References
- Anderson, R. (2018). Do you have concerns about Plan S? Then you must be an irresponsible, privileged, conspiratorial hypocrite. The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/11/26/do-you-have-concerns-about-plan-s-then-you-must-be-an-irresponsible-privileged-conspiratorial-hypocrite/
- Clarke, M. (2018). Plans S: Impact on society publishers. The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/12/05/plan-s-impact-on-society-publishers/
- Cochran, A. (2018). Plan S: A mandate for Gold OA with lots of strings attached. The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/12/07/plan-s-a-mandate-for-gold-oa-with-lots-of-strings-attached/
- Ellis, L. (2018). In talks with Elsevier, UCLA reaches for a novel bargaining chip: Its faculty. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/In-Talks-With-Elsevier-UCLA/245311?cid=wcontentlist_hp_latest
- McKenzie, L. (2018). Heavyweight showdown over research access. Inside Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/12/13/university-california-challenges-elsevier-over-access-scholarly-research
- Schimmer, R., Geschuhn, K., & Vogler, A. (2015). Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access. A Max Planck Digital Library Open Access Policy White Paper. http://dx.doi.org/10.17617/1.3