Do Citizens Trust the Civil Service Differently? Comparing the Determinants of Confidence in Political-Administrative Institutions

References

• Ariely, G. (2013). Public administration and citizen satisfaction with democracy: Cross national evidence. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79, 747–766.doi:10.1177/0020852313501432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blind, P. K. (2007). Building trust in government in the twenty-first century: Review of literature and emerging issues. 7th Global Forum on Reinventing Government. Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms, A. (2002). Compliance and community penalities. In A. Bottoms, L. Gelsthorpe, & S. Rex (Eds.), Community penalities. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G., van de Walle, S., & Kampen, J. K. (2005). Potential for comparative public opinion research in public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71, 229–240. doi:10.1177/0020852305053882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G., & van de Walle, S. 2001. Government performance and trust in government. Paper presented at the Annual EGPA meeting, Finland
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G. (2001). Pride and performance in public service: Some patterns of analysis". International Review of Administrative Sciences, 67(1), 15–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnevale, D. G., & Wechsler, B. (1992). Trust in the public sector: Individual and organizational determinants. Administration & Society, 23, 471–494. doi:10.1177/009539979202300404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catterberg, G., & Moreno, A. (2016). The individual bases of political trust: Trends in new and established democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(1), 31–48. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh081
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. 2003. ‘Trust in government – the significance of attitudes towards democracy, the public sector and public sector reforms’. Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2005). Trust in government: The relative importance of service satisfaction, political factors and demography. Public Performance and Management Review, 28, 487–511.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., & Hood, C. (1994). From old public administration to new public management. Public Money & Management, 14(3), 9–16. doi:10.1080/09540969409387823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, S., Gauld, R., & Herbison, P. (2009). The participation divide? Political participation, trust, and E-government in Australia and New Zealand. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63, 333–350. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2009.00643.x
   Google Scholar
• Goodsell, C. T. (2006). A new vision for public administration. Public Administration Review, 66, 623–635. doi:10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H. (2011). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). Essex, Uk: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hough, M., Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Myhill, A., & Quinton, P. (2010). Procedural justice, trust, and institutional legitimacy. Policing, 4(3), 203–210. doi:10.1093/police/paq027
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P., & Tyler, T. (2012). Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1051–1071. doi:10.1093/bjc/azs032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keele, L. (2007). Social capital and the dynamics of trust in government. American Journal of Political Science, 51(2), 241–254. doi:10.1111/ajps.2007.51.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2005). The role of trust in the modern administrative state: An integrative model. Administration & Society, 37, 611–635. doi:10.1177/0095399705278596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krane, D. (2007). Democracy, public administration and public policy. In R. Box (Ed.), Democracy and public administration (pp. 21–39). New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, W. D., & Sabatier, P. A. (2005). To trust an adversary: Integrating rational and psychological models of collaborative policymaking. American Political Science Review, 99, 491–503. doi:10.1017/S000305540505183X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. New York, NY: John Willey.
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe, J. (2004). Part of the solution or cogs in the system? The origins and consequences of trust in public administration. Public Integrity, 6, 93–113.
   Google Scholar
• Matthai, J. M. 1989. ‘Employee perception of trust, satisfaction and as predictors turnover intentions in a mental health setting’. Dissertation Abstracts International 51 (02).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A., & Listhaug, O. (1990). Political parties and confidence in government: A comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 20, 357–386. doi:10.1017/S0007123400005883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. H. (1974). Political issues and trust in government: 1964-1970. American Political Science Review, 68, 951–972. doi:10.2307/1959140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, K., & Norris, P. (2000). Confidence in Public Institutions: Faith, Culture, or Performance? In S. J. Pharr & R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral democracies? (pp. 52–73). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nyhan, R. C. (2000). Changing the paradigm: Trust and its role in public sector organizations. The American Review of Public Administration, 30, 87–109. doi:10.1177/02750740022064560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G. (1996). Public opinion toward civil service. In H. A. G. Bekke & J. L. Perry (Eds.), Civil service systems in comparative perspective. Bloomington, London: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shingler, J., Van Loon, M. E., Alter, T. R., & Bridger, J. C. (2008). The importance of subjective data for public agency performance evaluation. Public Administration Review, 68(6), 1101–1111. doi:10.1111/puar.2008.68.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37(3), 513–548. doi:10.1111/1540-5893.3703002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. (2011). Why people cooperate. The role of social motivations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.
   Google Scholar
• van de Walle, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2003). Public service performance and trust in government: The problem of causality. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(8–9), 891–913. doi:10.1081/PAD-120019352
   Google Scholar
• van de Walle, S., van Roosbroek, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2008). Trust in the public sector: Is there evidence for a long term decline? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74, 47–64. doi:10.1177/0020852307085733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ryzin, G. (2007). Pieces of a puzzle: Linking government performance, citizen satisfaction, and trust. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(4), 521–535. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576300403
   Google Scholar
• Vigoda-Gadot, E., Shoham, A., & Vashdi, D. R. (2010). Bridging bureaucracy and democracy in Europe: A comparative study of perceived managerial excellence, satisfaction with public services, and trust in governance. European Union Politics, 11, 289–308. doi:10.1177/1465116510363657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Holzer, M. (2006). Performance-trust link: Implications for performance measurement. Public Administration Review, 66, 114–126. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00560.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar