References
- Kamal, M. S.; Hussein, I. A.; Sultan, A. S. Review on Surfactant Flooding: Phase Behavior, Retention, IFT, and Field Applications. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 7701–7720. DOI:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00353.
- Hirasaki, G.; Miller, C.; Puerto, M. Recent Advances in Surfactant EOR. SPE J. 2011, 16, 889–907. DOI:10.2118/115386-PA.
- Chen, Z.; Zhao, X. Enhancing Heavy-Oil Recovery by Using Middle Carbon Alcohol-Enhanced Waterflooding, Surfactant Flooding, and Foam Flooding. Energy Fuels 2015, 29, 2153–2161. DOI:10.1021/ef502652a.
- Siggel, L.; Santa, M.; Hansch, M.; Nowak, M.; Ranft, M.; Weiss, H.; Hajnal, D.; Schreiner, E.; Oetter, G.; Tinsley, J. A. New Class of Viscoelastic Surfactants for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Presented at SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, April 14-18, 2012; Paper SPE-153969-MS.
- Olajire, A. A. Review of ASP EOR (Alkaline Surfactant Polymer Enhanced Oil Recovery) Technology in the Petroleum Industry: Prospects and Challenges. Energy 2014, 77, 963–982. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.005.
- Sheng, J. J. A Comprehensive Review of Alkaline–Surfactant–Polymer (ASP) Flooding. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 2014, 9, 471–489.
- Choi, B. I.; Jeong, M. S.; Lee, K. S. Temperature-Dependent Viscosity Model of HPAM Polymer through High-Temperature Reservoirs. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2014, 110, 225–231. DOI:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.09.006.
- Krumrine, P. H.; Mayer, E. H.; Brock, G. F. Scale Formation during Alkaline Flooding. J. Pet. Technol. 1985, 37, 1466–1474. DOI:10.2118/12671-PA.
- Karambeigi, M. S.; Abbassi, R.; Roayaei, E.; Emadi, M. A. Emulsion Flooding for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Interactive Optimization of Phase Behavior, Microvisual and Core-Flood Experiments. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 29, 382–391. DOI:10.1016/j.jiec.2015.04.019.
- McAuliffe, C. D. Oil-in-Water Emulsions and Their Flow Properties in Porous Media. J. Petrol. Technol. 1973, 25, 727–733. DOI:10.2118/4369-PA.
- McAuliffe, C. D. Crude-Oil-Water Emulsions to Improve Fluid Flow in an Oil Reservoir. J. Petrol. Technol. 1973, 25, 721–726. DOI:10.2118/4370-PA.
- Farias, M. R. D.; Carvalho, M.; Souza, A.; Hirasaki, J. G.; Miller, A. C. A Comparative Study of Emulsion Flooding and other IOR Methods for Heavy Oil Fields. Presented at SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, 16–18 April, Mexico City, Mexico, 2012. SPE Paper 152290.
- Bryan, J.; Kantzas, A. Potential for Alkali-Surfactant Flooding in Heavy Oil Reservoirs through Oil-in-Water Emulsification. J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 2009, 48, 37–46. DOI:10.2118/09-02-37.
- Cobos, S.; Carvalho, M. S.; Alvarado, V. Flow of Oil–Water Emulsions through a Constricted Capillary. Int. J. Multiphas. Flow 2009, 35, 507–515. DOI:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2009.02.018.
- Guillen, V. R.; Mao, I. R.; Carvalho, M. D. S.; Alvarado, V. Capillary-Driven Mobility Control in Macro Emulsion Flow in Porous Media. Int. J. Multiphas. Flow 2012, 43, 62–65. DOI:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2012.03.001.
- Moradi, M.; Kazempour, M.; French, J. T.; Alvarado, A. Dynamic Flow Response of Crude Oil-in-Water Emulsion during Flow through Porous Media. Fuel 2014, 135, 38–45. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2014.06.025.
- Manshad, A. K.; Rezaei, M.; Moradi, S.; Nowrouzi, I.; Mohammadi, H. A. Wettability Alteration and Interfacial Tension (IFT) Reduction in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Process with Ionic Liquid Flooding. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 248, 153–162. DOI:10.1016/j.molliq.2017.10.009.
- Pal, N.; Saxena, N.; Laxmi, D. K. V.; Mandal, A. Interfacial Behaviour, Wettability Alteration and Emulsification Characteristics of a Novel Surfactant: Implications for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2018, 187, 200–212. DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2018.04.062.
- Yuan, C.; Pu, W.; Wang, X.; Sun, L.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, S. Effects of Interfacial Tension, Emulsification, and Surfactant Concentration on Oil Recovery in Surfactant Flooding Process for High Temperature and High Salinity Reservoirs. Energy Fuels 2015, 29, 6165–6176. DOI:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b01393.
- Yu, L.; Dong, M.; Ding, B.; Yuan, Y. Experimental Study on the Effect of Interfacial Tension on the Conformance Control of Oil-in-Water Emulsions in Heterogeneous Oil Sands Reservoirs. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2018, 189, 165–178. DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2018.05.033.
- Miriana-Pérez, M.; Jarry, P.; Pérez-Sanchez, M.; Ramirez-Gouveia, M.; Salager, J. L. Surfactant–Oil–Water Systems near the affinity inversion—Part V: Properties of emulsions. J. Disper. Sci. Technol. 1986, 7, 331–343. DOI:10.1080/01932698608943464.
- Liu, R.; Du, D.; Pu, W.; Zhang, J.; Fan, X. Enhanced Oil Recovery Potential of Alkyl Alcohol Polyoxyethylene Ether Sulfonate Surfactants in High-Temperature and High-Salinity Reservoirs. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 12128–12140. DOI:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b02653.
- Gao, B.; Sharma, M. M. A Family of Alkyl Sulfate Gemini Surfactants. 2. Water–Oil Interfacial Tension Reduction. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 407, 375–381. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2013.06.066.
- Binks, B. P.; Clint, J. H.; Whitby, C. P. Rheological Behavior of Water-in-Oil Emulsions Stabilized by Hydrophobic Bentonite Particles. Langmuir 2005, 21, 5307–5316. DOI:10.1021/la050255w.
- Maaref, S.; Ayatollahi, S.; Rezaei, N.; Masihi, M. The Effect of Dispersed Phase Salinity on Water-in-Oil Emulsion Flow Performance: A Micromodel Study. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 4549–4561. DOI:10.1021/acs.iecr.7b00432.