Formalized Policy Entrepreneurship as a Governance Tool for Policy Integration

References

• Archer, M. (2003). Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aukes, E., Lulofs., K., & Bressers, H. (2017). Framing mechanisms: The interpretative policy entrepreneur´s toolbox” in Critical Policy Studies,12(4), 406–427. doi:10.1080/19460171.2017.1314219.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (2004). Governance an Interpretation: What are the Implications of Postfoundationalism? Public Administration, 82(3), 605–625. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00409.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (2006). Defending Interpretation. European Political Science, 5, 69–83. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210059
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., Rhodes, R. A. W., & Weller, P. (2003). Traditions of Governance: Interpreting the Changing Role of the public sector. Public Administration, 81(1), 1–17. doi:10.1111/padm.2003.81.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., & Richards, D. (2009). Decentring Policy Networks: A Theoretical Agenda. Public Administration, 87(1), 3–14. doi:10.1111/padm.2009.87.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdanor, V. (2005). Introduction. Joined-Up Government. In V. Bogdanor (ed), 1, (1–18).
   Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, N. (2011). The influence of political parties on policy coordination. Governance, 24(3), 469–494. doi:10.1111/gove.2011.24.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, S., Rayner, T., & Huitema, D. (2013). Mainstreaming climate policy: The case of climate adaptation and the implementation of EU water policy. Environment and Planning, 31(1), 134–153. doi:10.1068/c11134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkitt, I. (2016). Relational agency: Relational sociology. Agency and Interaction” in European Journal of Social Theory, 19(3), 322–339. doi:10.1177/1368431015591426
   Google Scholar
• Candel, J. J. L., & Biesbroek, R. (2016). Toward a processual understanding of policy integration. Policy Sciences, 49(3), 211–231. doi:10.1007/s11077-016-9248-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cejudo, G. M., & Michel, C. L. (2017). Addressing fragmented government action: Coordination, coherence, and integration. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 745–767. doi:10.1007/s11077-017-9281-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-Government Approach to Public Sector Reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066. doi:10.1111/puar.2007.67.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, I., & Van Meerkerk, J. (2015). Connective capacity in water governance practices: The meaning of boundary spanning and trust for integrated performance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 12, 25–29. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2014.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fred, M. (2015). Projectification in Swedish municipalities: A Case of Porous Organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 19(2), 49–68.
   Google Scholar
• Fred, M., & Hall, P. (2017). A projectified public administration how projects in swedish local governments become instruments for political and managerial concerns. Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift, Årgång, 119, 2017/1.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, J., Buick, F., & O ́Flynn, J. (2011). Experiments with joined-up, horizontal and whole-of-government in Anglophone countries. In A. Massey (Ed.), International Handbook on Civil Service Systems. (pp. 74–99). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, D. R. (2013). Policy Entrepreneurship in China’s Response to Urban Poverty. Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), 119–146. doi:10.1111/psj.12005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., Vince, J., & Del Rio, P. (2017). Policy integration and multi-level governance: Dealing with the vertical dimension of policy mix designs. Politics and Governance, 5(2), 69–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrelja,Robert, M., Jason, R., Tom, I. K., & Scholten, C. (2017). The interplay of formal and informal institutions between local and regional authorities when creating well-functioning public transport systems. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11(8), 611–622. doi:10.1080/15568318.2017.1292374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hysing, E. (2014). How Public Officials Gain Policy Influence - Lessons from Local Government in Sweden. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(2), 127–139. doi:10.1080/01900692.2013.836662
   Google Scholar
• Hysing, E., & Olsson, J. (2011). How green is the northern light? Green inside activists in local environmental governing in Sweden. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(4), 693–708. doi:10.1068/c10114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1984/2003). Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. New York: Longman Classics in Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J., & Klijn, H.-E. (2004). Managing Uncertainties in Networks. A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lundquist, L. (2011). Flocken i massamhället. Den politiska ordningens villkor och uttryck. Lund, Sweden: Arkiv Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. (2015). Policy Entrepreneurs and Morality Politics: Learning from Failure and Success. In I. Narbutaité Aflaki, E. Petridou, & L. Miles (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in the Polis: Understanding Political Entrepreneurship (pp. 103–118). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy Entrepreneurship and Policy Change. The Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667. doi:10.1111/psj.2009.37.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misztal, B. (2005). The new importance of the relationship between formality and informality. Feminist Theory, 6(2), 173–194. doi:10.1177/1464700105053693
   Google Scholar
• Montin, S. (2015). Municipalities, Regions, and County Councils: Actors and Institutions. In J. Pierre (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Swedish Politics (pp. 367–382). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morand, D. A. (1995). The role of formality and informality in the enactment of bureaucratic versus organic organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 831–872. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9512280023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, J. (2009). The power of the inside activist: understanding policy change by empowering the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). Planning Theory & Practice, 10(2), 167–187. doi:10.1080/14649350902884425
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, J., & Hysing, E. (2012). Theorizing inside activism: understanding policymaking and policy change from below. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 257–273. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.677123
   Google Scholar
• + 6, P., Leat, D., Seltzer, K. & Stoker, G. (2002). Towards Holistic Governance, The New reform Agenda. London, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (1998). Managing Horizontal Government: The Politics of Co-Ordination. Public Administration, 76(2), 295–311. doi:10.1111/padm.1998.76.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petridou, E., & Olausson, P. M. (2017). Policy Entrepreneurship and Policy Transfer: Flood Risk Governance in Northern Sweden. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 11(1), 1802–4866. doi:10.1515/cejpp-2016-0028
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M. A., & Hafner-Burton, E. (2000). Mainstreaming gender in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(3), 432–456. doi:10.1080/13501760050086116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulsen, B. (2009). Competing Traditions of Governance and Dilemmas of Administrative Accountability: The Case of Denmark. Public Administration, 87(1), 117–131. doi:10.1111/padm.2009.87.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. (2004). Democratic governance and the role of public administrators. In P. Bogason, S. Kensen, & H. T. Miller (Eds.), Tampering with Tradition (pp. 107–131). Lanham, MD: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Squires, J. (2005). Is mainstreaming transformative? Theorizing mainstreaming in the context of diversity and deliberation. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 12(3), 366–388. doi:10.1093/sp/jxi020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2008). Institutional aspects of integrating transport, environment and health policies. Transport Policy, 15, 139–148. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2006). Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36, 41–57. doi:10.1177/0275074005282583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, M. (2013). Logics of Legitimacy. Three Traditions of Public Administration Praxis. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, P. (2017). Cross-Sector Bureaucrats: Dedicated Bureaucrats in Local Government Administration. School of Public Administration. Gothenburg. Dissertation: University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, P., & Larsson, S., (forthc.2019). Kunskapsstyrning i besöksnäringen. Regionala samordnares perspektiv på kunskap i destinationsutveckling. Centre for Municipality Studies
   Google Scholar
• Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2017). Policy integration: Mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies, 38(6), 553–570. doi:10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hulst, M., & Yanow, D. (2016). From Policy Frames to “Framing”: Theorizing a More Dynamic, Political Approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(1), 92–112. doi:10.1177/0275074014533142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meerkerk, I., & Edelenbos, J. (2015). The effects of boundary spanners on trust and performance of urban governance networks: Findings from survey research on urban development projects in the Netherlands. Policy Sciences, 47(1), 3–24. doi:10.1007/s11077-013-9181-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. (2012). Collaboration in Public Policy and Practice: Perspectives on Boundary Spanners. Bristol, UK: Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. (2013). We are all boundary spanners now? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1), 17–32. doi:10.1108/09513551311293417
   Google Scholar