Sulfur fertilization enhanced productivity and profitability of popular kenaf varieties

References

• Abdallah, M., L. Dubousset, F. Meuriot, P. Etienne, J. Avice, and A. Ourry. 2010. Effect of mineral sulfur availability on nitrogen and sulfur uptake and remobilization during the vegetative growth of Brassica napus L. Journal of Experimental Botany 61 (10):2635–46. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akinrotimi, C. A., and P. I. Okocha. 2018. Evaluation of genetic divergence in kenaf (H. cannabinus L.) genotypes using agro-morphological characteristics. Journal of Plant Sciences and Agricultural Research 2 (12):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Alexopoulou, E., D. Li, Y. Papatheohari, H. Siqi, D. Scordia, and G. Testa. 2015. How kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) can achieve high yields in Europe and China. Industrial Crops and Products 68:131–40. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.10.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assefa, S., W. Haile, and W. Tena. 2021. Effects of phosphorus and sulfur on yield and nutrient uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) on Vertisols, North Central, Ethiopia. Heliyon 7 (3):e06614. PMID: 33869850; PMCID: PMC8035519. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mamun, M., M. Rafii, Y. Oladosu, A. B. Misran, Z. Berahim, Z. Ahmad, F. Arolu, and M. H. Khan. 2022. Genetic diversity among kenaf mutants as revealed by qualitative and quantitative traits. Journal of Natural Fibers 19 (11):4170–87. doi: 10.1080/15440478.2020.1856268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mamun, M., M. Y. Rafii, A. B. Misran, Z. Berahim, Z. Ahmad, M. M. H. Khan, Y. Oladosu, and F. Arolu. 2023. Kenaf (Hibiscus Cannabinus L.): A promising fiber crop with potential for genetic improvement utilizing both conventional and molecular approaches. Journal of Natural Fibers 20 (1):2145410. doi: 10.1080/15440478.2022.2145410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aulakh, M. S. 2003. Crop responses to sulphur nutrition. In: Sulphur in plants, ed. Abrol, Y.P., and Ahmad, A. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-0289-8_19.
   Google Scholar
• Ayadi, R., M. Hanana, R. Mzid, L. Hamrouni, M. L. Khouja, and A. Salhi Hanachi. 2016. Hibiscus cannabinus L.–kenaf: A review paper. Journal of Natural Fibers 14 (4):1–19. doi: 10.1080/15440478.2016.1240639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahtoee, A., K. Zargari, and E. Baniani. 2012. An investigation on fiber production of different kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) genotypes. World Applied Sciences Journal 16 (1):63–6.
   Google Scholar
• Basumatary, A., J. J. Shangne, K. N. Das, and D. Bhattacharyya. 2018. Impact of sulfur fertilization on distribution of sulfur fractions and use efficiency in blackgram in subtropical acidic soil of Assam, India. Journal of Plant Nutrition 41 (11):1436–43. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2018.1457683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basumatary, A., S. Chauhan, I. Bhupenchandra, K. Das, and D. Ozah. 2021. Impact of sulfur and boron fertilization on yield, quality of crop and nutrient use efficiencies in rapeseed in subtropical acidic soil of Assam, India. Journal of Plant Nutrition 44 (12):1779–93. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2021.1884708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, C. A. 1965. Methods of soil analysis Part 2. Madison: American Society of Agronomy Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bohn, H. L., R. A. Myer, and G. A. O’Connor. 2001. Soil chemistry. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Carciochi, W. D., F. Salvagiotti, A. Pagani, N. I. R. Calvo, M. Eyherabide, H. R. S. Rozas, and I. A. Ciampitti. 2020. Nitrogen and sulfur interaction on nutrient use efficiencies and diagnostic tools in maize. European Journal of Agronomy 116:126045. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2020.126045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carciochi, W. D., N. Wyngaard, G. A. Divito, N. I. R. Calvo, M. L. Cabrera, and H. E. Echeverría. 2016. Diagnosis of sulfur availability for corn based on soil analysis. Biology and Fertility of Soils 52 (7):917–26. doi: 10.1007/s00374-016-1130-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diwakar, H. G., B. C. Dhananjaya, T. Jayanthi, M. V. Ravi, and R. Siddaramappa. 2014. Transformation of S fractions under field conditions with groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in an Alfisol of Karnataka. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 45 (9):1269–77. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2014.884105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutt, A. K. 1962. Sulphur deficiency of jute. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 39 (1):73–6.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C. A., and C. C. Rost. 1945. Total organic sulphur and humus sulphur of Minnesota soils. Soil Science 59 (2):125–38. doi: 10.1097/00010694-194502000-00003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fageria, N. K., V. C. Baligar, and C. Jones. 1997. Growth and mineral nutrition of field crops, 494. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Girondé, A., L. Dubousset, J. Trouverie, P. Etienne, and J. C. Avice. 2014. The impact of sulfate restriction on seed yield and quality of winter oilseed rape depends on the ability to remobilize sulfate from vegetative tissues to reproductive organs. Frontiers in Plant Science 5:695. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, K. A., and A. A. Gomez. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gourav Sankhyan, N. K., R. P. Sharma, and G. D. Sharma. 2018. Vertical distribution of sulfur fractions in a continuously fertilized acid Alfisol under maize–wheat cropping system. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 49 (8):923–33. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2018.1448409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., Q. Xiao, X. Zhao, Z. Wu, Z. Dai, M. Zhang, Q. Caisheng, S. Long, and Y. F. Wang. 2023. Phytoremediation with kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) for cadmium-contaminated paddy soil in southern China: Translocation, uptake, and assessment of cultivars. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30 (1):1244–52. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22111-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamidon, M. H., M. T. Sultan, A. H. Ariffin, and A. U. Shah. 2019. Effects of fiber treatment on mechanical properties of kenaf fiber reinforced composites: A review. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 8 (3):3327–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.04.012.
   Google Scholar
• Haneklaus, S., E. Bloem, and E. Schnug. 2007. Sulfur interactions in crop ecosystems. In Sulfur in Plants an Ecological Perspective, ed. M. J. Hawkesford, and L. J. De Kok, 17–58. Germany: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5887-5_2.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, S. G. 1990. Sulfur in Bangadesh agriculture. Sulfur Agriculture 14:25–8.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. L. 1973. Soil chemical analysis, 485. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Private Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Kour, S., V. K. Jalali, S. Arora, A. S. Bali, and M. Gupta. 2014. Direct and residual effect of sulfur fertilization on yield, uptake and use efficiency in Indian mustard and succeeding rice crop. Journal of Plant Nutrition 37 (14):2291–301. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2014.920389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., and A. K. Ghorai. 2017. Sulphur is crucial for jute production. www.krishisewa.com.
   Google Scholar
• Lavanya, K., G. Kadalli, S. J. Patil, T. Jayanthi, D. Naveen, and R. Channabasavegowda. 2019. Sulphur fractionation studies in soils of long-term fertilizer experiment under finger millet – Maize cropping sequence. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 8 (09):1334–45. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2019.809.153.
   Google Scholar
• Magorzata, S., and Z. Lucyna. 2009. Effect of different rates and forms of sulfur on content of available phosphorus in soil. Journal of Elementology 14:795–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahapatra, B. A., A. Saha, A. Majumdar, S. Mitra, B. Majumdar, H. Choudhury, and M. Sinha. 2009. Improving yield and quality of jute and allied fibres through secondary and micronutrients. Indian Journal of Fertilisers 5:124–8.
   Google Scholar
• Maji, B., N. C. Sahu, I. Das, S. Saha, S. Sarkar, and S. Saha. 2013. Enhancing jute productivity through balanced fertilization with sulfur in some sulfur deficient areas of West Bengal, India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 47:100–7.
   Google Scholar
• Majumdar, B., S. Saha, A. R. Saha, and S. Sarkar. 2016. Interactive effect of Sulfur and nitrogen on fiber yield, nutrient uptake and quality of jute (Corchorus olitorius). Environment and Ecology 34 (3A):1144–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mazumdar, S. P., D. K. Kundu, D. Datta, B. Majumdar, N. M. Alam, A. R. Saha, S. Sarkar, and S. Mitra. 2023. Can sulfur improve the fiber yield of jute? Journal of Plant Nutrition 46 (6):943–57. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2022.2071737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, M. S., M. N. Gani, and M. M. Islam. 2017. Efficiency of BJRI kenaf-4 yield under different fertilizer levels. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 5 (5):145–9. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20170505.12.
   Google Scholar
• Mehmood, M. Z., O. Afzal, M. Ahmed, G. Qadir, A. M. Kheir, M. A. Aslam, A. M. U. Din, I. Khan, M. J. Hassan, T. A. Meraj, et al. 2021. Can sulfur improve the nutrient uptake, partitioning, and seed yield of sesame? Arabian Journal of Geosciences 14 (10):865. doi: 10.1007/s12517-021-07229-6.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, D. L. 2013. World sulfur outlook. Washington: The World Sulfur Institute. http://www.firt.org.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed, M., A. R. Rozyanty, A. F. Osman, T. Adam, U. Hashim, A. M. Mohammed, N. Z. Noriman, O. S. Dahham, and B. O. Betar. 2017. The weathering effect in natural environment on kenaf bast filled unsaturated polyester composite and integration of nano zinc particle for water repellent. Micro and Nanosystems 9 (1):16–27. doi: 10.2174/1876402909666170531075138.
   Google Scholar
• Motior, M., A. Abdou, F. H. Al Darwish, K. A. El-Tarabily, M. A. Awad, F. Golam, and M. Sofian-Azirun. 2011. Influence of elemental sulfur on nutrient uptake, yield and quality of cucumber grown in sandy calcareous soil. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5:1610–5.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhtar, A., M. I. Awan, S. Sadaf, A. Mahmood, T. Javed, A. N. Shah, R. Shabbir, S. S. Alotaibi, A. A. Shah, R. Adamski, et al. 2022. Sulfur enhancement for the improvement of castor bean growth and yield, and sustainable biodiesel production. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:905738. PMID: 35860539; PMCID: PMC9289615. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.905738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan, O. P., P. Kumar, B. Yadav, M. Dua, and A. K. Johri. 2022. Sulfur nutrition and its role in plant growth and development. Plant Signaling & Behavior. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2022.2030082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasool, F. U., B. Hassan, and I. A. Jahangir. 2013. Growth and yield of sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) as influenced by nitrogen, sulfur and farmyard manure under temperate conditions. SAARC Journal of Agriculture 11 (1):81–9. doi: 10.3329/sja.v11i1.18386.
   Google Scholar
• Saba, N., M. Jawaid, K. R. Hakeem, M. T. Paridah, A. Khalina, and O. Y. Alothman. 2015. Potential of bioenergy production from industrial kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) based on Malaysian perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 42:446–59. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santisree, P., S. S. Adimulam, P. Bommineni, P. Bhatnagar-Mathur, and K. K. Sharma. 2019. Hydrogen sulfide in plant abiotic stress tolerance: Progress and perspectives. In Reactive Oxygen, Nitrogen and Sulfur Species in Plants: Production, Metabolism, Signaling and Defense Mechanisms, 743–75. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, S. H., S. Islam, and F. Mohammad. 2022. Sulphur as a dynamic mineral element for plants: A review. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 22 (2):2118–43. doi: 10.1007/s42729-022-00798-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shil, S. 2019. Developing agro-morphological descriptors of mesta (Hibiscus spp. L.) varieties for germplasm evaluation and characterization as per DUS test guidelines. Journal of Crop and Weed 15:25–39.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, A. K., M. Kumar, and S. Mitra. 2018. Carbon footprint and energy use in jute and allied fiber production. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88 (8):1305–11. doi: 10.56093/ijas.v88i8.82579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A. K., M. K. Meena, R. C. Bharati, and R. M. Gade. 2013. Effect of sulfur and zinc management on yield, nutrient uptake, changes in soil fertility and economics in rice (Oryza sativa)–lentil (Lens culinaris) cropping system. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 83 (3):344–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S., and M. Singh. 2014. Effect of sulfur fertilization on sulfur balance in soil and productivity of wheat in a wheat–rice cropping system. Agricultural Research 3 (4):284–92. doi: 10.1007/s40003-014-0124-8.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, R., P. Parihar, and S. M. Prasad. 2018. Sulfur and calcium simultaneously regulate photosynthetic performance and nitrogen metabolism status in As-challenged Brassica juncea L. seedlings. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:772. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, B. P. 2013. Biofuel crops: Production, physiology, and genetics. Boston: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasarao, C., A. N. Ganeshamurthy, M. Ali, R. N. Singh, and K. K. Singh. 2004. Sulfur fractions, distribution, and their relationships with soil properties in different soil types of major pulse-growing regions of India. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 35 (19–20):2757–69. doi: 10.1081/CSS-200036435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffenson, D. 1954. Irregularities of chromosome division in Tradescantia grown on low sulfate. Experimental Cell Research 6:554–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, F. J. 1986. Cycles of soil: Carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, micronutrients. New York: Environmental Science. John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Subbiah, B. V., and G. L. Asija. 1956. A rapid procedure for estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science 25:259–60.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, H., S. Kopriva, M. Giordano, K. Saito, and R. Hell. 2011. Sulfur assimilation in photosynthetic organisms: Molecular functions and regulations of transporters and assimilatory enzymes. Annual Review of Plant Biology 62:157–84. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandon, H. L. S. 1993. Methods of analysis of soils, plants, water and fertilizers. New Delhi: Fertilizer Development and Consultation Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Tharazi, I., A. B. Sulong, N. Muhamad, C. H. C. Haron, D. Tholibon, N. F. Ismail, M. K. F. M. Radzi, and Z. Razak. 2017. Optimization of hot press parameters on tensile strength for unidirectional long kenaf fiber reinforced polylactic-acid composite. Procedia Engineering 184:478–85. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.150.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi, N. 2003. Role of FCO in promoting quality secondary and micronutrients. Fertiliser News 48:111–4.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. H., and A. Steinberg. 1959. Soil sulfur fractions as chemical indices of available sulfur in some Australian soils. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 10 (3):340–52. doi: 10.1071/AR9590340.
   Google Scholar
• Zenda, T., S. Liu, A. Dong, and H. Duan. 2021. Revisiting sulphur—The once neglected nutrient: It’s roles in plant growth, metabolism, stress tolerance and crop production. Agriculture 11 (7):626. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11070626.
   Google Scholar