Administrative Discretion Through Changing Presidencies and Political Polarization: Reflection on the Rise, Fall, and Rise of Federal-Local Immigration Partnerships in the U.S.

References

• Ambrosini, M. (2017). Why irregular migrants arrive and remain: The role of intermediaries. Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies, 43(11), 1813–1830. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1260442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosini, M., Cinalli, M., & Jacobson, D. (Eds.). (2020). Migration, borders and citizenship: Between policy and public spheres. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• American Civil Liberties Union. (2012, September 27). Failed 287(g) program leads to racial profiling and should not be renewed, ACLU says. Retrieved March 24, 2022, from https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/aclu-urges-ice-end-agreements-delegating-immigration-authority?redirect=immigrants-rights-racial-justice/aclu-urges-ice-end-agreements-delegating-immigration-authority
   Google Scholar
• American Civil Liberties Union. (2022). License to abuse: How ICE’s 287(g) program empowers racist sheriffs. Retrieved June 8, 2022, from https://www.aclu.org/report/license-abuse-how-ices-287g-program-empowers-racist-sheriffs
   Google Scholar
• American Immigration Council. (2021, July 8). The 287(g) program: An overview. Retrieved October 23, 2021, from https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/sites/default/files/research/the_287g_program_an_overview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ashcroft, J. (2002, June 6). Attorney general prepared remarks on the national security entry-exit registration system. Retrieved March 24, 2022, from https://www.justice.gov/archive/ag/speeches/2002/060502agpreparedremarks.htm
   Google Scholar
• Bastien, J. (2009). Goal ambiguity and informal discretion in the implementation of public policies: The case of Spanish immigration policy. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(4), 665–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852309351472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrelli, L. M. (2021). The border inside–organizational socialization of street-level bureaucrats in the European migration regime. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 36(4), 579–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2019.1676815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchard, G., & Carroll, B. W. (2002). Policy‐making and administrative discretion: The case of immigration in Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 45(2), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2002.tb01082.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. (2021). ICE comes to Tennessee: Violence work and abolition in the Appalachian South. Citizenship Studies, 25(2), 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2020.1859189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, B., Hobbs, M., Kaiser, A., Lang, S., Montero, D., Romines, K., & Scott, T. (2004). Immigration and immigrants: Trends in American public opinion, 1964-1999. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 12(3), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1300/J051v12n03_04
   Google Scholar
• Capps, R., Rosenblum, M. R., Rodriguez, C., & Chishti, M. (2011). Delegation and divergence: A study of 287 (g) state and local immigration enforcement. Migration Policy Institute. http://www.migrationpolicy.org/pubs/287g-divergence.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chacón, J. M. (2009). A diversion of attention: Immigration courts and the adjudication of fourth and fifth amendment rights. Duke Law Journal, 59(1), 1564–1,643.
   Google Scholar
• Chand, D. E. (2020). Is it population or personnel? The effects of diversity on immigration policy implementation by sheriff offices. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(2), 304–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1596821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chand, D., Calderon, M. A., & Hawes, D. P. (2022). Immigrant-serving organizations and local law enforcement: Do nonprofits predict cooperation with ICE? Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 8(3), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.8.3.423-444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, A. B. (2008). Why is the policeman asking for my visa? The future of federalism and immigration enforcement. Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law, 15(2), 209–242.
   Google Scholar
• Chand, D. E., & Schreckhise, W. D. (2015). Secure communities and community values: Local context and discretionary immigration law enforcement. Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies, 41(10), 1621–1643. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2014.986441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creek, H. M., & Yoder, S. (2012). With a little help from our feds: Understanding state immigration enforcement policy adoption in American federalism. Policy Studies Journal, 40(4), 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00469.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edlins, M., & Larrison, J. (2020). Street-level bureaucrats and the governance of unaccompanied migrant children. Public Policy and Administration, 35(4), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076718811438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, E. E. (1947). The California alien land law and the fourteenth amendment. California Law Review, 35(1), 61–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/3477375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, J. M., Rodriguez, N., & Castro, B. (2011). Social effects of mass deportations by the United States government, 2000–10. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(8), 1374–1391. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2011.575233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, B. (1993). Michael Lipsky and street level bureaucracy. In M. Hill (Ed.), The policy process: A reader (pp. 386–398). Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, J. (2016). Securing communities or profits? The effect of federal-local partnerships on immigration enforcement. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 16(3), 362–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440015626401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., Stråth, B., & Triandafyllidou, A. (2003). Contextualising immigration policy implementation in Europe. Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies, 29(2), 195–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183032000079594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. (2017, February 20). Memorandum: Enforcement of the immigration laws to serve the national interest. Retrieved March 27, 2022, from https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/17_0220_S1_Enforcement-of-the-Immigration-Laws-to-Serve-the-National-Interest.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lacayo, A. E. (2010). The impact of 287(g) of the immigration and nationality act on the latino community. National Council of LaRaza, Issue Brief No. 21. http://www.nclr.org/index.php/publications/the_impact_if_section_287g_ of_the_immigration_and_nationality_act_on_the_latino_community/
   Google Scholar
• Larrison, J., & Edlins, M. (2020). Exploring the responsibilities of street-level bureaucrats through the perspectives of unaccompanied migrant youth and their sponsors. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1672730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucrac. y: dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russel Sage. In LipskyStreet-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610447713
   Google Scholar
• Lucio, J. D. (2016). Public administrators and noncitizens. Administration & Society, 48(7), 831–850. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713509246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle, M. (2019). Following metro, Las Vegas ends its 287(g) agreement. Nevada Current. Retrieved February 5, 2023, from https://www.nevadacurrent.com/blog/following-metro-las-vegas-ends-its-287g-agreement/
   Google Scholar
• Martinsen, D. S. (2011). Judicial policy-making and Europeanization: the proportionality of national control and administrative discretion. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(7), 944–961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S. W., & Musheno, M. C. (2022). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.12247078
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. (1993). Latinos and representative bureaucracy testing the Thompson and Henderson hypotheses. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 3(4), 393–414.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, L. (2012). Policy innovation or vertical integration? A view of immigration federalism from the States. Law & Policy, 34(2), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2011.00360.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, J. (2019). Solid majority still opposes new construction of border wall. Gallup Retrieved February 5, 2022, from https://news.gallup.com/poll/246455/solid-majority-opposes-new-construction-border-wall.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Oyekanmi, A. A., & Agboola, A. O. (2022). The role of comparative public administration in the development of public institutions: The nigerian and britain example. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 12(1), 153167–153167. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v12i1.19671
   Google Scholar
• Pedroza, J. M. (2019). Deportation discretion: Tiered influence, minority threat, and ‘secure communities’ deportations. Policy Studies Journal, 47(3), 624–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, H. (2018). 287(g) Agreements in the trump era. Washington and Lee Law Review, 75(1), 253–1,286.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha, R. R., & Rodolfo, E. (2009). Racial threat, residential segregation, and the policy attitudes of Anglos. Political Research Quarterly, 62(2), 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908320931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreckhise, W. D., & Chand, D. E. (2021). Intergovernmental implementation in a time of uncooperative federalism: Immigration enforcement and federal secure communities program, 2011–14. Policy Studies Journal, 49(4), 1160–1188. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2011). Fact sheet: Delegation of immigration authority section 287(g) immigration and nationality act. http://www.ice.gov/news/library/factsheets/287g.htm
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2009). Immigration enforcement: Better controls needed over program authorizing state and local enforcement of federal immigration laws. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09109.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (2006, August 16). Fact sheet: Section 287(g) immigration and nationality act. Retrieved March 24, 2022, from https://web.archive.org/web/20060925232202/http:/www.ice.gov/doclib/pi/news/factsheets/060816dc287gfactsheet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (2012, December 20). FY 2012: ICE announces year-end removal numbers, highlights focus on key priorities and issues new national detainer guidance to further focus resources. Retrieved March 27, 2022, from https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/fy-2012-ice-announces-year-end-removal-numbers-highlights-focus-key-priorities-and
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (2017, July 31). ICE announces 18 new 287(g) agreements in Texas. Retrieved March 23, 2022, from https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/ice-announces-18-new-287g-agreements-texas
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (2021, January 31). Delegation of immigration authority section 287(g) immigration and nationality act. Retrieved January 15, 2022, from https://web.archive.org/web/20210131051047/https://www.ice.gov/identify-and-arrest/287g
   Google Scholar
• Varsanyi, M. W., Lewis, P. G., Provine, D. M., & Decker, S. (2012). A multilayered jurisdictional patchwork: Immigration federalism in the United States. Law & Policy, 34(2), 138–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2011.00356.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins-Hayes, C. (2011). Race, respect, and red tape: Inside the black box of racially representative bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 21(suppl_2), i233–i251. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq096
   Google Scholar
• Weissman, D. M., Headen, R. C., Parker, K. L., Bandy, K., & Currie, C. (2009). The policies and politics of local immigration enforcement laws. University of North Carolina, Immigration & Human Rights Clinic.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, V. M., & Williams, B. N. (2008). Black or blue: Racial profiling and representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 68(4), 654–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00905.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. M. (2015). Beyond enforcement: Welcomeness, local law enforcement, and immigrants. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, A. F. (2018). Welcoming New Americans? Local governments and immigrant incorporation. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226572796.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Wong, T. K. (2012). 287 (g) and the politics of interior immigration control in the United States: Explaining local cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies, 38(5), 737–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo, J., & Huang, X. (2020). Migration in public administration research: A systematic review and future directions. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1672731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar