Using job evaluation to achieve pay equity

References

• Acker , Joan . 1987 . “ Sex Bias in Job Evaluation: A Comparable Worth Issue ” . In Ingredients for Women's Employment Policy , Edited by: Bose , C. and Spitz , G. Albany, New York : State University of New York Press .
   Google Scholar
• Acker , J. “ Comparable Worth: The Oregon Case ” . In The Politics and Practice of Pay Equity , Edited by: Steinberg , R. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : Temple University Press . forthcoming
   Google Scholar
• Akalin , M. T. 1970 . Office Job Evaluation , Des Plaines, Illinois : Industrial Management Society .
   Google Scholar
• Anderson , C. H. and Corts , D. B. 1973 . Development of a Framework for a Factor-Ranking Benchmark System of Job Evaluation , Washington, D.C. : Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center .
   Google Scholar
• Arthur Young and Company . 1981 . A Comparable Worth Study of the Michigan Job Classifications , Lansing, Michigan : Office of Women and Work, Michigan Department of Labor .
   Google Scholar
• Arvey , R. D. 1979 . Unfair Discrimination in the Employment Interview: Legal and Psychological Aspects . Psychological Bulletin , 86 : 736 – 765 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvey , R. D. 1986 . Sex Bias in Job Evaluation Procedures . Personnel Psychology , 39 : 315 – 335 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvey , R. D. , Maxwell , S. E. and Abraham , L. M. 1985 . Reliability Artifacts in Comparable Worth Procedures . Journal of Applied Psychology , 70 : 695 – 705 .
   Google Scholar
• Arvey , R. D. , Passino , E. M. and Lounsbury , J. W. 1977 . Job Analysis Results as Influenced by Sex of Incumbent and Sex of Analyst . Journal of Applied Psychology , 62 : 411 – 416 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash , P. 1948 . The Reliability of Job Evaluation Rankings . Journal of Applied Psychology , 32 : 313 – 320 .
   Google Scholar
• Atchison , T. and French , W. 1967 . Pay Systems for Scientists and Engineers . Industrial Relations , 7 : 44 – 56 .
   Google Scholar
• Beatty , R. W. and Beatty , J. R. 1984 . “ Some Problems with Contemporary Job Evaluation Systems ” . In Comparable Worth and Wage Discrimination , Edited by: Remick , H. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : Temple University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Benge , E. J. 1984 . “ Using Factor Methods to Measure Jobs ” . In Handbook of Wage and Salary Administration , Edited by: Rock , M. New York : McGraw Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Bielby , W. T. and Baron , J. N. 1984 . “ A Woman's Place is with Other Women: Sex Segregation Within Organizations ” . In Sex Segregation in the Workplace , Edited by: Reskin , B. F. Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press .
   Google Scholar
• Chesler , D. J. 1948 . Reliability and Comparability of Different Job Evaluation Systems . Journal of Applied Psychology , 32 : 465 – 475 .
   Google Scholar
• Collett , M. J. 1983 . Comparable Worth: An Overview . Public Personnel Management , 12 : 325 – 331 .
   Google Scholar
• Doverspike , D. A. and Barrett , G. V. 1984 . An Internal Bias Analysis of a Job Evaluation Instrument . Journal of Applied Psychology , 69 : 648 – 662 .
   Google Scholar
• Doverspike , D. , Carlist , A. M. , Barrett , G. V. and Alexander , R. A. 1983 . Generalizabi1ity Analysis of a Point-Method Job Evaluation Instrument . Journal of Applied Psychology , 68 : 476 – 483 .
   Google Scholar
• Dresang , D. L. “ Gender and Pay: The Politics of Pay Equity in Wisconsin ” . In The Politics and Practice of Pay Equity , Edited by: Steimberg , R. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : Temple University Press . forthcoming
   Google Scholar
• Eulberg , J. R. 1987 . “ An Examination of the Measurement Properties and Role of Gender-Related Biases in the Evaluation of Non-Exempt Jobs ” . School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas . Ph.D. Dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Fraser , S. L. , Cronshaw , S. F. and Alexander , R. A. 1984 . Generalizabi1ity Analysis of a Point Method Job Evaluation Instrument: A Field Study . Journal of Applied Psychology , 69 : 643 – 647 .
   Google Scholar
• Gomez-Mejia , L. R. , Page , R. C and Tornow , W. W. 1982 . A Comparison of the Practical Utility of Traditional, Statistical, and Hybrid Job Evaluation Approaches . Academy of Management Journal , 25 : 790 – 809 .
   Google Scholar
• Grams , R. and Schwab , D. P. 19851985 . An Investigation of Systematic Gender-Related Error in Job Evaluation . Academy of Management Journal , 28 : 279 – 290 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann , H. I. and Treiman , D. J. 1983 . Notes on the NAS Study of Equal Pay for Jobs of Equal Value . Public Personnel Management , 12 : 404 – 417 .
   Google Scholar
• Jones , A. M. 1948 . Job Evaluation of Non-Academic Work at the University of Illinois . Journal of Applied Psychology , 32 : 15 – 19 .
   Google Scholar
• Katz , P. A. 1984 . “ The Federal Civil Service ” . In Handbook of Wage and Salary Administration , Edited by: Rock , M. New York : McGraw Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Lawshe , C. H. Jr. and Farbo , P. C. 1949 . Studies in Job Evaluation: 8. The Reliability of an Abbreviated Job Evaluation System . Journal of Applied Psychology , 33 : 158 – 166 .
