From Distance Education to Online Learning: Practical Approaches to Information Literacy Instruction and Collaborative Learning in Online Environments

REFERENCES

• Anderson, B., & Simpson, M. (2012). History and heritage in open, flexible, and distance education. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 16(2), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bailin, A., & Peña, A. (2007). Online library tutorials, narratives, and scripts. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(1), 106–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball State University's Strategic Planning Task Force. (2012). Strategic Plan 2012–2017. Retrieved from https://cms.bsu.edu/-/media/WWW/Depa-rtmentalContent/StratPlan/2017/PDFs/20122017%20Strategic%20Plan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Berge, Z.L., & Mrozowski, S. (2001). Review of research in distance education, 1990 to 1999. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Betty, P. (2008). Creation, management, and assessment of library screencasts: The Regis Libraries animated tutorials project. Journal of Library Administration, 48(3), 295–315. doi: 10.1080/01930820802289342
   Google Scholar
• Blummer, B.A., & Kritskaya, O. (2009). Best practices for creating an online tutorial: A literature review. Journal of Web Librarianship, 3(3), 199–216. doi:
   Google Scholar
• Bowles-Terry, M., Hensley, M.K., & Hinchliffe, L.J. (2010). Best practices for online video tutorials in academic libraries: A study of student preferences and understanding. Communications in Information Literacy, 4(1), 17.
   Google Scholar
• Brazzeal, B. (2006). Research guides as library instruction tools. Reference Services Review, 34(3), 358–367. doi: 10.1108/00907320610685319
   Google Scholar
• Burge, L. (2008). ‘Crafting the future’: Pioneer lessons and concerns for today. Distance Education, 29(1), 5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bury, S., & Oud, J. (2005). Usability testing of an online information literacy tutorial. Reference Services Review, 33(1), 54–65.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, D.M. (2008). A journey to legitimacy: The historical development of distance education through technology. TechTrends, 52(2), 45–51.
   Google Scholar
• Center for International Education. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. (2010). What are learning objects? . Retrieved from http://www4.uwm.edu/cie/learning_objects.cfm?gid=56
   Google Scholar
• Clyde, L. (2004). Digital learning objects. Teacher Librarian, 31(4), 55–57.
   Google Scholar
• Courtois, M.P., Higgins, M.E., & Kapur, A. (2005). Was this guide helpful? Users’ perceptions of subject guides. Reference Services Review, 33(2), 188–196. doi: 10.1108/00907320510597381
   Google Scholar
• Dupuis, J., Ryan, P., & Steeves, M. (2004). Creating dynamic subject guides. New Review of Information Networking, 10(2), 271–277. doi: 10.1080/136-14570500082931
   Google Scholar
• Farkas, M. (2011). Tutorials that matter. American Libraries, 42(7), 32.
   Google Scholar
• Farkas, M. (2013, August 19). Good for what? Considering context in building learning objects [Web log]. . Retrieved from http://meredith.wolfwa-ter.com/wordpress/2013/08/19/good-for-what-considering-context-in-building-learning-objects/
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, A.C., & Westbrock, T. (2010). Reaching out with LibGuides: Establishing a working set of best practices. Journal of Library Administration, 50(5/6), 638–656. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2010.488941
   Google Scholar
• Grays, L., Bosque, D.D., & Costello, K. (2008). Building a better M.I.C.E. trap: Using virtual focus groups to assess subject guides for distance education students. Journal of Library Administration, 48(3), 431–453. doi: 10.1080/0193-0820802289482
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. (2003). Online learning objects: Helping faculty teach information literacy (and more). Public Services Quarterly, 1(4), 1–9. doi: 10.1300/J295v01n04_01
   Google Scholar
• IEEE, Learning Standards Committee. (2002). Draft standard for learning object metadata. Retrieved from http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Indiana University Media Relations. (2012, Sep 12). Indiana University announces IU Online, a major new online education initiative. Retrieved from http://newsinfo.iu.edu/news/page/normal/23061.html
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, C., & Mogg, R. (2007). The information literacy resource bank: Re-purposing the wheel. Journal of Information Literacy, 1(1), 49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R., & Pellack, L. (2004). Internet subject guides in academic libraries: An analysis of contents, practices, and opinions. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 43(4), 319–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammerlocher, L., Couture, J., Sparks, O., Harp, M., & Allgood, T. (2011). Information literacy in learning landscapes: Flexible, adaptable, low-cost solutions. Reference Services Review, 39(3), 390–400. doi: 10.1108/00907321111161395
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, E., Cummings, L., Johnson, C., & Scales, B. (2006). If you build it, will they learn? Assessing online information literacy tutorials. College & Research Libraries, 67(5), 429–445. doi: 10.5860/crl.67.5.429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardis, L.A., & Ury, C.J. (2008). Innovation—an LO library: Reuse of learning objects. Reference Services Review, 36(4), 389–413. doi: 10.1108/00907320-810920360
   Google Scholar
• McGreal, R. (2004). Learning objects: A practical definition. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 1(9).
   Google Scholar
• McLean, L. (2014) From recommendations to reality: Designing effective online tutorials. LOEX 2014. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/LindseyMcLean/from-recommendations-to-reality-designing-effective-online-information-literacy-tutorials
   Google Scholar
• Mestre, L.S. (2010). Matching up learning styles with learning objects: What's effective? Journal of Library Administration, 50(7/8), 808–829. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2010.488975
   Google Scholar
• Mestre, L.S. (2012). Student preference for tutorial design: A usability study. Reference Services Review, 40(2), 258–276. doi: 10.1108/00907321211228318
   Google Scholar
• Mestre, L., Baures, L., Niedbala, M., Bishop, C., Cantrell, S., Perez, A., & Silfen, K. (2011). Learning objects as tools for teaching information literacy online: A survey of librarian usage. College & Research Libraries, 72(3), 236–252. doi: 10.5860/crl-130rl
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, S. (2001). What do they really think? Assessing student and faculty perspectives of a web-based tutorial to library research. College & Research Libraries, 62(4), 317–332. doi: 10.5860/crl.62.4.317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, S.E., & Grimes, M. (1999). A great deal of time and effort: An overview of creating and maintaining internet-based subject guides. Library Computing, 18(3), 213.
   Google Scholar
• Nipper, S. (1989). Third generation distance learning and computer conferencing. In R. Mason & A. Kaye (Eds.), Mindweave: Communication, computers, and distance education. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• OCLC E-Learning Task Force. (2003, October). Libraries and the enhancement of e-learning. Online Computer Library Center, Inc. Retrieved from http://www5.oclc.org/downloads/community/elearning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Polsani, P.R. (2003). Use and abuse of reusable learning objects. Journal of Digital Information, 3(4). Retrieved from https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/89/88%3Cbr
   Google Scholar
• Reeb, B., & Gibbons, S. (2004). Students, librarians, and subject guides: Improving a poor rate of return. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 4(1), 123–130. doi: 10.1353/pla.2004.0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saba, F. (2011). Distance education in the United States: Past, present, future. Educational Technology, 51(6), 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Shank, J. (2003). The emergence of learning objects: The reference librarian's role. Research Strategies, 19, 193–203. doi: 10.1016/j.resstr.2005.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Sicilia, M.-A., & García, E. (2003). On the concepts of usability and reusability of learning objects. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2).
   Google Scholar
• Strutin, M. (2008). Making research guides more useful and more well used. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 2008(55). doi: 10.5062/F4M61H5K
   Google Scholar
• Sult, L., Mery, Y., Blakiston, R., & Kline, E. (2013). A new approach to online database instruction: Developing the Guide on the Side. Reference Services Review, 41(1), 125–133. doi: 10.1108/00907321311300947
   Google Scholar
• Sumner, J. (2000). Serving the system: A critical history of distance education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance, and e-Learning, 15(3), 267–285.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. (2001). Fifth generation distance education. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/e-jist/docs/vol4no1/Taylor.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tchangalova, N., & Feigley, A. (2008). Subject guides: Putting a new spin on an old concept. Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, 9(3).
   Google Scholar
• Weller, M., Pegler, C.A., & Mason, R. (2003). Putting the pieces together: What working with learning objects means for the educator. In the Proceedings of the Second eLearnInternational World Summit, Edinburgh International Conference Centre, Edinburgh, Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, D.A. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D.A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects: Online version. Retrieved from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc
   Google Scholar