Handling Tensions in Frontline Policy Implementation: Legitimating, Interpreting, and Shielding a Disruptive Intervention

References

• Arnold, G. (2021). Distinguishing the street-level policy entrepreneur. Public Administration, 99(3), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakkeli, V., Frøyland, K., & Spjelkavik, Ø. (2020). Kvalitetsarbeid i Supported Employment-tjenester [Quality work in supported employment services]. AFI-rapport 2020:04 (Work Research Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Barley, S. R. (2008). Coalface institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 491–518). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bjerregaard, T., & Jonasson, C. (2014). Managing unstable institutional contradictions: The work of becoming. Organization Studies, 35(10), 1507–1536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614530913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaz, A., Davies, H., Fraser, A., & Nutley, S. (2019). What works now? Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boxenbaum, E. (2006). Lost in translation. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 939–948. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205285173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, G. A. (2005). In the eye of the storm: Frontline supervisors and federal agency performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), 505–527. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2011). Complexity and hybrid public administration—theoretical and empirical challenges. Public Organization Review, 11(4), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-010-0141-4
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2017). Transcending new public management: The transformation of public sector reforms. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cloutier, C., Denis, J.-L., Langley, A., & Lamothe, L. (2015). Agency at the managerial interface: Public sector reform as institutional work. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(2), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, S., & Kitchener, M. (2019). The role of middle managers in the implementation of national public policy. Policy and Politics, 47(2), 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15296527346801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis, J.-L., Ferlie, E., & Van Gestel, N. (2015). Understanding hybridity in public organizations. Public Administration, 93(2), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis, J.-L., Langley, A., & Rouleau, L. (2007). Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames. Human Relations, 60(1), 179–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707075288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, R. E., Bond, G. R., & Becker, D. R. (2012). Individual placement and support: An evidence-based approach to supported employment. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Union of Supported Employment. (2010). European Union of supported employment toolkit.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T. (2010). Professionals, managers and discretion: Critiquing street-level bureaucracy. The British Journal of Social Work, 41(2), 368–386. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T. (2016). Street-level bureaucracy, management and the corrupted world of service. European Journal of Social Work, 19(5), 602–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2015.1084274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossestøl, K., Borg, E., & Breit, E. (2020). NAV i en ny tid? En evaluering av hvordan retningsvalgene i Stortingsmelding 33 implementeres på NAV-kontorene [NAV in a new age? An evaluation of how direction choices in Storingsmelding 33 is implemented in the NAV offices] (AFI-rapport 2020: 09 (Work Research Institute)).
   Google Scholar
• Fossestøl, K., Breit, E., Andreassen, T. A., & Klemsdal, L. (2015). Managing institutional complexity in public sector reform: Hybridization in front-line service organizations. Public Administration, 93(2), 290–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gassner, D., & Gofen, A. (2018). Street-level management: A clientele-agent perspective on implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gestel, N., Waldorff, S. B., & Denis, J.-L. (2020). (Mis)taking social responsibility? Implementing welfare state reform by private and non-profit organizations. Public Management Review, 22(12), 1739–1759. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1648696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjersøe, H. M. (2020). Frontline provision of integrated welfare and employment services: Organising for activation competency. International Journal of Social Welfare, 30(3), 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2014). Implementing public policy. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hjelmar, U., & Møller, A. M. (2016). From knowledge to action: The potentials of knowledge portals. Nordic Social Work Research, 6(2), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2015.1109542
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2011). Public managers as the missing variable in policy studies: An empirical investigation using Canadian data. Review of Policy Research, 28(3), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00494.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupe, P. L., & Hill, M. J. (2016). ‘And the rest is implementation.’ Comparing approaches to what happens in policy processes beyond great expectations. Public Policy and Administration, 31(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076715598828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., & Keiser, L. R. (2019). Street-level bureaucracy research and first-line supervision. In P. Hupe (Ed.), Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy. The ground floor of government in context (pp. 172–192). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, J. (2018). Employer engagement in active labour market programmes: The role of boundary spanners. Public Administration, 96(4), 707–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keulemans, S., & Groeneveld, S. (2019). Supervisory leadership at the frontlines: Street-level discretion, supervisor influence, and street-level bureaucrats’ attitude towards clients. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(2), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemsdal, L., & Kjekshus, L. E. (2021). Designing administrative reforms for maintaining trust. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(3), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1694540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243–275). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, C., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organization studies (pp. 215–254). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980/2010). Street-level bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public services. 30th anniversary expanded edition: 2010. Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V. (2005). Something old, something new, something borrowed … How institutions change (and stay the same) in local governance. Policy Studies, 26(3–4), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870500198361
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2008). The logic of appropriateness. In M. Rein, M. Moran, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 689–708). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, A. M., Fitzgerald, L., & Buchanan, D. A. (2013). Beyond acceptance and resistance: Entrepreneurial change agency responses in policy implementation. British Journal of Management, 24(S1), S93–S115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meza, O. D., & Moreno-Jaimes, C. (2020). Taming the beast: Managers’ tactics to change frontline workers’ adversarial interaction with policy targets. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(10), 866–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1660991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. A methods sourcebook. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs. (2015–2016). NAV i en ny tid – for arbeid og aktivitet [NAV in a new era – For work and activity] (White Paper). https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/8f9e56528fb340eb9f6515cc21ab5119/no/pdfs/stm201520160033000dddpdfs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, G., & Sitton-Kent, L. (2016). Middle managers and the translation of new ideas in organizations: A review of micro-practices and contingencies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, D. (2013). Street-level bureaucrats and the welfare state: Toward a micro-institutionalist theory of policy implementation. Administration & Society, 45(9), 1038–1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399712451895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00003846
   Google Scholar
• Saguin, K., & Palotti, P. L. D. M. (2020). How do middle managers matter in policymaking? Examining managerial work and influence in Brazil. International Journal of Public Administration, . https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1766498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandfort, J. R. (2000). Moving beyond discretion and outcomes: Examining public management from the front lines of the welfare system. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 729–756. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024289
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2011). Interpretive research design. Concepts and processes. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smets, M., & Jarzabkowski, P. (2013). Reconstructing institutional complexity in practice: A relational model of institutional work and complexity. Human Relations, 66(10), 1279–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712471407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touati, N., Denis, J.-L., Grenier, C., & Smits, P. (2019). Implementing spaces to favor the emergence of ecologies of complex innovation in the public sector: An empirical analysis. Administration & Society, 51(3), 463–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716659734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmelmann, C. L., Vallgårda, S., & Jensen, A. M. (2018). Meet the local policy workers: Implementation of health promotion guidelines in Denmark. Public Policy and Administration, 33(1), 66–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076716683568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar