Incremental budgeting: A test of the model

References

• Natchez , Peter B. and Bupp , Irvin C. 1973 . Policy and Priority In Process . American Political Science Review , 67 September : 953
   Google Scholar
• Starling , Grover . 1979 . The Politics and Economics of Public Policy , 414 Homewood, Illiniois : The Dorsey Press .
   Google Scholar
• Testimony of Allen Schick . . U. S. Senate Committee on Government Operations (subcommittee on Intergovernmental Relations) . Government Economy and Spending Reforms Act of 1976 . 1976 , Hearings. pp. 27 Washington, D.C : Government Printing Office . March 17 t o April 7
   Google Scholar
• Anton , Thomas O. The Politics of State Expenditures in Illinois , Urbana, Illinois : The University of Illinois Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bailey , John J. and O'Connor , R.O. Operationalizing Incrementalism: Measuring the Muddles . Public Administration Review , 35 January : 342 February
   Google Scholar
• LeLoup , Lance T. 1977 . Budgetary Politics: Dollars, Deficits, Decisions , 228 Brunswick, Ohio : King 10 Court Communications .
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan , Richard D. 1978 . State Budgeting In Ohio , 22 Columbus, Ohio : Ohio Legislative Budget Office .
   Google Scholar
• Bailey , John J. and O'Connor , R.O. 1978 . op. cit , : 343
   Google Scholar
• Curzon , David and Gross , Bertram M. 1970 . PBB: Budgetary Review of the Cost and Effects of Government Activities . United Nations Intergovernmental Seminar . October 27 1970 , Washington, D.C. pp. 3
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan , Richard D. op. cit , 341
   Google Scholar
• For purposes of some analysis in this research either the whole sample of eighteen agencies were used or a subset six representative agencies were used to avoid unwiedly tables This was done only after comparing the results using eighteen to the results using six when the difference was minimal or non-existent.
   Google Scholar
• Ohio divides its operating budget in to two funds, Fund II and Fund 12. The former is composed of closed-ended accounts. These accounts each has a three digit number which describes the purpose to which the funds in the accounts will be put. The general categories of these accounts are 100-personnel, 200-maintenance, 300-equipment, etc.
   Google Scholar
• The ANOVA analysis was performed using the five major account sections of the budget document. These range from operating expenses (100-300), special purposes (4OO), subsidies (5OO), rotary funds (6OO), and capital improvements (700). These accounts were considered the dependent variable while the four political versions of the budget comprised the independent variable. A five by four table was thus constructed for non-experimental analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Dye , Thomas R. 1966 . Politics, Economics, and the Public , Chicago, Illinois : Rans McNally .
   Google Scholar
• Sharkansky , Ira . 1968 . Spending In the American States , Chicago, Illinois : Rand McNally .
   Google Scholar
• Davis , Otto M. 1966 . A Theory of the Budgetary Process , 60 September : 529 – 530 .
   Google Scholar
• Davis , Otto M. 1966 . ibid , 60 September reported very high coefficients. However, they did not analyze the invrements but used bases as raw data
   Google Scholar
• Scatterdiagrams revealed little that would in dicate curvil linearity in the dat a as one would expect with such a short time series.
   Google Scholar
• This was done by using the current appropriation.
   Google Scholar
• Sharkansky , Ira and Turnbull , A. 1969 . Budge Making In Georgia and Wisconsin: A Test of a Model . Midwest Journal of Political Science , 13 November : 235
   Google Scholar
• Davis . 1969 . op. cit , 13 November : 531
   Google Scholar
• 1969 . Y_T= BO+ (X_T−1)+ (X_T −2)+ E_T , 13 November
   Google Scholar