Waste sulfur from biogas desulphurization: a supplement of Brassica napus L. nutrition

References

• Ahmad, G., A. Jan, M. Arif, M. Tariq Jan, and H. Shah. 2011. Effect of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization on yield components, seed and oil yields of Canola. Journal of Plant Nutrition 34 (14):2069–82. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2011.618569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Bourky, R. h., M. A. Manshood, M. R. Mahmoud, and S. T. Al-Mousawy. 2021. Effect of humic acid on growth and yield several genotypes of rice (Oryza Sativa L.). IOP Conference Series 923 (1):012059. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/923/1/012059.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Eezzi, Y., and H. Al-Alawy. 2022. Effect of fulvic acid and seaweed on the growth and yield of broccoli. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results 13 (S01):583–87. doi: 10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S01.71.
   Google Scholar
• Arnau, Á. S., S. Pflüger, M. Giacomazzi, M. Decorte, and M. Genua. 2020. Annual Report 2020 European Biogas Association. Brussels, Belgium: European Biogas Association. Accessed September 7, 2022. https://www.europeanbiogas.eu/eba-annual-report-2020/.
   Google Scholar
• Barłóg, P., W. Grzebisz, and R. Łukowiak. 2022. Fertilizers and fertilization strategies mitigating soil factors constraining efficiency of nitrogen in plant production. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) 11 (14):1855. doi: 10.3390/plants11141855.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berger, K. C., and E. Truog. 1939. Boron determination in soils and plants. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Analytical Edition 11 (10):540–5. doi: 10.1021/ac50138a007.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, R. F., M. G. Mason, and G. H. Walton. 2000. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on the concentrations of oil and protein in canola (Brassica Napus) seed. Journal of Plant Nutrition 23 (3):339–48. doi: 10.1080/01904160009382020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, G. W., and R. I. Smith. 1997. Spatial and temporal trends in atmospheric sulphur deposition to agricultural surfaces in the United Kingdom. In Fertiliser society. London: Fertiliser Society.
   Google Scholar
• Carciochi, W. D., G. A. Divito, L. A. Fernández, and H. E. Echeverría. 2017. Sulfur affects root growth and improves nitrogen recovery and internal efficiency in wheat. Journal of Plant Nutrition 40 (9):1231–42. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2016.1187740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carciochi, W. D., N. I. Reussi Calvo, N. Wyngaard, G. A. Divito, M. Eyherabide, and H. E. Echeverría. 2019. Prognosis and diagnosis of sulfur status in maize by plant analysis. European Journal of Agronomy 108:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2019.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danyaei, A., S. Hassanpour, M. A. Baghaee, M. Dabbagh, and M. Babarabie. 2017. The effect of sulfur-containing humic acid on yield and nutrient uptake in olive fruit. Open Journal of Ecology 07 (04):279–88. doi: 10.4236/oje.2017.74019.
   Google Scholar
• Degryse, F., B. Ajiboye, R. Baird, R. C. da Silva, and M. J. McLaughlin. 2016. Oxidation of elemental sulfur in granular fertilizers depends on the soil-exposed surface area. Soil Science Society of America Journal 80 (2):294–305. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2015.06.0237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delfine, S., R. Tognetti, E. Desiderio, and A. Alvino. 2005. Effect of foliar application of n and humic acids on growth and yield of durum wheat. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 25 (2):183–91. doi: 10.1051/agro:2005017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y.-N., W.-C. Chen, L.-L. Zhang, B.-C. Sun, G.-W. Chu, and J.-F. Chen. 2022. Sulfur recycle in biogas production: Novel higee desulfurization process using natural amino acid salts. Chemosphere 297:134215. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubousset, L., P. Etienne, and J. C. Avice. 2010. Is the remobilization of s and n reserves for seed filling of winter oilseed rape modulated by sulphate restrictions occurring at different growth stages? Journal of Experimental Botany 61 (15):4313–24. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubuis, P.-H., C. Marazzi, E. Stadler, and F. Mauch. 2005. Sulphur deficiency causes a reduction in antimicrobial potential and leads to increased disease susceptibility of oilseed rape. Journal of Phytopathology 153 (1):27–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2004.00923.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulaimy, J., and W. Fahdawi. 2020. Effect of humic acid on growth and yield of barley humic acid as interacted with row spacing. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340936001.
   Google Scholar
• Egesel, C. Ö., M. K. Gül, and F. Kahrıman. 2009. Changes in yield and seed quality traits in rapeseed genotypes by sulphur fertilization. European Food Research and Technology 229 (3):505–13. doi: 10.1007/s00217-009-1067-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engardt, M., D. Simpson, M. Schwikowski, and L. Granat. 2017. Deposition of sulphur and nitrogen in Europe 1900–2050. Model calculations and comparison to historical observations. Tellus B 69 (1):1328945. doi: 10.1080/16000889.2017.1328945.
   Google Scholar
• Fazili, I. S., M. Masoodi, S. Ahmad, A. Jamal, J. S. Khan, and M. Z. Abdin. 2010. Interactive effect of sulfur and nitrogen on growth and yield attributes of oilseed crops (Brassica campestris l. and Eruca Sativa mill.) differing in yield potential. Journal of Plant Nutrition 33 (8):1216–28. doi: 10.1080/01904161003765745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinberg, A., A. Stenke, T. Peter, E. Lyn, S. Hinckley, C. T. Driscoll, and L. H. E. Winkel. 2021. Reductions in the deposition of sulfur and selenium to agricultural soils pose risk of future nutrient deficiencies. Communications Earth & Environment 2 (1):101. doi: 10.1038/s43247-021-00172-0.
   Google Scholar
• Fismes, J., P. C. Vong, A. Guckert, and E. Frossard. 2000. Influence of sulfur on apparent n-use efficiency, yield and quality of oilseed rape (Brassica Napus L.) grown on a calcareous soil. European Journal of Agronomy 12 (2):127–41. doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(99)00052-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontaine, D., J. Eriksen, and P. Sørensen. 2021. Sulfur from biogas desulfurization: Fate of S during storage in manure and after application to plants. The Science of the Total Environment 754 (February):142180. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gianquinto, G., J. P. Goffart, M. Olivier, G. Guarda, M. Colauzzi, L. Dalla Costa, G. Delle Vedove, J. Vos, and D. K. L. Mackerron. 2004. The use of hand-held chlorophyll meters as a tool to assess the nitrogen status and to guide nitrogen fertilization of potato crop. Potato Research 47 (1–2):35–80. doi: 10.1007/BF02731970.
   Google Scholar
• Grzebisz, W., A. Niewiadomska, and K. Przygocka-Cyna. 2022. Nitrogen hotspots on the farm—A practice-oriented approach. Agronomy 12 (6):1305. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12061305.
   Google Scholar
• Grzebisz, W., and K. Przygocka-Cyna. 2007. Spring malt barley response to elemental sulphur – the prognostic value of n and s concentrations in malt barley leaves. Plant, Soil and Environment 53 (9):388–94. doi: 10.17221/2295-PSE.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haneklaus, S., E. Bloem, and E. Schnug. 2007. Sulfur interactions in crop ecosystems. In Sulfur in plants an ecological perspective, ed. M. J. Hawkesford and L. J. De Kok, 17–58. Germany: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5887-5_2.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, P. J., P. J. Randall, and A. Pinkerton. 1987. Sulphur nutrition of sunflower (Helianthus Annuus) as affected by nitrogen supply: Effects on vegetative growth, the development of yield components, and seed yield and quality. Field Crops Research 16 (2):157–75. doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(87)90005-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., C. E. Clapp, and H. Magen. 2004. Mechanisms of plant growth stimulation by humic substances: The role of organo-iron complexes. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 50 (7):1089–95. doi: 10.1080/00380768.2004.10408579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CHMI 2019. IX. Atmospheric Deposition in the Territory of the Czech Republic Accessed September 11, 2022. https://www.chmi.cz/files/portal/docs/uoco/isko/grafroc/19groc/gr19cz/09_depozice_v1.pdf. (in Czech)
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, G. D. 2000. Effects of nitrogen and sulfur on canola yield and nutrient uptake. Agronomy Journal 92 (4):644–9. doi: 10.2134/agronj2000.924644x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamal, A., and M. Z. Abdin. 2005. Effect of sulphur and nitrogen application on growth characteristics, seed and oil yield of soybean cultivars https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230824531.
   Google Scholar
• Jamal, A., Y.-S. Moon, and M. Z. Abdin. 2014. Sulphur-a general overview and interaction with nitrogen. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228481225.
   Google Scholar
• Jankowski, K. J. 2008. Effect of sulfur on the quality of winter rape seeds. Article in journal of elementology. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282808488.
   Google Scholar
• Janzen, H. H., and J. R. Bettany. 1984. Sulfur nutrition of rapeseed: I. Influence of fertilizer nitrogen and sulfur rates. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48 (1):100–7. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800010019x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrell, W. M., and R. B. Beverly. 1981. The dilution effect in plant nutrition studies. Advances in Agronomy 34:197–224. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60887-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalid, S., A. Muhammad, M. Fazal, I. Imranuddin, N. Ullah, and I. Ullah. 2016. Effect of sulphur foliar application on yield and yield components of brassica napus. International Journal of Agricultural AndEnvironmental Research 2 (3):232–6. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33876.45442.
   Google Scholar
• Kulhánek, M., J. Balík, J. Černý, O. Sedlář, and F. Vašák. 2016. Evaluating of soil sulfur forms changes under different fertilizing systems during long-term field experiments. Plant, Soil and Environment 62 (9):408–15. doi: 10.17221/236/2016-PSE.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacroux, F., O. Trégoat, C. Van Leeuwen, A. Pons, T. Tominaga, V. Lavigne-Cruège, and D. Dubourdieu. 2008. Effect of foliar nitrogen and sulphur application on aromatic Expression of Vitis Vinifera&L. Cv. Sauvignon Blanc. OENO One 42 (3):125. doi: 10.20870/oeno-one.2008.42.3.816.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, W. L., and W. A. Norvell. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42 (3):421–8. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisowska, A., B. Filipek-Mazur, M. Komorowska, M. Niemiec, D. Bar-Michalczyk, M. Kuboń, S. Tabor, Z. Gródek-Szostak, A. Szeląg-Sikora, J. Sikora, et al. 2022. Environmental and production aspects of using fertilizers based on waste elemental sulfur and organic materials. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 15 (9):3387. doi: 10.3390/ma15093387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, B., D. K. Biswas, A. W. Herath, J. K. Whalen, S. Q. Ruan, C. Caldwell, H. Earl, A. Vanasse, P. Scott, and D. L. Smith. 2015. Growth, yield, and yield components of canola as affected by nitrogen, sulfur, and boron application. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 178 (4):658–70. doi: 10.1002/jpln.201400280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhi, S. S., E. D. Solberg, and M. Nyborg. 2005. Influence of formulation of elemental S fertilizer on yield, quality and S uptake of canola seed. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 85 (4):793–802. doi: 10.4141/P04-134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhi, S. S., M. Raza, J. J. Schoenau, A. R. Mermut, R. Kutcher, A. M. Johnston, and K. S. Gill. 2003. Feasibility of boron fertilization for yield, seed quality and B uptake of canola in northeastern saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 83 (1):99–108. doi: 10.4141/S01-081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhi, S. S., Y. Gan, and J. P. Raney. 2007. Yield, seed quality, and sulfur uptake of brassica oilseed crops in response to sulfur fertilization. Agronomy Journal 99 (2):570–7. doi: 10.2134/agronj2006.0269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, S. P., and F. J. Zhao. 1996. Sulphur uptake, yield responses and the interactions between nitrogen and sulphur in winter oilseed rape (Brassica Napus). The Journal of Agricultural Science 126 (1):53–62. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600088808.
