Implementation Drivers of Pay-for-Success Projects: The U.S. Experience

References

• Akbar, R., Pilcher, R., & Perrin, B. (2012). Performance measurement in Indonesia: The case of local government. Pacific Accounting Review, 24(3), 262–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/01140581211283878
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., & Boyne, G. A. (2010). Capacity, leadership, and organizational performance: Testing the black box model of public management. Public Administration Review, 70(3), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02158.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arena, M., Bengo, I., Calderini, M., & Chiodo, V. (2016). Social impact bonds: Blockbuster or flash in a pan? International Journal of Public Administration, 39(12), 927–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1057852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baliga, S. (2013). Shaping the success of social impact bonds in the United States: Lessons learned from the privatization of U.S. prisons. Duke Law Journal, 63(2), 437–479. http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol63/iss2/4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, E. M., & Wang, X. (2000). Performance measurement in U.S. counties: Capacity for reform. Public Administration Review, 60(5), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birdsall, C. (2019). Policy adoption, innovation, and performance management: The case of performance-funding policies in state postsecondary education. State and Local Government Review, 51(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X19861425
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, G., & Selden, S. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administrative Research and Theory, 10(4), 685–711. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024287
   Google Scholar
• Broccardo, E., Mazzuca, M., & Frigotto, M. L. (2019). Social impact bonds; The evolution of research and review of the academic literature. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), 1316–1332. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross‐sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66 (s1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnoy, M., & Marachi, R. (2020). Investing for “impact” or investing for profit? National Education Policy Center. https://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/social-impact-bonds
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, C., Patterson, M., Wood, S., Booth, A., Rick, J., & Balain, S. (2007). A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 2(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalluzzo, K. S., & Ittner, C. D. (2004). Implementing performance measurement innovations: Evidence from government. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(3/4), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00013-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamaki, F. N., Jenkins, G. P., & Hashemi, M. (2019). Social impact bonds: Implementation, evaluation, and monitoring. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(4), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1433206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dear, A., Helbitz, A., Khare, R., Lotan, R., Newman, J., Sims, G. C., & Zaroulis, A. (2016). Social impact bonds. The early years. http://socialfinance.org/content/uploads/2016/07/SIBs-Early-Years_Social-Finance_2016_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrijevska-Markoski, T. (2016). Social impact bonds: A new tool for governance of social programs - Evidence from the UK, USA and Australia. International Journal of Public Policy, 12(3), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPP.2016.079741
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrijevska-Markoski, T., & Martin, L. (2019). Pay-for-success contracting. In L. Martin & R. Schick (Eds.), Human services contracting: A public solutions handbook (pp. 28–36). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrijevska-Markoski, T. (2019). The impact of performance measurement and performance information use on municipal and county performance. Public Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 52–78. https://paq.spaef.org/article/1870/The-Impact-Of-Performance-Measurement-And-Performance-Information-Use-On-Municipal-And-County-Performance
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrijevska-Markoski, T., Breen, J. D., Nukpezah, J. A., & Mobley, R. (2021). Strategic planning and management in small municipalities in Mississippi – Implementation, perceived benefits, and determinants of use. Public Organization Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-020-00499-w
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrijevska-Markoski, T., & French, E. (2019). Determinants of public administrator’s use of performance information: Evidence from local governments in Florida. Public Administration Review, 79(5), 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliuz, S., Kapucu, N., Ustun, Y., & Demirhan, C. (2017). Predictors of an effective performance measurement system: Evidence from municipal governments in Turkey. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(4), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1113547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezz, I., Papazafeiropoulou, A., & Serrano, A. (2009). Challenges of interorganizational collaboration for information technology adoption: Insights from a governmental financial decision-making process in Egypt. Information Technology for Development, 15(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/itdj.20123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, A., Tan, S., Lagarde, M., & Mays, N. (2016). Narratives of promise, narratives of caution: A review of the literature on social impact bonds. Social Policy & Administration, 52(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacomantonio, C. (2017). Grant-maximizing but not money-making: A simple decision-tree analysis for social impact bonds. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2016.1271348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office. (2015). Pay for success. Collaboration among federal agencies would be helpful as governments explore new financing mechanisms. Report to the Chairman, Committee on the Budget, U.S. Senate.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, J. (2020). The national governance and policy context of social impact bond emergence: A comparative analysis of leaders and skeptics. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 22(2), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1695924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J., & Jennings, E. (2012). Administrators’ perspectives on successful interstate collaboration: The drug effectiveness review project. State and Local Government Review, 44(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X12446323
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. L. (2008a). The forgotten regional organizations: Creating capacity for economic development. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00841.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. L. (2008b). Assessing local capacity for federal grant-getting. American Review of Public Administration, 38(4), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074007311385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. L. (2009). Measurement with meaning: Evaluating trends and differences in innovation capacity among the states. Economic Development Quarterly, 23(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242408326467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. L. (2010). Grant management: Funding for public and nonprofit programs. Jones & Bartlett Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. L., & Bartels, C. E. (2014). Management practice variation in tax increment financing districts: An empirical examination of the administrative theory of performance. Economic Development Quarterly, 28(3), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242413513326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, C., & Kabourek, S. (2019). Pay-for-Success development in the United States: Feasible or failing to launch? Public Administration Review, 79(6), 867–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoback, J. (2015). Private money, public impact. State Legislature Magazine. http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/private-money-public-impact.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Humphries, K. W. (2014). Not your older brother’s bonds: The use and regulation of social-impact bonds in the United States. Law & Contemporary Problems, 76(3–4), 433–452. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4384&context=lcp
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, P. (2004). The role of leadership in the turnaround of a local authority. Public Money and Management, 24(4), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2004.00425.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, A., Brisbois, B., Zerger, S., & Hwang, S. (2018). Social impact bonds as a funding method for health and social programs: Potential areas of concern. American Journal of Public Health, 108(2), 210–215. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantz, P. M., Rosenbaum, S., Ku, L., & Iovan, S. (2016). Pay for success and population health: Early results from eleven projects reveal challenges and promise. Health Affairs, 11(11), 2053–2061. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0713
   Google Scholar
• Liebman, J., & Sellman, A. (2013). Social impact bonds. A guide for state and local governments. Harvard Kennedy School. Social Impact Bond Technical Assistance Lab.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, F., Barbetta, G. P., & Godina, F. (2018). Paradoxes of social impact bonds. Social Policy & Administration, 52(7), 1332–1353. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, F., & Meyer, M. (2017). Social impact bonds and the perils of aligned interests. Administrative Sciences, 7(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci7030024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, C. (2013). Towards a general theory of implementation. Implementation Science, 8(18), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinsey and Company. (2012). From potential to action: Bringing social impact bonds to the USA. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-and-social-sector/our-insights/from-potential-to-action-bringing-social-impact-bonds-to-the-us
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. (2015). Opinion: Can social-impact bonds really have big impact? Chronicle of Philanthropy, 27(8), 11. https://www.philanthropy.com/article/social-impact-bonds-need-to-focus-on-results/
   Google Scholar
• Milner, J., & Walsh, K. (2016). Measuring success in pay for success. Randomized controlled trials as the starting point. Urban Institute. https://pfs.urban.org/evaluation-toolkit/content/measuring-success-pay-success-randomized-controlled-trials-starting-point
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., Fernandez, S., Kim, S., LeRoux, K. M., Piotrowski, S. J., Wright, B. E., & Yang, K. (2011). Performance regimes amidst governance complexity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(suppl_1), i141–i155. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Implementation Research Network. (2020). Framework 3: Implementation drivers. Retrieved September 2020, from http://implementation.fpg.unc.edu/module-1/implementation-drivers
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, P. (2015). Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Science, 10(53), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pay for Success. (2021). Projects. Retrieved January 30, 2021, from http://www.payforsuccess.org/projects
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., Engbers, T. A., & Jun, S. Y. (2009). Back to the future? Performance-related pay, empirical research, and the perils of persistence. Public Administration Review, 69(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01939_2.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, M. J., McHugh, N., & Sinclair, S. (2017). Social impact bonds: Evidence-based policy or ideology? In B. Greve (Ed.), Handbook of social policy evaluation (pp. 263–278). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Saltman, K. (2017). The promise and realities of pay for success/ social impact bonds. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(59), 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2640
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Y., Aydemir, N. Y., & Wu, Y. (2018). What factors drive municipal fiscal policy adoption? An empirical investigation of major cities in the United States. State and Local Government Review, 50(3), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X18813418
   Google Scholar
• Social Finance. (2018a). Impact bond global database. https://sibdatabase.socialfinance.org.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Social Finance. (2018b). Social impact bonds reach global mass: 108 projects launched in 24 countries. https://socialfinance.org/news/social-impact-bonds-reach-global-mass-108-projects-launched-24-countries/
   Google Scholar
• Social Finance. (2020). What is pay for success? https://socialfinance.org/the-latest/what-is-pay-for-success/
   Google Scholar