Pretrial detention in Russian criminal courts: a statistical analysis

References

• Ares, C., Rankin, A., & Sturz, H. (1963). The Manhattan bail project: An interim report on the pre-trial use of pre-trial parole. New York University Law Review, 38, 67–95.
   Google Scholar
• CC RF. (1997). Criminal Code of Russian Federation, with amendments for 12/01/14.
   Google Scholar
• Chiricos, T. G., & Bales, W. D. (1991). Unemployment and punishment: An empirical assessment. Criminology, 29(4), 701–724. doi:10.1111/crim.1991.29.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CPC RF. (2001). Criminal Procedural Code of Russian Federation, with amendments for 12/01/14.
   Google Scholar
• D’Alessio, S. J., & Stolzenberg, L. (2002). A multilevel analysis of the relationship between labor surplus and pretrial incarceration. Social Problems, 49(2), 178–193. doi:10.1525/sp.2002.49.2.178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demuth, S. (2003). Racial and ethnic differences in pretrial release decisions and outcomes: A comparison of Hispanic, Black, and White felony arrestees. Criminology, 41(3), 873–908. doi:10.1111/crim.2003.41.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demuth, S., & Steffensmeier, D. (2004). The impact of gender and race-ethnicity in the pretrial release process. Social Problems, 51(2), 222–242. doi:10.1525/sp.2004.51.2.222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingo, P., & Denney, L. (2013). The political economy of pre-trial detention. London: ODI. Retrieved from http://www.odi.org.uk/sites/odi.org. uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/8257.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Foglesong, T. S., & Stone, C. (2011, April). Prison exit samples as a source for indicators of pretrial detention. Safety and Justice, 2011, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, C. E., & Bishop, D. M. (1985). The pretrial detention of juveniles and its impact on case dispositions. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 76, 1132–1152. doi:10.2307/1143504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freiburger, T. L., & Hilinski, C. M. (2010). The impact of race, gender, and age on the pretrial decision. Criminal Justice Review, 35(3), 318–334. doi:10.1177/0734016809360332
   Google Scholar
• Gazal-Ayal, O., & Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R. (2010). Let my people go: Ethnic in-group bias in judicial decisions — Evidence from a randomized natural experiment. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 7(3), 403–428. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1740-1461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldkamp, J. S. (1983). Questioning the practice of pretrial detention: Some empirical evidence from Philadelphia. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 74(4), 1556–1588. doi:10.2307/1143065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafetz, J. L. (2002). Pretrial detention, human rights, and judicial reform in Latin America. Fordham Int’l LJ, 26, 1754.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, M. D., Daudistel, H. C., & Farrell, R. A. (1987). Determinants of charge reductions and final dispositions in cases of burglary and robbery. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24(3), 233–254. doi:10.1177/0022427887024003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, J. A., & Fogarty, T. J. (1987). Race and plea bargained outcomes: A research note. Social Forces, 66(1), 176–182. doi:10.1093/sf/66.1.176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khun, A. (2010). Uchet lichnosti vinovnogo pri naznachenii nakazanija. Obshhestvo I Pravo, 5, 94–99.
   Google Scholar
• Khodzhaeva, E., Kazun, A., & Yakovlev, A. (2015). Advokatskoe soobshchestvo Rossii. Moscow: HSE.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, F., & Baradaran, S. (2013). Race, prediction, and pretrial detention. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 10(4), 741–770. doi:10.1111/jels.2013.10.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, O. (2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(4), 439–466. doi:10.1007/s10940-005-7362-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustard, D. B. (2003). Reexamining criminal behavior: The importance of omitted variable bias. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), 205–211. doi:10.1162/rest.2003.85.1.205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oleson, J. C., Lowenkamp, C. T., Cadigan, T. P., VanNostrand, M., & Wooldredge, J. (2016). The effects of pretrial detention in two federal districts. Justice Quarterly, 33(6), 1103–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paneyakh, E., Pozdnyakov, M., Titaev, K., & Shklyaruk, M. (2012). Pravookhranitelnaya deyatelnost v Rosii: struktura, funktsionirovaniye, puti reformirovaniya Chast pervaya, Diagnostika raboty pravookhranitelnykh organov rf i vypolneniya imi politseyskoy funktsii SPb, IRL EU SPb Retrieved from http://enforce.spb.ru/images/Fond_Kudrina/irl_pravookhrana_part_1_final_31_12_ich.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pozdnyakov, M. (2013). Prakticheskaya realizatsiya printsipa otkrytosti pravosudiya v Rosyskoy Federatsii SPb: IRL EU SPb. Retrieved from http://enforce.spb.ru/images/Isledovanya/otkrytost_pravosudiya_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pozdnyakov, M. (2015). Sistema osnovanii otmeny i izmeneniia sudebnykh aktov v rossiiskom ugolovnom protsesse. Moscow: Yurlitinform.
   Google Scholar
• Reitler, A. K., Sullivan, C. J., & Frank, J. (2013). The effects of legal and extralegal factors on detention decisions in US district courts. Justice Quarterly, 30(2), 340–368. doi:10.1080/07418825.2012.668925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezultaty monitoringa ofitsialnykh saytov federalnykh organov ispolnitelnoy vlasti (Reyting otkrytosti ofitsialnykh saytov FOIV). (2012). SPb, FSI. Retrieved from http://www.svobodainfo.org/ru/node/1613
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, M., & Ackerman, A. R. (2012). Pretrial detention and guilty pleas: If they cannot afford bail they must be guilty. Criminal Justice Studies, 25(3), 265–278.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, M., & Ackerman, A. R. (2014). Bail and sentencing: Does pretrial detention lead to harsher punishment? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25(1), 59–77. doi:10.1177/0887403412461501
   Google Scholar
• Schönteich, M. (2013). The overuse of pre-trial detention: Causes and consequences: Martin Schönteich examines arbitrary and excessive pre-trial imprisonment. Criminal Justice Matters, 92(1), 18–19. doi:10.1080/09627251.2013.805368
   Google Scholar
• Skougarevsky, D. (Ed.). (2014). Ugolovnaja justicija v Rossii v 2009 g.: kompleksnyj analiz sudebnoj statistiki. SPb: IPP EU SPB
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, P. H., Jr. (2002). Putin’s judicial reform: Making judges accountable as well as independent. E. Eur. Const. Rev., 11, 117–129.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, P. H., Jr. (2008). Assessing the courts in Russia: Parameters of progress under Putin. Demokratizatsiya, 16(1), 63–73. doi:10.3200/DEMO.16.1.63-74
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. (2008). Race, sex, and pretrial detention in federal court: Indirect effects and cumulative disadvantage. U. Kan. L. Rev., 57, 879–1275.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. (2013). The effects of the offender’s race, ethnicity, and sex on federal sentencing outcomes in the guidelines era. Law & Contemp. Prob., 76, 75–289.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. (2015). Evolution of sentencing research. Criminology & Public Policy, 14(2), 225–232. doi:10.1111/capp.2015.14.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudebny department (2013). Osnovnye svedenia o rabot sudebnoi sistemy. Retrieved from http://cdep.ru/index.php?id=79
   Google Scholar
• Titaev, K. (2011). Kak sudy prinimayut resheniya: Isledovaniye vliyaniya vnepravovykh faktorov na rosyskiye sudy. Ekonomicheskaya Sotsiologiya, 12(4), 122–125.
   Google Scholar
• Trochev, A. (2012). Suing Russia at home. Problems of Post-Communism, 59(5), 18–34. doi:10.2753/PPC1075-8216590502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. (2012). Recent developments and new directions in sentencing research. Justice Quarterly, 29(1), 1–40. doi:10.1080/07418825.2011.624115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkov, V. (2014). Socioeconomic status and sentencing disparities: Evidence from Russia’s criminal courts (Working paper IRL-01/2014) The European University at St. Petersburg, The Institute for the Rule of Law.
   Google Scholar
• Volkov, V., Dmitrieva, A., Pozdnjakov, M., & Titaev, K. (Eds.). (2012). Rossijskie sud’i kak professional’naja gruppa: sociologicheskoe issledovanie. SPb.: IRL EU SPb. Retrieved from http://enforce.spb.ru/images/analit_zapiski/Jan_2012_NormsValues.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Volkov, V., Dmitrieva, A., Pozdnjakov, M., & Titaev, K. (Eds.). (2015). Rossijskie sud’i: sociologicheskoe issledovanie professii. Moscow: Norma.
   Google Scholar
• Wermink, H., Johnson, B. D., De Keijser, J. W., Dirkzwager, A. J., Reef, J., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2016). The influence of detailed offender characteristics on consecutive criminal processing decisions in the Netherlands. Crime & Delinquency, 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, G. R., & Wheeler, C. L. (1980). Reflections on legal representation of the economically disadvantaged: Beyond assembly line justice: Type of counsel, pretrial detention, and outcomes in Houston. Crime & Delinquency, 26(3), 319–332. doi:10.1177/001112878002600303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (2003). The effect of pretrial detention on imprisonment decisions. Criminal Justice Review, 28(2), 299–316. doi:10.1177/073401680302800206
   Google Scholar