   Google Scholar
• Mehlich, A. 1984. Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: A modification of mehlich 2 extractant. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 15 (12):1409–16. doi: 10.1080/00103628409367568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortvedt, J. J. 1994. Needs for controlled-availability micronutrient fertilizers. Fertilizer Research 38 (3):213–21. doi: 10.1007/BF00749694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu, X., Q. Chen, F. Chen, L. Yuan, and G. Mi. 2017. A RNA-seq analysis of the response of photosynthetic system to low nitrogen supply in maize leaf. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18 (12):2624. doi: 10.3390/ijms18122624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na, G. N., and D. E. Salt. 2011. The role of sulfur assimilation and sulfur-containing compounds in trace element homeostasis in plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany 72 (1):18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachabe, M. H. 1998. Refining the definition of field capacity in the literature. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 124 (4):230–2. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1998)124:4(230).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan, O. P., P. Kumar, B. Yadav, M. Dua, and A. Kumar Johri. 2022. Sulfur nutrition and its role in plant growth and development. Plant Signaling & Behavior 9:2030082. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2022.2030082.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, S.,D. Pizzeghello,A. Muscolo, and A. Vianello. 2002. Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 34 (11):1527–36. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00174-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perveen, S., N. Iqbal, M. Saeed, S. Zafar, and Z. Arshad. 2018. Role of foliar application of sulfur-containing compounds on maize (Zea Mays L. Var. Malka and Hybrid DTC) under salt stress. Brazilian Journal of Botany 41 (4):805–15. doi: 10.1007/s40415-018-0506-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pużyńska, K., B. Kulig, W. Halecki, A. Lepiarczyk, and S. Pużyński. 2018. Response of oilseed rape leaves to sulfur and boron foliar application. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 40 (9):169. doi: 10.1007/s11738-018-2748-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza, M. A., L. Yang Feng, A. Manaf, A. Wasaya, M. Ansar, A. Hussain, M. H. B. Khalid, N. Iqbal, Z. J. Xi, Y. K. Chen, et al. 2018. Sulphur application increases seed yield and oil content in sesame seeds under rainfed conditions. Field Crops Research 218:51–8. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.12.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman, H., Q. Iqbal, M. Farooq, A. Wahid, I. Afzal, and S. M. A. Basra. 2013. Sulphur application improves the growth, seed yield and oil quality of canola. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 35 (10):2999–3006. doi: 10.1007/s11738-013-1331-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reussi, N., H. E. Echeverría, and H. Sainz Rozas. 2012. Stability of foliar nitrogen: Sulfur ratio in spring red wheat and sulfur dilution curve. Journal of Plant Nutrition 35 (7):990–1003. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2012.671403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, N. G., F. J. Zhao, and S. P. Mcgrath. 2000. Availability of different forms of sulphur fertilisers to wheat and oilseed rape. Plant and Soil 222 (1/2):139–47. doi: 10.1023/A:1004757503831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossini, F., M. Provenzano, F. Sestili, and R. Ruggeri. 2018. Synergistic effect of sulfur and nitrogen in the organic and mineral fertilization of durum wheat: Grain yield and quality traits in the mediterranean environment. Agronomy 8 (9):189. doi: 10.3390/agronomy8090189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvagiotti, F., and D. J. Miralles. 2008. Radiation interception, biomass production and grain yield as affected by the interaction of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization in wheat. European Journal of Agronomy 28 (3):282–90. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2007.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvagiotti, F., J. M. Castellarín, D. J. Miralles, and H. M. Pedrol. 2009. Sulfur fertilization improves nitrogen use efficiency in wheat by increasing nitrogen uptake. Field Crops Research 113 (2):170–7. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahzadi, T., A. Khan, F. Zafar, A. Ismail, E. Amin, and S. Riaz. 2015. An overview of brassica species for crop improvement. J. Agric. & Environ. Sci 15 (8):1568–73. doi: 10.5829/idosi.aejaes.2015.15.8.12746.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, H. W. 2009. Sulfur in soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 172 (3):326–35. doi: 10.1002/jpln.200900037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenau, J. J., and S. M. Sukhdev. 2008. Sulfur forms and cycling processes in soil and their relationship to sulfur fertility. In Sulfur: A missing link between soils, crops, and nutrition, edited by J. Jez, 1–10. Madison: American Society of Agronomy. doi: 10.2134/agronmonogr50.c1.
   Google Scholar
• Sienkiewicz-Cholewa, U., and R. Kieloch. 2015. Effect of sulphur and micronutrients fertilization on yield and fat content in winter rape seeds (Brassica Napus L.) Plant, Soil and Environment 61 (4):164–70. doi: 10.17221/24/2015-PSE.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarpa, P., J. Jancar, P. Lepcio, J. Antosovsky, D. Klofac, T. Kriska, A. M. Abdel-Mohsen, and M. Brtnicky. 2023. Effect of fertilizers enriched with bio-based carriers on selected growth parameters, grain yield and grain quality of maize (Zea mays L.). European Journal of Agronomy 143:126714. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2022.126714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutradhar, A. K., D. E. Kaiser, and F. G. Fernández. 2017. Does total nitrogen/sulfur ratio predict nitrogen or sulfur requirement for corn? Soil Science Society of America Journal 81 (3):564–77. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2016.10.0352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šerá, B., and F. Novák. 2011. The effect of humic substances on germination and early growth of lamb’s quarters (Chenopodium Album Agg.). Biologia 66 (3):470–6. doi: 10.2478/s11756-011-0037-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šerá, B., and F. Novák. 2022. Stimulation of seed germination and early growth by humic substances on poppy, pepper, rape, and hemp. Biologia 77 (3):641–8. doi: 10.1007/s11756-021-00952-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Škarpa, P., J. Antošovský, P. Ryant, T. Hammerschmiedt, A. Kintl, and M. Brtnický. 2021. Using waste sulfur from biogas production in combination with nitrogen fertilization of maize (Zea Mays L.) by foliar application. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) 10 (10):2188. doi: 10.3390/plants10102188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tabak, M., A. Lisowska, and B. Filipek-Mazur. 2020. Bioavailability of sulfur from waste obtained during biogas desulfurization and the effect of sulfur on soil acidity and biological activity. Processes 8 (7):863. doi: 10.3390/pr8070863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Türkmen, Ö., A. Dursun, M. Turan, and Ç. Erdinç. 2004. Calcium and humic acid affect seed germination, growth, and nutrient content of tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentum L.) seedlings under saline soil conditions. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B: Soil and Plant Science 54 (3):168–74. doi: 10.1080/09064710310022014.
   Google Scholar
• Varényiová, M., L. Ducsay, and P. Ryant. 2017. Sulphur nutrition and its effect on yield and oil content of oilseed rape (Brassica Napus L.). Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 65 (2):555–62. doi: 10.11118/actaun201765020555.
   Google Scholar
• Withers, P. J. A., and F. M. O’Donnell. 1994. The response of double-low winter oilseed rape to fertiliser sulphur. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 66 (1):93–101. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740660114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, R., S. Dong, C. Hu, and K. Wang. 2003. The role of nitrogen and sulfur interaction in maize Quality(Zea Mays L.) Agricultural Sciences in China 2:527–32.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, B. K. 2011. Interaction effect of phosphorus and sulphur on yield and quality of clusterbean in typic haplustept. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 7 (5):556–60.
   Google Scholar
• Zbíral, J., M. Smatanová, and P. Němec. 2018. Sulphur status in agricultural soils determined using the mehlich 3 method. Plant, Soil and Environment 64 (6):255–9. doi: 10.17221/142/2018-PSE.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zbíral, J., S. Malý, and M. Váňa. 2011. Soil analysis, 3rd ed. Central Institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture: Brno, Czech Republic, 18–52.
   Google Scholar
• Zenda, T., S. Liu, A. Dong, and H. Duan. 2021. Revisiting sulphur—The once neglected nutrient: It’s roles in plant growth, metabolism, stress tolerance and crop production. Agriculture 11 (7):626. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11070626.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, P., H. Zhang, G. Wu, X. Chen, N. Gruda, X. Li, J. Dong, and Z. Duan. 2021. Dose-dependent application of straw-derived fulvic acid on yield and quality of tomato plants grown in a greenhouse. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:736613. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.736613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, F. J., P. E. Bilsborrow, E. J. Evans, and S. P. McGrath. 1997. Nitrogen to sulphur ratio in rapeseed and in rapeseed protein and its use in diagnosing sulphur deficiency. Journal of Plant Nutrition 20 (4-5):549–58. doi: 10.1080/01904169709365273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, F., E. J. Evans, P. E. Bilsborrow, and J. K. Syers. 1993. Influence of sulphur and nitrogen on seed yield and quality of low glucosinolate oilseed rape (Brassica napus L). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 63 (1):29–37. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740630106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar