435
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Taming the Beast: Managers’ Tactics to Change Frontline Workers’ Adversarial Interaction with Policy Targets

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Alford, J. (2016). Co-production, interdependence and publicness : Extending public service-dominant logic. Public Management Review, 18(5), 673–691. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1111659
  • Alford, J., & Speed, R. (2006). Client focus in regulatory agencies: Oxymoron or opportunity? Public Management Review, 8(2), 313–331. doi:10.1080/14719030600587703
  • Arellano, D., & Barreto, F. (2016). Gobierno conductual: nudges, cambio de comportamiento inconsciente y opacidad. Foro Internacional, 226(4), 1–5. doi:10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
  • Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169–217. doi:10.1086/259394
  • Becker, G. S., & Stigler, G. J. (1974). Law enforcement, malfeasance, and compensation of enforcers. The Journal of Legal Studies, 3(1), 1–18. doi:10.1086/467507
  • Braithwaite, J. (1985). To punish or persuade: Enforcement of coal mine safety. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Braithwaite, J. (2006). Responsive regulation and developing economies. World Development, 34(5), 884–898. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.04.021
  • Brodkin, E. Z. (2011). Policy work: Street-level organizations under new managerialism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(i), 253–277. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq093
  • Brodkin, E. Z. (2012). Reflections on street-level bureaucracy: Past, present, and future. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 940–949. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02657.x
  • Brunetto, Y., Farr-wharton, R., Shacklock, K., & Robson, F. (2012). Supervisor relationships, teamwork, role ambiguity and discretionary power : Nurses in Australia and the United Kingdom. International Journal of Public AdministrationJournal of Public Administration, 0692. doi:10.1080/01900692.2012.655471
  • Cialdini, R. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment social psychology crafting normative messages to protect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 105–109. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01242
  • Cooke, D. K., Brant, K. K., & Woods, J. M. (2018). The role of public service motivation in employee work engagement: A test of the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Public Administration, 1–11. doi:10.1080/01900692.2018.1517265
  • Dulleck, U., Fooken, J., Newton, C., Ristl, A., Schaffner, M., & Torgler, B. (2016). Tax compliance and psychic costs : Behavioral experimental evidence using a physiological marker ☆. Journal of Public Economics, 134, 9–18. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.12.007
  • Favero, N., Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (2016). Goals, trust, participation, and feedback: Linking internal management with performance outcomes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26, 327–343. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu044
  • Fernandez, S., & Rainey, H. G. (2006). Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 168–176.
  • Gassner, D., & Gofen, A. (2018). Street-level management: A clientele-agent perspective on implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 551–568. doi:10.1093/jopart/muy051
  • Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings: the intelligence of the unconscious. London, UK: Penguin Group.
  • Gofen, A. (2013). Mind the Gap: Dimensions and influence of street-level divergence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 473–493. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut037
  • Gofen, A., Blomqvist, P., Needham, C., Warren, K., & Winblad, U. (2018). Negotiated compliance at the street level: Personalizing immunization in England, Israel and Sweden. Public Administration Review, (May 2004), 1–15. doi:10.1111/padm.12557
  • Gofen, A., & Needham, C. (2015). Service personalization as a response to noncompliance with routine childhood vaccination. Governance: an International Journal of Policy and Administration, 28(3), 269–283. doi:10.1111/gove.12082
  • Green, A. S. & Green, D. P. (2012). Field experiments: Design, analysis and interpretation. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Hendren, K., Luo, Q. E., & Pandey, S. K. (2018, December). The state of mixed methods research in public administration and public policy. Public Administration Review, 78, 904–916. doi:10.1111/puar.12981
  • Howlett, M., & Muhkerjee, I. (2017). Design and non-design in policy formulation: Where knowledge meets power in the policy process. In Handbook of policy formulation. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Elgar Publishing.
  • Hupe, P., & Buffat, A. (2014). A public service gap : Capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street-level bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 16(4), 548–569. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.854401
  • INEGI. (2010). Censo de Población y Vivienda: Principales resultados (national population and home census: Main results). Retrieved August 2019 from https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/tmp/scitel/default?ev=7
  • Ingram, H., & Schneider, A. (1990). Improving implementation through framing smarter statutes. Journal of Public Policy, 10(01), 67. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00004682
  • John, P., Smith, G., & Stoker, G. (2009). Nudge nudge, think think: Two strategies for changing civic behaviour. Political Quarterly, 80(3), 361–370. doi:10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.02001.x
  • Jones, B. D. (2002). Bounded rationality and public policy: Herbert A. Simon and the decision foundation of collective choice. Policy Sciences, 35(3), 269–284. doi:10.1023/A:1021341309418
  • Jones, B. D. (2003). Bounded rationality and political science: Lessons from public administration and public policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4), 395–412. doi:10.1093/jpart/mug028
  • Jones, B. D. (2017). Behavioral rationality as a foundation for public policy studies. Cognitive Systems Research, 43, 63–75. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.01.003
  • Jones, M. D., Shanahan, E. A., & Mcbeth, M. K. (2014). The science of stories: Applications of the narrative policy framework in public policy analysis. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Jones, R., Pykett, J., & Whitehead, M. (2013). Changing behaviours: On the rise of the psychological state. Chelteham, UK and Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publisher.
  • Lavee, E., Cohen, N., & Nouman, H. (2018). Reinforcing public responsibility? Influences and practices in street-level bureaucrats’ engagement in policy design. Public Administration, 96(2013), 333–348. doi:10.1111/padm.12402
  • Lieberman, E. S. (2005). Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 435–452. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051762
  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2008). The logic of appropriateness. In R. E. Goodin, M. Moran, & M. Rein (Eds.), The oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 1–23). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548453.003.0034
  • Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 329–358. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024272
  • Murphy, Tyler, T. R.., & Curtis, A. (2009). Nurturing regulatory compliance: Is procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law?. Regulation and Governance, 3(1), 1–26.
  • Mutereko, S., Chitakunye, P., & Mutereko, S. (2015). Discretion and autonomy: Public administrators’ dilemmas in the implementation of national curriculum statements. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(2), 143–155. doi:10.1080/01900692.2014.934835
  • Nurunnabi, M. (2018). Tax evasion and the role of the state actor(s) in Bangladesh. International Journal of Public Administration, 1–17. doi:10.1080/01900692.2018.1520245
  • Oberfield, Z. W. (2010). Rule following and discretion at government’s frontlines: Continuity and change during organization socialization. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 735–755. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup025
  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. T. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 281–316.
  • Rose, D. D. (2011). National and local forces in state politics : The implications of multi-level policy analysis. Political Science, 67(4), 1162–1173.
  • Sale, J. E. M., & Brazil, K. (2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality & Quantity, 36, 43–53. doi:10.1023/A:1014301607592
  • Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1990). Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. The Journal of Politics, 52(2), 510–529. doi:10.2307/2131904
  • Scholz, J. T., & Lubel, M. (1998). Trust and taxpaying: Testing the heuristic approach to collective action. American Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 398–417. doi:10.2307/2991764
  • Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129–138. doi:10.1037/h0042769
  • Simon, H. A. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality. In C. MacGuire & R. Radner (Eds.), Decision and organization (pp. 161–176). North-Holland Publishing Company. Retrieved from http://innovbfa.viabloga.com/files/Herbert_Simon___theories_of_bounded_rationality___1972.pdf
  • Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making process in administrative organizations (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press: Simon & Schuster Inc.
  • Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2007). Introduction to econometrics (2nd ed., p. 796). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Sumadilaga, D. H., Soetjipto, B. W., Wahyuni, S., & Hari, S. (2017). The influences of perceived managerial discretion and risk-taking behavior on government organizational performance. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(13), 1075–1084. doi:10.1080/01900692.2016.1242613
  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New York, NY: Penguin Books LTD.
  • Tummers, L. L. G., Bekkers, V., Vink, E., & Musheno, M. (2015). Coping during public service delivery: A conceptualization and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1099–1126. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu056
  • Ulfsdotter Eriksson, Y., Larsson, B., & Adolfsson, P. (2019). Implementing and integrating policies on performance-based pay: Coordinating the “one-employer approach” in a Swedish municipality. International Journal of Public Administration, 1–12. doi:10.1080/01900692.2019.1570523
  • Weaver, K. R. (2014). Compliance regimes and barriers to behavioral change. Governance: an International Journal of Policy and Administration, 27(2), 243–265. doi:10.1111/gove.12032
  • Weaver, K. R. (2015). Getting people to behave: Research lessons for policy makers. Public Administration Review, 75(6), 806–816. doi:10.1111/puar.12412
  • Winter, S. C., & May, P. J. (2001). Motivation for compliance with environmental regulations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(4), 675–698. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6688

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.