References
- Gandhi, B.; Prakash, A.; Bergougnou, M. A. Hydrodynamic Behavior of Slurry Bubble Column at High Solids Concentrations. Powder Technol. 1999, 103, 80–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-5910(98)00182-X.
- Shaikh, A.; Al-Dahhan, M. H. A Review on Flow Regime Transition in Bubble Columns. Int. J. Chem. Reactor Eng. 2007, 5, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-6580.1368.
- Li, H.; Prakash, A. Influence of Slurry Concentrations on Bubble Population and Their Rise Velocities in a Three-Phase Slurry Bubble Column. Powder Technol. 2000, 113, 158–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-5910(00)00228-X.
- Han, O.-H.; Kim, M.-K.; Kim, B.-G.; Subasinghe, N.; Park, C.-H. Fine Coal Beneficiation by Column Flotation. Fuel Process. Technol. 2014, 126, 49–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.04.014.
- Leonard, C.; Ferrasse, J.-H.; Boutin, O.; Lefevre, S.; Viand, A. Bubble Column Reactors for High Pressures and High Temperatures Operation. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2015, 100, 391–421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.05.013.
- Banisi, S.; Finch, J. A.; Laplante, A. R.; Weber, M. E. Effect of Solid Particles on Gas Holdup in Flotation Columns—II. Investigation of Mechanisms of Gas Holdup Reduction in Presence of Solids. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1995, 50, 2335–2342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(95)00076-H.
- Barghi, S.; Prakash, A.; Margaritis, A.; Bergougnou, M. A. Flow Regime Identification in a Slurry Bubble Column from Gas Holdup and Pressure Fluctuations Analysis. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2008, 82, 865–870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450820501.
- Kim, H. S.; Kim, J. H.; Lee, C. G.; Kang, S. H.; Woo, K. J.; Jung, H. J.; Kim, D. W. Bubble and Heat Transfer Phenomena in Viscous Slurry Bubble Column. ACES 2014, 04, 417–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/aces.2014.44046.
- Ojima, S.; Hayashi, K.; Tomiyama, A. Effects of Hydrophilic Particles on Bubbly Flow in Slurry Bubble Column. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 2014, 58, 154–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2013.09.005.
- Orvalho, S.; Hashida, M.; Zednikova, M.; Stanovsky, P.; Ruzicka, M. C.; Sasaki, S.; Tomiyama, A. Flow Regimes in Slurry Bubble Column: Effect of Column Height and Particle Concentration. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 351, 799–815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.06.115.
- Prakash, R.; Majumder, S. K.; Singh, A. Gas Holdup and Frictional Pressure Drop Contributions in Microstructured Two-and Three-Phase Bubbling Bed with Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Liquids: Effect of Coarse and Fine Particles with Surface Active Agent. Chem. Eng. Process 2018, 133, 40–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2018.09.020.
- Vadlakonda, B.; Mangadoddy, N. Hydrodynamic Study of Three-Phase Flow in Column Flotation Using Electrical Resistance Tomography Coupled with Pressure Transducers. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 203, 274–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.04.039.
- Li, W.; Zhong, W.; Jin, B.; Xiao, R.; Lu, Y.; He, T. Study of the Particle Size Effect on Bubble Rise Velocities in a Three-Phase Bubble Column. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. Int. J. Chem. Mol. Nuclear Mater. Metall. Eng. 2013, 7, 971–975. DOI: scholar.waset.org/1999.2/9996735
- Anastasiou, A. D.; Kazakis, N. A.; Mouza, A. A.; Paras, S. V. Effect of Organic Surfactant Additives on Gas Holdup in the Pseudo-Homogeneous Regime in Bubble Columns Equipped with Fine Pore Sparger. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2010, 65, 5872–5880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.08.011.
- Azgomi, F.; Gomez, C. O.; Finch, J. A. Correspondence of Gas Holdup and Bubble Size in Presence of Different Frothers. Int. J. Miner. Process 2007, 83, 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2007.03.002.
