine and hospital management in Europe. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 27(5), guest editorial. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-01-2013-0011
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, S., & Ratto, M. (2003). The role of incentives in the public sector: Issues and evidence. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(2), 285–299. doi:10.1093/oxrep/19.2.285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callanan, M. (2005). Institutionalizing participation and governance? New participative structures in local government in Ireland. Public Administration, 83(4), 909–929. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00483.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, G., & Matthews, M. (2017). Methods for delivering complex social services: Exploring adaptive management and regulation in the Australian national disability insurance scheme. Public Management Review, 19(2), 194–211. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1148194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlesworth, J., Clarke, J., & Cochrane, A. (1996). Tangled webs? Managing local mixed economies of care. Public Administration, 74(1), 67–88. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1996.tb00858.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloutier, C., Denis, J. L., Langley, A., & Lamothe, L. (2016). Agency at the managerial interface: Public sector reform as institutional work. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(2), 259–276. doi:10.1093/jopart/muv009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Considine, M. (2000). Contract regimes and reflexive governance: Comparing employment service reforms in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, New Zealand and Australia. Public Administration, 78(3), 613–638. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia, T., & Denis, J. L. (2016). Hybrid management, organizational configuration, and medical professionalism: Evidence from the establishment of a clinical directorate in Portugal. BMC Health Services Research, 16(2), SI, 161–171. doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1398-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Currie, G., Grubnic, S., & Hodges, R. (2011). Leadership in public services networks: Antecedents, process and outcome. Public Administration, 89(2), 242–264. doi:10.1111/J.1467-9299.2011.01931.X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, G., & Procter, S. J. (2005). The antecedents of middle managers’ strategic contribution: The case of a professional bureaucracy. Journal Of Management Studies, 42(7), 1325–1356. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00546.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer, H. F., Enders, J., & Leisyte, L. (2007). Public sector reform in Dutch higher education: The organizational transformation of the university. Public Administration, 85(1), 27–46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00632.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bruijn, H. (2002). Performance measurement in the public sector: Strategies to cope with the risks of performance measurement. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(6/7), 578–594. doi:10.1108/09513550210448607
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, T., & Martin, S. (2005). From competition to collaboration in public service delivery: A new agenda for research. Public Administration, 83(1), 233–242. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00446.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, R., Currie, G., & Martin, G. (2010). Team work in context: Institutional mediation in the public-service professional bureaucracy. Organization Studies, 31(8), 1069–1097. doi:10.1177/0170840610376142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotaki, M. (2011). Towards developing new partnerships in public services: Users as consumers, citizens and/or co-producers in health and social care in England and Sweden. Public Administration, 89(3), 933–955. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01879.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatenby, M., Rees, C., Truss, C., Alfes, K., & Soane, E. (2015). Managing change, or changing managers? The role of middle managers in UK public service reform. Public Management Review, 17(8), 1124–1145. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.895028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, L. (2012). In search of collaborative public management. Public Management Review, 14(7), 947–966. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.650057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germov, J. (2005). Managerialism in the Australian public health sector: Towards the hyper-rationalisation of professional bureaucracies. Sociology Of Health & Illness, 27(6), 738–758. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00472.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourdin, G., & Schepers, R. (2009). Hospital governance and the medical practitioner in Belgium. Journal Of Health Organization And Management, 23(3), 319–331. doi:10.1108/14777260910966744
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray, A., & Jenkins, B. (1993). Codes of accountability in the new public sector. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 6(3), 52–67. doi:10.1108/09513579310042560
   Google Scholar
• Hammerschmid, G., & Meyer, R. E. (2005). New public management in Austria: Local variation on a global theme? Public Administration, 83(3), 709–733. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00471.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–39. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00778.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffares, S., & Skelcher, C. (2011). Democratic subjectivities in network governance: A Q methodology study of English and Dutch public managers. Public Administration, 89(4), 1253–1273. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01888.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, J., & Patapan, H. (2006). In search of prudence: The hidden problem of managerial reform. Public Administration Review, 66(5), 711–724. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00636.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. (2006). Central regulation of English local authorities: An example of meta-governance? Public Administration, 84(3), 603–621. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00604.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. J. M. (2005). Distinctiveness in the study of public management in Europe. Public Management Review, 7(4), 537–563. doi:10.1080/14719030500362470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. J. M. (2011). Distinctiveness of administrative reform in Greece, Italy, Portugal And Spain. Common characteristics of context, administrations and reforms. Public Administration, 89(3), 801–818. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01862.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinder, T. (2012). Learning, innovating and performance in post-new public management of locally delivered public services. Public Management Review, 14(3), 403–428. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.637408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, I. (1999). Managers or Colleagues? Public Management: an International Journal of Research and Theory, 1(4), 489–509. doi:10.1080/14719039900000023
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, I., & Ackroyd, S. (2003). Transforming the professional archetype? Public Management Review, 5(4), 509–529. doi:10.1080/1471903032000178563
   Google Scholar
• Kitchener, M., & Gask, L. (2003). NPM merger mania. Lessons from an early case. Public Management Review, 5(1), 19–44. doi:10.1080/1461667022000028843
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H. (2008). Complexity theory and public administration: What’s new? Key concepts in complexity theory compared to their counterparts in public administration. Public Management Review, 10(3), 299–317. doi:10.1080/14719030802002675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knott, J. H. (2011). Federalist No. 10: Are factions the problem in creating democratic accountability in the public interest? Public Administration Review, 71(1), SI, s29–s36. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02459.x
   Google Scholar
• Knott, J. H., & Miller, G. J. (2006). Social welfare, corruption and credibility. Public Management Review, 8(2), 227–252. doi:10.1080/14719030600587455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J., & Jentoft, S. (2009). Meta-governance: Values, norms and principles, and the making of hard choices. Public Administration, 87(4), 818–836. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01780.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari, S., & Handscombe, R. D. (2007). Sweep or seep? Structure, culture, enterprise and universities. Management Decision, 45(1), 43–61. doi:10.1108/00251740710718953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I. (2008). The NPM Agenda: Back to the future. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(1), 77–96. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00444.x
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I. (2009). New public management: The cruellest invention of the human spirit? ABACUS, 45(1), 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00275.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Learmonth, M. (2005). Doing things with words: The case of “management” and “administration”. Public Administration, 83(3), 617–637. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00465.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lega, F., & DePietro, C. (2005). Converging patterns in hospital organization: Beyond the professional bureaucracy. Health Policy, 74(3), 261–281. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.01.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann Nielsen, V. (2006). Are street-level bureaucrats compelled or enticed to cope? Public Administration, 84(4), 861–889. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00616.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, L. E. (2001). Globalization and administrative reform: - What is happening in theory? Public Management Review, 3(2), 191–208. doi:10.1080/14616670010029584
   Google Scholar
• Magone, J. M. (2011). The difficult transformation of state and public administration in Portugal. Europeanization and the persistence of neo-patrimonialism. Public Administration, 89(3), 756–782. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01913.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, G. P. (2011). The third sector, user involvement and public service reform: A case study in the co-governance of health service provision. Public Administration, 89(3), 909–932. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01910.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, G. P., Currie, G., & Finn, R. (2009). Leadership, service reform, and public-service networks: The case of cancer-genetics pilots in the English NHS. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), 769–794. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGivern, G., Currie, G., Ferlie, E., Fitzgerald, L., & Waring, J. (2015). Hybrid manager–professionals’ identity work: The maintenance and hybridization of medical professionalism in managerial contexts. Public Administration, 93(2), 412–432. doi:10.1111/padm.12119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meek, J. W. (2010). Complexity theory for public administration and policy. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 12(1), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & Bohte, J. (2001). Structure and discretion: Missing links in representative bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(4), 455–470. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1940). Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces, 18(4), 560–568. doi:10.2307/2570634
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. E., Egger-Peitler, I., Höllerer, M. A., & Hammerschmid, G. (2014). Of bureaucrats and passionate public managers: Institutional logics, executive identities, and public service motivation. Public Administration, 92(4), 861–885. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02105.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meynhardt, T., & Diefenbach, F. E. (2012). What drives entrepreneurial orientation in the public sector? evidence from Germany’s federal labor agency. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 761–792. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1979). the structuring of organizations. New Jersey, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M., & Abma, T. (2003). Management by measurement? Public management practices amidst ambiguity. Public Administration, 81(4), 853–871. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00374.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M., & De Wit, B. (2012). Responses to managerialism: How management pressures affect managerial relations and loyalties in education. Public Administration, 90(4), 957–973. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02068.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ongaro, E. (2006). The dynamics of devolution processes in legalistic countries: Organizational change in the Italian public sector. Public Administration, 84(3), 737–770. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00610.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, K., & Vince, R. (2009). Traditions of local government. Public Administration, 87(3), 655–677. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01770.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (2010a). “The (new) public governance: A suitable case for treatment”, Chap. 1. In S.P. Osborne (ed.), The new public governance? London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (2010b). Public governance and public service delivery: A research agenda for the future, Chap. 23. In S.P. Osborne (ed.), The new public governance? London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2009). Bureaucracies remember, post-bureaucratic organizations forget? Public Administration, 87(2), 198–218. doi:10.1111/J.1467-9299.2008.01738.X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public management reform: An international comparison. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1999). The audit society.Rituals of verification. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raadschelders, J. C. N. (1995). Rediscovering citizenship: Historical and contemporary reflections. Public Administration, 73(4), 611–625. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1995.tb00849.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, H., & Downer, J. (2012). “Renewing defra”: Exploring the emergence of risk-based policymaking in UK central government. Public Administration, 90(3), 781–799. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01999.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibel, W. (2010). Beyond bureaucracy—public administration as political integrator and non-weberian thought in Germany. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 719–730. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02200.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organizations. American Sociological Review, 13(1), 25–35. doi:10.2307/2086752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tichelar, M. (1997). Professional bureaucracy as a barrier to management learning in the public services: A personal reflection. Local Government Studies, 23(2), 14–25. doi:10.1080/03003939708433862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeeten, F. H. M. (2008). Performance management practices in public sector organizations: Impact on performance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(3), 427–454. doi:10.1108/09513570810863996
   Google Scholar
• Vinot, D. (2014). Transforming hospital management à la francaise: The new role of clinical managers in French public hospitals. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 27(5), 406–416. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-06-2012-0067
   Google Scholar
• Voets, J., Verhoest, K., & Molenveld, A. (2015). Coordinating for Integrated Youth Care: The need for smart metagovernance. Public Management Review, 17(7), 981–1001. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1029347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1922). Economy and society. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1946). Essays in sociology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. N., Kang, S.-C., & Johnson, J. (2016). (Co)-Contamination as the dark side of co-production: Public value failures in co-production processes. Public Management Review, 18(5), 692–717. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1111660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar