Hybridity in the Public Sector—Comparing Development Features in Municipalities in Japan and Norway

References

• Askim, J. (2007). How do politicians use performance information? An analysis of the Norwegian local government experience. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(3), 453–472. doi:10.1177/0020852307081152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston, J., Martin, J., Pallot, J., & Walsh, P. (1996). Public management: The New Zealand Model. Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. B. L. (2005). The politics of administrative reforms in Asia: Paradigms and legacies, paths and diversities. Governance, 18(2), 257–282. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00275.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. (2003). Narrative of Norwegian Governance: Elaborating the strong state. Public Administration, 81(1), 163–190. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Fimreite, A. L., & Lægreid, P. (2007). Reform of the employment and welfare administrations—The challenges of co-coordinating diverse public organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(3), 389–409. doi:10.1177/0020852307081149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2005). Trust in Government: The relative importance of service satisfaction, political factors, and demography. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(4), 487–511.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1057–1064. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00797.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2009). Living in the Past?—Change and continuity in the Norwegian Central Civil Service. Public Administration Review, 69(5), 951–961. doi:10.1111/puar.2009.69.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M., & Stewart, J. (1997). Handling the wicked issues: A challenge for government. Birmingham, UK: INLOGOV.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead: Long live digital-era governance. JPART, 16(3), 467–494. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui057
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1965). The political system. An Inquiry into the state of political science. New York, NY: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M. (2012). How bureaucratic structure matters. In J. Pierre & B. G. Peters (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (2nd ed., pp. 157–168). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fountain, J. E. (2001). Paradoxes of public sector customer service. Governance, 14(1), 55–74. doi:10.1111/0952-1895.00151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gant, J., & Turner-Lee, N. (2011). Government transparency: Six strategies for more open and participatory government. Aspen, CO: The Aspen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• General Accounting Office. (1993). Performance budgeting: State experiences and implications for the federal government. Washington, DC: GAO/AFMD-93-41.
   Google Scholar
• Gulick, L. (1937). Notes on the theory on organizations. With special reference to government. In L. Gulick & L. Urwin (Eds.), Papers on the science of administration (pp. 1–46). New York, NY: A. M. Kelley.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, H. (1960). The forest ranger. A study in administrative behavior. Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Knutsson, H., Mattisson, O., Ramberg, U., & Johnsen, Å. (2016). Modernizing the public sector: The Scandinavian Way. In I. Lapsley & H. Knutsson (Eds.), Modernizing the public sector: Scandinavian perspectives (pp. 241–255). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koike, O. (2013). Institurionalizing performance management in Asia: Looking East or West? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 20(5), 347–360. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-05-2013-0066
   Google Scholar
• Kokubu, K., Shiba, K., Kato, Y., & Okano, H. (1998). A runner a lap behind in the race for public sector financial management reform: The Japanese Case. In O. Olson, J. Guthrie, & C. Hamphrey (Eds.), Global Warning: International financial management changes (pp. 130–155). Bergen, Norway: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. D. (1988). Sovereignty. An institutional perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 21(1), 66–94. doi:10.1177/0010414088021001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (eds.). (2014). Introduction to comparative public administration. Administrative systems and reforms in Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, & Bouckaert, G. (eds). (2016). Local public sector reforms in times of crisis. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lan, Z., & Rainey, H. (1992). Goals, rules, and effectiveness in public, private, and hybrid organizations: More Evidence on frequent assertions about differences. JPART, 2(1), 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1983). Organizing political life. What administrative reorganization tells us about government. American Political Science Review, 77, 281–297. doi:10.2307/1958916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MIC. (2015). Polling rate at a glance. Tokyo, Japan: Author.
   Google Scholar
• MIC. (2016). National Census for 2015. Tokyo, Japan: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, M.-J., & Ingraham, P. (1998). Shaping administrative reform and governance: An examination of the political nexus triads in Three Asian Countries. Governance, 11(1), 77–100. doi:10.1111/gove.1998.11.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura, A. (2012). Asian model of government re-examined in the aftermath of the global economic crunch: A Japanese perspective from the experience of the triple disasters in March 2011. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(2), 239–259. doi:10.1177/0020852312439488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation. (2014). Local government in norway. Oslo, Norway: NMLGM.
   Google Scholar
• Noutomi, I., & Nakanishi, M. (2007). Net Results of the Japanese NPM Movement at Local Governments since the Mid-1990s: Performance budgeting, total quality management and target based budgeting. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(12–14), 1393–1433. doi:10.1080/01900690701229574
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016). OECD income distribution database (IDD): Gini, poverty, income, methods and concepts. Paris, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. P. (1996). Norway: Slow Learner or another Triumph of Tortoise? In J. P. Olsen & B. G. Peters (Eds.), Learning from Expertise (pp. 180–213). Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, PA: Adison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. (2010). The new public governance: Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pallot, J., & Yamamoto, K. (2001). Government or governance? Japan’s New balance sheet in international perspective. In V. Montesinos & J. M. Vela (Eds.), Innovation in government accounting (pp. 131–144). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. M., & Joaquin, M. E. (2012). Of alternating waves and shifting shores: The configuration of reform values in the US Federal bureaucracy. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(3), 514–536. doi:10.1177/0020852312442659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patashnik, E. M. (2008). Reform at risk. what happens after major policy changes are enacted? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pekkanen, R. (2006). Japan’s dual civil society: Members without advocates. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckeart, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis—New public management, governance, and the neo-weberian state (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, D., & Smith, M. (2006). The tensions of political control and administrative autonomy: From NPM to a reconstituted westminster model. In T. Christensen & P. Lægreid (Eds.), Autonomy and regulation. Coping with agencies in the modern state (pp. 181–202). London, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, L. E. (2002). Municipal size and local nonelectoral participation: Findings from Denmark, the Netherlands, and Norway. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 20(6), 829–851. doi:10.1068/c0227
   Google Scholar
• Self, P. (2000). Rolling back the State. economic dogma & political choice. New York, NY: St Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behaviour. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 369–404. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsujinaka, Y., Ahmed, S., & Kobashi, Y. (2013). Constructing co-governance between government and civil society: An institutional approach to collaboration. Public Organization Review, 13(4), 411–426. doi:10.1007/s11115-013-0260-9
   Google Scholar
• Tsutsui, T. (2012). Challenges and opportunities in the development of the community-based integrated care system in Japan. Journal of the National Institute of Public Health, 61(2), 96–103.
   Google Scholar
• van Houwelingen, P. (2017). Political participation and municipal population size: A meta-study, Local Government Studies, 43(3), 408–428. 1300147. doi:10.1080/03003930.2017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vries, D. V., & Nemec, J. (2013). Public sector reform: An overview of recent literature and research on NPM and alternative paths. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1), 4–16. doi:10.1108/09513551311293408
   Google Scholar
• Wollebæk, D., & Selle, P. (2008). A social democratic model of civic society? In B. Jobert & B. Kohler-Koch (Eds.), Changing images of civil society. From protest to governance (pp. 47–69). New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, K. (1999). Accounting system reform in Japanese Local Governments. Financial Accountability & Management, 15(3–4), 291–307. doi:10.1111/1468-0408.00086
   Google Scholar