Zinc fertilization strategies in soybean: plant uptake, yield, and seed concentration

References

• Bender, R. R., J. W. Haegele, and F. E. Below. 2015. Uptake, partitioning, and remobilization in modern soybean varieties. Agronomy Journal 107 (2):563–73. doi: 10.2134/agronj14.0435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, J., Jr., J. J. Mortvedt, F. R. Cox, L. M. Shuman, and R. M. Welch. 1991. Plant tissue analysis in micronutrients. In ’Micronutrients in agriculture, 477–521. Madison, WI: SSSA Inc. doi: 10.2136/sssabookser4.2ed.c13.
   Google Scholar
• Bouis, H. E., and R. M. Welch. 2010. Biofortification: A sustainable agricultural strategy for reducing micronutrient malnutrition in the global south. Crop Science 50: S-20–32. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2009.09.0531.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, H., S. Wei, and I. Twardowska. 2020. Biofortification of soybean (Glycine max L.) with Se and Zn, and enhancing its physiological functions by spiking these elements to soil during flowering phase. The Science of the Total Environment 740:139648. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalling, J. W., K. Winter, K. M. Andersen, and B. L. Turner. 2013. Artefacts of the pot environment on soil nutrient availability: Implications for the interpretation of ecological studies. Plant Ecology 214 (2):329–38. doi: 10.1007/s11258-013-0172-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Oliveira, N. T., P. M. De Rezende, M. De Fatima Piccolo Barcelos, and A. T. Bruzi. 2019. Zinc biofortification strategies in food-type soybean cultivars. Australian Journal of Crop Science 13 (01):11–6. doi: 10.21475/ajcs.19.13.01.p783.
   Google Scholar
• Di Mauro, G., P. A. Cipriotti, S. Gallo, and J. L. Rotundo. 2018. Environmental and management variables explain soybean yield gap variability in Central Argentina. European Journal of Agronomy 99:186–94. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2018.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., Jr., J. F. Davis, and D. L. Thurlow. 1964. Zinc availability in calcareous Michigan soils as influenced by phosphorus level and temperature. Soil Science Society of America Journal 28 (1):83–6. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1964.03615995002800010038x.
   Google Scholar
• Enderson, J., A. P. Mallarino, and M. U. Haq. 2015. Soybean yield response to foliar-applied micronutrients and relationships among soil and tissue tests. Agronomy Journal 107 (6):2143–61. doi: 10.2134/agronj14.0536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, W. R., and C. E. Caviness. 1977. Stages of soybean development. Iowa State University Cooperative Extension Service, Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Special Report No. 80, Ames.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, M. A., O. E. Soulages, S. G. Acebal, E. H. Rueda, and R. Sánchez. 2015. Sorption of Zn (II) and Cu (II) by four Argentinean soils as affected by pH, oxides, organic matter and clay content. Environmental Earth Sciences 74 (5):4201–14. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4518-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flies, E. J., B. W. Brook, L. Blomqvist, and J. C. Buettel. 2018. Forecasting future global food demand: A systematic review and meta-analysis of model complexity. Environment International 120:93–103. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, F. O., I. A. Ciampitti, and H. Baigorri. 2009. ’Manual del cultivo de sojá. 180p. Buenos Aires: International Plant Nutrition Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, G. W., and J. W. Bauder. 1986. Particle size analysis. In Methods of soil analysis, ed. A. Klute, Vol. 1, 383–411. Madison, WI: SSSA Inc. doi: 10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c15.
   Google Scholar
• Grassini, P., N. C. La Menza, J. I. R. Edreira, J. P. Monzón, F. A. Tenorio, and J. E. Specht. 2021. Soybean. In Crop physiology case histories for major crops, 282–319. London, UK: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819194-1.00008-6.
   Google Scholar
• Han, X., X. Li, N. Uren, and C. Tang. 2011. Zinc fractions and availability to soybeans in representative soils of Northeast China. Journal of Soils and Sediments 11 (4):596–606. doi: 10.1007/s11368-011-0336-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidarian, A. R., H. Kord, K. Mostafav, A. P. Lak, and F. A. Mashhadi. 2011. Investigating Fe and Zn foliar application on yield and its components of soybean (Glycine max (L) Merr.) at different growth stages. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Sustainable Development 3:189–97. doi: 10.5897/JABSD.9000024.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C., M. J. Webb, and R. D. Graham. 1996. Pot size affects expression of Mn efficiency in barley. Plant and Soil 178 (2):205–8. doi: 10.1007/BF00011584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, H., and D. B. Egli. 1995. Soybean seed number and crop growth rate during flowering. Agronomy Journal 87 (2):264–7. doi: 10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700020020x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez, M. P., D. Effrón, A. M. De La Horra, and R. Defrieri. 1996. Foliar potassium, calcium, magnesium, zinc, and manganese content in soybean cultivars at different stages of development. Journal of Plant Nutrition 19 (6):807–16. doi: 10.1080/01904169609365163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., and G. Pandey. 2020. Biofortification of pulses and legumes to enhance nutrition. Heliyon 6 (3):e03682. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavado, R. S., C. A. Porcelli, and R. Alvarez. 2001. Nutrient and heavy metal concentration and distribution in corn, soybean and wheat as affected by different tillage systems in the Argentine Pampas. Soil and Tillage Research 62 (1–2):55–60. doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00216-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite, C. M. C., A. da Silva, F. R. C. F. César, G. F. Guimarães, E. Almeida, and T. Muraoka. 2020. Low efficiency of Zn uptake and translocation in plants provide poor micronutrient enrichment in rice and soybean grains. Journal of Plant Nutrition 43 (1):79–91. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2019.1659341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, W. L., and W. A. Norvell. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and cooper. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42 (3):421–8. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D. Y., W. Zhang, P. Yan, X. P. Chen, F. S. Zhang, and C. Q. Zou. 2017. Soil application of zinc fertilizer could achieve high yield and high grain zinc concentration in maize. Plant and Soil 411 (1–2):47–55. doi: 10.1007/s11104-016-3105-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Y. B., and N. C. Uren. 1997. The effects of temperature, time and cycles of drying and rewetting on the extractability of zinc added to a calcareous soil. Geoderma 75 (1–2):89–97. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7061(96)00080-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez Cuesta, N., W. Carciochi, H. Sainz Rozas, M. Eyherabide, N. Wyngaard, J. C. Colazo, G. Ferraris, F. Salvagiotti, and P. Barbieri. 2021. Effect of zinc application strategies on maize grain yield and zinc concentration in Mollisols. Journal of Plant Nutrition 44 (4):486–97. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2020.1844754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnaughay, K. D. M., and F. A. Bazzaz. 1991. Is physical space a soil resource? Ecology 72 (1):94–103. doi: 10.2307/1938905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraghan, J. T., and T. C. Helms. 2005. Seed zinc of soybean as an indicator of zinc status of the mother plant. Journal of Plant Nutrition 28 (1):161–71. doi: 10.1081/PLN-200042252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning, P., X. Zhang, T. Wu, Y. Li, S. Wang, P. Fei, J. Dong, J. Shi, and X. Tian. 2021. Biofortification of wheat with zinc as affected by foliar applications of zinc, pesticides, phosphorus and biostimulants. Crop and Pasture Science 73 (2):3–12. doi: 10.1071/CP20455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortez, O. A., S. Tamagno, F. Salvagiotti, P. V. V. Prasad, and I. A. Ciampitti. 2019. Soybean nitrogen sources and demand during the seed‐filling period. Agronomy Journal 111 (4):1779–87. doi: 10.2134/agronj2018.10.0656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passioura, J. B. 2006. The perils of pot experiments. Functional Plant Biology: FPB 33 (12):1075–9. doi: 10.1071/FP06223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payero, J. O., and S. Irmak. 2013. Daily energy fluxes, evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of soybean. Agricultural Water Management 129:31–43. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2013.06.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poorter, H., J. B. Hler, D. van Dusschoten, J. Climent, and J. A. Postma. 2012. Pot size matters: A meta-analysis of the effects of rooting volume on plant growth. Functional Plant Biology: FPB 39 (11):839–50. doi: 10.1071/FP12049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Praharaj, S., M. Skalicky, S. Maitra, P. Bhadra, T. Shankar, M. Brestic, V. Hejnak, P. Vachova, and A. Hossain. 2021. Zinc biofortification in food crops could alleviate the zinc malnutrition in human health. Molecules 26 (12):3509. doi: 10.3390/molecules26123509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid, A., and R. L. Fox. 1992. Evaluating internal zinc requirements of grain crops by seed analysis. Agronomy Journal 84 (3):469–74. doi: 10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400030022x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, T. L. 2007. Right product, right rate, right time and right place (the foundation of best management practices for fertilizer. Fertilizer Best Management Practices. General Principles, Strategy for their Adoption, and Voluntary Initiatives vs. Regulations. Procedures of IFA International Workshop, 7–9 March 2007, Brussels, Belgium, International Fertilizer Industry Association, Paris, France, 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Rubio, G., F. X. Pereyra, and M. A. Taboada. 2019. Soils of the Pampean region. In The soils of Argentina. World Soils Book Series, ed. G. Rubio, R. Lavado, and F. Pereyra, 81–100. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-76853-3_6.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghzadeh, B. 2013. A review of zinc nutrition and plant breeding. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 13. doi: 10.4067/S0718-95162013005000072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sainz Rozas, H., M. Puricelli, M. Eyherabide, P. A. Barbieri, H. E. R. Echeverría, N. I. Calvo, and J. P. Martínez. 2015. Available zinc levels in soils of Argentina. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research 7:59–71.
   Google Scholar
• Sainz Rozas, H., M. Eyherabide, G. Larrea, N. Martínez Cuesta, H. Angelini, N. Reussi Calvo, and N. Wyngaard. 2019. Relevamiento y determinación de propiedades químicas en suelos de aptitud agrícola de la región pampeana [Survey and measurements of chemical properties in soils of agricultural aptitude of the Pampas region]. Proceedings of the Simposio de Fertilidad 2019, Conocer Más y Mejor; May 8–9; Rosario, Argentina, 141–58. Buenos Aires: Fertilizar Asociación Civil. Accessed March 27, 2021. https://www.fertilizar.org.ar/subida/evento/Simposio2019/ActaSimposioFertilidad2019.pdf/. (In Spanish).
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Rodríguez, A. R., M. Marín-Paredes, A. González-Guzmán, J. M. Méndez, M. Sánchez-Parra, D. Sacristán, M. Fuentes-García, V. Barrón, J. Torrent, and M. C. del Campillo. 2021. Zinc biofortification strategies for wheat grown on calcareous Vertisols in southern Spain: Application method and rate. Plant and Soil 462 (1–2):125–40. doi: 10.1007/s11104-021-04863-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. 2009. SAS/STAT 9.2 user’s guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52225.x.
   Google Scholar
• Schulte, E. E., and B. G. Hopkins. 1996. Estimation of organic matter by weight loss-on-ignition. In Soil organic matter: Analysis and interpretation, ed. F. R. Magdoff, M. A. Tabatabai, and E. A. Hanlon, Jr., 21–31. Madison, WI: SSSA Inc. doi: 10.2136/sssaspecpub46.c3.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, P., P. Aggarwal, and A. Kaur. 2017. Biofortification: A new approach to eradicate hidden hunger. Food Reviews International 33 (1):1–21. doi: 10.1080/87559129.2015.1137309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, H. G., and A. J. Ohlrogge. 1973. Plant analysis as an aid in fertilizing soybeans and peanuts. In Soil testing and plant analysis, ed. L. M. Walsh and J. D. Beaton, 315–28. Madison, WI: SSSA INC.
   Google Scholar
• Sucunza, F. A., F. H. Gutiérrez Boem, F. O. Garcia, M. Boxler, and G. Rubio. 2018. Long-term phosphorus fertilization of wheat, soybean and maize on Mollisols: Soil test trends, critical levels and balances. European Journal of Agronomy 96:87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2018.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutradhar, A. K., D. E. Kaiser, and L. M. Behnken. 2017. Soybean response to broadcast application of boron, chlorine, manganese, and zinc. Agronomy Journal 109 (3):1048–59. doi: 10.2134/agronj2016.07.0389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres Duggan, M., R. Melgar, M. B. Rodríguez, R. S. Lavado, and I. A. Ciampitti. 2012. Sulfur fertilization technology in the Argentine Pampas region: A review. Revista Agronomía & Ambiente 32:61–73.
   Google Scholar
• Ullah, A., M. Farooq, F. Nadeem, A. Rehman, A. Nawaz, M. Naveed, A. Wakeel, and M. Hussain. 2020. Zinc seed treatments improve productivity, quality and grain biofortification of desi and kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Crop and Pasture Science 71 (7):668–78. doi: 10.1071/CP19266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture. 2014. Keys to soil taxonomy, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil Survey Staff. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, A., E. M. Romney, V. Q. Hale, and R. M. Hoover. 1969. Effects of soil temperature and zinc application on yields and micronutrient content of four crop species grown together in a glasshouse. Agronomy Journal 61 (4):567–8. doi: 10.2134/agronj1969.00021962006100040025x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulfiqar, U., S. Hussain, M. Maqsood, M. Ishfaq, and N. Ali. 2021. Zinc nutrition to enhance rice productivity, zinc use efficiency, and grain biofortification under different production systems. Crop Science 61 (1):739–49. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar