An application of the integrated framework of legitimacy to the state courts context

References

• Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkin-Plunk, C. A., Peck, J. H., & Armstrong, G. S. (2019). Do race and ethnicity matter? An examination of racial/ethnic differences in perceptions of procedural justice and recidivism among problem-solving court clients. Race and Justice, 9(2), 151–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, T. (2017). Exploring the relationship of shared race/ethnicity with court actors, perceptions of court procedural justice, and obligation to obey among male offenders. Race and Justice, 7, 87–102. advance online publication.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, T., Pelfrey, W. V., Bedard, L. E., Dhungana, K., Gertz, M., & Golden, K. (2014). Female inmate’s procedural justice perceptions of the police and courts: Is there a spill-over of police effects? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 144–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker v. Carr. (1962). 369 U.S. 186.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumesiter, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370.
   Google Scholar
• Benesh, S. C. (2006). Understanding public confidence in American courts. Journal of Politics, 68, 697–707. Retrieved from. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4639891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benesh, S. C., & Howell, S. E. (2001). Confidence in the courts: A comparison of users and nonusers. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 19, 199–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthelot, E. R., McNeal, B. A., & Baldwin, J. M. (2018). Relationships between agency-specific contact, victimization type, and trust and confidence in the police and courts. American Journal of Criminal Justice. Online First. Retrieved from. . doi: 10.1007/s12103-018-9434-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boatright, R. G. (1999). Why citizens don’t respond to jury summonses and what courts can do about it. Judicature, 82, 156–164.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H., & Dietrich, H. (2008). Fair procedures, yes. But we dare not lose sight of fair outcomes. Court Review, 44, 72–77.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H., Tomkins, A. J., Neeley, E. M., Herian, M. N., & Hamm, J. A. (2012). Reducing court’s failure-to-appear rate by written reminders. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 19, 70–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(1), 119–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, K., & Leben, S. (2007). Procedural fairness: A key ingredient in public satisfaction. Court Review, 44, 4–24.
   Google Scholar
• Caldeira, G. A. (1986). Neither the purse nor the sword: Dynamics of public confidence in the Supreme Court. The American Political Science Review, 80, 1209–1226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cann, D. M., & Yates, J. (2007). Homegrown institutional legitimacy: Assessing citizens’ diffuse support for state courts. American Politics Research, 36, 297–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cann, D. M., & Yates, J. (2016). These estimable courts: Understanding public perceptions of state judicial institutions and legal policy-making. New York: Oxford University Press. Capecchi 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Capecchi, C. (2015). 'Black Lives Matter' protesters gather; Mall is shut in response. New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/24/us/black-lives-matter-protesters-gather-mall-of-america-is-shut.html
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, T. M., Schaufffler, R. Y., Ostrom, B. J., Ostrom, C., & Hanson, R. A. (2008). A unifying framework for court performance measurement. Final Report for the State Justice Institute. Retrieved from https://ncsc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ctadmin/id/1079/
   Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., & Rodell, J. B. (2011). Justice, trust, and trustworthiness: A longitudinal analysis integrating three theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 1183–1206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decision Resources. (2007). The Minnesota difference: The Minnesota court system and the public. Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• DOJ Civil Rights Division. (2015). Investigation of the Ferguson police department. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/press-releases/attachments/2015/03/04/ferguson_police_department_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, G. W., Lindquist, S. A., & Bradbury, M. D. (2006). Evaluating performance in state judicial institutions: Trust and confidence in the Georgia judiciary. State & Local Government Review, 38, 176–190. Retrieved from. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4355433.
   Google Scholar
• Eckberg, D. A., Podkopacz, M. R., & Zehm, K. (2004). Juvenile court fairness study. Minneapolis, MN: Fourth Judicial District of the State of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experrimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flango, V. E., & Kauder, N. (2009). Court performance measures in child abuse and neglect cases: Key measures. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Program Report. Retrieved from https://www.ojjdp.gov/publications/courttoolkit.html
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurter, F. (1928). Distribution of judicial power between United States and state courts. Cornell Law Review, 3, 499–530.
   Google Scholar
• Gau, J. M. (2014). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A test of measurement and structure. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 187–205.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. L., & Caldeira, G. A. (2009). Knowing the Supreme Court? A reconsideration public ignorance of the high court. The Journal of Politics, 71(2), 429–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. L., & Caldeira, G. A. (2011). Has legal realism damaged the legitimacy of the U.S. supreme court? Law & Society Review, 45, 195–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. L., Caldeira, G. A., & Spence, L. K. (2003). Measuring attitudes toward the United States supreme court. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 354–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., Hansman, C., & Frenchman, E. (2016). The heavy costs of high bail: Evidence from judge randomization. The Journal of Legal Studies, 45, 471–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, A. (1788). The judiciary department. Federalist No. 78. Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/resources/display/content/The+Federalist+Papers#TheFederalistPapers-78
   Google Scholar
• Hamm, J. A., Lee, J., Trinkner, R., Wingrove, T., Leben, S., & Breuer, C. (2016). On the cross domain scholarship of trust in the institutional context. In E. Shockley, T. Neal, L. PytlikZillig, & B. Bornstein (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on trust: towards theoretical and methodological integration (pp. 131–156). New York City: Springer Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hamm, J. A., PytlikZillig, L. M., Herian, M. N., Bornstein, B. H., Tomkins, A. J., & Hoffman, L. (2013). Deconstructing public confidence in state courts. Journal of Trust Research, 3, 11–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hamm, J. A., PytlikZillig, L. M., Tomkins, A. J., Herian, M. N., Bornstein, B. H., & Neeley, E. M. (2011). Exploring separable components of institutional confidence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 95–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm, J. A., Trinkner, R., & Carr, J. D. (2017). Fair process, trust, and cooperation: Moving toward an integrated framework of police legitimacy. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44, 1183–1212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. A. (2017). Trust in the system? Factors that impact citizens’ views of the courts in the United Kingdom. Social Science Quarterly, 98, 1502–1517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, M., Ying-Ying, Y., Larsen, J., Gatowski, S. I., & Rubio, D. M. (2009). Court performance measures in child abuse and neglect cases: Guide to judicial workload assessment. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Program Report. Retrieved from https://www.ojjdp.gov/publications/courttoolkit.html
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, E., & Spitzer, M. L. (1985). Entitlements, rights, and fairness: An experimental examination of subjects’ concepts of distributive justice. The Journal of Legal Studies, 14, 259–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough, M., Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Myhill, A., & Quinton, P. (2010). Procedural justice, trust, and institutional legitimacy. Policing, 4, 201–203.
   Google Scholar
• Hulst, L., van Den Bos, K., Akkermans, A. J., & Lind, E. A. (2017). Experimental evidence that behavioral disinhibition weakens the association between procedural justice and evaluations of judges. Utrecht Law Review, 13, 114–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. (2018). Norms, normativity, and the legitimacy of justice institutions: International perspectives. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 14, 17.1–17.21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, K. A., & Holtfreter, K. (2016). An integrated theory of specialized court programs: Using procedural justice and therapeutic jurisprudence to promote offender compliance and rehabilitation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43, 45–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelleher, C. A., & Wolak, J. (2007). Explaining public confidence in the branches of state government. Political Research Quarterly, 60, 707–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochel, T. R., Parks, R., & Mastrofski, S. D. (2013). Examining police effectiveness as a precursor to legitimacy and cooperation with police. Justice Quarterly, 30(5), 895–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leben, S. (1999). Public trust and confidence in the courts: A national conference and beyond. Court Review, 36, 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. G., Cheesman, F., Rottman, D., Swaner, R., Lambson, S., Rempel, M., & Curtis, R. (2013). A community court grows in Brooklyn: A comprehensive evaluation of the red hook community justice center. Williamsburg VA: National Center for State Courts.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, J., Wu, L., & Ma, H. (2018). When does procedural justice influence perceived legitimacy? The role of standing uncertainty and group identification. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. Online First. Retrieved from. . https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ajsp.12340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longazel, J. G., Parker, L. S., & Sun, I. Y. (2011). Experiencing court, experiencing race: Perceived procedural injustice among court users. Race and Justice, 1, 2022–2227.
   Google Scholar
• MacCoun, R. J. (2005). Voice, control, and belonging: The double-edged sword of procedural fairness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 171–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, B. (2016). The Judge is the key component: The importance of procedural fairness in drug-treatment courts. Court Review, 52, 8–33.
   Google Scholar
• Malega, R. & Cohen, T. H. (2013). State Court Organization, 2011. Special report: Bureau of justice statistics. Retrieved from: https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/sco11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2005). Rational, institutional and active trust: Just do it!? In K. M. Bijlsma-Frankema & R. J. A. Klein Woolthuis (Eds.), Trust under pressure: empirical investigations of the functioning of trust and trust building in uncertain circumstances (pp. 24–51). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mondak, J. J., & Smithey, S. I. (1997). The dynamics of public support for the Supreme Court. The Journal of Politics, 59, 1114–1142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, L. (2016). Judges team up with PBS’s Tavis smiley for “Listening Tour”. Retrieved from http://www.ncsc.org/Newsroom/News-Releases/2016/Listening-Tour.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., & Tyler, T. R. (2017). Experimenting with procedural justice policing. Journal off Experimental Criminology, 13, 287–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for State Courts. (1999). How the public views the state courts: A 1999 national survey. Williamsburg, VA. Retrieved from: https://www.flcourts.org/content/download/217619/1971660/publicop_natl.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Center for State Courts. (2005). CourTools: Access and Fairness. Williamsburg, VA. Retrieved from: http://www.courtools.org/~/media/Microsites/Files/CourTools/CourTools%20Measure%201%20-%20Access%20and%20Fairness.ashx
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, S. D. (1999). Public trust as a dimension of equal justice: Some suggestions to increase public trust. Court Review, 36, 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, S. M., & Huth, D. A. (1998). Explaining public attitudes toward local courts. The Justice System Journal, 20, 41–61. Retrieved from. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27976966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, B. J., Strickland, S. M., & Hannaford-Agor, P. L. (2004). Examining trial trends in state courts: 1976–2002. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1, 755–782.
   Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R., Bachman, R., Brame, R., & Sherman, L. W. (1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effects of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law & Society Review, 31, 163–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, G. D., Hare, C., & Wrighton, J. M. (2012). Electing to trust: An exploration of the relationship between public opinion and localized processes on judicial selection. American Review of Politics, 33, 51–72.
   Google Scholar
• Podkopacz, M. R., Eckberg, D. A., & Zehm, K. (2004). Drug court defendant experience and fairness study. Minneapolis, MN: Fourth Judicial District of the State of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, S. G. (1984). Adequate and independent state grounds as a means of balancing the relationship between state and federal courts. Texas Law Review, 63, 977–993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PytlikZillig, L., Hamm, J. A., Shockley, E., Herian, M. N., Neal, T., Kimbrough, C. D., … Bornstein, B. H. (2016). The dimensionality of trust-relevant constructs in four institutional domains: Results from confirmatory factor analyses. Journal of Trust Research, 6, 111–150.
   Google Scholar
• Reisig, M. D., Bratton, J., & Gertz, M. (2007). The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1005–1028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottman, D. B. (2000). Public perceptions of the state courts: A primer. The Court Manager, 15, 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Rottman, D. B., & Tomkins, A. (1999). Public trust and confidence in the courts: What public opinion surveys mean to judges. Court Review, 36, 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Rottman, D. R. (2007). Adhere to procedural fairness in the justice system. Criminology, 6, 835–842.
   Google Scholar
• Rubio, D. M., Cheesman, F., & Federspiel, W. (2008). Performance measurement of drug courts: The state of the art. Statewide Technical Assistance Bulletin, 6. Retrieved from https://ncsc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/spcts/id/171/
   Google Scholar
• Schauffler, R. Y. (2007). Judicial accountability in the US state courts: Measuring court performance. Utrecht Law Review, 3, 112–128.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. T., Matland, R. E., Michelbach, P. A., & Bornstein, B. H. (2001). Just deserts: An experimental study of distributive justice norms. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 749–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. C., & Spears, J. W. (1997). Gender and case processing decisions. Women & Criminal Justice, 8, 29–59.
   Google Scholar
• Stack, L. (2016). Light sentence for Brock Turner in Stanford rape case draws outrage. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/07/us/outrage-in-stanford-rape-case-over-dueling-statements-of-victim-and-attackers-father.html
   Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strategies, G. B. A. (2015). Analysis of national survey of registered voters. Retrieved from https://www.ncsc.org/Topics/Court-Community/Public-Trust-and-Confidence/Resource-Guide/2015-State-of-State-Courts-Survey.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Strategies, G. B. A. (2016). Annual National Tracking Survey Analysis. Retrieved from https://www.ncsc.org/Topics/Court-Community/Public-Trust-and-Confidence/Resource-Guide/2016-State-of-State-Courts-Survey.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Strategies, G. B. A. (2017). 2017 State of the State Courts – Survey Analysis. Retrieved from https://www.ncsc.org/2017survey
   Google Scholar
• Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37, 513–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tankebe, J. (2008). Police effectiveness and police trustworthiness in Ghana: An empirical appraisal. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 8, 185–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tankebe, J. (2009). Public cooperation with the police in Ghana: Does procedural fairness matter? Criminology, 47, 1265–1293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51, 103–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why citizens obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2005). Policing in black and white: Ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly, 8, 322–342.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law (2nd ed. ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Jackson, J. (2014). Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation, and engagement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(1), 78–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., Schulhofer, S., & Huq, A. Z. (2010). Legitimacy and deterrence effects in counterterrorism policing: A study of Muslim Americans. Law & Society Review, 44, 365–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgements. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 1–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Duizend, R., Steelman, D. C., & Suskin, L. (2011). Model time standards for state trial courts. Retrieved from https://www.ncsc.org/Services-and-Experts/Technology-tools/~/media/Files/PDF/CourtMD/Model-Time-Standards-for-State-Trial-Courts.ashx
   Google Scholar
• Velicogna, M., & Ng, C. Y. (2006). Legitimacy and internet in the judiciary: A lesson from the Italian courts’ websites experience. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 14, 370–389.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzel, J. P., Bowler, S., & Lanoue, D. J. (2003). The sources of public confidence in state courts: Experience and institutions. American Politics Research, 31, 191–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, S. E., Nix, J., Kaminski, R., & Rojek, J. (2015 July). Is the effect of procedural justice on police legitimacy invariant? Testing the generality of procedural justice and competing antecedents of legitimacy. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Published online. doi:10.1007/s10940-015-9263-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar