Unpacking Nordic Administrative Reforms: Agile and Adaptive Governments

References

• Alford, J., & Hughes, O. (2008). Public value pragmatism as the next phase of public management. The American Review of Public Administration, 38(2), 130–148. doi:10.1177/0275074008314203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., Trondal, J., & Øgård, M. (Eds.). (2017). Governance in turbulent times. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bertelsmann Stiftung. (2016). Sustainable governance indicators. Governance capacity. Retrieved from http://www.sgi-network.org/2015/Governance/Executive_Capacity
   Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J., Christensen, P. M., Fimreite, A. L., & Selle, P. (2012). Reform strategies matter: Explaining the perplexing results of regional government reforms in Norway and Denmark. Local Government Studies, 38(1), 71–90. doi:10.1080/03003930.2011.629195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner, R. D. (2010). Adaptive governance as a reform strategy. Policy Science, 43(4), 301–341. doi:10.1007/s11077-010-9117-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N., & Olsen, J. P. (1993). The reforming organization. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Bjurstrøm, C. (2017). Government institutions and state reforms. In O. Knuten (Ed.), The Nordic models in political science(pp. 149–170). Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (eds). (2007a). Transcending new public management. The transformation of public sector reforms. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007b). The whole-of-governance approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00797.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2009). Complexity and hybrid public organizations. Theoretical and empirical challenges. Public Organization Review, 11(4), 407–423. doi:10.1007/s11115-010-0141-4
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2018). An organizational approach to public administration. In E. Ongaro & S. Van Thiel (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of public administration and public management in Europe (Vol. 2, Chap. 55, pp. 1087–1104). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A., & Lindblom, C. E. (1953). Politics, economics, and welfare. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., Gornitzka, Å., & Trondal, J. (2016). Organization theory. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook of theories of governance(pp. 32–45). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2018). An organizational approach to public governnce. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ejersbo, N., & Greve, C. (2016). Relevance of management instruments. In C. Greve, P. Lægreid, & L. H. Rykkja (Eds.), Nordic administrative reforms. Lessons for public management(pp. 129–144). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Farjoun, M., Ansell, C., & Boin, A. (2015). Pragmatism in organizational stodies. Meeting the challenges of a dynamic and complex world. Organizational Science, 26(6), 1887–1904. doi:10.1287/orsc.2015.1016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political order and political decay. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Greve, C., & Ejersbo, N. (2016). Reform context and status. In C. Greve, P. Lægreid, & L. H. Rykkja (Eds.), Nordic administrative reforms. Lessons for public management(pp. 37–56). London, UK: PalgraveMacmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Greve, C., Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2016). The Nordic model revisited: Active reformers and high performing public administration. In C. Greve, P. Lægreid, & L. H. Rykkja (Eds.), Nordic administrative reforms. Lessons for public management(pp. 189–212). London, UK: PalgraveMacmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (2015). The Swedish administrative model. In J. Pierre (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Swedish politics(pp. 299–314). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammerschmid, G., Van de Walle, S., Andrew, R., & Bezes, P. (Eds.). (2016). Public administration reforms in Europe: The view from the top. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, Y., Moynihan, D. P.,  & Ingraham, P. W. (2003). Capacity, management, and performance: Exploring links. The American Review of Public Administration, 33, 295–313.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, K. (2019). Understanding complexity of administrative reform. International Journal of Organizational Analyses. Online First. doi:10.1108/IJOA-02-2018-1356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, B., Pierre, J., & Sundstrøm, G. (2015). Governing the embedded state. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., & van der Voort, H. (2016). Adaptive governance: Towards a stable, accountable and responsive government. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The politics of attention: How government prioritize problems. Chicago, IL: Chicago Unviersity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (2000). The global public management revolution. Washington, DC: The Brooking Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (2004). System under Stress. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. J. M., & Van der Meer, F.-B. (2011). Small, slow, and gradual reform: What can historical institutionalism tell us? International Journal of Public Sector Administration, 34(8), 475–485. doi:10.1080/01900692.2011.583768
   Google Scholar
• Knutsen, O. (Ed.). (2017). The Nordic models in political science. Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. (1988). Sovereignity. An institutional perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 21, 66–94. doi:10.1177/0010414088021001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P. (2017). Nordic administrative traditions. In P. Nedergaard & A. Wivel (Eds.), The Routledge handbook on Scandinavian politics. Chapter 7 (pp. 80–91). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2016). Administrative reform – processes, trends, and content. In C. Greve, P. Lægreid, & L. H. Rykkja (Eds.), Nordic administrative reforms. Lessons for public management(pp. 105–128). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P., Sarapuu, K., Rykkja, L. H., & Randma-Liiv, T. (2015). New coordination challenges in the welfare state. Public Management Review, 17(7), 927–939. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1029344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. M., & Thelen, K. (2010). Explaining institutional change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. P. (1988). Administrative reforms and theories of organizations. In C. Campbell & B. G. Peters (Eds.), Organizing governance & governing organizations(pp. 233–254). Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. P. (1996). Norway: Slow learner or another triumph of the tortoise? In J. P. Olsen & B. G. Peters (Eds.), Lessons from experience. Experimental reforms in eight democracies (pp. 180–213). Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. P. (1997). Institutional design in democratic context. Journal of Political Philosophy, 5(3), 203–229. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00032
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. P. (2009). Change and continuity. An institutional approach to institutions of democratic governance. European Political Science Review, 1(1), 3–32. doi:10.1017/S1755773909000022
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. P. (2010). Governing through institution building. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, M. (2011). Managerialism and models of management. In T. Christensen & P. Lægreid (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to the new public management(pp. 237–250). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, M., & Peters, B. G. (2010). Traditions and public administration. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Røvik, K. A. (1996). Deinstitutionalization and the logic of fashion. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevon (Eds.), Translating organizational change(pp. 139–171). New York, NY: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Røvik, K. A. (2011). From Fashion to Virus. An alternative theory of organizations handling of management ideas. Organizational Studies, 32(5), 631–653. doi:10.1177/0170840611405426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, H. (2006). Explaining Australian economic success: Good policy or good luck? Governance, 19(2), 173–205. doi:10.1111/gove.2006.19.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Beyond continuity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wedlin, L., & Sahlin, K. (2017). Imitation and translation of management ideas. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE handbook on organizational institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 102–127). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wegrich, K., & Stimac, V. (2014). Coordination capacity. In M. Lodge & K. Wegrich (Eds.), The problem-solving capacity of the modern state(pp. 41–62). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wivel, A., & Nedregaard, P. (2018). Introduction. Scandinavian politics between myths and reality. In P. Nedregaard & A. Wivel (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Scandinavian politics(pp. 1–10). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2016). Worldwide governance indicators. Methodology and analytical issues. Retreived from http:///info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi
   Google Scholar