252
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

And you know, we’re on each other’s team: Lessons from an in-depth analysis of researcher–practitioner partnerships in criminal justice research

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 179-204 | Received 16 Nov 2022, Accepted 11 Apr 2023, Published online: 19 Apr 2023

References

  • Alpert, G. P., Rojek, J., & Hansen, J. A. (2013). Building bridges between police researchers and practitioners: Agents of change in a complex world. Final Report to the National Institute of Justice.
  • Backes, B., & Rorie, M. (2013). Partners in research: Lessons learned in Los Angeles: Practitioners and researchers discuss the benefits and challenges of working together. National Institute of Justice.
  • Bacon, M., Shapland, J., Skinns, L., & White, A. (2021). Fragile alliances: Culture, funding and sustainability in police-academic partnerships. Evidence & Policy, 17(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426420X15808911426311
  • Bales, W. D., Scaggs, S. J. A., Clark, C. L., Ensley, D., & Coltharp, P. (2014). Researcher–practitioner partnerships: A case of the development of a long-term collaborative project between a university and a criminal justice agency. Criminal Justice Studies, 27(3), 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2014.947807
  • Ballan, M. S., & Amodeo, C. (2019). Advancing practice-relevant research for survivors of intimate partner violence with disabilities: A research-to practice fellowship project. Office for Victims of Crime, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
  • Blomberg, T. G. (2019). Making a difference in criminology: Past, present, and future. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 44(4), 670–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-019-09484-6
  • Bond, B. J., Hajjar, L., Ryan, A., & White, M. D. (2014). Lowell, massachusetts, smart policing initiative. Reducing property crime in targeted hot spots. Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice.
  • Braga, A., & Hinkle, M. (2010). The participation of academics in the criminal justice working group process. In J. Klofas, N. K. Hipple, & E. McGarrell (Eds.), The new criminal justice (pp. 114–120). Routledge.
  • Braga, A. A., Kennedy, D. M., Waring, E. J., & Piehl, A. M. (2001). Problem-oriented policing, deterrence, and youth violence: An evaluation of Boston’s operation ceasefire. The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(3), 195–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427801038003001
  • Campbell, R., Cabral, G. F., Pierce, S. J., Sharma, D. B., Bybee, D., Shaw, J., Horsford, S., & Feeney, B. (2015). The detroit sexual assault kit (SAK) action research project (ARP), final report. US Department of Justice.
  • Campbell, R., & Fehler-cabral, G. (2017). Accountability, collaboration, and social change: Ethical tensions in an action research project to address untested sexual assault kits (SAKs). American Journal of Community Psychology, 60(3–4), 476–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12176
  • Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019
  • Chicago Area Project. (2022). Chicago area project. Retrieved October 26, 2022, from https://www.chicagoareaproject.org/
  • DeHart, D., & Shapiro, C. (2016). Integrated administrative data & criminal justice research. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(2), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-016-9355-5
  • Elmes, G., & Roedl, G. (2012). Increasing student and community safety partnership: A researcher-practitioner partnership between West Virginia university department of geology and geography, the West Virginia university police department and the Morgantown police department. Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice.
  • Elo, S., & Kyngash, K. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
  • Forge. (2019). Measuring resilience among trans and non-binary survivors of sexual violence: A research-to practice fellowship project. [Report]. Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice.
  • Fox, K. A., Fisher, B. S., & Decker, S. H. (2018). Identifying the needs of American Indian women who sought shelter: A practitioner-researcher partnership. Journal of Family Violence, 33(4), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-9953-8
  • Frabutt, J. M., Gathings, M. J., Harvey, L. L., & DiLuca, K. L. (2010). Added value through a partnership model of action research: A case example from a project safe neighborhoods research partner. In J. Klofas, N. K. Hipple, & E. McGarrell (Eds.), New criminal justice: American communities and the changing world of crime control (pp. 103–113). Taylor & Francis.
  • Goodison, S. E., Barnum, J. D., Vermeer, M. J., Woods, D., Sitar, S. I., & Jackson, B. A. (2020). The law enforcement response to homelessness: Identifying high-priority needs to improve law enforcement strategies for addressing homelessness. RAND Corporation.
  • Gordon, T. (2012). State and local budgets and the great recession. The Brookings Institution.
  • Grieco, J., Vovak, H., & Lum, C. (2014). Examining research-practice partnerships in policing evaluations. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 8(4), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pau031
  • Gwet, K. L. (2014). Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters (4th ed.). Advanced Analytics.
  • Hawkins, N. (2010). Research in practice: When a researcher-practitioner partnership works. NIJ Journal, (266), 4–8.
  • Hodgkinson, T. (2018). Help! I need somebody. Help! Not just anybody: An event perspective of the community safety partnership making process in Canada [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Simon Fraser University.
  • Hsieh, H. -F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  • Johnson, S. (2014). Project research to action in mentoring, final report. US Department of Justice.
  • Katz, C. M., Webb, V. J., Schaefer, D. R., & Haar, R. N. (2002). Expanding research capacity to support the implementation of community policing through the development of a multi-agency research partnership involving the Chandler, Glendale, and Scottsdale, Arizona Police departments and Arizona State University West, Final report. US Department of Justice.
  • Klofas, J., Hipple, N. K., & McGarrell, E. (Eds.). (2010). The new criminal justice: American communities and the changing world of crime control. Routledge.
  • Lane, J., Turner, S., & Flores, C. (2004). Researcher-practitioner collaboration in community corrections: Overcoming hurdles for successful partnerships. Criminal Justice Review, 29(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/073401680402900107
  • Laub, J. H., Rojek, J., Sullivan, T., & Tseng, V. (2012). Game change: How researcher-practitioner partnerships are redefining how we study crime - plenary panel at the 2012 NIJ conference [Video]. Retrieved October 26, 2022, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdwBObISJDs
  • Martin, T. (2012). Law enforcement research priorities for 2010 and beyond: Results of the IACP membership survey and focus group 2009-2010. US Department of Justice.
  • Mastrofski, J. A., Derman, D., Phillips, E., & Woodling, G. (2001). NIJ researcher-practitioner partnerships: Evaluation of grants to encourage arrest policies for domestic violence, final report (US Department of justice Report 187345). US Department of Justice.
  • McAlister, A. M., Lee, D. M., Ehlert, K. M., Kajfez, R. L., Faber, C. J., & Kennedy, M. S. (2017). Qualitative coding: An approach to assess inter-rater reliability. Presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (Paper ID #18189). https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2—28777
  • McEwen, T. (1999). NIJ’s locally initiated research partnerships in policing: Factors that add up to success. National Institute of Justice Journal, (238), 2–10.
  • McEwen, T. (2003). Evaluation of the locally initiated research partnership program. US Department of Justice.
  • Murray, R. K., & Irlbeck, D. M. (2020). Evolution of the researcher–practitioner partner model and the role of academic research partners in Byrne criminal justice innovation (BCJI) grants. Contemporary Justice Review, 23(1), 44–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2019.1700366
  • Murray, C., Ong, I., Paige, H. S., Foreman, T., Akers, W., Flasch, P., Monika, J. H., Przewoznik, J., Guerrero, C., & Dooley, R. (2015). Linking research and practice to address domestic and sexual violence: Lessons learned from a statewide conference with researchers and practitioners. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 7(2), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-07-2014-0129
  • National Institute of Justice. (2012). Game change: How researcher-practitioner partnerships are redefining how we study crime- Plenary Panel at the 2012 NIJ Conference. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
  • National Institute of Justice. (2015). Topical working group on the use of administrative segregation in the U.S. Hilton crystal city at Washington reagan national airport [NCJ 249785]. US Department of Justice.
  • Park, Y. (2018). How research is translated to policy and practice in the criminal justice system. Corrections Today, 80(5), 18–20.
  • Pesta, G. B., Blomberg, T. G., Ramos, J., & Ranson, J. W. A. (2018). Translational criminology: Toward best practice. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 44(3), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-018-9467-1
  • Pesta, G. B., Ramos, J., Ranson, A., Singer, A., & Blomberg, T. G. (2016). Translational criminology - research and public policy, final summary report [NCJ 250597]. US Department of Justice.
  • Piza, E. L., Kennedy, L. W., & Caplan, J. M. (2018). Facilitators and impediments to designing, implementing, and evaluating risk-based policing strategies using risk terrain modeling: Insights from a multi-city evaluation in the United States. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 24(4), 489–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-017-9367-9
  • Ranson, J. W. A., Ramos, J., Pesta, G., & Blomberg, T. G. (2017). Unlocking knowledge: Florida’s researcher-practitioner partnerships work. Corrections Today, 79(1), 28–31.
  • Rojek, J., Shjarback, J. A., Hansen, J. A., & Alpert, G. P. (2019). Present but not prevalent: Identifying the organizational correlates of researcher-practitioner partnerships in U.S. law enforcement. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 20(6), 552–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2019.1657626
  • Rojek, J., Smith, H. P., & Alpert, G. P. (2015). The prevalence and characteristics of police practitioner–researcher partnerships. Police Quarterly, 15(3), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611112440698
  • Rosenfeld, R. (2016). Evaluating a researcher-practitioner partnership and field experiment. US Department of Justice.
  • Rudes, D. S., Viglione, J., Lerch, J., Porter, C., & Taxman, F. S. (2014). Build to sustain: Collaborative partnerships between university researchers and criminal justice practitioners. Criminal Justice Studies, 27(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2014.947808
  • Saunders, J., Hipple, N. K., Allison, K., & Peterson, J. (2020). Estimating the impact of research practitioner partnerships on evidence-based program implementation. Justice Quarterly, 37(7), 1322–1342. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2020.1831578
  • Selvi, A. F. (2020). Qualitative content analysis. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 440–452). Routledge.
  • Sideman, O., Andiloro, N. R., & Kutateladze, B. L. (2014). Prosecution and racial justice in New York County - Partnership report. US Department of Justice.
  • Spivak, H. (2018, February 26). Researcher-practitioner partnerships [Speech transcript]. US Department of Justice.
  • Steinheider, B., Wuestewald, T., Boyatzis, R. E., & Kroutter, P. (2012). In search of a methodology of collaboration: Understanding researcher–practitioner philosophical differences in policing. Police Practice & Research, 13(4), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2012.671620
  • Sullivan, T. P., Khondkaryan, E., Moss-Racusin, L., & Fisher, B. S. (2013). How researchers can develop successful relationships with criminal justice practitioners, Findings from the research-practitioner study (RPPS) [NCJ 243912]. US Department of Justice.
  • Sullivan, T. P., McPartland, T., & Fisher, B. S. (2013). Guidelines for successful researcher-practitioner partnerships in the criminal justice system, findings from the researcher-practitioner partnerships study (RPPS) [NCJ 243918]. US Department of Justice.
  • Sullivan, T., Price, C., Belluci, B., & Hill, B. (2017). Criminal Protective Orders as a Critical Strategy to Reduce Domestic Violence: Researcher-Practitioner Partnership Summary. National Institute of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/250665.pdf
  • Sullivan, T. P., Price, C., McPartland, T., Hunter, B. A., & Fisher, B. S. (2017). The researcher–practitioner partnership study (RPPS): Experiences from criminal justice system collaborations studying violence against women. Violence Against Women, 23(7), 887–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216650290
  • Sullivan, T. P., Willie, T. C., & Fisher, B. S. (2013). Highlights and lowlights of researcher-practitioner collaborations in the criminal justice system, findings from the researcher-practitioner partnership study (RPPS) [NCJ 243914]. US Department of Justice.
  • Telep, C. (2014, November 15). Back to the future with the ASC’s new division of policing. OUPblog. https://blog.oup.com/2014/11/asc-new-division-policing/
  • Travis, L. F., III. (2001). Institutionalizing the use of research in a local police department: A continuing partnership (Report number 190991). US Department of Justice.
  • Vaughn, P., & Turner, C. (2016). Decoding via coding: Analyzing qualitative text data through thematic coding and survey methodologies. Journal of Library Administration, 56(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2015.1105035
  • Walls, R. J., Levine, B. N., Liberatore, M., & Shields, C. (2011, August 9). Effective digital forensics research is investigator-centric [Presentation]. Proceedings, 6th USENIX workshop on hot topics in security, San Francisco, CA, https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/hotsec11/tech/final_files/Walls.pdf
  • Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983488
  • Weisburd, D., Hinkle, J. C., Famega, C., & Ready, J. (2010). Legitimacy, fear and collective efficacy in crime hot spots: Assessing the impacts of broken windows policing strategies on citizen attitudes. US Department of Justice.
  • Welsh, W. N. (2002). Building an effective research collaboration between the center for public policy at temple university and the Pennsylvania department of corrections: Final report. US Department of Justice.
  • Williams, M., & Moser, T. (2019). The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International Management Review, 15(1), 45–72. http://www.imrjournal.org/uploads/1/4/2/8/14286482/imr-v15n1art4.pdf
  • Worden, R. E., McLean, S. J., & Bonner, H. S. (2014). Research partners in criminal justice: Notes from Syracuse. Criminal Justice Studies, 27(3), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2014.947812

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.