- Kim, J. Y.; Kim, B.; Nho, N.-S.; Go, K.-S.; Kim, W.; Bae, J. W.; Jeong, S. W.; Epstein, N.; Lee, D. H. Gas Holdup and Hydrodynamic Flow Regime Transition in Bubble Columns. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2017, 56, 450–462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.07.043.
- Li, S.; Huang, S.; Fan, J. Effect of Surfactants on Gas Holdup in Shear-Thinning Fluids. Int. J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 2017, 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9062649.
- Rollbusch, P.; Becker, M.; Ludwig, M.; Bieberle, A.; Grünewald, M.; Hampel, U.; Franke, R. Experimental Investigation of the Influence of Column Scale, Gas Density and Liquid Properties on Gas Holdup in Bubble Columns. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 2015, 75, 88–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.05.009.
- Kumar, S.; Khanna, A. Experimental Analysis and Development of Correlations for Gas Holdup in High Pressure Slurry Co-Current Bubble Columns. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2014, 31, 1964–1972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-014-0121-4.
- Kumar, S.; Kumar, R. A.; Munshi, P.; Khanna, A. Gas Hold-up in Three Phase Co-Current Bubble Columns. Procedia Eng. 2012, 42, 782–794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.470.
- Besagni, G.; Guédon, G.; Inzoli, F. Experimental Investigation of Counter Current Air-Water Flow in a Large Diameter Vertical Pipe with Inners. J Phys. Conf. Ser., 2014, 547, 012024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/547/1/012024.
- Besagni, G.; Inzoli, F. The Effect of Liquid Phase Properties on Bubble Column Fluid Dynamics: Gas Holdup, Flow Regime Transition, Bubble Size Distributions and Shapes, Interfacial Areas and Foaming Phenomena. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2017, 170, 270–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.03.043.
- Besagni, G.; Inzoli, F. The Effect of Electrolyte Concentration on Counter-Current Gas–Liquid Bubble Column Fluid Dynamics: Gas Holdup, Flow Regime Transition and Bubble Size Distributions. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2017, 118, 170–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2016.12.012.
- Trivedi, R.; Renganathan, T.; Krishnaiah, K. Hydrodynamics of Countercurrent Bubble Column: Experiments and Predictions. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 338, 636–650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.023.
- Bhunia, K.; Kundu, G.; Mukherjee, D. Gas Holdup Characteristics in a Flotation Column with Different Solids. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2017, 52, 1298–1309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2017.1287196.
- Luewisutthichat, W.; Tsutsumi, A.; Yoshida, K. Bubble Characteristics in Multi-Phase Flow Systems: Bubble Sizes and Size Distributions. J. Chem. Eng. Japan. 1997, 30, 461–466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.30.461.
- Shukla, S. C.; Kundu, G.; Mukherjee, D. Study of Gas Holdup and Pressure Characteristics in a Column Flotation Cell Using Coal. Miner. Eng. 2010, 23, 636–642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2010.03.005.
- Bahri, Z.; Shafaei, S. Z.; Karamoozian, M. Investigation of Effective Parameters on the Gas Holdup in Column Flotation of a Coal Tailing Sample. Int. J. Coal Prep. Util. 2013, 33, 47–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19392699.2012.759944.
- Shah, M.; Kiss, A. A.; Zondervan, E.; Van der Schaaf, J.; De Haan, A. B. Gas Holdup, Axial Dispersion, and Mass Transfer Studies in Bubble Columns. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 14268–14278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ie301227t.
- Sujatha, K. T.; Jain, D.; Kamath, S.; Kuipers, J. A. M.; Deen, N. G. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of a Micro-Structured Bubble Column with Chemisorption. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2017, 169, 225–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2016.12.035.
- Prakash, R.; Majumder, S. K.; Singh, A. Dispersion Characteristics in a Counter-Current Microstructured Slurry Bubble Column and Its Analysis Based on the Turbulence and Circulation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 8093–8111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c00834.
- Palaskar, S. N.; De, J. K.; Pandit, A. B. Liquid Phase RTD Studies in Sectionalized Bubble Column. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2000, 23, 61–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4125(200001)23:1%3C61::AID-CEAT61%3E3.0.CO;2-K DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4125(200001)23:1<61::AID-CEAT61>3.0.CO;2-K.
- Dreher, A. J.; Krishna, R. Liquid-Phase Backmixing in Bubble Columns, Structured by Introduction of Partition Plates. Catal. Today 2001, 69, 165–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(01)00365-0.
- Wu, Y.; Cheng, Z.-M.; Huang, Z.-B. Backmixing Reduction of a Bubble Column by Interruption of the Global Liquid Circulation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 6558–6563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ie900128j.
- Bhatia, B.; Nigam, K. D. P.; Auban, D.; Hebrard, G. Effect of a New High Porosity Packing on Hydrodynamics and Mass Transfer in Bubble Columns. Chem. Eng. Process 2004, 43, 1371–1380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2003.10.009.
- Ojima, S.; Sasaki, S.; Hayashi, K.; Tomiyama, A. Effects of Particle Diameter on Bubble Coalescence in a Slurry Bubble Column. J. Chem. Eng. Japan. 2015, 48, 181–189. . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.14we248.
- Kuan, S. H.; Finch, J. A. Impact of Talc on Pulp and Froth Properties in F150 and 1-Pentanol Frother Systems. Miner. Eng. 2010, 23, 1003–1009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2010.04.010.
- Lakhdissi, E. M.; Soleimani, I.; Guy, C.; Chaouki, J. Simultaneous Effect of Particle Size and Solid Concentration on the Hydrodynamics of Slurry Bubble Column Reactors. AIChE J. 2020, 66, e16813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16813.
- Sarhan, A. R.; Naser, J.; Brooks, G. Effects of Particle Size and Concentration on Bubble Coalescence and Froth Formation in a Slurry Bubble Column. Particuology 2018, 36, 82–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2017.04.011.
- Mokhtari, M.; Chaouki, J. New Technique for Simultaneous Measurement of the Local Solid and Gas Holdup by Using Optical Fiber Probes in the Slurry Bubble Column. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 358, 831–841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.067.
- Banisi, S.; Finch, J. A.; Laplante, A. R.; Weber, M. E. Effect of Solid Particles on Gas Holdup in Flotation Columns—I. Measurement. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1995, 50, 2329–2334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(95)00075-G.
- Fan, L.-S.; Hemminger, O.; Yu, Z.; Wang, F. Bubbles in Nanofluids. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46, 4341–4346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ie061532c.
- Mena, P. C.; Ruzicka, M. C.; Rocha, F. A.; Teixeira, J. A.; Drahoš, J. Effect of Solids on Homogeneous–Heterogeneous Flow Regime Transition in Bubble Columns. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60, 6013–6026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2005.04.020.
- Pandit, A. B.; Joshi, J. B. Three Phase Sparged Reactors—Some Design Aspects. Rev. Chem. Eng. 1984, 2, 1–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/REVCE.1984.2.1.1.
- Sada, E.; Kumazawa, H.; Lee, C. H. Influences of Suspended Fine Particles on Gas Holdup and Mass Transfer Characteristics in a Slurry Bubble Column. AIChE J. 1986, 32, 853–856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690320516.
- Yang, G. Q.; Du, B.; Fan, L. S. Formation and Dynamics in Gas–Liquid–Solid Fluidization—A Review. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007, 62, 2–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.08.021.
- Tsutsumi, A.; Nieh, J.-Y.; Fan, L.-S. Particle Wettability Effects on Bubble Wake Dynamics in Gas—Liquid—Solid Fluidization. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1991, 46, 2381–2384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(91)85140-S.
- Uribe-Salas, A.; De Lira-Gomez, P.; Perez-Garibay, R.; Nava-Alonso, F.; Magallanes-Hernandez, L.; Lara-Valenzuela, C. Overloading of Gas Bubbles in Column Flotation of Coarse Particles and Effect upon Recovery. Int. J. Miner. Process 2003, 71, 167–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-7516(03)00036-X.
- Kluytmans, J. H. J.; van Wachem, B. G. M.; Kuster, B. F. M.; Schouten, J. C. Gas Holdup in a Slurry Bubble Column: Influence of Electrolyte and Carbon Particles. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 5326–5333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ie001078r.
- Biń, A. K.; Duczmal, B.; Machniewski, P. Hydrodynamics and Ozone Mass Transfer in a Tall Bubble Column. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2001, 56, 6233–6240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00213-5.
- Jin, H.; Yang, S.; He, G.; Wang, M.; Williams, R. A. The Effect of Gas‐Liquid Counter‐Current Operation on Gas Hold‐Up in Bubble Columns Using Electrical Resistance Tomography. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2010, 85, 1278–1283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2428.
- Uchida, S.; Tsuyutani, S.; Seno, T. Flow Regimes and Mass Transfer in Counter‐Current Bubble Columns. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 1989, 67, 866–869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450670521.
- Ityokumbul, M. T.; Kosaric, N.; Bulani, W. Effect of Fine Solids and Frother on Gas Hold-up and Liquid Mixing in a Flotation Column. Miner. Eng. 1995, 8, 1369–1380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0892-6875(95)00103-W.
- Hooshyar, N.; Hamersma, P. J.; Mudde, R. F.; van Ommen, J. R. Intensified Operation of Slurry Bubble Columns Using Structured Gas Injection. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 88, 533–542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.20338.
- Jamialahmadi, M.; Müller‐Steinhagen, H. Effect of Solid Particles on Gas Hold‐Up in Bubble Columns. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 1991, 69, 390–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450690149.
- Marrucci, G. A Theory of Coalescence. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1969, 24, 975–985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(69)87006-5.
- Ruthiya, K. C.; van der Schaaf, J.; Kuster, B. F. M.; Schouten, J. C. Influence of Particles and Electrolyte on Gas Hold-up and Mass Transfer in a Slurry Bubble Column. Int. J. Chem. Reactor Eng. 2006, 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-6580.1237.
- Kim, Y. H.; Tsutsumi, A.; Yoshida, K. Effect of Particle Size on Gas Holdup in Three-Phase Reactors. Sadhana 1987, 10, 261–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02816208.
- Fan, L.-S.; Yang, G. Q.; Lee, D. J.; Tsuchiya, K.; Luo, X. Some Aspects of High-Pressure Phenomena of Bubbles in Liquids and Liquid–Solid Suspensions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1999, 54, 4681–4709. [Database] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00348-6.
- Luo, X.; Lee, D. J.; Lau, R.; Yang, G.; Fan, L. S. Maximum Stable Bubble Size and Gas Holdup in High‐Pressure Slurry Bubble Columns. AIChE J. 1999, 45, 665–680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690450402.
- Rabha, S.; Schubert, M.; Hampel, U. Intrinsic Flow Behavior in a Slurry Bubble Column: A Study on the Effect of Particle Size. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2013, 93, 401–411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2013.02.034.
- Eissa, S. H.; Schügerl, K. Holdup and Backmixing Investigations in Cocurrent and Countercurrent Bubble Columns. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1975, 30, 1251–1256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(75)85048-2.
- Smith, J. S.; Burns, L. F.; Valsaraj, K. T.; Thibodeaux, L. J. Bubble Column Reactors for Wastewater Treatment. 2. The Effect of Sparger Design on Sublation Column Hydrodynamics in the Homogeneous Flow Regime. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996, 35, 1700–1710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ie950366y.
- Stegeman, D.; Knop, P. A.; Wijnands, A. J. G.; Westerterp, K. R. Interfacial Area and Gas Holdup in a Bubble Column Reactor at Elevated Pressures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996, 35, 3842–3847. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/ie960325h. [Database] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ie960325h.
- Chaumat, H.; Billet-Duquenne, A. M.; Augier, F.; Mathieu, C.; Delmas, H. Mass Transfer in Bubble Column for Industrial Conditions—Effects of Organic Medium, Gas and Liquid Flow Rates and Column Design. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60, 5930–5936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2005.04.026.
- Jin, H.; Yang, S.; Wang, M.; Williams, R. A. Measurement of Gas Holdup Profiles in a Gas Liquid Cocurrent Bubble Column Using Electrical Resistance Tomography. AIP Conf. Proc. 2007, 914, 869–876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2747525.
- Muroyama, K.; Imai, K.; Oka, Y.; Hayashi, J. Mass Transfer Properties in a Bubble Column Associated with Micro-Bubble Dispersions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2013, 100, 464–473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2013.03.043.
- Pjontek, D.; Parisien, V.; Macchi, A. Bubble Characteristics Measured Using a Monofibre Optical Probe in a Bubble Column and Freeboard Region under High Gas Holdup Conditions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2014, 111, 153–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2014.02.024.
- Hernandez-Alvarado, F.; Kalaga, D. V.; Banerjee, S.; Kawaji, M. Comparison of Gas Hold-Up Profiles in Co-Current, Counter-Current and Batch Bubble Column Reactors Measured Using Gamma Densitometry and Surface of Revolution Method. In ASME 2016 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting Collocated with the ASME 2016 Heat Transfer Summer Conference and the ASME 2016 14th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels; American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, 2016.
- Besagni, G.; Di Pasquali, A.; Gallazzini, L.; Gottardi, E.; Colombo, L. P. M.; Inzoli, F. The Effect of Aspect Ratio in Counter-Current Gas-Liquid Bubble Columns: Experimental Results and Gas Holdup Correlations. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 2017, 94, 53–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.04.015.
- Parisien, V.; Farrell, A.; Pjontek, D.; McKnight, C. A.; Wiens, J.; Macchi, A. Bubble Swarm Characteristics in a Bubble Column under High Gas Holdup Conditions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2017, 157, 88–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2016.04.051.
- Prakash, R.; Majumder, S. K.; Singh, A. Bubble-Slurry Interfacial Shear Stress and Frictional Pressure Drop in a Rectangular Column in the Presence and Absence of a Surface-Active Agent. Powder Technol. 2020, 366, 761–775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.03.015.
- Einstein, A. Eine neue Bestimmung der Moleküldimensionen. Ann. Phys. 1906, 324, 289–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19063240204.
- Thomas, D. G. Transport Characteristics of Suspension: VIII. A Note on the Viscosity of Newtonian Suspensions of Uniform Spherical Particles. J. Colloid Sci. 1965, 20, 267–277. [Database] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-8522(65)90016-4.
- Prakash, R.; Majumder, S. K. Effect of Particle Size and Concentration on Bubble Size Distribution and Aspect Ratio in a Counter-Current Microstructured Bubble Column. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2020, 90, 105–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2020.07.002.
- Nagarajan, K.; Renganathan, T.; Krishnaiah, K. Hydrodynamics of a Continuous Countercurrent Liquid–Solid System: Experiments and Modeling. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 35486–35497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA05595H.
- Vinaya, M.; Varma, Y. B. G. Gas Holdup-Slip Velocity Relationship in Multistage Bubble Column. Bioprocess Eng. 1996, 15, 105–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372985.
- Lapidus, L.; Elgin, J. C. Mechanics of Vertical‐Moving Fluidized Systems. AIChE J. 1957, 3, 63–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690030112.
- Wallis, G. B. One-Dimensional Two-Phase Flow, Graham B. Wallis, McGraw-Huill, New York (1969). AIChE J. 1970, 16, 896–1105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690160603.
- Darton, R. C.; Harrison, D. Gas and Liquid Hold-up in Three-Phase Fluidisation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1975, 30, 581–586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(75)80030-3.
- Besagni, G.; Inzoli, F. Comprehensive Experimental Investigation of Counter-Current Bubble Column Hydrodynamics: Holdup, Flow Regime Transition, Bubble Size Distributions and Local Flow Properties. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2016, 146, 259–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2016.02.043.
- Götz, M.; Lefebvre, J.; Mörs, F.; Ortloff, F.; Reimert, R.; Bajohr, S.; Kolb, T. Novel Gas Holdup Correlation for Slurry Bubble Column Reactors Operated in the Homogeneous Regime. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 308, 1209–1224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.101.
- Sarhan, A. R.; Naser, J.; Brooks, G. CFD Simulation on Influence of Suspended Solid Particles on Bubbles' Coalescence Rate in Flotation Cell. Int. J. Miner. Process 2016, 146, 54–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2015.11.014.
- Rabha, S.; Schubert, M.; Wagner, M.; Lucas, D.; Hampel, U. Size and Radial Gas Hold‐up Distributions in a Slurry Bubble Column Using Ultrafast Electron Beam X‐Ray Tomography. AIChE J. 2013, 59, 1709–1722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.13920.
- Behkish, A.; Lemoine, R.; Oukaci, R.; Morsi, B. I. Novel Correlations for Gas Holdup in Large-Scale Slurry Bubble Column Reactors Operating under Elevated Pressures and Temperatures. Chem. Eng. J. 2006, 115, 157–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2005.10.006.
- Bothe, M.; Schlüter, M. Modellierungsparameter für Blasenströmungen. Chem. Ing. Tech. 2013, 7, 1023–1035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201300051.
- Kawatra, S. K.; Eisele, T. C. Rheological Effects in Grinding Circuits. Int. J. Miner. Process 1988, 22, 251–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-7516(88)90067-1.
- Zhou, Z. A.; Plitt, L. R.; Egiebor, N. O. The Effects of Solids and Reagents on the Characteristics of Coal Flotation in Columns. Miner. Eng. 1993, 6, 291–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0892-6875(93)90037-N.
- Senapati, P. K.; Panda, D.; Parida, A. Predicting Viscosity of Limestone–Water Slurry. J. Miner. Mater. Charact. Eng. 2009, 8, 203–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2009.83018.
- Tsutsumi, A.; Chen, W.; Kim, Y.-H. Classification and Characterization of Hydrodynamic and Transport Behaviors of Three-Phase Reactors. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 1999, 16, 709–720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02698341.
- Götz, M.; Lefebvre, J.; Mörs, F.; Reimert, R.; Graf, F.; Kolb, T. Hydrodynamics of Organic and Ionic Liquids in a Slurry Bubble Column Reactor Operated at Elevated Temperatures. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 286, 348–360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.10.044.
- Prakash, R.; Majumder, S. K.; Singh, A. Particle-Laden Bubble Size and Its Distribution in Microstructured Bubbling Bed in Presence and Absence of a Surface Active Agent. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 3499–3522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b05625.
- Prakash, R.; Majumder, S. K.; Singh, A. Bubble Size Distribution and Specific Bubble Interfacial Area in Two–Phase Microstructured Dense Bubbling Bed. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2020, 156, 108–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2020.01.032.
- Fahad, M. K.; Prakash, R.; Majumder, S. K.; Ghosh, P. Gas Holdup in the Gas-Liquid-Coal Slurry Flow in a Flotation Column in Presence of Surface Active Agent. Multiphase Sci. Technol. 2019, 31, 199–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1615/MultScienTechn.2019029957.
- Otake, T.; Tone, S.; Shinohara, K. Gas Holdup in the Bubble Column with Cocurrent and Countercurrent Gas-Liquid Flow. J. Chem. Eng. Japan. 1981, 14, 338–340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.14.338. [Database] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.14.338.
- Godfrey, J. C.; Slater, M. J. Slip Velocity Relationships for Liquid-Liquid Extraction Columns. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 1991, 69, 130–141.
- Richardson, J. F.; Zaki, W. N. Sedimentation and Fluidisation: Part I. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 1954, 32, 35–37.
- Yerushalmi, J.; Cankurt, N. T. Further Studies of the Regimes of Fluidization. Powder Technol. 1979, 24, 197–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(79)87036-9.
- Sada, E.; Kumazawa, H.; Lee, C.; Iguchi, T. Gas Holdup and Mass-Transfer Characteristics in a Three-Phase Bubble Column. Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev. 1986, 25, 472–476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/i200033a020.
- Deckwer, W.-D. Grundlagen der Chemischen Technik, Reaktionstechnik in Blasensäulen. 1. Aufl., Salle und Sauerländer: Frankfurt/Main, 1985.
- Hooshyar, N.; Hamersma, P. J.; Mudde, R. F.; van Ommen, J. R. Gas Fraction and Bubble Dynamics in Structured Slurry Bubble Columns. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 10689–10697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ie100528c.