Foliar application of sulfur improved growth, yield and physiological attributes of canola (brassica napus L.) under heat stress conditions

References

• Ahmad, Z., E. A. Waraich, C. Barutçular, H. Alharby, A. Bamagoos, F. Kizilgeci, F. Öztürk, A. Hossain, Y. Bayoumi, and A. E. Sabagh. 2020. Enhancing drought tolerance in camelina sativa l. and canola napus l. Through application of selenium. Pakistan Journal of Botany 52 (6):1927–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.30848/PJB2020-6(31).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anjum, N. A., S. S. Gill, S. Umar, I. Ahmad, A. C. Duarte, and E. Pereira. 2012. Improving growth and productivity of Oleiferous Brassicas under changing environment: significance of nitrogen and sulphur nutrition, and underlying mechanisms. TheScientificWorldJournal 2012:657808. doi: https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/657808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anjum, F., A. Wahid, M. Farooq, and F. Javed. 2011. Potential of foliar applied thiourea in improving salt and high temperature tolerance of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 13:251–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babu, S. N. S., and D. M. Hegde. 2010. Delineation of sulphur deficient soil and evaluation of oilseed crops responses to sulphur. Fertilizer Market News 33:9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Begum, F., F. Hossain, and M. R. I. Mondal. 2012. Influence of Sulphur on morpho-physiological and yield parameters of canola (Brassica campestris L.). Journal of Agriculture Research 37 (4):645–52.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas, H., R. K. Rattan, S. P. Datta, and A. K. Singh. 2003. Adsorption and translocation of sulfur in some tropical acid soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 166 (4):519–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200320245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, N. C., and R. R. Weil. 2002. The nature and properties of soils. Singapore: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bukhari, M. A., M. S. Sharif, Z. Ahmad, C. Barutçular, M. Afzal, A. Hossain, and A. E. L. Sabagh. 2020. Silicon mitigates the adverse effect of drought in canola (Brassica napus L.) through promoting the physiological and antioxidants activity. Silicon 3 (2):205–210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00685-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan, D. R., S. Paroda, and M. Ram. 1996. Response of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) to biofertilizers, sulphur and nitrogen fertilization. Indian Journal of Agronomy 41 (4):620–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crafts-Brandner, S. J., and M. E. Salvucci. 2000. Rubisco activase constrains the photosynthetic potential of leaves at high temperature and CO2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97 (24):13430–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.230451497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donahue, R. A., M. E. Poulson, and G. E. Edwards. 1997. A method for measuring whole plant photosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Photosynthesis Research 52 (3):263–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005834327441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Sabagh, A., A. Hossain, C. Barutçular, O. Gormus, Z. Ahmad, S. Hussain, M. S. Islam, H. Alharby, A. Bamagoos, N. Kumar, et al. 2019. Effects of drought stress on the quality of major oilseed crops: Implications and possible mitigation strategies -A review. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 17 (2):4019–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1702_40194043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, J., K. Thorup-Kristensen, and M. Askegaard. 2004. Plant availability of catch crop sulfur following spring incorporation. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 167 (5):609–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200420415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, R., R. H. Ellis, T. R. Wheeler, and P. Hadley. 1998. Effect of high temperature stress at anthesis on grain yield and biomass of field grown crops of wheat. Plant Cell Environment 34:67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, P. K., K. M. Hati, K. G. Mandal, A. K. Misra, R. S. Chaudhary, and K. K. Bandyopadhyay. 2000. Sulfur nutrition in oilseeds and oilseeds-based cropping systems. Fort. Newsletter 8:51–2.
   Google Scholar
• GOP. 2017–2018. Economic survey of Pakistan, 19–20. Islamabad, Pakistan: Ministry of Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A. E. 2001. Crop responses to environment. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Haneklaus, S., H. M. Paulsen, and A. K. Gupta. 1999. Influence of sulfur fertilization on yield and quality of oilseed rape and mustard. In New horizons for an old crop. Proceedings of 10th International Rapeseed Congress. Australia Capital Territory, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Imran, and A. A. Khan. 2015. Phenological charateristics of Brassica napus L. as influenced by biochar application and shoot cutting duration (days). Civil and Environmental Research 7 (3):104–7.
   Google Scholar
• Imran, A. A. Khan, H. Z. Inamullah, A. Fayaz, T. S. Syed, and U. Amjad, Irfanullah. 2015. Yield and yield attributes of canola cultivars as influence by sulfur level under Swat valley conditions. Pure and Applied Biology 4 (3):296–301.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal, J. 1988. Effect of applied sulphur on yield and quality to Brassica juncea (Raya Pila). MSc thesis., Dept. Soil Sci. University of Agriculture, Faisalabad.
   Google Scholar
• Itanna, F. 2005. Sulfur distribution in five Ethiopian Rift Valley soils under humid and semi-arid climate. Journal of Arid Environment 62 (4):597–612. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagetiya, B. L., and M. J. Kaur. 2006. Role of thiourea in improving productivity of soybean. International Journal of Plant Science 1:308–10.
   Google Scholar
• Jan, S. A., N. Bibi, Z. K. Shinwari, M. A. Rabbani, S. Ullah, A. Qadir, and N. Khan. 2017. Impact of salt, drought, heat and frost stresses on morpho-biochemical and physiological properties of Brassica species: An updated review. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development 2:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, H. G. 1992. Plants and microclimate: A quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kandil, H., M. H. El-Halfawi, and S. A. Ibrahim. 2011. Influence of elemental sulfur and/or inoculation with sulfur oxidizing bacteria on growth, and nutrient content of sorghum plants grown on different soils. Factori şi Procese Pedogenetice din Zona Temperată 10:13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Kandil, H., and N. Gad. 2012. Growth and oil production of canola as affected by different sulphur sources. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research 2:5196–202.
   Google Scholar
• Kastori, R., M. Plesnicar, I. A. Maksimovic, N. Petrovic, D. Pankovic, and Z. Sakac. 2000. Photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and water relations in young sugar beet plants as affected by sulfur supply. Journal of Plant Nutrition 23 (8):1037–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160009382080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, P. C., B. R. Bochner, and B. N. Ames. 1983. AppppA, heat-shock stress, and cell oxidation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 80 (24):7496–500. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.80.24.7496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhi, S. S., Y. Gan, and J. P. Raney. 2007. Yield, seed quality, and sulfur uptake of Brassica oilseed crops in response to sulfur fertilization. Agronomy Journal 99 (2):570–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhi, S. S., and K. S. Gill. 2002. Effectiveness of sulphate-S fertilization at different growth stages for yield, seed quality and S uptake of canola. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 82 (4):665–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.4141/P01-184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marking, S. 2018. The effect of temperature on the rate of photosynthesis. https://sciencing.com/effect-temperature-rate-photosynthesis-19595.html
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, D. I. 1981. Pattern of flower and pod development in rapeseed. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 61 (2):275–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps81-040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. R., A. M. Johnston, S. A. Brandt, C. L. McDonald, D. A. Derksen, and J. Waddington. 1998. Comparing the adaptation of canola, canola and mustard to three soil climatic zones of the Canadian prairies. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 78 (4):565–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.4141/P97-153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, G. 1960. Some relations between number of seeds per pod, seed size and oil content and the effects of selection for these characters in Brassica and Sinapsis. Hereditas 46:27–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postma, R., P. J. Van Erp, and R. Saanen. 1999. Quantifying the sulfur supply to agricultural crops. In Sulfur in plants, eds. Y. P. Abroland, and A. Ahmad, 60–61. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, S. N., and B. G. Sing. 1996. Growth and development of sunflower as influenced by sulphur and benzyladenine. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 10 (2):171–5.