   Google Scholar
• Lawshe , C. H. Jr. and Wilson , R. F. 1947 . Studies in Job Evaluation: 6. The Reliability of Two Point Rating Systems . Journal of Applied Psychology , 31 : 355 – 365 .
   Google Scholar
• Madigan , R. M. 1985 . Comparable Worth Judgements: A Measurement Properties Analysis . Journal of Applied Psychology , 70 : 137 – 147 .
   Google Scholar
• Madigan , R. M. and Hoover , D. J. 1986 . Effects of Alternative Job Evaluation Methods on Decisions Involving Pay Equity . Academy of Management Journal , 29 : 84 – 100 .
   Google Scholar
• McArthur , L. Z. 1985 . “ Social Judgement Biases in Comparable Worth Analysis ” . In Comparable Worth: New Directions for Research , Edited by: Hartmann , Heidi I. Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press .
   Google Scholar
• McArthur , L. Z. and Obrant , S. W. 1986 . Sex Biases in Comparable Worth Analyses . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 16 : 757 – 770 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick , E. J. , Jeanneret , P. R. and Mecham , R. C. 1972 . A Study of Job Characteristics and Job Dimensions as Based on the Position Description Questionnaire . Journal of Applied Psychology , 56 : 547 – 562 .
   Google Scholar
• Nieva , V. F. and Gutek , B. A. 1980 . Sex Effects on Evaluation . Academy of Management , 5 : 267 – 276 .
   Google Scholar
• Northrup , Herbert R. 1980 . “ Wage Setting and Collective Bargaining ” . In Comparable Worth: Issues and Alternatives , Edited by: Livernash , E. R. Washington, D.C. : Equal Employment Advisory Council .
   Google Scholar
• Orazem , P. F. and Mattila , P. 1989 . “ Comparable Worth and the Structure of Earnings: The Iowa Case ” . In Pay Equity: Empirical Inquiries , Edited by: Michael , R. T. , Hartmann , H. I. and O’Farrell , B. Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press .
   Google Scholar
• Patten , T. 1987 . “ How Do You Know If Your Job Evaluation System is Working? ” . In New Perspectives on Compensation , Edited by: Balkin , D. B. and Gemez-Mejia , L. R. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey : Prentice Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Pierson , D. A. , Koziara , K. S. and Johannesson , R. 1984 . “ A Policy-Capturing Application in a Union Setting ” . In Comparable Worth and Wage Discrimination , Edited by: Remick , H. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : Temple University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Remick , H. 1984 . “ Major Issues in A Priori Applications ” . In Comparable Worth and Wage Discrimination , Edited by: Remick , H. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : Temple University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Robinson , D. D. , Wahlstrom , O. H. and Mecham , R. C. 1974 . Comparison of Job Evaluation Methods: A Policy-Capturing Approach Using the Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ) . Journal of Applied Psychology , 59 : 633 – 637 .
   Google Scholar
• Rothchild , N. 1984 . “ Overview of Pay Initiatives, 1974-1984 ” . In Comparable Worth: Issue for the 80's , Washington, D.C. : U.S. Commission on Civil Rights .
   Google Scholar
• Schwab , D. P. 1980 . “ Job Evaluation and Pay Setting: Concepts and Practices ” . In Comparable Worth: Issues and Alternatives , Edited by: Livernash , E. R. Washington, D.C. : Equal Employment Advisory Council .
   Google Scholar
• Schwab , D. P. 1985 . “ Job Evaluation Research and Research Needs ” . In Comparable Worth: New Directions for Research , Edited by: Hartmann , Heidi L. Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press .
   Google Scholar
• Schwab , D. P. and Grams , R. 1985 . Sex-Related Errors in Job Evaluation: A Real-World Test . Journal of Applied Psychology , 70 : 533 – 539 .
   Google Scholar
• Schwab , D. P. and Heneman , H. G. III. 1986 . Assessment of a Consensus-Based Multiple Information Source Job Evaluation System . Journal of Applied Psychology , 71 : 354 – 356 .
   Google Scholar
• Schwab , D. P. and Wichern , D. W. 1983 . Systematic Bias in Job Evaluation and Market Wages: Implications for the Comparable Worth Debate . Journal of Applied Psychology , 31 : 353 – 364 .
   Google Scholar
• Snelgar , R. J. 1983 . The Comparability of Job Evaluation Methods in Supplying Approximately Similar Classifications in Rating One Job Series . Personnel Psychology , 36 : 371 – 380 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg , R. J. 1984 . “ Identifying Wage Discrimination and Implementing Pay Equity Adjustments ” . In Comparable Worth: Issue for the 80's , Washington, D.C. : U.S. Commission on Civil Rights .
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg , R. J. , Haignere , L. , Bose , C. and Spitz , G. 1987 . “ Equitable Compensation: Methodological Criteria for Comparable Worth ” . In Ingredients for Women's Employment Policy , Albany, New York : State University of New York Press .
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg , R. J. , Haignere , L. , Possin , C. , Chertos , C. H. and Treiman , D. J. 1986 . The New York State Pay Equity Study: A Research Report , Albany, New York : Center for Women in Government, State University of New York Press .
   Google Scholar
• Treiman , D. J. 1979 . Job Evaluation: An Analytic Review , Washington, D.C. : National Academy of Sciences . Interim Report to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
   Google Scholar