The relationship of interpersonal attraction and attraction to group in a growth group setting

Reference

• Back , K. W. 1951 . Influence through social communication. . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 46 : 9 – 23 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker , P. M. 1981 . The division of labor: Interdependence, isolation, and cohesion in small groups. . Small Group Behavior , 12 : 93 – 106 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednar , R. L. and Lawlis , G. Empirical research in group psychotherapy. Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change . Edited by: Bergin , A.E. and Garfield , S.L. pp. 812 – 838 . New York : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Bovard , E. W. 1951 . The experimental production of interpersonal affect. . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 46 : 521 – 528 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovard , E. W. 1953 . Conformity to social norms and attraction to the group. . Science , 118 : 598 – 599 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunch , B. J. , Lund , N. L. and Wiggins , F. K. 1983 . Self-disclosure and perceived closeness in the development of group process. . Journal for Specialists in Group Work , 8 : 59 – 66 .
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright , D. 1968 . “ The nature of group cohesiveness. ” . In Group dynamics: Research and theory , 3rd ed. , Edited by: Cartwright , D. and Zander , A. 91 – 109 . Evanston, IL : Row, Peterson .
   Google Scholar
• Cox , P. L. 1982 . Group composition and cohesion development in personal growth groups. , Unpublished master's thesis University of Missouri—Columbia .
   Google Scholar
• Daylaw , L. T. and McInnis , C. E. 1970 . The effect of peer rating treatments on group morale. . The Canadian Psychologist , 11 : 281 – 288 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans , N. J. 1979 . Determinants of attraction to group: The effect of attraction to members, attraction to leader and psychological type on attraction to group in a growth group setting (doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri—Columbia, 1978). . Dissertation Abstracts International , 40 : 105A
   Google Scholar
• Evans , N. J. 1982 . The relationship of psychological type and attraction to group in a growth group setting. . Journal for Specialists in Group Work , 7 : 74 – 79 .
   Google Scholar
• Evans , N. J. and Jarvis , P.A . 1977 . The Group Attitude Scale. , Bloomington, IN : Indiana University . Unpublished test (available from Nancy J. Evans, Higher Education and Student Affairs, Wright Education Building, Suite 236, 47405)
   Google Scholar
• Evans , N. J. and Jarvis , P. A. Cohesion: A variable to be considered in group work. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Personnel and Guidance Association . March , Washington, DC
   Google Scholar
• Evans , N. J. and Jarvis , P. A. 1980 . Group cohesion: A review and reevaluation. . Small Group Behavior , 11 : 359 – 370 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans , N. J. and Jarvis , P. A. in press . The Group Attitude Scale: A measure of attraction to group. . Small Group Behavior ,
   Google Scholar
• Festinger , L. 1950 . Informal social communication. . Psychological Review , 57 : 271 – 281 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske , D. W. and Cox , J. A. Jr. 1960 . The consistency of ratings by peers. . Journal of Applied Psychology , 44 : 11 – 17 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank , J. D. 1957 . Some determinants, manifestations, and effects of cohesiveness in therapy groups. . International Journal of Group Psychotherapy , 7 : 53 – 63 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon , L. V. and Medland , F. F. 1965 . The cross-group stability of peer ratings of leadership potential. . Personnel Psychology , 18 : 173 – 177 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagstrom , W. D. and Selvin , H. C. 1965 . Two dimensions of cohesiveness in small groups. . Sociometry , 28 : 30 – 43 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hurst , A. G. 1975 . Therapeutic group process: A study of leadership styles and cohesiveness with adolescents. . Dissertation Abstracts International , 36 : 1919B – 1920B . University Microfilms No. 75–11, 471
   Google Scholar
• Israel , J. 1956 . Self-evaluation and rejection in groups. , Stockholm : Almqvist & Wiksell .
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs , M. 1977 . A comparison of publicly delivered and anonymously delivered verbal feedback in brief personal growth groups. . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 45 : 385 – 390 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim , J. and Kohout , F. J. 1975 . “ Multiple regression analysis: Subprogram regression. ” . In Statistical package for the social sciences , 2nd ed. , Edited by: Nie , N.H. , Hull , C.H. , Jenkins , J.G. , Steinbrenner , K. and Bent , D.H. 320 – 367 . New York : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Lott , B. E. 1961 . Group cohesiveness: A learning phenomenon. . Journal of Social Psychology , 55 : 275 – 286 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lott , A. V. and Lott , B. E. 1965 . Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. . Psychological Bulletin , 64 : 259 – 309 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lundgren , D. C. and Knight , D. J. 1977 . Trainer style and member attitudes toward trainer and group in t-groups. . Small Group Behavior , 8 : 47 – 64 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos , R. H. and Humphrey , B. 1974 . The Group Environment Scale. , Palo Alto, CA : Consulting Psychologists Press .
   Google Scholar
• Newcomb , T. M. 1956 . The prediction of interpersonal attraction. . American Psychologist , 11 : 575 – 586 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcomb , T. M. 1960 . “ Varieties of interpersonal attraction. ” . In Group dynamics: Research and theory , 2nd ed. , Edited by: Cartwright , D. and Zander , A. 104 – 119 . New York : Harper & Row .
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally , J. C. 1967 . Psychometric theory. , New York : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe , R. D. , Kernaghan , J. A. and Rubenstein , A. H. 1975 . Group cohesiveness: A factor in the adoption of innovations among scientific work groups. . Small Group Behavior , 6 : 282 – 291 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliverson , L. R. 1976 . Identification of dimensions of leadership and leader behavior and cohesion in encounter groups. . Dissertation Abstracts International , 37 : 136A – 137A . University Microfilms No. 76–16, 760
   Google Scholar
• Ribner , N. G. 1974 . Effects of an explicit group contract on self-disclosures and group cohesiveness. . Journal of Counseling Psychology , 21 : 116 – 120 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose , G. S. and Bednar , R. L. 1980 . Effects of positive and negative self-disclosure and feedback on early group development. . Journal of Counseling Psychology , 27 : 63 – 70 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmuck , R. A. and Schmuck , P. A. 1971 . Group process in the classroom. , Dubuque, IA : Brown .
   Google Scholar
• Simutis , C. L.T. 1983 . The effect of termination on cohesion and behavior in time limited growth groups. , Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Missouri—Columbia .
   Google Scholar
• Snoek , J. D. 1962 . Some effects of rejection upon attraction to a group. . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 64 : 175 – 182 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiles , D. B. 1973 . The significant other as a determinant of positive perceptions of group process experience. . Dissertation Abstracts International , 34 : 142A – 143A . University Microfilms No. 73–16, 846
   Google Scholar
• Stockton , R. and Hulse , D. 1981 . Developing cohesion in small groups: Theory and research. . Journal for Specialists in Group Work , 6 : 188 – 194 .
   Google Scholar
• Van Bergen , A. and Koekebakker , J. 1959 . “Group cohesiveness” in laboratory experiments. . Acta Psychologica , 16 : 81 – 98 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalom , I. D. , Houts , P. S. , Zimerberg , S. M. and Rand , K. H. 1967 . Prediction of improvement in group therapy. . Archives of General Psychiatry , 17 : 159 – 168 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar