Enhancing Urban Brownfield Regeneration to Pursue Sustainable Community Outcomes through Dynamic Performance Governance

References

• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bereciartua, P. (2014). Análisis multicriterio de la autopista ribereña de la ciudad de Buenos Aires. Research report 02/2014. Berecolabs.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C. (2010). Improving performance and fostering accountability in the public sector through system dynamics modelling: From an ‘external’ to an ‘internal’ perspective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27(4), 361–384. doi:10.1002/sres.1038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C. (2016). Dynamic performance management. System Dynamics for performance management (Vol. 1). Cham, Zurich: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31845-5
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C., Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2017). Applying a dynamic performance management framework to wicked issues: how coproduction helps to transform young people’s services in Surrey County Council, UK. International Journal of Public Administration. doi:10.1080/01900692.2017.1280822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C., & Rivenbark, W. C. (2014). Performance management in local government: The application of system dynamics to promote data use. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(13), 945–954. doi:10.1080/01900692.2014.944990
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C., & Tomaselli, S. (2015). A dynamic performance management approach to support local strategic planning. International Review of Public, 20(4), 370–385. doi:10.1080/12294659.2015.1088687
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C., & Williams, D. W. (2015). Applying system dynamics modeling to foster a cause-and-effect perspective in dealing with behavioral distortions associated with a city’s performance measurement programs. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(3), 395–425. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1006471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C., Winch, G., & Cosenz, F. (2017). Experimenting lean dynamic performance management systems design in SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67. doi:10.1108/IJPPM-10-2017-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C., & Winch, G. W. (2006). Unleashing growth potential in “stunted” SMEs: Insights from simulator experiments. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 3(1), 92–105. doi:10.1504/IJESB.2006.008664
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C., & Winch, G. W. (2009). Supporting value creation in SMEs through capacity building and innovation initiatives: The danger of provoking unsustainable rapid growth. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 1(2), 164–184. doi:10.1504/IJEV.2009.029102
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2007). Managing performance: International comparisons. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860. doi:10.1111/puar.2007.67.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole‐of‐government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066. doi:10.1111/puar.2007.67.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coda, V. (2010). Entrepreneurial values and strategic management: Essays in management theory. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from https://books.google.it/books?id=MwLCSAAACAAJ
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2010). Integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 211–230. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes: A performance matrix. Public Performance and Management Review. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1031016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garay, A., Wainer, L., Henderson, H., & Rotbart, D. (2013). Puerto Madero, Análisis de un proyecto. Land Policy, JULIO, 2013, 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaffarzadegan, N., Lyneis, J., & Richardson, G. P. (2011). How small system dynamics models can help the public policy process. System Dynamics Review, 27(1), 22–44. doi:10.1002/sdr.442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration and Society. doi:10.1177/0095399713481601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle, B. (2006). Global and local change on the Port-City Waterfront. Geographical Review. doi:10.2307/3250860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Informe de Estadística Criminal de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. 2019. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ministerio de Justicia y Seguridad.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H. (2008). Governance and governance networks in Europe. Public Management Review, 10(4), 505–525. doi:10.1080/14719030802263954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2000). Public management and policy networks. Public Management: an International Journal of Research and Theory. doi:10.1080/14719030000000007
   Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2014). Governance for complexity – How to organize for the handling of «wicked issues»? Policy & Politics conference, Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Morecroft, J. D. W. (1985). The feedback view of business policy and strategy. System Dynamics Review, 1(1), 4–19. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morecroft, J. D. W. (2015). Strategic modelling and business dynamics: A feedback systems approach. Cornwall, UK: Wiley. Retrieved from https://books.google.it/books?id=2xezCQAAQBAJ
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (2010). The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2015). Pursuing horizontal management. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1990). Policy networks: A British perspective. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(3), 293–317. doi:10.1177/0951692890002003003
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (2017). Network governance and the differentiated polity (Vol. 1). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198786108.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston, MA: Irwin/McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from https://books.google.it/books?id=CCKCQgAACAAJ
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., & Ansell, C. (2017). Strengthening political leadership and policy innovation through the expansion of collaborative forms of governance. Public Management Review. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1200662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignieri, V. (2018). Framing the Sources of image of a local area through outcome-based dynamic performance management. Public Organization Review, 19(2), 249–271. doi:10.1007/s11115-018-0402-1
   Google Scholar
• Warren, K. (2015). Strategy dynamics essentials. Princes Risborough, Buckinghamshire: Strategy Dynamics Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, G., & Joyce, P. (2006). Exploring the dynamics of building, and losing, consumer trust in B2C eBusiness. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management. doi:10.1108/09590550610673617
   Google Scholar
• Wolstenholme, E. (1999). Qualitative vs quantitative modelling: The evolving balance. Journal of the Operational Research Society. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar