Italian Utilities and Public Control: Evidence of Merger Effects

References

• Abatecola, G., & Poggesi, S. (2010). Corporate governance and performance: Evidence from the Italian listed local public utilities (2000-2008). International Journal of Public Administration, 33(11), 534–540. doi:10.1080/01900692.2010.506085
   Google Scholar
• Aklamanu, A., Degbey, W. Y., & Tarba, S. Y. (2016). The role of HRM and social capital configuration for knowledge sharing in post-M&A integration: A framework for future empirical investigation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(22), 2790–2822. doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1075575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anessi Pessina, E., & Steccolini, I. (2007). Effects of budgetary and accruals accounting coexistence: Evidence from the Italian local governments. Financial Accountability & Management, 23(2), 113–131. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2007.00422.x
   Google Scholar
• Angwin, D. N., Mellahi, K., Gomes, E., & Peter, E. (2016). How communication approaches impact mergers and acquisitions outcomes. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(20), 2370–2397. doi:10.1080/09585192.2014.985330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arena, M., & Klarskov Jeppesen, K. (2016). Practice variation in public sector internal auditing: An institutional analysis. European Accounting Review, 25(2), 319–345. doi:10.1080/09638180.2015.1018917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argento, D., Grossi, G., Tagesson, T., & Collin, S.-O. (2010). The “externalization” of local public service delivery: Experience in Italy and Sweden. International Journal of Public Policy, 5(1), 41–56. doi:10.1504/IJPP.2010.029780
   Google Scholar
• Arnaboldi, M., Lapsey, I., & Dal Molin, M. (2016). Modernizing public services: Subtle interplays of politics and management. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 12(4), 547–567. doi:10.1108/JAOC-07-2014-0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asquer, A. (2011). Liberalization and regulatory reform of network industries: A comparative analysis of Italian public utilities. Utilities Policy, 19(3), 172–184. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2011.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachiller, P., & Grossi, G. (2012). Great expectations but poor results: Financial and social performance of the Toscana Energia merger. Public Money and Management, 32(1), 69–74. doi:10.1080/09540962.2012.643067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbera, C., Guarini, E., & Steccolini, I. (2016). Italian municipalities and the fiscal crisis: Four strategies for muddling through. Financial Accountability & Management, 32(3), 335–361. doi:10.1111/faam.12088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastida, F., & Benito, B. (2007). Central government budget practices and transparency: An international comparison. Public Administration, 85(3), 667–716. doi:10.1111/padm.2007.85.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, F., & Matzler, K. (2014). Antecedents of M&A success: The role of strategic complementarity, cultural fit, and degree and speed of integration. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2), 269–291. doi:10.1002/smj.2091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellò, B., & Spano, A. (2015). Governing the purple zone: How politicians influence public managers. European Management Journal, 33(5), 354–365. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2015.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benston, G. J. (2008). The shortcomings of fair-value accounting described in SFAS 157. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(2), 101–114. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2008.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggio, M. (2013). Municipal capitalism: From state to mixed ownership in local public service provision (Munich Personal RePEc Archive, MPRA Paper No. 46245). Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/46245, 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Bognetti, G., & Robotti, L. (2003). The reforms of local public utilities in Italy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 74(1), 117–137. doi:10.1111/1467-8292.00218
   Google Scholar
• Bognetti, G., & Robotti, L. (2007). The provision of local public services through mixed enterprises: The Italian case. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 78(3), 415–437. doi:10.1111/apce.2007.78.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Bolivar, M. P. R., & Galera, A. N. (2007). Could fair value accounting be useful, under NPM models, for users of financial information? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(3), 473–502. doi:10.1177/0020852307081153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolivar, M. P. R., & Galera, A. N. (2012). The role of fair value accounting in promoting government accountability. Abacus, 48(3), 348–386. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6281.2011.00352.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortolotti, B., & Faccio, M. (2009). Government control of privatized firms. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 2907–2939. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brueller, N. N., Carmeli, A., & Markman, G. D. (2018). Linking merger and acquisition stragies to postmerger integration: A configurational perspective of human resource management. Journal of Management, 44(5), 1793–1818. doi:10.1177/0149206315626270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno, C. (2012). Vertical and horizontal integration, unbundling and quality of service in public utilities. A literature review. Impresa Progetto - Electronic Journal of Management, 9(1), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bugeja, M., & Loyeung, A. (2015). What drives the allocation of the purchase price to goodwill? Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 11(3), 245–261. doi:10.1016/j.jcae.2015.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Cafferata, R. (2010). The enduring presence of groups and public enterprises in the Italian economy. Journal of Management and Governance, 14(3), 199–220. doi:10.1007/s10997-010-9147-0
   Google Scholar
• Caker, M., & Nyland, K. (2017). Inter-organizational cooperation challenging hierarchical accountability: The dominated actors in a municipal joint venture. Financial Accountability & Management, 33(1), 102–120. doi:10.1111/faam.12115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrò, A., & Torchia, M. (2011). Conflicts of interest and governance mechanisms in Italian local public utilities. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(7), 447–460. doi:10.1080/01900692.2011.576215
   Google Scholar
• Calabrò, A., Torchia, M., & Ranalli, F. (2013). Ownership and control in local public utilities: The Italian case. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(4), 835–862. doi:10.1007/s10997-011-9206-1
   Google Scholar
• Campa, J. M., & Hernando, I. (2004). Shareholder value creation in European M&As. European Financial Management, 10(1), 47–81. doi:10.1111/j.1468-036X.2004.00240.x
   Google Scholar
• Capano, G. (2003). Administrative traditions and policy change: When policy paradigms matter. The case of Italian administrative reform during the 1990s. Public Administration, 81(4), 781–801. doi:10.1111/padm.2003.81.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepiku, D., Mussari, R., & Giordano, F. (2016). Local governments managing austerity: Approaches, determinants and impact. Public Administration, 94(1), 223–243. doi:10.1111/padm.2016.94.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citroni, G., Lippi, A., & Profeti, S. (2013). Remapping the state: Inter-Municipal cooperation through corporatisation and public-private governance structures. Local Government Studies, 39(2), 208–234. doi:10.1080/03003930.2012.707615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clatworthy, M. A., Mellett, H. J., & Peel, M. J. (2000). Corporate governance under “new public management”: An exemplification. Corporate Governance, 8(2), 166–176. doi:10.1111/corg.2000.8.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin, S.-O. Y., Tagesson, T., Andersson, A., Cato, J., & Hansson, K. (2009). Explaining the choice of accounting standards in municipal corporations: Positive accounting theory and institutional theory as competitive or concurrent theories. Critical Perspective on Accounting, 20(2), 141–174. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2008.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, L., & Sherer, M. (2001). Analysis of changes in external accountability and Accounting in provatized industries: A case study of British gas. Public Administration, 79(3), 511–532. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, R. M., & Wojdak, J. F. (1969). Income manipulation and the purchase-pooling choice. Journal of Accounting Research, 7(2), 188–195. doi:10.2307/2489964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantino, F. (2011). Public property in Italy. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(1–2), 84–88. doi:10.1080/01900692.2011.536085
   Google Scholar
• Da Cruz, N. F., & Marques, R. C. (2012). Mixed companies and local governance: No man can serve two masters. Public Administration, 90(3), 737–758. doi:10.1111/padm.2012.90.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Pillo, F., Capece, G., Cricelli, L., & Levialdi, N. (2012). Business diversification strategies in the Italian energy markets. International Journal of Social. Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 6(11), 2814–2820.
   Google Scholar
• DiGeorgio, R. (2003). Making mergers and acquisitions work: What we know and don’t know – part II. Journal of Change Management, 3(3), 259–274. doi:10.1080/714042539
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, S., & Meijer, A. (2016). Transparency and public value – analyzing the transparency practices and value creation of public utilities. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(12), 940–951. doi:10.1080/01900692.2015.1064133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, K. M. (1990). An empirical analysis of management’s choice of accounting treatment for business combinations. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 9(2), 111–133. doi:10.1016/0278-4254(90)90014-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Financial Reporting Advisory Group and Organismo Italiano di Contabilità. (2011). Accounting for Business Combinations Under Common control (Discussion Paper). Retrieved from http://www.efrag.org.
   Google Scholar
• Fattore, G., Dubois, H. F. W., & Lapenta, A. (2012). Measuring new public management and governance in political debate. Public Administration Review, 72(2), 218–227. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02497.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, M. P., Santos, J. C., Riberio de Almeida, M. I., & Reis, N. R. (2014). Mergers & acquisitions research: A bibliometric study of top strategy and international business journals, 1980–2010. Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2550–2558. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1990). EITF issue no. 90-5 – exchange of ownership interests between entities under common control. Norwalk, CT: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2007). SFAS 141 – business combinations (revised). Norwalk, CT: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Y., Carmeli, A., Tishler, A., & Shimizu, K. (2016). Untangling micro-behavioral sources of failure in mergers and acquisitions: A theoretical integration and extension. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(20), 2339–2369. doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1042003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galera, A. N., & Bolivar, M. P. R. (2007). The contribution of international accounting standards to implement NPM in developing and developed countries. Public Administration and Development, 27(5), 413–425. doi:10.1002/pad.470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galera, A. N., & Bolivar, M. P. R. (2011). Modernizing governments in transitional and emerging economies through financial reporting based on international standards. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(3), 609–640. doi:10.1177/0020852311407365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galpin, T. J., & Herndon, M. (2014). The complete guide to mergers & acquisitions: Process tools and templates for merger integration at every level. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Canal, E., & Guillen, M. F. (2008). Risk and the strategy of foreign location choice in regulated industries. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1097–1115. doi:10.1002/smj.692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardini, S., & Grossi, G. (2014). Voluntary adoption of the consolidated financial statement and fair value accounting by Italian local governments. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 26(2), 313–344. doi:10.1108/JPBAFM-26-02-2014-B004
   Google Scholar
• Gilardoni, A., & Carta, M. (2009). European utility market. M&A deals and emerging strategies in the power sector. Management Delle Utilities, 7(2), 27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Gilardoni, A., Carta, M., & Arcudi, C. (2012). Post integration winning moves toward a high performance utility model. Management Delle Utilities, 10(1), 42–44.
   Google Scholar
• Gilardoni, A., Cesari, L., Arcudi., C., Balestra, C., Carta, M., Ceccaroni, F., & Werthschulte, S. (2011). The leading European utilities. Winning governance and operating models. Management Delle Utilities, 9(1), 60–83.
   Google Scholar
• Gilardoni, A., Marangoni, A., & Fontana, S. (2006, February 20- 24). Alliances and mergers in the Italian utilities industry: Empirical evidence and main trends. Paper presented at the Fourteenth International Working Seminar on Production Economics, Innsbruck.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1–3), 3–73. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., & Mussari, R. (2008). Effects of outsourcing on performance measurement and reporting: The experience of Italian local governments. Public Budgeting & Finance, 28(1), 22–38. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5850.2008.00895.x
   Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., & Reichard, C. (2008). Municipal corporatization in Germany and Italy. Public Management Review, 10(5), 597–617. doi:10.1080/14719030802264275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., & Steccolini, I. (2014). Accounting for public governance. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 11(2), 86–91. doi:10.1108/QRAM-04-2014-0031
   Google Scholar
• Gualmini, E. (2008). Restructuring weberian bureaucracy: Comparing managerial reforms in Europe and the United States. Public Administration, 86(1), 75–94. doi:10.1111/padm.2008.86.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrini, A., & Romano, G. (2013). The process of tariff setting in an unstable legal framework: An Italian case study. Utilities Policy, 24(1), 78–85. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2012.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Haleblian, J., Devers, C. E., McNamara, G., Carpenter, M. A., & Davison, R. B. (2009). Taking stock of what we know about mergers and acquisitions: A Review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 35(3), 469–502. doi:10.1177/0149206308330554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. doi:10.1111/padm.1991.69.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1995). The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variation on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 93–109. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, A. S. (2009). Designing research for publication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2002). Basis for conclusions on exposure draft ED 3 business combinations. London, UK: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2008). IFRS 3 – business combinations (revised). London, UK: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2011). IFRS 11 – joint arrangement. London, UK: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S. (2010). New public management for the “classical continental European administration”: Modernization at the local level in Germany, France and Italy. Public Administration, 88(4), 1116–1130. doi:10.1111/padm.2010.88.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, R., & Finkelstein, S. (1999). Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization. Organization Science, 10(1), 1–26. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liguori, M., & Steccolini, I. (2014). Accounting, innovation and public-sector change. Translating reform into change? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(4–5), 319–323. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2013.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, B., & Stevens, J. (2004). Match your merger integration strategy and leadership style to your merger type. Strategy & Leadership, 32(4), 10–16. doi:10.1108/10878570410547652
   Google Scholar
• Marks, M. L., & Mirvis, P. H. (2000). Creating an effective transition structure to manage mergers, acquisitions and alliances. Organizational Dynamics, 28(3), 35–47. doi:10.1016/S0090-2616(00)88448-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. L., & Mirvis, P. H. (2011). Merge ahead: A research agenda in increase merger and acquisition success. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(2), 161–168. doi:10.1007/s10869-011-9219-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. D., Rich, J. S., & Wilks, T. J. (2006). Auditing fair value measurements: A synthesis of relevant research. Accounting Horizons, 20(3), 287–303. doi:10.2308/acch.2006.20.3.287
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Jerez, F. A. (2008). Governance and merger accounting: evidence from stock price reactions to purchase versus pooling. European Accounting Review, 17(1), 5–35. doi:10.1080/09638180701706013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheson, A., & Kwon, H. S. (2003). Public sector modernisation: A new agenda. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 3(1), 7–24. doi:10.1787/budget-v3-art2-en
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, M. (2011). Practical M&A execution and integration. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mele, V. (2010). Innovation policy in Italy (1993-2002): Understanding the invention and persistence of a public management reform. Governance: an International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 23(2), 251–276. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1468-0491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mele, V., & Ongaro, E. (2014). Public sector reforms in a context of political instability: Italy 1992-2007. International Public Management Journal, 17(1), 111–142. doi:10.1080/10967494.2013.849168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menozzi, A. (2009). Board of directors in the Italian public utilities. Milan, Italy: Giuffrè Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Monteduro, F. (2014). Public-private versus public ownership and economic performance: Evidence from Italian local utilities. Journal of Management and Governance, 18(1), 29–49. doi:10.1007/s10997-012-9235-4
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, R. (1994). Accounting for business combinations in the global economy: Purchase, pooling, or ___? Journal of Accounting Education, 12(1), 81–87. doi:10.1016/0748-5751(94)90021-3
   Google Scholar
• Moschieri, C., & Campa, J. M. (2014). New trends in mergers and acquisitions: Idiosyncrasies of the European market. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1478–1485. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussari, R., & Ruggiero, P. (2017). Merging for capacity and a capacity for merging: Politicians, citizens, and discourses in public administrations. Financial Accountability & Management, 33(1), 27–47. doi:10.1111/faam.12102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan, K., & Dunne, K. M. (1991). The purchase-pooling choice: Some explanatory variables. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10(4), 309–323. doi:10.1016/0278-4254(91)90004-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nor-Aziah, A. K., & Scapens, R. W. (2007). Corporatisation and accounting change. The role of accounting and accountants in a Malaysian public utility. Management Accounting Research, 18(2), 209–247. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2007.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Onesti, T., Romano, M., & Taliento, M. (2015). Business combinations under common control. Concerns, criticism, strides. Financial Reporting, 7(1), 107–126.
   Google Scholar
• Ongaro, E. (2006). The dynamics of devolution processes in legalistic countries: Organizational change in the Italian public sector. Public Administration, 84(3), 737–770. doi:10.1111/padm.2006.84.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ongaro, E. (2008). Introduction: The reform of public management in France, Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 101–117. doi:10.1108/09513550810855618
   Google Scholar
• Ongaro, E. (2011). The role of politics and institutions in the Italian administrative reform trajectory. Public Administration, 89(3), 738–755. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01885.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ongaro, E., & Valotti, G. (2008). Public management reform in Italy: Explaining the implementation gap. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 174–204. doi:10.1108/09513550810855654
   Google Scholar
• Orelli, R. L., Padovani, E., & Katsikas, E. (2016). NPM reforms in napoleonic countries: A comparative study of management accounting innovations in Greek and Italian municipalities. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(10), 778–789. doi:10.1080/01900692.2015.1034324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quagli, A., & Avallone, F. (2010). Fair value or cost model? Drivers of choice for IAS 40 in the real estate industry. European Accounting Review, 19(3), 461–493. doi:10.1080/09638180.2010.496547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, D. J., & Thompson, H. E. (1990). “Fifty in five”: The prospects for merger in the electric utility industry. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2(2), 111–128. doi:10.1007/BF00165929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reginato, E., Fadda, I., & Paglietti, P. (2016). The influence of resistance to change on public-sector reform implementation; The case of Italian municipalities’ internal control system. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(12), 989–999. doi:10.1080/01900692.2015.1068325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reginato, E., Landis, C., Fadda, I., & Pavan, A. (2014). German and Italian municipalities’ internal control system: Convergence to a neo-weberian reform pattern? International Journal of Public Administration, 37(10), 601–610. doi:10.1080/01900692.2014.880852
   Google Scholar
• Romano, G., & Guerrini, A. (2014). The effect of ownership, board size and board composition on the performance of Italian water utilities. Utilities Policy, 31(4), 18–28. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2014.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C. (2014). The diffusion of privatization in Europe: Political affinity or economic competition? Public Administration, 92(3), 615–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testarmata, S. 2009. The strategies of local utilities after the liberalization of the European energy sector: Which is the emerging business model? The case study of Italy (DSI Essays Series – University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’ No. 4). Milan, Italy: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Turrini, A., & Montanelli, R. (2008). evaluating the reform of social services in Italy: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(10–11), 1259–1274. doi:10.1080/01900690801973386
   Google Scholar
• Turrini, A., & Valotti, G. (2016). Public management reforms in Italy: A renaissance revival?. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 393. doi:10.1111/puar.12560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, J. R. (1999). Pooling or purchase: A merger mistery. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, 85(1), 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1978). Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 53(1), 112–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive accounting theory. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice/Hall International.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, T., & Clegg, J. (2017). Exploring sources of value destruction in international acquisitions: A synthesized theoretical lens. International Business Review, 26(5), 927–941. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker, S. C. (2012). Mergers & acquisitions integration handbook. New Jersey, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, E., Redd, K. S., & Liang, J. (2017). Country-specific determinants of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A comprehensive review and future research directions. Journal of World Business, 52(2), 127–183. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2016.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar