A Content Analysis of Research Articles in The Journal for Specialists in Group Work: 1998–2015

REFERENCES

• Asner-Self, K. K. (2009). Research on groups: Writing your quantitative study so that JSGW will publish it; researchers, academics, and practitioners will use it; everyone will benefit; and good quality groups will proliferate. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 34, 195–201. doi:10.1080/01933920903041480
   Google Scholar
• Association for Specialists in Group Work (ASGW). (2000). Association for Specialists in Group Work professional standards for the training of group workers. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 25, 327–342. doi:10.1080/01933920008411677
   Google Scholar
• Bednar, R. L., Corey, G., Evans, N. J., Gazda, G. M., Pistole, C., Stockton, R., & Robison, F. F. (1987). Overcoming obstacles to the future development of research on group work. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 12, 98–111. doi:10.1080/01933928708411759
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, R., Crockett, S. A., & Erford, B. T. (2012). Journal for Specialists in Group Work (JSGW) Publication pattern review: A meta-study of author and article characteristics from 1981–2010. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 37(1), 56–70. doi:10.1080/01933922.2011.632812
   Google Scholar
• Conyne, R. K., Dye, A., Gill, S. J., Leddick, G. R., Morran, D. K., & Ward, D. E. (1985). A retrospective of “critical issues.” The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 10, 112–115. doi:10.1080/01933928508411811
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Delucia-Waack, J. L. (1997). Measuring the effectiveness of group work: A review and analysis of process and outcome measures. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 22, 277–293. doi:10.1080/01933929708415531
   Google Scholar
• Dies, R. R. (1985). Research foundations for the future of group work. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 10, 68–73. doi:10.1080/01933928508411802
   Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erford, B. T., Clark, K. H., & Erford, B. M. (2011). Adultspan publication patterns: Author and article characteristics from 1999–2009. Adultspan, 10(1), 52–62. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0029.2011.tb00006.x
   Google Scholar
• Erford, B. T., Miller, E. M., Duncan, K., & Erford, B. M. (2010). Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development (MECD) submission patterns: MECD author and article characteristics from 1990–2009. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 42, 296–307. doi:10.1080/01933922.2011.632812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falco, L. D., Bauman, S., Sumnicht, Z., & Engelstad, A. (2011). Content analysis of the Professional School Counseling journal: The first ten years. Professional School Counseling, 14, 271–277. doi:10.5330/PSC.n.2011-14.271
   Google Scholar
• Hays, D. G., Wood, C., Dahl, H., & Kirk-Jenkins, A. (2016). Methodological rigor in Journal of Counseling and Development qualitative research articles: A 15-Year Review. Journal of Counseling and Development, 94, 172–183. doi:10.1002/jcad.12074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helwig, A., & Schmidt, L. (2011). Content analysis of 32 years of American Counseling Association convention programs. Journal of Counseling and Development, 89, 148–154. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2011.tb00072.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne, A. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1997). Research in group work: How did we get where we are? The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 22, 228–240. doi:10.1080/01933929708415527
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulse-Killacky, D., Robison, F. F., & Morran, K. D. (1991). Reporting group research: Conceptual and technical considerations for preparing manuscripts. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 16, 101–108. doi:10.1080/01933929108415594
   Google Scholar
• Kalodner, C. R., Alfred, A. R., & Hoyt, W. T. (1997). Group research in applied settings: Examples and recommendations. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 22, 253–265. doi:10.1080/01933929708415529
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Livi, S., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). The statistical analysis of data from small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 126–137. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivlighan, D. M., Jr., & Kivlighan, D. M. (2014). Therapeutic factors: Current theory and research. In J. L. DeLucia-Waack, C. R. Kaldoner, & M. T. Riva (Eds.), Handbook of group counseling and psychotherapy (2nd ed., pp. 46–54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, W. B. (2008). Developing and submitting credible qualitative manuscripts. Counselor Education and Supervision, 47, 210–217. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2008.tb00052.x
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marley, S. C. (2010). Psychological measurement for specialists in group work. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 35, 331–348. doi:10.1080/01933922.2010.514978
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, P. C. (1997). Group research: Practitioner’s perspective. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 22, 294–296. doi:10.1080/01933929708415532
   Google Scholar
• Morran, D. K., Robison, F. F., & Hulse-Killacky, D. (1990). Group research and the unit of analysis problem: The use of ANOVA designs with nested factors. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 15(1), 10–14. doi:10.1080/01933929008411906
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, B. N. (1998). Hierarchical linear modeling and the “unit of analysis” problem: A solution for analyzing responses of intact group members. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 2, 299–312. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.2.4.299
   Google Scholar
• Riva, M. T., & Smith, R. D. (1997). Looking into the future of group research: Where do we go from here? The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 22, 266–276. doi:10.1080/01933929708415530
   Google Scholar
• Robison, F. F., Morran, K. D., & Hulse-Killacky, D. (1989). Single-subject research designs for group counselors studying their own groups. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 14, 93–97. doi:10.1080/01933928908411892
   Google Scholar
• Rubel, D. J., & Villalba, J. A. (2009). How to publish qualitative research in JSGW: A couple more voices in the conversation. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 34, 295–306. doi:10.1080/01933920903251964
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, S., Vasserman-Stokes, E., & Vannatta, R. (2014). Group cohesion in experiential growth groups. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 39, 236–256. doi:10.1080/01933922.2014.924343
   Google Scholar
• Stockton, R., & Toth, P. L. (1997). Applying a general research training model to group work. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 22, 241–252. doi:10.1080/01933929708415528
   Google Scholar
• Swank, J. M., & Shin, S. M. (2015). Garden counseling groups and self-esteem: A mixed methods study with children with emotional and behavioral problems. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 40, 315–331. doi:10.1080/01933922.2015.1056570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasca, G. A. (2016). Statistical methods in group psychology and group psychotherapy: Introduction to the Special Issue. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 20, 121–125. doi:10.1037/gdn0000054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasca, G. A., Ramsay, T., Corace, K., Illing, V., Bone, M., Bissada, H., & Balfour, L. (2010). Modeling longitudinal data from a rolling therapy group program with membership turnover: Does group culture affect individual alliance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 151–162. doi:10.1037/a0014837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. Wildemuth (Ed.), applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 308–319). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited. Retrieved from https://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~yanz/publication.html
   Google Scholar