   Google Scholar
• Saleem, M., E. Elahi, A. W. Gandahi, S. M. Bhatti, H. Ibrahim, and M. Ali. 2019. Effect of sulphur application on growth, oil content and yield of sunflower. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 35 (4):1198–203. doi: https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2019/35.4.1198.1203.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, H. W. 2001. Sulfur in crop production. European Journal of Agronomy 14 (2):81–111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00082-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonhof, I., D. Blankenburg, S. Muller, and A. Krumbein. 2007. Sulfur and nitrogen supply influence growth, product appearance, and glucosinolate concentration of broccoli. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 170 (1):65–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200620639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharifi, R. S. 2012. Study of yield, yield attribute and dry matter accumulation of canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars in relation to sulphur fertilizer. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 4 (7):409–15.
   Google Scholar
• Shekhawat, P., A. Rathore, and M. Singh. 1996. Effect of source and level of sulphur on yield attributes and seed yield of clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 41:424–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sing, A., S. P. Sing, R. S. Katyar, and P. P. Sing. 2000. Response of nitrogen and sulphur on economic yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under sodic soil condition. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 70 (8):536–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel, R. G. D., J. H. Torrie, and D. A. Deekey. 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach. 3rd ed, 400–428. New York: McGraw Hill Book. Int. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Steffenson, D. 1954. Irregularities of chromosome division in Tradescantia grown on low sulfate. Experimental Cell Research 6:554–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, W. M (M. ). 2010. Sulfur–The 4th Major Nutrient," IPNI Plant Nutrition TODAY, Spring, 2010, No. 7, www.ipni.net/pnt
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari, K. N., and B. R. Gupta. 2006. Sulfur for sustainable high yield agriculture in Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Fertilizer 1:37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Tomer, T. S., S. Singh, S. Kumar, and S. Tomer. 1997. Response of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) to nitrogen, phosphorus and sulphur fertilization. Indian Journal of Agronomy 42:148–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trividi, S. K., and V. Singh. 1999. Response of black gram (Phaseolus mungo). Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) cropping sequence to fertilizer application. Indian Journal of Agriculture Science 69:86–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollenweider, P., and M. S. Gunthardt-Goerg. 2005. Diagnosis of abiotic and biotic stress factors using the visible symptoms in foliage. Environmental Pollution (Barking, Essex: 1987) 137 (3):455–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2005.01.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahid, A. 2007. Physiological implications of metabolite biosynthesis for net assimilation and heat-stress tolerance of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) sprouts. Journal of Plant Research 120 (2):219–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-006-0040-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahid, A., S. Gelani, M. Ashraf, and M. R. Foolad. 2007. Heat tolerance in plants: An overview. Environmental and Experimental Botany 61 (3):199–223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waraich, E. A., R. Ahmad, R. Ahmad, Z. Ahmad, Z. Ahmad, C. Barutcular, M. Erman, F. Cig, H. Saneoka, F. Öztürk, et al. 2020a. Comparative study of growth, physiology and yield attributes of camelina (camelina sativa L.) and canola (Brassica napus L.) Under different irrigation regimes. Pakistan Journal of Botany 52 (5):1537–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.30848/PJB2020-5(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waraich, E. A., F. Rashid, Z. Ahmad, R. Ahmad, and M. Ahmad. 2020b. Foliar applied potassium stimulate drought tolerance in canola under water deficit conditions. Journal of Plant Nutrition 43 (13):1923–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1758132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, F. J., S. E. Salmon, P. J. A. Withers, J. M. Monaghan, E. J. Evans, P. R. Shewry, and S. P. McGrath. 1999. Variation in the bread making quality and rheological properties of wheat in relation to sulfur nutrition under field conditions. Journal of Cereal Science 30 (1):19–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.1998.0244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, F. J., P. J. A. Withers, E. J. Evans, J. Monaghan, S. E. Salmon, P. R. Shewry, and S. P. McGrath. 1997. Sulfur nutrition: An important factor for the quality of wheat and rapeseed. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 43 (sup1):1137–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.1997.11863731.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., X. Xiao, D. Bi, and F. Hu. 2008. Effects of sulfur fertilization on soybean root and leaf traits, and soil microbial activity. Journal of Plant Nutrition 31 (3):473–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160801895001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar