Regulating Collaboration: The Legal Framework of Collaborative Governance in Ten European Countries

References

• Ackerman, J. M., & Sandoval-Ballesteros, I. E. (2006). The global explosion of freedom of information laws. Administrative Law Review, 58(1), 85–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington D.C: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht, J. (2016). Legal framework and criteria for effectively coordinating public participation under the floods directive and water framework directive: European requirements and German transposition. Environmental Science & Policy, 55(Part 2), 368–375. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amsler, L. B., formerly Bingham. (2016). Collaborative governance: Integrating management, politics, and law. Public Administration Review, 76(5), 700–711. doi:10.1111/puar.12605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aschhoff, N. (2018). Citizens differ from organizations: Modeling a specific citizen-centered collaborative capacity. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(4), 284–296. doi:10.1080/01900692.2016.1263657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Author1 and Author2.
   Google Scholar
• Batory, A., & Svensson, S. 2017. Literature and Report Review. Available at http://tropico-project.eu/work-packages/work-package-2/
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, L. B., Nabatchi, T., & O’Leary, R. (2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 547–558. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00482.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, L. B., & O’Leary, R. (2015). Big ideas in collaborative public management. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2008). NPM and beyond— leadership, demography and culture. International Journal of Administrative Sciences, 74(1), 5–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2015). The challenges of coordination in National Security Management – the case of the terrorist attack in Norway. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(2), 352–372. doi:10.1177/0020852314564307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. (1997). Collaborative governance in the administrative state. UCLA Law Review, 45(1), 1–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, T. (2010). ‘Written constitutions and the administrative state. On the constitutional character of administrative law.’. In S. Rose-Ackermann & T. Ginsburg (Eds.), Comparative administrative law (pp. 117–127). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N. (2009). Environment law, regulation and governance: Shifting architectures. Journal of Environmental Law, 21(2), 179–212. doi:10.1093/jel/eqp011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerschmid, G., Van de Walle, S., Andrews, R., & Bezes, P. (2016). Public administration reforms in Europe: The view from the top. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Jamil, I., Askvik, S., & Hossain, F. (2013). Understanding administrative culture: Some theoretical and methodological remarks. International Journal of Public Administration, 36(13), 900–909. doi:10.1080/01900692.2013.837728
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2014). Introduction to comparative public administration: Administrative systems and reform in Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez-De Silanes, F., & Schleifer, A. (2008). The economic consequences of legal origins. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(2), 285–332. doi:10.1257/jel.46.2.285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P., Randma-Liiv, T., Rykkja, L. H., & Sarapuu, K. (Eds..). (2014). Organizing for coordination in the public sector. In Practices and lessons from 12 European Countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2015). Organizing for ‘Wicked problems’ – analyzing coordination arrangements in two policy areas: Internal security and the welfare administration. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(6), 475–493. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-01-2015-0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2016). Collaborative governance in health and technology policy: The use and effects of procedural policy instruments. Administration & Society, 51(2), 272–298. doi:10.1177/0095399716664163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative politics and the comparative method. American Political Science Review, 65(3), 682–693. doi:10.2307/1955513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lips, A., Miriam, B., O’Neill, R., & Eppel, E. A. (2011). Cross-agency collaboration in New Zealand: An empirical study of information sharing practices, enablers and barriers in managing for shared social outcomes. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(4), 255–266. doi:10.1080/01900692.2010.533571
   Google Scholar
• Mancheva, I. (2018). Which factors spur forest owners’ collaboration over forest waters? Forest Policy and Economics, 91(June), 54–63. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, 66(December), 33–43. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00664.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-Sahling, J.-H., & Yesilkagit, K. (2011). Differential legacy effects: Three propositions on the impact of administrative traditions on public administration reform in Europe East and West. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(2), 311–322. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.544515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michener, G. (2011). FOI laws around the world. Journal of Democracy, 22(2), 145–159. doi:10.1353/jod.2011.0021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thijs, Nick, Gerhard Hammerschmid and Enora Palaric. 2018. A comparative overview of public administration characteristics and performance in EU28. European Commission, Directorate- General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., & Ansell, C. (2017). Strengthening political leadership and policy innovation through the expansion of collaborative forms of governance. Public Management Review, 19(1), 37–54. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1200662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trubek, D. M., & Trubek, L. G. (2007). New governance and legal regulation: Complementarity, rivalry, and transformation. Columbia Journal of European Law, 13(3), 539–564.
   Google Scholar
• van Twist, M., Kort, M., & van der Steen, M. (2015). Assessing and appraising the effects of policy for wicked issues: Including unforeseen achievements in the evaluation of the district policy for deprived areas in the Netherlands. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(8), 596–605. doi:10.1080/01900692.2014.952821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesilkagit, K. (2010). The Future of administrative tradition: Tradition as ideas and structure. In M. Painter & G. B. Peters (Eds.), Tradition and public administration. London: 145-157, Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar