Neither Fish nor Fowl: A Role Theory Approach to Librarians Teaching

REFERENCES

• American Library Association. (1989). American Library Association presidential committee on information literacy. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential
   Google Scholar
• Association of College and Research Libraries. (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education: The final version, approved January 2000. College & Research Libraries News, 61(3), 207–215.
   Google Scholar
• Badke, W.B. (2005). Can't get no respect: Helping faculty to understand the educational power of information literacy. Reference Librarian, 43(89), 63–80.
   Google Scholar
• Badke, W.B. (2008). Ten reasons to teach information literacy for credit. Online, 32(6), 47–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S. (2009). Libraries and learning: A history of paradigm change. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 9(2), 181–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle, B.J. (1986). Recent developments in role theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 67–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, M. (1981). Sources of tension and conflict between librarians and faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 52(2), 182–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, M. (1995). Librarians as educators: Assessing our self-image. Public & Access Services Quarterly, 1(1), 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Bolin, M.K. (2008). Librarian status at US research universities: Extending the typology. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(5), 416–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, M.B. (2012). Academic libraries and the credit-bearing class. Communications in Information Literacy, 5(2), 156–173.
   Google Scholar
• Chesnut, M.T., Wesley, T.L., & Zai, R. (2010). Adding an extra helping of service when you already have a full plate: Building an embedded librarian program. Public Services Quarterly, 6(2/3), 122–129.
   Google Scholar
• Danton, J.P. (1937). The college library: A new factor in education. The Journal of Higher Education, 8(7), 376–382.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E.L., Lundstrom, K., & Martin, P.N. (2011). Librarian perceptions and information literacy instruction models. Reference Services Review, 39(4), 686–702.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, S. (1993). Information literacy: Some misgivings. American Libraries, 24(4), 344–346.
   Google Scholar
• Given, L.M., & Julien, H. (2005). Finding common ground: An analysis of librarians’ expressed attitudes towards faculty. Reference Librarian, 43(89), 25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Grafstein, A. (2002). A discipline-based approach to information literacy. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(4), 191–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardesty, L. (1995). Faculty culture and bibliographic instruction: An exploratory analysis. Library Trends, 44(2), 339–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindin, M.J. (2007). Role theory. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (pp. 3959–3962). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Iannuzzi, P. (1998). Faculty development and information literacy: Establishing campus partnerships. Reference Services Review, 26(3/4), 97–102.
   Google Scholar
• Joint statement on faculty status of college and university librarians. (2012). College & Research Libraries News, 73(11), 669–670.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, J. (2006). Isn't being a librarian enough? Librarians as classroom teachers. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 13(3), 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G.D., & Gonyea, R.M. (2003). The role of the academic library in promoting student engagement in learning. College & Research Libraries, 64(4), 256–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstrom, J., & Shonrock, D.D. (2006). Faculty-librarian collaboration to achieve integration of information literacy. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 46(1), 18–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longstreet, C. (2011). The trouble with disciplining disciplines. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 2011(125), 21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Maughan, P.D. (2001). Assessing information literacy among undergraduates: A discussion of the literature and the University of California-Berkeley assessment experience. College & Research Libraries, 62(1), 71–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W.B., & Morton, B. (1992). On becoming faculty librarians: Acculturation problems and remedies. College & Research Libraries, 53(5), 379–392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naisbitt, J. (1982). Megatrends: Ten new directions transforming our lives. New York: Warner Books.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Educational Statistics. (2010). Academic libraries: 2010 first look [Data file]. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2012/2012365_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, L. (2008). Information literacy as professional legitimation: The quest for professional jurisdiction. Library Review, 58(4), 272–289.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, L. (2009a). Information literacy as professional legitimation: A critical analysis. Journal of Education for Library & Information Science, 50(2), 79–89.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, L. (2009b). Information literacy as professional legitimation: The quest for a new jurisdiction. Library Review, 58(7), 493–508.
   Google Scholar
• Owusu-Ansah, E.K. (2004). Information literacy and higher education: Placing the academic library in the center of a comprehensive solution. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(1), 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owusu-Ansah, E.K. (2007). Beyond collaboration: Seeking greater scope and centrality for library instruction. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 7(4), 415–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rader, H.B. (2002). Information literacy 1973–2002: A selected literature review. Library Trends, 51(2), 242–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, L. (2007). Regional accreditation organizations’ treatment of information literacy: Definitions, collaboration, and assessment. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(3), 317–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J.J., & Hughes, S.K. (1996). Information literacy as a liberal art. Educom Review, 31(2). Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/apps/er/review/reviewarticles/31231.html
   Google Scholar
• Sugimoto, C.R., Russell, T.G., & Grant, S. (2009). Library and information science doctoral education: The landscape from 1930–2007. Journal of Education for Library & Information Science, 50(3), 190–202.
   Google Scholar
• Solony, M.F. (1995). The history of bibliographic instruction: Changing trends from books to the electronic world. Reference Librarian, 24(51), 31–51.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, G.W. (1993). Faculty recalcitrance about bibliographic instruction. In L. Hardesty, J Hastreiter, & D. Henderson (Eds.), Bibliographic instruction in practice: A tribute to the legacy of Evan Ira Farber (pp. 103–105). Ann Arbor, MI: Pierian Press.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. (2010). Fall staff survey; and IPEDS winter 2001–02 through winter 2009–10, human resources component, fall staff section [Data file]. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d11/tables/dt11_257.asp
   Google Scholar
• Walter, S. (2008). Librarians as teachers: A qualitative inquiry into professional identity. College & Research Libraries, 69(1), 51–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, D. (2002). Seeking the promised land of information literacy. In E. Bullard, R. Baier, & J. Nims (Eds.), Integrating information literacy into the college experience: Papers presented at the thirtieth national LOEX Library Instruction Conference, held in Ypsilanti, Michigan, 10 to 11 May 2002 (pp. 1–4). Ann Arbor, MI: Pierian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, E.H. (1934). The librarian as colleague. The Journal of Higher Education, 5(4), 180–186.
   Google Scholar
• Zabel, D. (2004). A reaction to “Information Literacy and Higher Education”. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(1), 17–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar