How Public Servants Confront Common Dilemmas in Public Engagement: Evidence from a Survey of Canadian Public Officials

References

• Arshad, S., & Khurram, S. (2020). Can government’s presence on social media stimulate citizens’ online political participation? Investigating the influence of transparency, trust, and responsiveness. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2016). Popular democracy: The paradox of participation. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bherer, L., & Breux, S. (2012). The diversity of public participation tools: Complementing or competing with one another? Canadian Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 379–403. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423912000376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, P., & Davis, G. (2002). Mapping public participation in policy choices. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.00255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Quick, K. S., Slotterback, C. S., & Crosby, B. C. (2013). Designing public participation processes. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02678.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bua, A. (2019). Democratic innovations and the policy process. In S. Elstub & O. Escobar (Eds.), Handbook of democratic innovation and governance (pp. 282–296). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, D. (2002). Engagement, for a change? Engaging users and communities in the policy process. Social Policy & Administration, 36(5), 516–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, J. (1987). The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology, 21(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038587021001008
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2003). Survey article: Recipes for public spheres: Eight institutional design choices and their consequences. Journal of Political Philosophy, 11(3), 338–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66, 66–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E. (2007). Enfranchising all affected interests, and its alternatives. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 35(1), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00098.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, E., & Schirra, S., 2011. Playing with empathy: Digital role-playing games in public meetings. In: Proceedings of Communities and Technologies Conference 2011 . (pp. 179–185). Association for Computing Machinery. https://dl.eusset.eu/bitstream/20.500.12015/2632/1/00404.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Guttman, N. (2007). Bringing the mountain to the public: Dilemmas and contradictions in the procedures of public deliberation initiatives that AIM to get “ordinary citizens” to deliberate policy issues. Communication Theory, 17(4), 411–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00305.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. (2007). Community engagement: Participation on whose terms? Australian Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361140701513570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M. (2009). Deliberative governance in context of power. Policy & Society, 28(3), 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.08.004
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M. (2011). The politics of public deliberation: Citizen engagement and interest advocacy. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, S. (2015). Citizen participation in budgeting: A trade‐off between knowledge and inclusiveness? Public Administration Review, 75(4), 572–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo, S., & Nabatchi, T. (2020). Different processes, different outcomes? Assessing the individual‐level impacts of public participation. Public Administration Review, 81(1), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. F. (2011). The limits of deliberative democracy and empowerment: Elite motivation in three Canadian cases. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423910001058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Greenaway, J. (1998). Shifting agendas, changing regulatory structures and the ‘new’politics of environmental pollution: British coastal water policy, 1955–1995. Public Administration, 76(4), 669–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, J., & Bishop, P. (2002). Engagement and contest: The danger of mixing modes. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.00261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larocque, F. (2011). The impact of institutionalization, politicization and mobilization on the direct participation of citizens experiencing poverty. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 883–902. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423911000795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, K., Abelson, J., Giacomini, M., & Contandriopoulos, D. (2015). Conceptualizing the use of public involvement in health policy decision-making. Social Science & Medicine, 138(August), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, Y., & Schachter, H. L. (2018). Exploring the antecedents of municipal managers’ attitudes towards citizen participation. Public Management Review, 20(9), 1287–1308. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1363903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, L., McNutt, K., & Rayner, J. (2015). Power to the people? The impacts and outcomes of energy public engagement in Saskatchewan and Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 48(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423915000190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masuda, J. R., McGee, T. K., & Garvin, T. D. (2008). Power, knowledge, and public engagement: Constructing ‘citizenship’in Alberta’s industrial heartland. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 10(4), 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080802332026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, J., Rahman, T., & Somer, M. (2018). Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: Common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences for democratic polities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migchelbrink, K., & Van de Walle, S. (2020a). When will public officials listen? A vignette experiment on the effects of input legitimacy on public officials’ willingness to use public participation. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migchelbrink, K., & Van de Walle, S. (2020b). Increasing the cost of participation: Red tape and public officials’ attitudes toward public participation. International Review of Administrative Sciences, July, 0020852320942311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852320942311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montpetit, É. (2003). Public public engagement in policy network environments: The case of assisted reproductive technology policy in Canada. Canadian Public Policy, 29(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.2307/3552490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., & Leighninger, M. (2015). Public participation for 21st century democracy. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J. (2006). Deliberating in the real world: Problems of legitimacy in deliberative democracy. Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, politics and the state. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raboy, M. (1995). The role of public engagement in shaping the Canadian broadcasting system. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 28(3), 455–477. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423900006697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rega, C., & Baldizzone, G. (2015). Public participation in strategic environmental assessment: A practitioners’ perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50(January), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. (2004). Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. The American Review of Public Administration, 34(4), 315–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074004269288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, F. M., Mellon, J., & Peixoto, T. (2017). The effect of bureaucratic responsiveness on citizen participation. Public Administration Review, 77(3), 340–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. (2009). The dilemmas of engagement. ANU Press. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/33773/459074.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. C. (1993). Public involvement and governmental effectiveness: A decision-making model for public managers. Administration & Society, 24(4), 444–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979302400402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, L. C., Aydelotte, J., & Miller, J. (2000). Putting more public in policy analysis. Public Administration Review, 60(4), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. (2009). Governance-driven democratization. Critical Policy Studies, 3(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460170903158040
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Callahan, K. (2007). Citizen involvement efforts and bureaucratic responsiveness: Participatory values, stakeholder pressures, and administrative practicality. Public Administration Review, 67(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00711.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Pandey, S. K. (2011). Further dissecting the black box of citizen participation: When does citizen involvement lead to good outcomes? Public Administration Review, 71(6), 880–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02417.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar