277
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Nexus between Gender Diversity and Research Performance: The Case of Public Procurement

, , &

References

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Murgia, G. (2013). Gender differences in research collaboration. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 811–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.07.002
  • Abutabenjeh, S., Gordon, S. B., & Mengistu, B. (2017). International trade protectionist policies and in-state preferences: A link. Journal of Public Procurement, 17(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-17-01-2017-B002
  • Abutabenjeh, S., Gordon, S., & Mengistu, B. (2018). The impacts of in-state procurement preference policies on the economy of South Carolina. Journal of Public Procurement, 18(3), 240–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-09-2018-015
  • Abutabenjeh, S. (2021). Strategic management in state government two servants of the same master: Procurement and finance. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(7), 607–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1742158
  • Ali, M., Kulik, C. T., & Metz, I. (2009). The impact of gender diversity on performance in services and manufacturing organizations. In Academy of Management Proceedings (1), 1–6. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management
  • Alkadry, M. G., Trammell, E., & Dimand, A. M. (2019). The power of public procurement: Social equity and sustainability as externalities and as deliberate policy tools. International Journal of Procurement Management, 12(3), 336–362. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPM.2019.099553
  • Allison, P. D., & Long, J. S. (1990). Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review, 55(4), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095801
  • Astin, H. S., & Leland, C. (1991). Women of influence, women of vision: A cross-generational study of leaders and social change. Jossey-Bass.
  • AWESOME & Gartner. (2019). Women in supply chain research. In partnership with Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals. https://www.awesomeleaders.org/research/awesomegartner-research/
  • Bae, K. B., & Skaggs, S. (2019). The impact of gender diversity on performance: The moderating role of industry, alliance network, and family-friendly policies–Evidence from Korea. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(6), 896–913. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.45
  • Bentley, J. T., & Adamson, R. (2003). Gender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers: A literature review. Special report (NSF 00-327). National Science Foundation, and Mathtech, Inc. NSF.
  • Bentley, J. T., & Adamson, R. (2004). Gender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers: A literature review. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf03322/pdf/nsf03322.pdf
  • Bland, C. J., Center, B. A., Finstad, D. A., Risbey, K. R., & Staples, J. (2006). The impact of appointment type on the productivity and commitment of full-time faculty in research and doctoral institutions. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 89–123. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2006.0002
  • Botelho, T. L., & Abraham, M. (2017). Pursuing quality: How search costs and uncertainty magnify gender-based double standards in a multistage evaluation process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(4), 698–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217694358
  • Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008
  • Bunderson, J. (2003). Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(4), 557–591. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556637
  • Campbell, L. G., Mehtani, S., Dozier, M. E., Rinehart, J., & Larivière, V. (2013). Gender-heterogeneous working groups produce higher quality science. PloS One, 8(10), e79147. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079147
  • Choi, S., & Rainey, H. (2010). Managing diversity in U.S. Federal agencies: Effects of diversity and diversity management on employee perceptions of organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02115.x
  • Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1984). The productivity puzzle. Advances in Motivation and Achievement. Women in Science. JAI Press.
  • Corley, E. A., & Sabharwal, M. (2010). Scholarly collaboration and productivity patterns in public administration: Analyzing recent trends. Public Administration, 88(3), 627–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01830.x
  • De Saá‐Pérez, P., Díaz‐Díaz, N. L., Aguiar‐Díaz, I., & Ballesteros‐Rodríguez, J. L. (2017). How diversity contributes to academic research teams performance. R&D Management, 47(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12139
  • Eagly, A. H. (2016). When passionate advocates meet research on diversity, does the honest broker stand a chance? Journal of Social Issues, 72(1), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12163
  • Farzana, R. (2019). The moderating effects of gender diversity on supply chain practice and firm performance. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 15(4), 203–209. h ttps://d o i:1 0.17265/1548-6583/2019.04.003
  • Foldy, E. (2004). Learning from diversity: A theoretical exploration. Public Administration Review, 64(5), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00401.x
  • Fuchs, S., Von Stebut, J., & Allmendinger, J. (2001). Gender, science, and scientific organizations in Germany. Minerva, 39(2), 175–201. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010380510013
  • Guldiken, O., Mallon, M. R., Fainshmidt, S., Judge, W. Q., & Clark, C. E. (2019). Beyond tokenism: How strategic leaders influence more meaningful gender diversity on boards of directors. Strategic Management Journal, 40(12), 2024–2046. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3049
  • Guy, M. E., & Schumacher, K. (2009). Gender and diversity in public administration. Foundations of Public Administration, ASPA.
  • Harzing (2019). https://harzing.com/blog/2017/11/making-your-case-for-impact-if-you-have-few-citations
  • Homan, A. C., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. (2007). Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1189
  • Hsieh, C., & Winslow, E. (2006). Gender representation in the federal workforce: A comparison among groups. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26(3), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X05281785
  • ICPSR Lab guide (2018) ICPSRCDA: Lab Guide http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/1067572/27948547/1563213488753/icpsrcda18-LabGuideV3_Stata.pdf?token=VFMhAeo8Fp%2BnoqWCI%2F6EHAo2244%3D
  • Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 599–627. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.41331491
  • Joshi, A. (2014). By whom and when is women’s expertise recognized? The interactive effects of gender and education in science and engineering teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(2), 202–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839214528331
  • Kearney, E., Gebert, D., & Voelpel, S. (2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members’ need for cognition. Academy of Management, 52(3), 581–598. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.41331431
  • King, M. M., Bergstrom, C. T., Correll, S. J., Jacquet, J., & West, J. D. (2017). Men set their own cites high: Gender and self-citation across fields and over time. Socius, 3, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117738903
  • Kirsch, A. (2018). The gender composition of corporate boards: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2), 346–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.06.001
  • Knepper, H., Scutelnicu, G., & Tekula, R. (2020). Why gender and research productivity matters in academia: Exploring evidence from NAPAA-accredited schools. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 26(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2019.1565066
  • Kyvik, S., & Teigen, M. (1996). Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity. Science, Technology & Human Values, 21(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399602100103
  • Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Soc. Stud. Sci, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046
  • Leahey, E. (2006). Gender differences in productivity: Research specialization as a missing link. Gender & Society, 20(6), 754–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206293030
  • Leišytė, L. (2016). New public management and research productivity–a precarious state of affairs of academic work in the Netherlands. Studies in Higher Education, 41(5), 828–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1147721
  • Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2014). Regression models for catego- rical dependent variables using stata (3rd ed.). StataCorp LP.
  • Long, J. S. (1990). The origins of sex differences in science. Social Forces, 68(June), 1297–1315. https://doi.org/10.2307/2579146
  • MacManus, S. (2007). Government contracting and procurement: A critical process for both the public and private sectors. International Journal of Public Administration, 15(5), 1213–1240. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900699208524756
  • Mairesse, J., & Pezzoni, M. (2015). Does gender affect scientific productivity? Revue économique, 66(1), 65–113. https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.661.0065
  • Mayer, S., & Rathmann, J. (2018). How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions. Scientometrics, 117(3), 1663–1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2933-1
  • Moon, K. K. (2016). The effects of diversity and transformational leadership climate onorganizational citizenship behavior in the US federal government: An organizational-level longitudinal study. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(2), 361–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2016.1216002
  • Moss-Racusin, C. A., Van der Toorn, J., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Scientific diversity interventions. Science, 343(6171), 615–616. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245936
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). Chapter 3: postsecondary education. Digest of Education Statistics.https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/ch_3.asp
  • Nielsen, M. W., Bloch, C. W., & Schiebinger, L. (2018). Making gender diversity work for scientific discovery and innovation. Nat. Hum. Behav, 2(10), 726–734. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0433-1
  • Nielsen, M. W. (2016). Gender inequality and research performance: Moving beyond individual-meritocratic explanations of academic advancement. Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 2044–2060. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007945
  • Nielsen, M., & Borjeson, L. (2019). Gender diversity in the management field: Does it matter for research outcomes? Research Policy, 48(7), 1617–1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.006
  • Nishii, L. H. (2013). The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1754–1774. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0823
  • Page, S. E. (2008). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies-new edition. Princeton University Press.
  • Park, S. (2013). Does gender matter? The effect of gender representation of public bureaucracy on governmental performance. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012439933
  • Park, S. (2020). Size matters: Toward a contingency theory of diversity effects on performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(2), 278–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1657917
  • Perry, J. L., & Kraemer, K. L. (1986). Research methodology in the public administration review, 1975-1984. Public Administration Review, 46(3), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/3110436
  • Prier, E., Schwerin, E., & McCue, C. P. (2016). Implementation of sustainable public procurement practices and policies: A sorting framework. Journal of Public Procurement, 16(3), 312–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-16-03-2016-B004
  • Reskin, B. F., & Roos, P. A. (2009). Job queues, gender queues: Explaining women’s inroads into male occupations. Temple University Press.
  • Rhoten, D., & Pfirman, S. (2007). Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences. Research Policy, 36(1), 56–75. h ttps://d o i:1 0.1 016/j.respol.2006.08.001
  • Rutherford, A. (2016). The effect of top-management team heterogeneity on performance in institutions of higher education. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(1), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2016.1177559
  • Sabharwal, M. (2013). Productivity and leadership patterns of female faculty members in public administration. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(1), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2013.12001721
  • Schneid, M., Isidor, R., Li, C., & Kabst, R. (2015). The influence of cultural context on the relationship between gender diversity and team performance: A meta-analysis. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(6), 733–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.957712
  • Scutelnicu, G., & Knepper, H. (2019). A tale of two journals: Women’s representation in public administration scholarship. Public Integrity, 21(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2017.1421009
  • Shin, S., Kim, T., Lee, J., & Bian, L. (2012). Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0270
  • Slack, J. D., Myers, N., Nelson, L., & Sirk, K. (1996). Women, research, and mentorship in public administration. Public Administration Review, 56(5), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.2307/977044
  • Smith, P. (2018). Why are there so few women in senior procurement positions. Spend Matters UK/Europe. https://spendmatters.com/uk/why-are-there-so-few-women-in-senior-procurement-positions/
  • Snider, K., & Rendon, R. (2012). Public procurement: Public administration and public service perspectives. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(2), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2012.12001687
  • Song, M. (2018). Gender representation and student performance: Representative bureaucracy goes to Korea. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(4), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016676888
  • Sonnert, G. 1995. Gender differences in science careers: The project access study (with the assistance of Holton, G.). Rutgers University.
  • Stack, S. (2004). Gender, children and research productivity. Research in Higher Education, 45(8), 891–920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-5953-z
  • Terjesen, S., & Sealy, R. (2016). Board gender quotas: Exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(1), 23–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.7
  • Thai, K. V. (2001). Public procurement re-examined. Journal of Public Procurement, 1(1), 9–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-01-01-2001-B001
  • Trammell, E., Abutabenjeh, S., & Dimand, A. (2020). A review of public administration research: Where does public procurement fit in? International Journal of Public Administration, 43(8), 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1644654
  • Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 549–579. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393472
  • Van Rijnsoever, F. J., Hessels, L. K., & Vandeberg, R. L. (2008). A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers. Research Policy, 37(8), 1255–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.020
  • Way, S. F., Morgan, A. C., Larremore, D. B., & Clauset, A. (2019). Productivity,prominence, and the effects of academic environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116( 22), 10729–10733.
  • Weisshaar, K. (2017). Publish and perish? An assessment of gender gaps in promotion to tenure in academia. Social Forces, 96(2), 529–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sox052
  • Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence aboutan old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 847–870. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657505
  • Yang, P., Riepe, J., Moser, K., Pull, K., & Terjesen, S. (2019). Women directors, firm performance, and firm risk: A causal perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(5), 101297.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.