2,154
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Wrongful convictions in asian countries: A systematic literature review

ORCID Icon, , , , & ORCID Icon
Received 15 Jun 2022, Accepted 25 Feb 2023, Published online: 06 Mar 2023

References

  • Adams, D., Mabry, J., McCoy, M., & Lord, W. (2013). Challenges for forensic science: New demands in today’s world. The Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 45(4), 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2012.728246
  • Anderson, K. (2012). Reflections on I just didn’t do it, the lay judge system, and legal education in and out of Japan. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 7, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2194607800000648
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
  • Chen, S., & Chua, E. (2010). Wrongful convictions in Singapore: A general survey of risk factors. Singapore Law Review, 28, 98–122.
  • Garrett, B. (2020). Wrongful convictions. Annual Review of Criminology, 3, 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024739
  • Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. Sage.
  • Grant, M., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
  • Greene, E., & Loftus, E. (1984). Solving the eyewitness problem. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2(4), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370020406
  • Grounds, A. T. (2005). Understanding the effects of wrongful imprisonment. Crime and Justice, 32, 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1086/655352
  • Guo, Z. (2019). Torture and exclusion of evidence in China. China Perspectives, 1(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.8742
  • Guo, Z. (2020). Presumption of innocence in China. The Presumption of Innocence Online Experts Workshop, Online.
  • Hampikian, G., Peri, G., Lo, S. -S., Chin, M. -H., & Liu, K. -L. (2017). Case report: Coincidental inclusion in a 17-locus Y-STR mixture, wrongful conviction and exoneration forensic science international. Genetics, 31, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.08.004
  • Hawes, C. (2020). Transforming the culture of Chinese prosecutors through guiding cases. New Criminal Law Review, 23(2), 196–235. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2020.23.2.196
  • He, J. (2014). Wrongful convictions and the exclusionary rules in China. Frontiers of Law in China, 9(3), 490–505.
  • He, J. (2016a). Back from the dead: Wrongful convictions and criminal justice in China. University of Hawaiʻi Press.
  • He, J. (2016b). Miscarriage of justice and malpractice in criminal investigations in China. China Review, 16(1), 65–93.
  • He, J. (2021). A case study on shortage of evidence in wrongful convictions in China. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 25(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712720983933
  • He, J., & He, R. (2012). Empirical studies of wrongful convictions in mainland China. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 80(4), 1277–1292.
  • Huff, C. (2002). What can we learn from other nations about the problem of wrongful conviction. Judicature, 86(2), 91–97.
  • Huff, R., & Killias, M. (Eds.). (2008). Wrongful conviction: International perspectives on miscarriages of justice. Temple University Press.
  • Huff, C., Rattner, A., & Sagarin, E. (1996). Convicted but innocent: Wrongful conviction and public policy. Sage.
  • Hui, C., & Lo, W. (2015). One country, two cultures: Are hong kong mock jurors “mainlandized” by the predominant Chinese criminal justice concept of confession? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(10), 1104–1124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X14528463
  • Ito, K. (2013). Wrongful convictions and recent criminal justice reform in Japan. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 80(4), 1245–1275.
  • Jiahong, H. (2021). A Case Study on Shortage of Evidence in Wrongful Convictions in China the. International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 25(1), 36–52.
  • Jiang, N. (2013a). The adequacy of China’s responses to wrongful convictions. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 41(4), 390–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2013.08.002
  • Jiang, N. (2013b). A comparison of wrongful convictions in death penalty cases between China and the United States. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 41, 144–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2013.03.001
  • Jiang, N. (2014). Iron triangle of the gong jian fa: Lessons from wrongful convictions in capital cases? International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 42, 406–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2014.08.003
  • Jiang, N. (2015a). Convicting the innocent: What causes wrongful convictions in China? The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 3(1), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxv002
  • Jiang, N. (2015b). Problems and prospects: China’s responses to wrongful conviction. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 43(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2014.10.002
  • Jiang, N. (2016). Wrongful convictions in China: Comparative and empirical perspectives. Springer.
  • Jiang, N. (2018a). Difficult paths: Slow progress in preventing wrongful convictions in China. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 52, 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2017.09.003
  • Jiang, N. (2018b). Excluding tortured confessions in the People’s Republic of China: A long march towards the eventual abolition of torture? International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 54, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2018.06.004
  • Jiang, N. (2018c). Old wine in new bottles? New strategies for judicial accountability in China. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 52, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2017.09.006
  • Jiang, S., Pilot, R., & Saito, T. (2010). Why Japanese support the death penalty? International Criminal Justice Review, 20(3), 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567710373276
  • Johnson, D. (2015). Wrongful convictions and the culture of denial in Japanese criminal justice. The Asia-Pacific Journal, 13(6), 1–14.
  • Kassin, S. (1984). Eyewitness identification: Victims versus bystanders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14(6), 519–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1984.tb02257.x
  • Kim, M., & Penrod, S. (2010). Legal decision making among Korean and American legal professionals and lay people. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 38, 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2011.01.004
  • Le, L. C., Hoang, H. Y., Bui, T. H., Nguyen, Q. D., Mai, T. S., & Luong, T. H. (2022). Understanding causes for wrongful convictions in Vietnam: A view from the top and the bottom of the iceberg. Asian Journal of Criminology, 17(S1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-022-09390-7
  • Leo, R. (2017). The criminology of wrongful conviction: A decade later. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33(1), 82–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986216673013
  • Leo, R., & Gould, J. (2009). Studying wrongful convictions: learning from social science Ohio state. Journal of Criminal Law, 1(1), 7–30.
  • Liang, B., Liu, J., & Lu, H. (2019). Variability of death penalty attitude in China: An empirical test of the Marshall hypotheses crime. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 72(3), 269–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-018-9809-4
  • Lin, X., Chen, C., & Wang, Y. (2019). Regulating the power of Chinese police through the exclusionary rule–an empirical study. Policing and Society, 29(9). https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2018.1502291
  • Lu, H., & Liang, B. (2022). Introduction: Wrongful convictions and exonerations in Asia. Asian Journal of Criminology, 17, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-022-09385-4
  • Luong, T. H. (2021). Why Vietnam continues to impose the death penalty for drug offences: A narrative commentary. International Journal of Drug Policy, 88, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.103043
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  • Mujuzi, J. (2021). Compensation for wrongful conviction/miscarriage of justice in Hong Kong in light of a v secretary for justice and another [2020]. International Human Rights Law Review, 10(2), 291–311. (11 March 2020). https://doi.org/10.1163/22131035-10020005. hkcfi 427; hcal 176/2018
  • Newman, B. (2021). Managerial induced guilty pleas in England and Israel – Legitimacy and the role of the judiciary: Reclaiming judicial responsibility through managerial means. Criminal Law Forum, 32(3), 355–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-021-09418-0
  • Newman, M., & Gough, D. (2020). Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application. In O. Zawacki-Richter, M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, & K. Buntins (Eds.), Systematic review in educational research: Methodology, perspective and application (pp. 3–22). Springer.
  • Nobles, R., & Schiff, D. (1995). Miscarriages of justice: A systems approach. The Morden Law Review, 58(3), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1995.tb02012.x
  • Oeberst, A., & Wu, S. (2015). Independent vs. Interdependent self-construal and interrogative compliance: Intra-and cross-cultural evidence. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.038
  • Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2005). Systematic reviews in the social science: A practical guide. Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Pittway, L. (2008). Systematic literature reviews. In R. Thorpe & R. Holt (Eds.), The SAGE dictionary of qualitative management research (pp. 217–218). Sage.
  • Rattner, A. (1983). Convicted but innocent: Wrongful conviction and the criminal justice system. [LLD, Ohio State University].
  • Rattner, A. (1988). Convicted but innocent: Wrongful conviction and the criminal justice system. Law and Human Behavior, 12(3), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044385
  • Sambunijak, D., Cumpston, M., & Watts, C. (2019). Module 1: Introduction to conducting systematic review. Cochrance. Retrieved 11 December from https://training.cochrane.org/interactivelearning/module-1-introduction-conducting-systematic-reviews
  • School of Law. (2022). Wrongful Conviction. In Criminal law & Procedure. https://lawlibraryguides.neu.edu/CrimLaw/wrongfulconviction
  • Seiff, J. (1934). The presumption of innocence. Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology, 25(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.2307/1135677
  • Soukara, S. (2020). The role of investigative interviewing on witness testimony. The Cyprus Review, 32(1), 63–88.
  • Sumampouw, N., Bjorndal, L., Magnussen, S., Otgaar, H., & Brennen, T. (2021). Knowledge about eyewitness testimony: A survey of Indonesian police officers and psychologists psychology. Psychology, Crime & Law, 28(8), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.1962868
  • Thayer, J. (1897). The presumption of innocence in criminal cases. The Yale Law Journal, 6(4), 185. https://doi.org/10.2307/780722
  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.
  • Wrightsman, L., & Kassin, S. (1993). Confessions in the courtroom. Sage.
  • Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
  • Zhong, L., & Dai, M. (2019). The politics of wrongful conviction. Journal of Contemporary China, 28(116), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1511396
  • Zhuo, Y. (2021). Convicting the innocent or freeing the guilty? Public attitudes towards criminal justice errors. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 65(4), 458–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X20944684