References
- Allern, E. H. (2012). Appointments to public administration in Norway: No room for political parties. In P. Kopecký, P. Mair, & M. Spirova (Eds.), Party patronage and party government in European democracies (pp. 272–293). Oxford University Press.
- Aucoin, P. (1990). Administrative reform in public management: Paradigms, principles, paradoxes and pendulums. Governance, 3(2), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.1990.3.issue-2
- Aucoin, P. (2012). New political governance in Westminster systems: Impartial public administration and management performance at risk. Governance, 25(2), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.2012.25.issue-2
- Bach, T., Hammerschmid, G., & Löffler, L. (2020). More delegation, more political control? Politicization of senior-level appointments in 18 European countries. Public Policy and Administration, 35(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076718776356
- Bach, T., & Veit, S. (2018). The determinants of promotion to high public office in Germany: Partisan loyalty, political craft, or managerial competencies? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(2), 254–269.
- Boräng, F., Cornell, A., Grimes, M., & Schuster, C. (2018). Cooking the books: Bureaucratic politicization and policy knowledge. Governance, 31(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.2018.31.issue-1
- Bourgault, J., & Dion, S. (1989). Governments come and go, but what of civil servants? Canadian deputy ministers and transitions in power (1867-1987). Governance, 2(2), 124–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.1989.tb00086.x.
- Boyne, G. A., James, O., John, P., & Petrovsky, N. (2010). Does political change affect senior management turnover? An empirical analysis of top-tier local authorities in England. Public Administration, 88(1), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01751.x
- Campbell, C., & Wilson, G. K. (1995). The end of Whitehall: Death of a paradigm? Blackwell Publishers.
- Christensen, J. G. (2004). Political responsiveness in a merit bureaucracy: Denmark. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Politicization of the civil service in comparative perspective: The quest for control (pp. 14–40). Routledge.
- Christensen, J. G., Klemmensen, R., & Opstrup, N. (2014). Politicization and the replacement of top civil servants in Denmark. Governance, 27(2), 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.2014.27.issue-2
- Christiansen, P. M., Niklasson, B., & Öhberg, P. (2016). Does politics crowd out professional competence? The organisation of ministerial advice in Denmark and Sweden. West European Politics, 39(6), 1230–1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1176368
- Cooper, C. A. (2018a). Encouraging civil servants to be frank and fearless: Merit recruitment and employee voice. Public Administration, 96(4), 721–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.2018.96.issue-4
- Cooper, C. A. (2018b). Bureaucratic identity and the resistance of politicization. Administration & Society, 50(1), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715581046
- Cooper, C. A. (2019). Politics and the permanency of permanent secretaries: Testing the vitality of the Whitehall Tradition in Britain, 1949-2014. British Politics. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-019-00113-8
- Dahlström, C., & Holmgren, M. (2019). The political dynamics of bureaucratic turnover. British Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 823–836. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000230
- Dahlström, C., & Lapuente, V. (2017). Organizing leviathan: Politicians, bureaucrats, and the making of good government. Cambridge University Press.
- Dahlström, C., & Niklasson, B. (2013). The politics of politicization in Sweden. Public Administration, 91(4), 891–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.2013.91.issue-4
- Dahlström, C., Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (Eds.). (2011). Steering from the centre: Strengthening political control in Western democracies. University of Toronto Press.
- Dahlström, C., Teorell, J., Dahlberg, S., Hartman, F., Lindberg, A., & Nistotskaya, M. (2015). The quality of government expert survey II – A report. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute.
- Derlien, H.-U. (1988). Repercussions of government change on the career civil service in West Germany: The cases of 1969 and 1982. Governance, 1(1), 50–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.1988.1.issue-1
- Derlien, H.-U. (1992). Observations on the state of comparative administration research in Europe — Rather comparable than comparative. Governance, 5(3), 279–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.1992.5.issue-3
- Derlien, H.-U. (2003). Mandarins or managers? The bureaucratic elite in Bonn, 1970 to 1987 and Beyond. Governance, 16(3), 401–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.2003.16.issue-3
- Dierickx, G. (2003). Senior civil servants and bureaucratic change in Belgium. Governance, 16(3), 321–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.2003.16.issue-3
- Diez, S. P. (2004). Politicisation of the Spanish civil service: Continuity in 1982 and 1996. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Politicization of the civil service in comparative perspective: The quest for control (pp. 227–256). Routledge.
- Dreyfus, F. (2000). L’invention de la bureaucratie: servir l’etat en France, en Grande-Bretagne et aux Etats-Unis [The invention of the bureaucracy: Serving the state in France, Great Britain and the United States]. La Decouverte.
- Eichbaum, C., & Shaw, R. (2008). Revisiting politicization: Political advisers and public servants in Westminster systems. Governance, 21(3), 337–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.2008.21.issue-3
- Ennser-Jedenastik, L. (2016). The party politicization of administrative elites in the Netherlands. Acta Politica, 51(4), 451–471. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-016-0005-1
- Evans, P., & Rauch, J. E. (1999). Bureaucracy and growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of “Weberian” state structures on economic growth. American Sociological Review, 64(5), 748–765. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657374
- Flinders, M., Felicity, M., & Eason, C. (2012). Political recruitment beyond elections: An exploration of the linkage between patronage, democracy, and diversity in the United Kingdom. Public Administration, 90(2), 511–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01969.x
- Fuenzalida, J., & Riccucci, N. M. (2018). The effects of politicization on performance: The mediating role of HRM practices. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X18758378
- Gallie, W. B. (1955). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56(1), 167–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/56.1.167
- Gherghina, S., & Kopecký, P. (2016). Politicization of administrative elites in Western Europe: An introduction. Acta Politica, 51(4), 407–412. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-016-0020-2
- Greve, C., Ejersbo, N., Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2019). Unpacking Nordic administrative reforms: Agile and adaptive governments. International Journal of Public Administration, 1–14. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1645688
- Halligan, J. (2010). The fate of administrative tradition in Anglophone countries during the reform era. In M. Painter & B. G. Peters (Eds.), Tradition and public administration (pp. 129–142). Palgrave.
- Halligan, J. (2015). Anglophone systems: Diffusion and policy transfer within an administrative tradition. In F. M. van der Meer, J. C. N. Raadschelders, & T. A. J. Toonen (Eds.), Comparative civil service systems in the 21st century (pp. 57–76). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Heper, M. (1985). The state and public bureaucracies: A comparative and historical perspective. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 27(1), 86–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500013670
- Hood, C., & Lodge, M. (2006). The politics of public service bargains: Reward, competency, loyalty—and blame. Oxford University Press.
- Hustedt, T., & Salomonsen, H. H. (2014). Ensuring political responsiveness: Politicization mechanisms in ministerial bureaucracies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(4), 746–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314533449
- Jenson, J., & Frédéric, M. (2010). Sociology, institutionalism and the European Union. Comparative European Politics, 8(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2010.5
- Kettl, D. F. (2002). The transformation of governance. The John Hopkins University Press.
- Kim, B.H., & Hong, S. (2019) Political change and turnovers: How do political principals consider organizational, individual, and performance information? Public Choice, 181(3-4), 291–308.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00655-x
- Knill, C. (1999). Explaining cross-national variance in administrative reform: Autonomous versus instrumental bureaucracies. Journal of Public Policy, 19(2), 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X99000203
- Kopecký, P., & Mair, P. (2012). Party patronage as an organizational resource. In P. Kopecký, P. Mair, & M. Spirova (Eds.), Party patronage and party government in European democracies (pp. 3–16). Oxford University Press.
- Kopecký, P., Meyer-Sahling, J.-H., Panizza, F., Scherlis, G., Schuster, C., & Spirova, M. (2016). Party patronage in contemporary democracies: Results from an expert survey in 22 countries from five regions. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 416–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12135
- Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2019). Introduction to comparative public administration (2nd ed.). Edward Elgar.
- Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Rubecksen, K. (2007). Modern management tools in state agencies: The case of Norway. International Public Management Journal, 10(4), 387–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490701683586
- Lee, C. K. (2018). The politicization of senior civil service in Korea: A human resource management perspective. Asian Education and Development Studies, 7(4), 412–425. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-11-2017-0114
- Lewis, D. E. (2008). The politics of presidential appointments. Princeton University Press.
- Lewis, D. E., & Waterman, R. W. (2013). The invisible presidential appointments: An examination of appointments to the department of labor, 2001-11. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 43(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.2013.43.issue-1
- March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1998). The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International Organization, 52(4), 943–969. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550699
- Marland, A., Lewis, J. P., & Flanagan, T. (2017). Governance in the age of digital media and Branding. Governance, 30(1), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.2017.30.issue-1
- Meyer-Sahling, J.-H., & Mikkelsen, K. S. (2017). Civil service laws, merit, politicization, and corruption: The perspective of public officials from five East European countries. Public Administration, 94(4), 1105–1123. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12276
- Neuhold, C., Vanhoonacker, S., & Verhey, L. F. M., (Eds.). (2013). Civil servants and politics: A delicate balance. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Northcote, S. H., & Trevelyan, C. E. (1954). The northcote-trevelyan report. Public Administration, 32(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1954.tb01719.x. (Original work published 1854).
- Orelli, R. L., Padovani, E., & Katsikas, E. (2016). NPM reforms in Napoleonic countries: A comparative study of management accounting innovations in Greek and Italian municipalities. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(10), 778–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1034324
- Painter, M., & Peters, B. G. (Eds.). (2010). Tradition and public administration. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Park, S., & Kim, B. (2014). Who is appointed to what position? The politics of appointment in quangos of Korea. Public Organization Review, 14(3), 325–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0221-3
- Peters, B. G. (2008). The Napoleonic tradition. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550810855627
- Peters, B. G. (2013). Politicization: What is it and why should we care? In C. Neuhold, S. Vanhoonacker, & L. Verhey (Eds.), Civil servants and politics: A delicate balance (pp. 12–24). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (Eds.). (2004). Politicization of the civil service in comparative perspective. Routledge.
- Petrovsky, N., James, O., Moseley, A., & Boyne, G. A. (2017). What explains agency heads’ length of tenure? Testing managerial background, performance, and political environment effects. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 591–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.2017.77.issue-4
- Pierre, J. (2004). Politicization of the Swedish civil service. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Politicization in comparative perspective: The quest for control (pp. 41–54). Routledge.
- Pierre, J. (2010). Administrative reform in Sweden: The resilience of administrative tradition? In M. Painter & B. G. Peters (Eds.), Tradition and public administration (pp. 191–202). Palgrave.
- Richardson, M. D. (2019). Politicization and expertise: Exit, effort, and investment. The Journal of Politics, 81(3), 878–891. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1086/703072
- Rouban, L. (2004). Politicization of the civil service in France: From structural to strategic politicization. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Politicization of the civil service in comparative perspective: The quest for control (pp. 81–100). Routledge.
- Rouban, L. (2015). Political-administrative relations: Evolving models of politicization. In F. M. van der Meer, J. C. N. Raadschelders, & T. A. J. Toonen (Eds.), Comparative civil service systems in the 21st century (pp. 317–333). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Saint-Martin, D. (2003). L’affaire Groupaction: Un cas de politisation de la fonction publique fédérale? [The Groupeaction affair: A case of politicization of the federal public service?]. Canadian Public Administration, 46(4), 450–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.2003.46.issue-4
- Savoie, D. J. (2003). Breaking the bargain: Public servants, ministers, and parliament. University of Toronto Press.
- Schröter, E. (2004). The Politicization of the German civil service: A three-dimensional portrait of the ministerial bureaucracy. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Politicization in comparative perspective: The quest for control (pp. 55–80). Routledge.
- Silberman, B. S. (1993). Cages of reason. University of Chicago.
- Sotiropoulos, D. A. (2004). Southern European public bureaucracies in comparative perspective. West European Politics, 27(3), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140238042000228077
- Van de Walle, S. (2019). Explaining variation in perceived managerial autonomy and direct politicization in European public sectors. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(4), 627–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317748357
- Van der Meer, F. M. (2004). Dutch government reform and the quest for political control. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Politicization of the civil service in comparative perspective: The quest for control (pp. 206–226). Routledge.
- Veit, S., & Scholz, S. (2016). Linking administrative career patterns and politicization: Signalling effects in the careers of top civil servants in Germany. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(3), 516–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564310
- Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197–222. doi: 10.2307/2139277
- Yesilkagit, K. (2010). The future of administrative tradition: Tradition as ideas and structure. In M. Painter & B. G. Peters (Eds.), Tradition and Public Administration (pp. 145–157). Palgrave Macmillan.