Migration in Public Administration Research: A Systematic Review and Future Directions

References

• Aka, P. C., & Deason, L. M. (2011). Culturally and linguistically competent public services in an era of English-Only laws. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(5), 291–306. doi:10.1080/01900692.2010.533925
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., Boyne, G., O’Toole, L., Meier, K., & Walker, R. (2013). Managing migration? EU enlargement, local government capacity and performance in England. Public Administration, 91(1), 174–194. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02043.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2011). Dimensions of publicness and organizational performance: A review of the evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 301–319. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angel, J. L. (2003). Devolution and the social welfare of elderly immigrants: Who will bear the burden? Public Administration Review, 63(1), 79–89. doi:10.1111/puar.2003.63.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askim, J., Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2015). Accountability and performance management: The Norwegian hospital, welfare, and immigration administration. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(13–14), 971–982. doi:10.1080/01900692.2015.1069840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrios, S. A. (2002). Is the immigration and naturalization service unreformable? Past experience and future prospects. Administration & Society, 34(4), 370–388. doi:10.1177/0095399702034004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastien, J. (2009). Goal ambiguity and informal discretion in the implementation of public policies: The case of Spanish immigration policy. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(4), 665–685. doi:10.1177/0020852309351472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaglio, R. P., Belardinelli, P., Belle, N., & Cantarelli, P. (2019). Behavioral public administration ad fontes: A synthesis of research on bounded rationality, cognitive biases, and nudging in public organizations. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 304–320. doi:10.1111/puar.12994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrelli, L. M. (2018). Whisper down, up and between the lanes: Exclusionary policies and their limits of control in times of irregularized migration. Public Administration, 96(4), 803–816. doi:10.1111/padm.2018.96.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, C. (2012). How information scarcity influences the policy agenda: Evidence from UK immigration policy. Governance, 25(3), 367–389. doi:10.1111/gove.2012.25.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, C. (2015). The double life of targets in public policy: Disciplining and signalling in UK Asylum policy. Public Administration, 93(2), 490–505. doi:10.1111/padm.12134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, L. A., & Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2006). Sovereignty under siege, or a circuitous path for strengthening the state? Digital diasporas and human rights. International Journal of Public Administration, 29(8), 595–618. doi:10.1080/01900690500455321
   Google Scholar
• Breunig, C., & Luedtke, A. (2008). What motivates the gatekeepers? Explaining governing party preferences on immigration. Governance, 21(1), 123–146. doi:10.1111/gove.2008.21.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campomori, F., & Caponio, T. (2017). Immigrant integration policymaking in Italy: Regional policies in a multi-level governance perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(2), 303–321. doi:10.1177/0020852315611238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caponio, T., & Borkert, M. (2010). The local dimension of migration policymaking. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IMISCOE.
   Google Scholar
• Caponio, T., Scholten, P., & Zapata-Barrero, R. (2019). The Routledge handbook of the governance of migration and diversity in cities. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chand, D. E., & Schreckhise, W. D. (2018). Independence in administrative adjudications: When and why agency judges are subject to deference and influence. Administration & Society, 0095399718760593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chand, D. E., Schreckhise, W. D., & Bowers, M. L. (2016). The dynamics of state and local contexts and immigration asylum hearing decisions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(1), 182–196. doi:10.1093/jopart/muw043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, R. M. (2014). Examining the relationship between immigrant status and after-school care usage of young children in the US. International Review of Public Administration, 19(4), 329–346. doi:10.1080/12294659.2014.966993
   Google Scholar
• Clarivate Analytics. (2019). 2018 journal impact factor. Journal Citation Reports.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. S. (2001). Globalization and the boundaries of the state: A framework for analyzing the changing practice of sovereignty. Governance, 14(1), 75–97. doi:10.1111/gove.2001.14.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz Nichols, V., LeBrón, A. M., & Pedraza, F. I. (2018). Spillover effects: Immigrant policing and government skepticism in matters of health for Latinos. Public Administration Review, 78(3), 432–443. doi:10.1111/puar.12916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Graauw, E. (2016). Making immigrant rights real: Nonprofits and the politics of integration in San Francisco. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, S., & Wise, L. R. (2010). An exploration of why public organizations ‘Ingest’innovations. Public Administration, 88(4), 979–998. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01857.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filomeno, F. A. (2017). Theories of local immigration policy. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Galgóczi, B., & Leschke, J. (2015). Intra-EU labor mobility: A key pillar of the EU architecture subject to challenge. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(12), 860–873. doi:10.1080/01900692.2015.1015549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulasekaram, P., & Ramakrishnan, S. K. (2015). The new immigration federalism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, S. E. (2017). The ‘local turn’in historical perspective: Two city case studies in Britain and Germany. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(2), 340–357. doi:10.1177/0020852315592466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, X., & Liu, C. Y. (2018). Welcoming cities: Immigration policy at the local government level. Urban Affairs Review, 54(1), 3–32. doi:10.1177/1078087416678999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Migration. (2018). World migration report, 2018. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M. (2012). Can government initiatives increase citizen coproduction? Results of a randomized field experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 27–54. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones-Correa, M. (2008). Race to the top? The politics of immigrant education in suburbia. In D. S. Massey (Ed.), New faces in new places: The changing geography of American immigration (pp. 308–340). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, S. Y., Kim, E., & Moon, S. G. (2017). The influence of personal values, social trust, and political trust on multicultural acceptance. International Review of Public Administration, 22(2), 138–152. doi:10.1080/12294659.2017.1316945
   Google Scholar
• Jung, T., Scott, T., Davies, H. T. O., Bower, P., Whalley, D., McNally, R., & Mannion, R. (2009). Instruments for exploring organizational culture: A review of the literature. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1087–1096. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02066.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazin, F. A. (2001). The third sector and immigrant absorption: Lessons from the Israeli experience. International Journal of Public Administration, 24(11), 1211–1232. doi:10.1081/PAD-100105236
   Google Scholar
• Levine, H., & Peffer, S. (2012). Quiet casualties: An analysis of U non-immigrant status of undocumented immigrant victims of intimate partner violence. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(9), 634–642. doi:10.1080/01900692.2012.661191
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. G., Provine, D. M., Varsanyi, M. W., & Decker, S. H. (2012). Why do (some) city police departments enforce federal immigration law? Political, demographic, and organizational influences on local choices. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 1–25. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. G., & Ramakrishnan, S. K. (2007). Police practices in immigrant-destination cities: Political control or bureaucratic professionalism? Urban Affairs Review, 42(6), 874–900. doi:10.1177/1078087407300752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebert, S. (2010). The role of informal institutions in US immigration policy: The case of illegal labor migration from Kyrgyzstan. Public Administration Review, 70(3), 390–400. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1540-6210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebert, S., & Ameringer, C. F. (2013). The health care safety net and the affordable care act: Implications for Hispanic immigrants. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 810–820. doi:10.1111/puar.2013.73.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindén, T. S. (2015). Social accountability in immigration regulation: The inclusion of social actors in the asylum appeals process. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(13–14), 1009–1019. doi:10.1080/01900692.2015.1069843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucio, J. D. (2016). Public administrators and noncitizens. Administration & Society, 48(7), 831–850. doi:10.1177/0095399713509246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrow, H. (2009). Immigrant bureaucratic incorporation: The dual roles of professional missions and government policies. American Sociological Review, 74(5), 756–776. doi:10.1177/000312240907400504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald‐Wilmsen, B., Gifford, S. M., Webster, K., Wiseman, J., & Casey, S. (2009). Resettling refugees in rural and regional Australia: Learning from recent policy and program initiatives. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68(1), 97–111. doi:10.1111/ajpa.2009.68.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrberg, G. (2017). Local challenges and national concerns: Municipal level responses to national refugee settlement policies in Denmark and Sweden. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(2), 322–339. doi:10.1177/0020852315586309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E. (2018). Expanding the field of view: The role of agricultural employers in street-level immigration policy implementation. Administration & Society, 50(8), 1097–1124. doi:10.1177/0095399715598339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ospina, S. M., & Saz-Carranza, A. (2010). Paradox and collaboration in network management. Administration & Society, 42(4), 404–440. doi:10.1177/0095399710362723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottaviano, G., & Peri, G. (2006). The economic value of cultural diversity: Evidence from US cities. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 9–44. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbi002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. (2008). The values shaping Australian asylum policy: The views of policy insiders. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(3), 307–320. doi:10.1111/ajpa.2008.67.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, S. K., Cantor, J. C., & Lloyd, K. (2014). Immigrant health care access and the affordable care act. Public Administration Review, 74(6), 749–759. doi:10.1111/puar.12280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastor, M., & Mollenkopf, J. (2012). Struggling over strangers or receiving with resilience? The metropolitics of immigrant integration. In M. Weir, N. Pindus, H. Wial, & H. Wolman (Eds.), Urban and regional policy and its effects: Building resilient regions (pp. 100–147). Washington, DC: Brooking Institutions Press.
   Google Scholar
• Penninx, R., Kraal, K., Martiniello, M., & Vertovec, S. (2004). Citizenship in European cities: Immigrants, local politics, and integration policies. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Peri, G. (2010). The impact of immigrants in recession and economic expansion. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pianezzi, D., & Grossi, G. (2018). Corruption in migration management: A network perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 0020852317753528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietsch, J. (2013). Immigration and refugees: Punctuations in the Commonwealth policy agenda. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 72(2), 143–155. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, P. J., & Garrett, T. M. (2013). America’s homo sacer: Examining US deportation hearings and the criminalization of illegal immigration. Administration & Society, 45(2), 167–186. doi:10.1177/0095399712451888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poppelaars, C., & Scholten, P. (2008). Two worlds apart: The divergence of national and local immigrant integration policies in the Netherlands. Administration & Society, 40(4), 335–357. doi:10.1177/0095399708317172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qvist, M. (2017). Meta‐governance and network formation in collaborative spaces of uncertainty: The case of Swedish refugee integration policy. Public Administration, 95(2), 498–511. doi:10.1111/padm.2017.95.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichersdorfer, J., Christensen, T., & Vrangbæk, K. (2013). Accountability of immigration administration: Comparing crises in Norway, Denmark and Germany. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(2), 271–291. doi:10.1177/0020852313478251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritz, A., Brewer, G. A., & Neumann, O. (2016). Public service motivation: A systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 414–426. doi:10.1111/puar.12505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachter, H. L., & Liu, R. (2005). Policy development and new immigrant communities: A case study of citizen input in defining transit problems. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 614–623. doi:10.1111/puar.2005.65.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, M. (2017). The implementation trap: The local level and diversity policies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(2), 267–282. doi:10.1177/0020852315590204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholten, P., Collett, E., & Petrovic, M. (2017). Mainstreaming migrant integration? A critical analysis of a new trend in integration governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(2), 283–302. doi:10.1177/0020852315612902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shpaizman, I. (2014). Ideas and institutional conversion through layering: The case of Israeli immigration policy. Public Administration, 92(4), 1038–1053. doi:10.1111/padm.2014.92.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tholen, B. (2010). The changing border: Developments and risks in border control management of Western countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(2), 259–278. doi:10.1177/0020852309365673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2017). International migration report 2017: Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/404). United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publications/migrationreport/docs/MigrationReport2017_Highlights.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2019, May 20) Migration, global issues. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/migration/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Van Wart, M. (2003). Public sector leadership theory: An assessment. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 214–228. doi:10.1111/puar.2003.63.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wart, M. (2013). Lessons from leadership theory and the contemporary challenges of leaders. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 553–565. doi:10.1111/puar.2013.73.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varsanyi, M. W. (2008). Rescaling the “Alien,” rescaling personhood: Neoliberalism, immigration, and the State. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98(4), 877–896. doi:10.1080/00045600802223341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varsanyi, M. W. (2010). Taking local control: Immigration policy activism in U.S. cities and states. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, K., & Leitner, H. (2011). The variegated landscape of local immigration policies in the United States. Urban Geography, 32(2), 156–178. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.32.2.156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., & Andrews, R. (2013). Local government management and performance: A review of evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 101–133. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan Ismail, W. N. I., Raja Ariffin, R. N., & Cheong, K. C. (2017). Human trafficking in Malaysia: Bureaucratic challenges in policy implementation. Administration & Society, 49(2), 212–231. doi:10.1177/0095399714532271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. M. (2015). Beyond enforcement: Welcomeness, local law enforcement, and immigrants. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 433–442. doi:10.1111/puar.12335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, C. F. (2014). How Do States Implement Liberal Immigration Policies? Control signals and skilled immigration reform in Australia. Governance, 27(3), 397–421. doi:10.1111/gove.2014.27.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata-Barrero, R. (2017). Intercultural policy and multi-level governance in Barcelona: Mainstreaming comprehensive approach. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(2), 247–266. doi:10.1177/0020852315592962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata-Barrero, R., Caponio, T., & Scholten, P. (2017). Theorizing the ‘local turn’ in a multi-level governance framework of analysis: A case study in immigrant policies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(2), 241–246. doi:10.1177/0020852316688426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar