Hardening Budget Constraints: A Cross-National Study of Fiscal Sustainability and Subnational Debt

References

• Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, ACIR. (1987). Fiscal Discipline in the Federal System: National Reform and the Experience in the States. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Ahrend, R., Curto-Grau, M., & Vammalle, C. (2013). “Passing the buck? Central and sub-national governments in times of fiscal stress. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 2013/05. Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., Hausmann, R., Hommes, R., & Stein, E. (1996). Budget institutions and fiscal performance in Latin America. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., & Tabellini, G. (1990). Voting on the budget deficit. American Economic Review, 80(1), 37–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahl, R. O. Y., & Wallace, S. (2005). Public financing in developing and transition countries. Public Budgeting & Finance, 25(4s), 83–98. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5850.2005.00005.x
   Google Scholar
• Ballard-Rosa, C., Mosley, L., & Wellhausen, R. (Forthcoming). Contingent advantage? Sovereign borrow, democratic institutions and global capital cycles. British Journal of Political Science.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskaran, T. (2010). On the link between fiscal decentralization and public debt in OECD countries. Public Choice, 45(3), 351–378. doi:10.1007/s11127-009-9570-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayoumi, T., Goldstein, M., & Woglom, G. (1995). Do credit markets discipline sovereign borrowers: Evidence from U.S. states. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 27(4), 1046–1059. doi:10.2307/2077788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, A. L., & Smith, H. J. M. (2017). The impact of parties and elections on municipal debt policy in Mexico. Governance, 30(4), 621–639. doi:10.1111/gove.12234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrero, E., & Carrera, A. (2002). Fiscal decentralisation and institutional constraints. paradoxes of the Mexican case (DAP working paper). Mexico City: CIDE.
   Google Scholar
• Canuto, O., & Liu, L. (2013). Until debt do us part: Subnational debt, insolvency, and markets. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Cecchetti, S. G., Mohanty, M., & Zampolli, F. (2010, February 12–13). The future of public debt: Prospects and implications. Paper presented at the Reserve Bank of India’s International Research Conference “Challenges to Central Banking in the context of Financial Crisis”, Mumbai, India.
   Google Scholar
• Cernuschi, T., & Platz, D. (2006, December 11–13). Financing basic utilities for all: A survey of issues. Paper presented at the Financing Access to Basic Utilities for All, organized by the Friedrich Ebert Foundation, International Poverty Centre, UNDP, Brazilian Ministry of the Cities (SNSA) and the Financing for Development Office, UN-DESA, Brasilia, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Conlan, T. (1986). Ambivalent federalism: Inter-governmental policy in the reagan administration. In L. G. Bender & J. A. Stever (Eds.), Administering the new federalism (pp. 15–40). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conlan, T., Posner, P., Smith, H. J. M., & Sommerfeld, M. (2015). “Autonomy and interdependence: The scope and limits of “Fend for Yourself Federalism” in the U.S.” chapter. In J. Kim and H. Blöchliger (Eds.), Institutions of intergovernmental fiscal relations: Challenges ahead (pp. 155–179). Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (2005). Who governs?: Democracy and power in an American city (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale Studies in Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Debrun, X., Moulin, L., Turrini, A., Ayuso-i-Casals, J., & Kumar, M. (2008). Tied to the mast? Fiscal rules in the European union. Economic Policy, 23(54), 297–362. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0327.2008.00199.x
   Google Scholar
• Eyraud, L. X., Hodge, D. A., Lledo, V., & Pattillo, C. (2018). Second-generation fiscal rules: Balancing simplicity, flexibility, and enforceability (pages 135). Washington, DC: IMF Staff Discussion Note. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Staff-Discussion-Notes/Issues/2018/04/12/Second-Generation-Fiscal-Rules-Balancing-Simplicity-Flexibility-and-Enforceability-45131. ISBN/ISSN:9781484350683/2221-030X
   Google Scholar
• Freire, M., Peterson, J., Huertas, M., & Valadez, M. (Ed). (2004). Subnational capital markets in developing countries: From theory to practice. Washington, DC: World Bank and Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTLACREGTOPURBDEV/FeaturedTopics/20860291/TheorytoPractice.pdf. ISBN 0-8213-5464-7
   Google Scholar
• Giugale, M., Hernández Trillo, F., & Oliveira, J. (2000). Subnational borrowing and debt management. In S. Webb & M. Giugale (Eds.), Fiscal decentralization in Mexico: Achievements and challenges (pp. 237–270). Washington, DC: The World Bank. Retrieved from http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/decentralization/cd/achievementsandchallengesCH6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, M, & Woglom, G (2017) Market-based Fiscal Discipline in Monetary Unions: Evidence from the US Municipal Bond Market chapter in Trade, Currencies, and FinanceIn M. Goldstein (Ed.), (pp. 127–163). (Peterson Institute for International Economics, USA). doi:10.1142/9935
   Google Scholar
• Hanniman, K. (2012). Booms, busts, and bailouts: Fiscal federalism, sovereign risk, and subnational credit. A dissertation Political Science department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández Trillo, F., Diaz-Cayeros, A., & Gamboa Gonzalez, R. (2002). Determinants and consequences of bailing out states in Mexico. Eastern Economic Journal, 28(3), 365–380.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., & Bosler, C. (2014). China’s debt dilemma: Deleveraging while generating growth. Wahington, DC. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• International County and City Management Association. (1987). Designing a bond issue: A Guide “Municipal Bonds” an MIS Report, published by ICMA Vol. 19 Number 6.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, N. (2005). Fiscal federalism and international capital: The effect of fiscal federalism on foreign direct investment and sovereign debt ratings. Swiss Political Science Review, 11(4), 77–95. doi:10.1002/j.1662-6370.2005.tb00371.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. B. (2018). The rise of patient capital: The political economy of Chinese global finance (Working paper) Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3108215
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D., & Teo, T. (2014). Law, focal points and fiscal discipline in the United States and the European Union. American Political Science Review, 108(2), 355–370. doi:10.1017/S0003055414000100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2002, November). Local government finance and bond market financing in Korea. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank. ISBN No. 971-561-501-5
   Google Scholar
• Kincaid, J. (2012). Constitutional frameworks of state and local government finance. In R. D. Ebel & J. E. Peterson (Eds.), Oxford handbook of state and local government finance. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199765362.013.0002
   Google Scholar
• Kornai, J. (1998). The place of the soft budget constraint syndrome in economic theory. Journal of Comparative Economics, 26, 11–17. doi:10.1006/jcec.1997.1505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krane, D., Ebdon, C., & Bartle, J. (2004). Devolution, fiscal federalism, and changing patterns of municipal revenues: The mismatch between theory and Reality. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(4), 513–533. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laubach, T. (2005). Fiscal Relations Across Levels of Government in the United States (OECD Economics Department Working Paper 462). Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Leigland, J. (1997). Accelerating municipal bonds market development emerging economies: An assessment of strategies and progress. Public Budgeting & Finance, 17(2), 57–79. doi:10.1111/1540-5850.01100
   Google Scholar
• Levitin, A. (2012). Bankrupt politics and the politics of Bankruptcy. Cornell L. Rev, 97(6), 1399–1459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, R., & Alt, J. (2001). A visible hand? Bond markets, political parties, balanced budget laws and state government debt. Economics and Politics, 13(1), 49–72. doi:10.1111/1468-0343.00083
   Google Scholar
• Martell, C. R. (2003). Municipal investment, borrowing, and pricing under decentralization: The Brazilian case. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(2), 173–196. doi:10.1081/PAD-120018301
   Google Scholar
• Martell, C. R., & Teske, P. (2007). Fiscal management implications of the TABOR bind. Public Administration Review, 67(4), 673–687. doi:10.1111/puar.2007.67.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moldogaziev, T., Espinosa, S., & Martell, C. R. (2017). Fiscal governance, information capacity, and subnational capital finance. Public Finance Review. doi:10.1177/1091142117711018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullin, M., & Daley, D. M. (2010). Working with the state: Exploring interagency collaboration within a federalist system. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 757–778. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. (2013). Audit Report of National Government Debt. NAO, ( in Chinese). Audit Report No.32 of 2013. Retrieved from http://www.audit.gov.cn/web743/n746/n752/n769/c66759/content.html
   Google Scholar
• Naughton, B. (2015, July 14). Local debt restructuring: A case of ongoing authoritarian reform. China Leadership Monitor, Summer 2015: 47(2). Retrieved from http://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/research/docs/clm47bn.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. (2017). Local revenue structure under economic hardship: Reliance on alternative revenue sources in California counties. Local Government Studies, 43(4), 645–667. doi:10.1080/03003930.2017.1305956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. (2018). Understanding public sector debt: Financial vicious circle under the soft budget constraint. Public Organization Review, 18(1), 71–92. doi:10.1007/s11115-016-0358-y
   Google Scholar
• Poterba, J. M. (1994). State responses to fiscal crises: The effect of budgetary institutions and politics. Journal of Political Economy, 104(4), 799–821. doi:10.1086/261955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poterba, J. M., & Rueben, K. (1999). State fiscal institutions and the U.S. municipal bond market. In J. Poterba & J. von Hagen (Eds.), Fiscal institutions and fiscal performance (pp. 181–208). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/chapters/c8028Chapterpagesinbook
   Google Scholar
• Revilla, E. (2013). Debt management in Mexico: A tale of two crises. In L. Liu & O. Canuto (Eds.), Until debt do us part: subnational debt, insolvency, and markets (pp. 145–176). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Rodden, J. (2002). The Dilemma of fiscal federalism: Grants and fiscal performance around the world. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 670–687. doi:10.2307/3088407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodden, J. (2006). Hamilton’s paradox: The promise and peril of fiscal federalism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodden, J., Eskeland, G. S., & Litvack, J. I. (2003). Fiscal decentralization and the challenge of hard budget constraints. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Santiso, C. (2005). Budget institutions and fiscal responsibility: Parliaments and the political economy of the budgetary process in latin America. Paper presented at the XVII Regional Seminar on Fiscal Policy, Santiago, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis. ECPR press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/Parties_and_Party_Systems.html?id=ywr0CcGDNHwC&redir_esc=y
   Google Scholar
• Shen, C., Jin, J., & Zhou, H. (2012). Fiscal decentralization in China: History, impact, challenges and next steps. Annals of Economics and Finance, 13(1), 1–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. J. M., & Benton, A. L. (2017). The role of inter-regional governance and administrative capacity in subnational debt dynamics.. Public Budget and Finance, 37(2), 58–82. doi:10.1111/pbaf.12155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. J. M., & Revell, K. D. (2016). Political decentralization and fiscal federalism in Argentina and Mexico. World Development, 77, 231–248. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sour, L. (2008). Un Prepaso de los Conceptos sobre Capacidad y Esfuerzo fiscal, y su Aplicacion en los Gobiernos Locales Mexicanos. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos Colegio de México, A.C.México, Mexico City 23 (pp. 002). ISSN: 0186-7210 [email protected]
   Google Scholar
• Tang, S., Callahan, R. F., & Pisano, M. (2014). Using common-pool resource principles to design local government fiscal sustainability. Public Administration Review, 74(6), 791–803. doi:10.1111/puar.12273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter-Minassian, T. (1997). Fiscal federalism in theory and practice. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Thau, A. (2011). The bond book (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Torres, G., & Zelter, J. (1998). Rating securitizations above the sovereign ceiling. Fitch Information Bulletin. One State Street Plaza, NY: Fitch IBCA, Inc., Retrieved from: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~igiddy/ABS/sovceiling.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Von Hagen, J. (1991). A note on the empirical effectiveness of formal fiscal restraints. Journal of Public Economics, 44(2), 199–210. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(91)90025-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, K., & Gold, S. D. (1997). The other side of devolution: Shifting relationships between state and local government. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Weingast, B. (2009). Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 279–293. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2008.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar