Polycentric Governance and Decentralized Decision-Making for Pervasive Spectrum Sharing

References

• Andersson, K. P., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective. Policy Sciences, 41(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-007-9055-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araral, E., & Hartley, K. (2013, June). Polycentric governance for a new environmental regime: Theoretical frontiers in policy reform and public administration. 1st international conference on public policy.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, S. M. (2002). The logic of scarcity: Idle spectrum as a first amendment violation. Duke Law Journal, 52(1), 1–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/1373132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito, J. (2007). The spectrum commons in theory and practice. Stanford Technology Law Review, 1. http://stlr.stanford.edu/pdf/brito-commons.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, B. (2019). Practising polycentric governance. In A. Thiel, W. Blomquist, and D. Garrick (Eds.), Governing complexity: Analyzing and applying polycentricity (pp. 238–255). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. (2017). Spectrum collaboration challenge. https://www.darpa.mil/about-us/timeline/spectrum-collaboration-challenge
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (2003). Balancing policy options in a turbulent telecommunications market. In R. M. Entman (Ed.), Balancing policy options in a turbulent telecommunications market(pp. 11–25). The ASPEN Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M., & Chuang, J. (2005). Overcoming free-riding behavior in peer-to-peer systems. ACM Sigecom Exchanges, 5(4), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/1120717.1120723
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, T., & Johnson, C. (2014). Elinor Ostrom’s legacy: Governing the commons and the rational choice controversy. Development and Change, 45(5), 1093–1110. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazlett, T. W. (1990). The rationality of US regulation of the broadcast spectrum. The Journal of Law and Economics, 33(1), 133–175. https://doi.org/10.1086/467202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herter, C. A. (1985). The electromagnetic spectrum: A critical natural resource. Natural Resources Journal, 25(3), 651–663. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol25/iss3/6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapucu, N., & Garayev, V. (2011). Collaborative decision-making in emergency and crisis management. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(6), 366–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.561477
   Google Scholar
• Kapucu, N., Haupt, B., & Yuksel, M. (2016). Wireless communication and spectrum sharing for public safety in the United States. Journal of Emergency Management, 14(3), 167. https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2016.0283
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kapucu, N., Haupt, B., & Yuksel, M. (2017). Spectrum sharing policy: Interoperable communication and information sharing for public safety. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 9(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodzy, P. (2003). Next generation spectrum policy. In R. M. Entman (Ed.), Balancing policy options in a turbulent telecommunications market(pp. 47–55). The ASPEN Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, W. F. (1833). Two lectures on the checks to population. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Henry, A. D., & McCoy, M. (2010). Collaborative institutions in an ecology of games. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00431.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Mewhirter, J., Berardo, R., & Scholz, J. (2020). The origins of conflict in polycentric governance systems. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mankiw, N. G. (2004). Essentials of economics (3rd ed.). Southwestern.
   Google Scholar
• McGinnis, M. D., & Ostrom, E. (2012). Reflections on Vincent Ostrom, public administration, and polycentricity. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02488.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnis, M. D. (2002). Polycentric governance and development: Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGinnis, M. D. (2011). Networks of adjacent action situations in polycentric governance. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 51–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00396.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. H., Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Lemos, M. C., Huitema, D., Phelps, J., Evans, L., Cohen, P., Song, A. M., Turner, R., Quinn, T., & Hughes, T. P. (2019). The black box of power in polycentric environmental governance. Global Environmental Change, 57(article 101934), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 36(1), 48–49. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.36.1.48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J. (1951). Noncooperative games. The Annals of Mathematics, 54(2), 286–295. https://doi.org/10.2307/1969529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (1997). Implementing public innovations in network settings. Administration & Society, 29(2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979702900201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, M. J., & Rubinstein, A. (1994). A course in game theory. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1999). Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), pp. 493–535. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2007). A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39), 15181–15187. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702288104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2008). Polycentric systems as one approach for solving collective-action problems. Social Science Research Network. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1304697
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010a). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010b). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Transnational Corporations Review, 2(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/19186444.2010.11658229
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., & Warren, R. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review, 55(4), 831–842. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400125973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peha, J. M. (2005). Approaches to spectrum sharing. IEEE Communications, 43(2),11–12. www.ece.cmu.edu/~peha/wireless.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1951). The logic of liberty. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, M., Quint, T., & Yuksel, M. (2018). Regulating freeriding in inter-operator spectrum sharing. Proceedings of IEEE international symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN)(pp. 1–10).
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J. N. (1992). The relocation of authority in a shrinking world. Comparative politics, 253–272.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, S. (2014). Networking partner selection and its impact on the perceived success of collaboration. Public Performance and Management Review, 37(4), 632–657. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576370405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultheis, A. D. (2014). From one end of the spectrum to the other: The case for stronger property rights in FCC spectrum licenses and a response to Musey’s spectrum rationalization challenge. Journal of High Technology Law, 15, 395. h ttp s://cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.suffolk.edu/dist/5/1153/files/2015/05/FROM-ONE-END-OF-THE-SPECTRUM-TO-THE-OTHER1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00106
   Google Scholar
• Thiel, A. (2016). The polycentricity approach and the research challenges confronting environmental governance (THESys Discussion Paper No. 2016-1), 1–27. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. edoc.hu-berlin.de/series/thesysdiscpapers
   Google Scholar
• Toonen, T. (2010). Resilience in public administration: The work of Elinor and Vincent Ostrom from a public administration perspective. Public Administration Review, 70(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02147.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. E. (2005). Self-governance, polycentrism, and federalism: Recurring themes in Vincent Ostrom’s scholarly oeuvre. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 57(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2004.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, M. B. H., Krishnamurthy, P., & Gomez, M. M. (2017). How can polycentric governance of spectrum work? Proceedings of IEEE international symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN)(pp. 1–10).
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, M. B. H., Lehr, W. H., Acker, A., & Gomez, M. M. (2015). Socio-technical considerations for Spectrum Access System (SAS) design. Proceedings of IEEE international symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN)(pp. 35–46).
   Google Scholar