The Challenge of Administrative Internationalization: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead

References

• Abushamsieh, K., López-Hernández, A. M., & Ortiz-Rodríguez, D. (2014). The development of public accounting transparency in selected Arab countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80, 421–442. doi:10.1177/0020852313514522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, T., de Francesco, F., Maggetti, M., & Ruffing, E. (2016). Transnational bureaucratic politics: An institutional riva-lry perspective on EU Network Governance. Public Administration, 94, 9–24. doi:10.1111/padm.2016.94.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, T., Ruffing, E., & Yesilkagit, K. (2015). The differential empowering effects of Europeanization on the autonomy of national agencies. Governance, 28, 285–304. doi:10.1111/gove.2015.28.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baclija, I. (2012). Measuring new public management at the local level: Experiences from EU cities. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 8, 23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Baltodano, A. P. (1997). The study of public administration in times of global interpenetration: A historical rationale for a theoretical model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7, 615–638. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024368
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W. (2015). Die Verwaltungswissenschaft und die Herausforderung der Denationalisierung. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 56, 648–671. doi:10.5771/0032-3470-2015-4
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., Eckhard, S., Ege, J., & Knill, C. (2017). A public administration perspective on international organizations. In M. W. Bauer, C. Knill, & S. Eckhard (Eds.), International bureaucracy: Challenges and lessons for public administration research (pp. 1–12). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., & Trondal, J. (Eds.). (2015). The Palgrave handbook on the European administrative system. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Beck Jørgensen, T. (1999). The public sector in an in-between time: Searching for new public values. Public Administration, 77, 565–584. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz, A., Corcaci, A., & Doser, J. W. (2016). Unravelling multilevel administration. Patterns and dynamics of administrative co-ordination in European governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 23, 999–1018. doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1162838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusca, I., Gómez Villegas, M., & Montesinos, V. (2016). Public financial management reforms: The role of IPSAS in Latin-America. Public Administration and Development, 36, 51–64. doi:10.1002/pad.1747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusis, M. (2002). Between EU requirements, competitive politics, and national traditions: Re-creating regions in the accession countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Governance, 15, 531–559. doi:10.1111/gove.2002.15.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, H. S., Rosenbloom, D. H., & Rene, H. (2008). After reform: Accommodating old values and assimilating new ones. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67, 69–78. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00569.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. B. L. (2005). The politics of administrative reforms in Asia: Paradigms and legacies, paths and diversities. Governance, 18, 257–282. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00275.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. (2012). Global ideas and modern public sector reforms. American Review of Public Administration, 42, 635–653. doi:10.1177/0275074012452113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Lisheng, D., & Painter, M. (2008). Administrative reform in China’s central government — How much `learning from the West’? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74, 351–371. doi:10.1177/0020852308095308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, W. D. (2012). Governance and global public policy. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 673–687). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Di Mascio, F., & Natalini, A. (2014). Fiscal Retrenchment in Southern Europe: Changing patterns of public management in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain. Public Management Review, 17, 129–148. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.790275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicken, P. (2014). Global shift: Mapping the changing contours of the world economy (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobre, A. M. (2008). Designing and justifying regional reforms: Lessons from Romania. Policy & Politics, 36, 587–600. doi:10.1332/147084408X349783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dommett, K., MacCarthaigh, M., & Hardiman, N. (2016). Reforming the westminster model of agency governance: Britain and Ireland after the crisis. Governance, 29, 535–552. doi:10.1111/gove.12227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckhard, S., & Ege, J. (2016). International bureaucracies and their influence on policy-making: A review of empirical evidence. Journal of European Public Policy, 23, 960–978. doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1162837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ege, J. (2018). Learning from the commission case: The comparative study of management change in international public administrations. Public Administration. doi:10.1111/padm.12546
   Google Scholar
• Ege, J., & Bauer, M. W. (2013). International bureaucracies from a public administration and international relations perspective. In B. Reinalda (Ed.), Routledge handbook of international organization (pp. 135–148). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2009). National agencies in the European administrative space: Government driven, Commission driven or networked? Public Administration, 87, 779–790. doi:10.1111/padm.2009.87.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (1999). Globalization and public administration. Public Administration Review, 59, 509–522. doi:10.2307/3110299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (2002). Globalization, privatization, and the future of modern governance: A critical assessment. Public Finance & Management, 2, 151.
   Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (2012). The future of public administration: Challenges and opportunities-A critical perspective. Administration & Society, 44, 487–517. doi:10.1177/0095399712452658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, K. H. (2000). European integration and national executives: A cause in search of an effect? West European Politics, 23, 211–231. doi:10.1080/01402380008425406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, K. H., & Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. (2008). The Europeanisation of national political systems: Parliaments and executives. Living Reviews in European Governance, 3. doi:10.12942/lreg-2008-2
   Google Scholar
• Grande, E. (2018). Verwaltung im globalen Wandel. Neue Perspektiven für die Verwaltungswissenschaft. In M. W. Bauer & E. Grande (Eds.), Perspektiven der Verwaltungswissenschaft. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Groeneveld, S., Tummers, L., Bronkhorst, B., Ashikali, T., & van Thiel, S. (2015). Quantitative methods in public administration: Their use and development through time. International Public Management Journal, 18, 61–86. doi:10.1080/10967494.2014.972484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulrajani, N., & Moloney, K. (2012). Globalizing public administration: Today’s research and tomorrow’s agenda. Public Administration Review, 72, 78–86. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02489.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, T., & Held, D. (2011). Handbook of transnational governance: Institutions and innovations. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Haque, M. S. (1996). Public service under challenge in the age of privatization. Governance, 9, 186–216. doi:10.1111/gove.1996.9.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmsen, R. (1999). The Europeanization of national administrations: A comparative study of France and the Netherlands. Governance, 12, 81–113. doi:10.1111/gove.1999.12.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held, D. (Ed.). (2000a). A globalizing world. Culture, economics, politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D. (2000b). Democracy and the global order from the modern state to cosmopolitan governance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, Y., Ni, A. Y., Poocharoen, -O.-O., Yang, K., & Zhao, Z. J. (2011). The case for public administration with a global perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 145–151. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddleston, M. W. (2000). Onto the darkling plain: Globalization and the American public service in the twenty-first century. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 665–684. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024286
   Google Scholar
• James, S. (2010). Adapting to Brussels: Europeanization of the core executive and the ‘strategic-projection’ model. Journal of European Public Policy, 17, 818–835. doi:10.1080/13501763.2010.486985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffery, C., & Wincott, D. (2010). The challenge of territorial politics: Beyond methodological nationalism. In C. Hay (Ed.), New directions in political science. Responding to the challenges of an interdependent world (pp. 167–188). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jreisat, J. E. (2005). Comparative public administration is back in, prudently. Public Administration Review, 65, 231–242. doi:10.1111/puar.2005.65.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayaalp, E. (2012). Torn in translation: An ethnographic study of regulatory decision-making in Turkey. Regulation & Governance, 6, 225–241. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (1997). The global revolution in public management: Driving themes, missing links. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16, 446–462. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (2000). The transformation of governance: Globalization, devolution, and the role of government. Public Administration Review, 60, 488–497. doi:10.1111/puar.2000.60.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (2002). The Transformation of governance: Public administration for twenty-first century America. Interpreting American politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koppell, J. G. S. (2010). World rule: Accountability, legitimacy, and the design of global governance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laffan, B., & O’Mahony, J. (2007). Managing Europe from an Irish perspective: Critical junctures and the increasing formalization of the core executive in Ireland. Public Administration, 85, 167–188. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00639.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legrand, T. (2019). Sovereignty renewed: Transgovernmental policy networks and the global-local dilmma. In D. Stone & K. Moloney (Eds.), Oxford handbook on global policy and transnational administration (pp. 251–274). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, M. (2005). The importance of being modern: International benchmarking and national regulatory innovation1. Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 649–667. doi:10.1080/13501760500160151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mele, V., Anderfuhren-Biget, S., & Varone, F. (2016). Conflicts of interest in International Organizations: Evidence from two United Nations humanitarian agencies. Public Administration, 94, 490–508. doi:10.1111/padm.12228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moschella, M., & Weaver, C. (2014). Handbook of global economic governance: Players, power, and paradigms. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J., & Hanf, K. (2002). American public administration and impacts of international governance. Public Administration Review, 62, 158–169. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.62.s1.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, C., & Bindman, E. (2017). Civic participation in a hybrid regime: Limited pluralism in policymaking and delivery in contemporary Russia. Government and Opposition, 62, 1–23. doi:10.1017/gov.2017.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peci, A., & Sobral, F. (2011). Regulatory impact assessment: How political and organizational forces influence its diffusion in a developing country. Regulation & Governance, 5, 204–220. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2011.01105.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L. (2016). Building global public administration knowledge. Public Administration Review. doi:10.1111/puar.12588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2000). Is the emperor in his underwear? An analysis of the impacts of public management reform. Public Management, 2, 181–199.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis - into the age of austerity (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. (2005). Diffusion without convergence: How political context shapes the adoption of regulatory impact assessment. Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 924–943. doi:10.1080/13501760500161621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Gill, N. (2003). The global trend towards devolution and its implications. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21, 333–351. doi:10.1068/c0235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (1997). Has globalization gone too far? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, D. H., Kravchuck, R., & Clerkin, R. M. (2015). Public administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Saner, R. (2001). Globalization and its impact on leadership qualification in public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 67, 649–661. doi:10.1177/0020852301674004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2011). Was local governance such a good idea? A global comparative perspective. Public Administration, 89, 15–31. doi:10.1111/padm.2011.89.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11, 545–566. doi:10.1080/13501760410001694291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2019). Global policy and transnational administration: Intellectual currents in world making. In D. Stone & K. Moloney (Eds.), Oxford Handbook on Global Policy and Transnational Administration (pp. 461–485). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D., & Ladi, S. (2015). Global policy and transnational administration. Public Administration, 4, 839–855. doi:10.1111/padm.12207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D., & Moloney, K. (Eds.). (2019). Oxford handbook on global policy and transnational administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trondal, J. (2011). Bureaucratic structure and administrative behaviour: Lessons from international bureaucracies. West European Politics, 34, 795–818. doi:10.1080/01402382.2011.572392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trondal, J., & Bauer, M. W. (2017). Conceptualizing the European multilevel administrative order: Capturing variation in the European administrative system. European Political Science Review, 9, 73–94. doi:10.1017/S1755773915000223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L., Bekkers, V., Vink, E., & Musheno, M. (2015). Coping during public service delivery: A conceptualization and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Stolk, C., & Wegrich, K. (2008). Convergence without diffusion? A comparative analysis of the choice of performance indicators in tax administration and social security. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74, 589–614. doi:10.1177/0020852308098470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, E., & Wong, W. (1998). Public administration in a global context: Bridging the gaps of theory and practice between Western and Non-Western Nations. Public Administration Review, 58, 40. doi:10.2307/976888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, E., & Wong, W. (2001). Effects of global pressures on public bureaucracy: Modeling a new theoretical framework. Administration & Society, 33, 371–402. doi:10.1177/0095399701334001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessels, W., Maurer, A., & Mittag, J. (2003). Fifteen into one? The European union and its member states. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wollmann, H. (2000). Local government modernization in Germany: Between incrementalism and reform waves. Public Administration, 78, 915–936. doi:10.1111/padm.2000.78.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesilkagit, K. (2012). The internationalization of national bureaucracy: The impact on relationships between politicians and bureaucrats. In M. Lodge & K. Wegrich (Eds.), Executive politics and governance. Executive politics in times of crisis (pp. 19–40). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. (1998). Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates: Globalisierung und Denationalisierung als Chance. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar