The Status of Women in STEM in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature 2007–2017

References

• Ackerman, P. L., R. Kanfer, and M. E. Beier. 2013. Trait complex, cognitive ability, and domain knowledge predictors of baccalaureate success, STEM persistence, and gender differences. Journal of Educational Psychology 105 (3):911–27. doi:10.1037/a0032338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adornato, P. 2017. Uncovering the lived experiences of junior and senior undergraduate female science majors. Ph.D., Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlqvist, S. 2014. Reducing the gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and math fields: Developmental and experimental extensions of the perceived identity compatibility model. Ph.D., State University of New York at Stony Brook.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlqvist, S., B. London, and L. Rosenthal. 2013. Unstable identity compatibility how gender rejection sensitivity undermines the success of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields. Psychological Science 24 (9):1644–52. doi:10.1177/0956797613476048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander Nealy, Y. K. 2017. An exploration of the factors that contribute to the success of African American professionals in STEM-related careers. Ph.D., Wayne State University.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Q. R., and M. A. Hermann. 2016. African-American women’s experiences in graduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education at a predominantly white university: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 9 (4):307–22. doi:10.1037/a0039705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelo Alonso, R. A. 2015. Engineering familia: The role of a professional organization in the development of engineering identities of Latina/o undergraduates. Ph.D., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Amon, M. J. 2017. Looking through the glass ceiling: A qualitative study of STEM women’s career narratives. Frontiers in Psychology 8:236. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderton, H. 2012. STEM, teens, and public libraries: It’s easier than you think! Young Adult Library Services 10 (2):44–46.
   Google Scholar
• Arrieta, D., and J. Kern. 2015. Art outreach toward STEAM and academic libraries. New Library World 116:677–95. doi:10.1108/NLW-06-2015-0041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryee, M. 2017. College students’ persistence and degree completion in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): The role of non-cognitive attributes of self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and interest. Ph.D., Seton Hall University.
   Google Scholar
• Ault, P. C. 2008. Salmon cycles: Influences of a science field study immersion experience with Native American young women. Ed.D., Lewis and Clark College.
   Google Scholar
• Avallone, L. M., A. Gannet Hallar, H. Thiry, and L. M. Edwards. 2013. Supporting the retention and advancement of women in the atmospheric sciences. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 94 (9):1313–18. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00078.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachman, K. R. O. 2011. The influence of work-family balance based realistic job previews on job decisions in academia. M.A., Rice University.
   Google Scholar
• Banchefsky, S., J. Westfall, B. Park, and C. M. Judd. 2016. But you don’t look like a scientist!: Women scientists with feminine appearance are deemed less likely to be scientists. Sex Roles 75 (3–4):95–109. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0586-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bancroft, S. F. 2014. A critical exploration of science doctoral programs: Counterstories from underrepresented women of color. Ed.D., The University of Akron.
   Google Scholar
• Barker-Williams, C. 2017. The lived experience of women related to mentoring in STEM programs: A phenomenology study. Ph.D., Capella University.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, D. 2016. Make an exhibit of yourself: Reaching out to faculty and students through exhibits. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 83. http://www.istl.org/16-winter/tips2.html
   Google Scholar
• Barth, J. M., S. Dunlap, and K. Chappetta. 2016. The influence of romantic partners on women in STEM majors. Sex Roles 75 (3–4):110–25. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0596-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, J. M., R. E. Guadagno, L. Rice, C. A. Eno, J. A. Minney, and Alabama STEM Education Resource Team. 2015. Untangling life goals and occupational stereotypes in men’s and women’s career interest. Sex Roles 73 (11–12):502–18. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0537-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthelemy, R. S., M. McCormick, and C. Henderson. 2016. Gender discrimination in physics and astronomy: Graduate student experiences of sexism and gender microaggressions. Physical Review Physics Education Research 12 (2):16. doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, K. B. 2010. Women in science and engineering: Thriving or surviving? Ed.D., University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar
• Beals, R. A. 2016. ‘It was a whole new environment’ – transformative organizational culture and the development of science identity for underrepresented students in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM). Ph.D., The University of New Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Bear, J. B., and A. W. Woolley. 2011. The role of gender in team collaboration and performance. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 36 (2):146–53. doi:10.1179/030801811X13013181961473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley, M. A., and M. J. Fischer. 2012. Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math and engineering majors. Social Psychology of Education 15 (4):427–48. doi:10.1007/s11218-012-9185-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beddoes, K., and A. L. Pawley. 2014. ‘Different people have different priorities’: Work–family balance, gender, and the discourse of choice. Studies in Higher Education 39 (9):1573–85. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.801432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beekman, J. A., and D. Ober. 2015. Gender gap trends on mathematics exams position girls and young women for STEM careers. School Science and Mathematics 115 (1):35–50. doi:10.1111/ssm.2015.115.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bejerano, A. R., and T. M. Bartosh. 2015. Learning masculinity: Unmasking the hidden curriculum in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics courses. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 21 (2):107–24. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2015011359.
   Google Scholar
• Bench, S. W., H. C. Lench, J. Liew, K. Miner, and S. A. Flores. 2015. Gender gaps in overestimation of math performance. Sex Roles 72 (11–12):536–46. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0486-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berryman, S. E. 1983. Who will do science? Minority and female attainment of science and mathematics degrees: Trends and causes. NY: New York : Rockefeller Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bieri Buschor, C., S. Berweger, A. Keck Frei, and C. Kappler. 2014. Majoring in STEM—What accounts for women’s career decision making? A mixed methods study. The Journal of Educational Research 107 (3):167–76. doi:10.1080/00220671.2013.788989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, A. E. 2015. Career aspirations of high school males and females in a science, technology, engineering, and mathematics program. D.Ed., University of Maryland, College Park.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, L. V., L. A. Snyder, and C. Mavriplis. 2009. Diverse faculty in STEM fields: Attitudes, performance, and fair treatment. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 2 (4):195–205. doi:10.1037/a0016974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, E. E., R. B. Miller, M. Ong, and Y. V. Zastavker. 2017. Undergraduate STEM instructors’ teacher identities and discourses on student gender expression and equity. Journal of Engineering Education 106 (1):14–43. doi:10.1002/jee.v106.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohanna, D. D. 2016. Academic and social experiences of female community college transfer students in engineering fields at Midwestern university. Ph.D., Iowa State University.
   Google Scholar
• Bonner, D. C. 2015. A game-based learning approach to increase female participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields. M.S., Iowa State University.
   Google Scholar
• Borghetti, L. 2014. Closing the gender gap: Action video game training, cognitive improvement, and related self-efficacy. M.A., University of Dayton.
   Google Scholar
• Borum, V., and E. Walker. 2011. Why didn’t I know? Black women mathematicians and their avenues of exposure to the doctorate. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 17 (4):357–69. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v17.i4.
   Google Scholar
• Borum, V., and E. Walker. 2012. What makes the difference? Black women’s undergraduate and graduate experiences in mathematics. The Journal of Negro Education 81 (4):366–78. doi:10.7709/jnegroeducation.81.4.0366.
   Google Scholar
• Bottia, M. C., E. Stearns, R. A. Mickelson, S. Moller, and L. Valentino. 2015. Growing the roots of STEM majors: Female math and science high school faculty and the participation of students in STEM. Economics of Education Review 45:14–27. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, B., and M. Kasarda. 2014. The influence of social interactions on female students retention in two engineering programs. Insights on Learning Disabilities 11 (1):33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Burge, S. W. 2013. Cohort changes in the relationship between adolescents’ family attitudes, STEM intentions and attainment. Sociological Perspectives 56 (1):49–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnette, S. F. 2013. Resiliency in physics: The lived experiences of African-American women who completed doctoral physics programs. Ph.D., North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• Buzzanell, P. M., Z. Ziyu Long, L. B. Anderson, K. Kokini, and J. C. Batra. 2015. Mentoring in academe: A feminist poststructural lens on stories of women engineering faculty of color. Management Communication Quarterly 29 (3):440–57. doi:10.1177/0893318915574311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byars-Winston, A. 2014. Toward a framework for multicultural STEM-focused career interventions. The Career Development Quarterly 62 (4):340–57. doi:10.1002/cdq.2014.62.issue-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bystydzienski, J. M., M. Eisenhart, and M. Bruning. 2015. High school is not too late: Developing girls’ interest and engagement in engineering careers. The Career Development Quarterly 63 (1):88–95. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2015.00097.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, C. L. 2011. Effective recruitment and retention of women in the aerospace industry. Ph.D., Capella University.
   Google Scholar
• Cannady, M. A., E. Greenwald, and K. N. Harris. 2014. Problematizing the STEM pipeline metaphor: Is the STEM pipeline metaphor serving our students and the STEM workforce? Science Education 98 (3):443–60. doi:10.1002/sce.21108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbajal, S. C. 2015. Exploring the undergraduate experience of Latina students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors: Motivators and strategies for achieving baccalaureate attainment. M.A., California State University, Long Beach, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Carpi, A., D. M. Ronan, H. M. Falconer, and N. H. Lents. 2017. Cultivating minority scientists: Undergraduate research increases self-efficacy and career ambitions for underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 54 (2):169–94. doi:10.1002/tea.21341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrigan, C., K. O’Leary, E. Riskin, J. Yen, and M. O’Donnell. 2017. On-Ramping: Following women scientists and engineers through their transition from nonacademic to faculty careers. The Journal of Technology Transfer 42 (1):98–115. doi:10.1007/s10961-015-9460-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrigan, C., K. Quinn, and E. A. Riskin. 2011. The gendered division of labor among STEM faculty and the effects of critical mass. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 4 (3):131–46. doi:10.1037/a0021831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, S. S., and B. A. Richley. 2013. Gendered institutional research cultures in science: The post-doc transition for women scientists. Community, Work & Family 16 (3):327–49. doi:10.1080/13668803.2013.820097.
   Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., W. M. Williams, D. K. Ginther, and S. Kahn. 2014. Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 15 (3):75–141. doi:10.1177/1529100614541236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceglie, R. J., and J. Settlage. 2016. College student persistence in scientific disciplines: Cultural and social capital as contributing factors. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14 (S1):S169–186. doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9592-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charleston, L., and R. Leon. 2016. Constructing self-efficacy in STEM graduate education. Journal for Multicultural Education 10 (2):152–66. doi:10.1108/JME-12-2015-0048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charleston, L. J., P. L. George, F. L. Jackson, J. Berhanu, and M. H. Amechi. 2014. Navigating underrepresented STEM spaces: Experiences of black women in US computing science higher education programs who actualize success. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 7 (3):166–76. doi:10.1037/a0036632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlevoix-Romine, D. J. 2008. Women’s success in science: The role of self -efficacy and resiliency in building social capital. Ph.D., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, J. P. 2012. From STEM to stern: A review and test of stereotype threat interventions on women’s math performance and motivation. M.S., Montana State University.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, D. 2011. Career path barriers of women doctoral students in STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) disciplines. M.A., Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J. M., and W. G. Moons. 2015. They won’t listen to me: Anticipated power and women’s disinterest in male-dominated domains. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 18 (1):116–28. doi:10.1177/1368430214550340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., A. Master, and A. N. Meltzoff. 2015. Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology 6:49. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., V. C. Plaut, C. Handron, and L. Hudson. 2013. The stereotypical computer scientist: Gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex Roles 69 (1–2):58–71. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0296-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., J. O. Siy, M. Vichayapai, B. J. Drury, and S. Kim. 2011. Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM? Social Psychological and Personality Science 2 (6):656–64. doi:10.1177/1948550611405218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., S. A. Ziegler, A. K. Montoya, and L. Jiang. 2017. Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin 143 (1):1–35. doi:10.1037/bul0000052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesler, N. C., G. Barabino, S. N. Bhatia, and R. Richards-Kortum. 2010. The pipeline still leaks and more than you think: A status report on gender diversity in biomedical engineering. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 38 (5):1928–35. doi:10.1007/s10439-010-9958-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S., M. Goodman, B. Oppenheimer, J. Codling, and T. Robinson. 2009. Images of women in STEM fields. JCOM: Journal of Science Communication 8 (3):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, S. L., C. Dyar, N. Maung, and B. London. 2016. Psychosocial pathways to STEM engagement among graduate students in the life sciences. CBE-Life Sciences Education 15 (3):15ar45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comeaux, E., T. Bachman, R. M. Burton, and A. Aliyeva. 2017. Undergraduate experiences of Division I athlete science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) graduates. Journal of Science Education and Technology 26 (1):24–32. doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9648-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conklin, S. 2015. Women’s decision to major in STEM fields. Ph.D., State University of New York at Albany.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, W. M. 2009. Female STEM majors wanted: The impact of certain factors on choice of a college major. D.B.A., University of Phoenix.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, C., and C. Hill. 2015. Solving the equation: The variables for women’s success in engineering and computing. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
   Google Scholar
• Cozzens, S. E. 2008. Gender issues in US science and technology policy: Equality of what? Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):345–56. doi:10.1007/s11948-008-9061-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, G. A. 2010. !Claro, se puede! Critical resilience: A critical race perspective on resilience in the baccalaureate achievement of Latino/a engineering and life science students. Ph.D., The University of Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Dabney, K. P., and R. H. Tai. 2014. Factors associated with female chemist doctoral career choice within the physical sciences. Journal of Chemical Education 91 (11):1777–86. doi:10.1021/ed4008815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagley, M., M. Georgiopoulos, A. Reece, and C. Young. 2016. Increasing retention and graduation rates through a STEM learning community. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice 18 (2):167–82. doi:10.1177/1521025115584746.
   Google Scholar
• Danbold, F., and Y. J. Huo. 2017. Men’s defense of their prototypicality undermines the success of women in STEM initiatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 72:57–66. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, R. 2014. Women in STEM and human information behavior: Implications for LIS educators. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 55 (3):255–58.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, A. 2014. Predicting undergraduates’ intent to persist in STEM: Self-efficacy, role salience and anticipated work-family conflict. M.A., Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Deemer, E. D. 2015. Women’s science major satisfaction: Regulatory focus and the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Career Development 42 (1):60–71. doi:10.1177/0894845314543190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deemer, E. D., K. T. Mahoney, and J. H. Ball. 2012. Research motives of faculty in academic STEM: Measurement invariance of the research motivation scale. Journal of Career Assessment 20 (2):182–95. doi:10.1177/1069072711420856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deemer, E. D., J. L. Smith, A. N. Carroll, and J. P. Carpenter. 2014. Academic procrastination in STEM: Interactive effects of stereotype threat and achievement goals. The Career Development Quarterly 62 (2):143–55. doi:10.1002/cdq.2014.62.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Bella, L., and R. J. Crisp. 2016. Women’s adaptation to STEM domains promotes resilience and a lesser reliance on heuristic thinking. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 19 (2):184–201. doi:10.1177/1368430215596074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekman, A. B., E. R. Brown, A. M. Johnston, and E. K. Clark. 2010. Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science 21 (8):1051–57. doi:10.1177/0956797610377342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekman, A. B., M. Steinberg, E. R. Brown, A. L. Belanger, and E. K. Clark. 2017. A goal congruity model of role entry, engagement, and exit: Understanding communal goal processes in STEM gender gaps. Personality and Social Psychology Review 21 (2):142–75. doi:10.1177/1088868316642141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekman, A. B., E. S. Weisgram, and A. L. Belanger. 2015. New routes to recruiting and retaining women in STEM: Policy implications of a communal goal congruity perspective. Social Issues and Policy Review 9 (1):52–88. doi:10.1111/sipr.2015.9.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerschuk, P., C. Bahrim, J. Daniel, J. Kruger, J. Mann, and C. Martin. 2016. Closing the gaps and filling the STEM pipeline: A multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Science Education and Technology 25 (4):682–95. doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9622-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, J. C., S. Galindo-Gonzalez, A. N. Ardissone, and E. W. Triplett. 2016. Broadening participation of women and underrepresented minorities in STEM through a hybrid online transfer program. CBE-Life Sciences Education 15 (3):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugan, J. P., K. Q. Fath, S. D. Howes, K. R. Lavelle, and J. R. Polanin. 2013. Developing the leadership capacity and leader efficacy of college women in science, technology, engineering, and math fields. Journal of Leadership Studies 7 (3):6–23. doi:10.1002/jls.21292.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, H. A. 2014. ‘You must be smart’: Intersecting gender, ethnicity, and degree type in the lives of university mathematics majors. Ph.D., University of California, Santa Barbara.
   Google Scholar
• Easley, T. R. 2013. Understanding STEM faculty perceptions of matters of diversity. Ed.D., North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• Easterly, D. M., and C. S. Ricard. 2011. Conscious efforts to end unconscious bias: Why women leave academic research. Journal of Research Administration 42 (1):61–73.
   Google Scholar
• Eddy, S. L., and S. E. Brownell. 2016. Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines. Physical Review Physics Education Research 12 (2):UNSP 020106. doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, E. I. 2015. STEMS4ME: A community college connection program for minority women in STEM fields. M.A., Saint Mary’s College of California.
   Google Scholar
• Edzie, R. L. 2014. Exploring the factors that influence and motivate female students to enroll and persist in collegiate STEM degree programs: A mixed methods study. Ph.D., The University of Nebraska - Lincoln.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, J., B. K. Fosdick, and C. Rasmussen. 2016. Women 1.5 times more likely to leave STEM pipeline after calculus compared to men: Lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit. PloS One 11 (7):e0157447. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engberg, M. E., and G. C. Wolniak. 2013. College student pathways to the STEM disciplines. Teachers College Record 115 (1):010304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa, L. L. 2011. Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review 81 (2):209–41. doi:10.17763/haer.81.2.92315ww157656k3u.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, N. A. 2015. Understanding the engineering problem: Investigation of cultural and social cognitive variables on intent to persist for female students. M.A., Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.
   Google Scholar
• Feeney, M. K., and M. Bernal. 2010. Women in STEM networks: Who seeks advice and support from women scientists? Scientometrics 85 (3):767–90. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0256-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeney, M. K., M. Bernal, and L. Bowman. 2014. Enabling work? Family-friendly policies and academic productivity for men and women scientists. Science & Public Policy (SPP) 41 (6):750–64. doi:10.1093/scipol/scu006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer-Vinent, I. J. 2016. Programmatic and scaffolded information literacy embedded in the science curriculum. Science & Technology Libraries 35 (4):295–303. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2016.1214096.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, L. 2017. Walking the path together from high school to STEM majors and careers: Utilizing community engagement and a focus on teaching to increase opportunities for URM students. Journal of Science Education and Technology 26 (1):116–26. doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9656-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, S. 2017. The downside of good peers: How classroom composition differentially affects men’s and women’s STEM persistence. Labour Economics 46:211–26. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2017.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouad, N. A., G. Hackett, P. L. Smith, N. Kantamneni, M. Fitzpatrick, S. Haag, and D. Spencer. 2010. Barriers and supports for continuing in mathematics and science: Gender and educational level differences. Journal of Vocational Behavior 77 (3):361–73. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchetti, M., T. Ravn, and V. Kuntz. 2010. Retention and recruitment programs for female undergraduate students in engineering at the University of Toledo, Ohio, USA. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 11 (5/6):25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Fuesting, M. A., and A. B. Diekman. 2017. Not by success alone: Role models provide pathways to communal opportunities in STEM. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 43 (2):163–76. doi:10.1177/0146167216678857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuselier, L., and J. K. Jackson. 2010. Perceptions of collaboration, equity and values in science among female and male college students. Journal of Baltic Science Education 9 (2):109–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway, S. N. 2012. African American women making race work in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). Ph.D., The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gayles, J. G., and F. Ampaw. 2014. The impact of college experiences on degree completion in STEM fields at four-year institutions: Does gender matter? The Journal of Higher Education 85 (4):439–68. doi:10.1080/00221546.2014.11777336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayles, J. G., and F. D. Ampaw. 2011. Gender matters: An examination of differential effects of the college experience on degree attainment in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research 152:19–25. doi:10.1002/ir.405.
   Google Scholar
• Gehringer, T. A. 2015. Examining the STEM pipeline: The role of organizational socialization in STEM career persistence. M.A., University of Nebraska at Omaha.
   Google Scholar
• George-Jackson, C. E. 2014. Undergraduate women’s persistence in the sciences. Journal about Women in Higher Education 7 (1):96–119.
   Google Scholar
• George-Jackson, C. E. 2009. Rethinking the STEM fields: The importance of definitions in examining women’s participation and success in the sciences. Ph.D., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, K. D., Jr, J. McGready, J. C. Bennett, and K. Griffin. 2014. Biomedical science Ph.D. career interest patterns by race/ethnicity and gender. PloS One 9 (12):e114736. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilliam, M., P. Jagoda, C. Fabiyi, P. Lyman, C. Wilson, B. Hill, and A. Bouris. 2017. Alternate reality games as an informal learning tool for generating STEM engagement among underrepresented youth: A qualitative evaluation of the source. Journal of Science Education and Technology 26 (3):295–308. doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9679-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladney, M. 2016. The academic and professional experiences of African American women in STEM careers: A narrative inquiry. D.B.A., Northcentral University.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, C., and K. L. Minnotte. 2010. Recruiting and hiring women in STEM fields. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 3 (4):218–29. doi:10.1037/a0020581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, E. G. 2010. Lipstick and labcoats: Undergraduate women’s gender negotiation in STEM fields. NASPA Journal about Women in Higher Education 5 (2):115–40.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, H. B. May 12, 2015. The America COMPETES Acts: An overview. Congressional Research Service Report. Accessed July 10, 2017. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc816039/m2/1/high_res_d/R43880_2015May12.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, S. T., M. C. Durmowicz, E. M. Roskes, and S. P. Slattery. 2010. Women in the academy: Female leadership in STEM education and the evolution of a mentoring web. Forum on Public Policy Online 2010 (2):1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Goulden, M., M. Mason, and K. Frasch. 2011. Keeping women in the science pipeline. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 638 (1):141–62. doi:10.1177/0002716211416925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grays, S. D. 2013. WISE women: A narrative study of former living-learning community participants’ experiences as STEM majors. Ed.D., North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• Gurski, J. S. 2016. Examining the personal nature of the K-14 engineering pipeline for young women. Ed.D., Drexel University.
   Google Scholar
• Hagedorn, L. S., and A. V. Purnamasari. 2012. A realistic look at STEM and the role of community colleges. Community College Review 40 (2):145–64. doi:10.1177/0091552112443701.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, K. J. 2016. ‘They believe that because they are women, it should be easier for them.’ Subtle and overt sexism toward women in STEM from social media commentary. Ph.D., Virginia Commonwealth University.
   Google Scholar
• Han, S. W. 2016a. National education systems and gender gaps in STEM occupational expectations. International Journal of Educational Development 49:175–87. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handelsman, J., and N. Sakraney. 2015. Implicit bias. White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Accessed June 28, 2017. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/bias_9-14-15_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Handley, I. M., E. R. Brown, C. A. Moss-Racusin, and J. L. Smith. 2015. Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112 (43):13201–06. doi:10.1073/pnas.1510649112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, E. E., and M. O. Longhurst. 2016. Understanding the gender gap: Social cognitive changes during an introductory STEM course. Journal of Counseling Psychology 63 (2):233–39. doi:10.1037/cou0000119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C. M. 2015. Surviving the sciences: Factors that influence exit from the STEM workforce. Ph.D., University of Maryland, Baltimore County.
   Google Scholar
• Harsh, J. A., A. V. Maltese, and R. H. Tai. 2012. A perspective of gender differences in chemistry and physics undergraduate research experiences. Journal of Chemical Education 89 (11):1364–70. doi:10.1021/ed200581m.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, J. 2016. Dissecting a gendered organization: Implications for career trajectories for mid-career faculty women in STEM. The Journal of Higher Education 87 (5):605–34. doi:10.1080/00221546.2016.11777416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbronner, N. N. 2009. Pathways in STEM: Factors affecting the retention and attrition of talented men and women from the STEM pipeline. Ph.D., University of Connecticut.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbronner, N. N. 2011. Stepping onto the STEM pathway: Factors affecting talented students’ declaration of STEM majors in college. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 34 (6):876–99. doi:10.1177/0162353211425100.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, P. R., P. Wesley Schultz, M. Estrada, A. Woodcock, and R. C. Chance. 2013. Sustaining optimal motivation: A Longitudinal analysis of interventions to broaden participation of underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Educational Psychology 105 (1):89–107. doi:10.1037/a0029691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, S. D., R. M. Adelman, J. E. Bodford, M. A. O. Oliver Graudejus, and S. Y. K. Virginia. 2016. The effects of a female role model on academic performance and persistence of women in STEM courses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 38 (5):258–68. doi:10.1080/01973533.2016.1209757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirshfield, L. E. 2011. Authority, expertise, and impression management: Gendered professionalization of chemists in the academy. Ph.D., University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Hoepner, C. C. 2010. Advanced placement math and science courses: Influential factors and predictors for success in college STEM majors. Ed.D., University of California, Los Angeles, CA..
   Google Scholar
• Hogue, B. A. 2012. Gender differences in self-efficacy and sense of class and school belonging for majors in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. Ph.D., Walden University.
   Google Scholar
• Holleran, S. E., J. Whitehead, T. Schmader, and M. R. Mehl. 2011. Talking shop and shooting the breeze: A Study of workplace conversation and job disengagement among STEM faculty. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2 (1):65–71. doi:10.1177/1948550610379921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, M. H., J. K. Jackson, and R. Stoiko. 2016. Departmental dialogues: Facilitating positive academic climates to improve equity in STEM disciplines. Innovative Higher Education 41 (5):381–94. doi:10.1007/s10755-016-9358-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopewell, L., C. L. McNeely, E. W. Kuiler, and J.-O. Hahm. 2009. University leaders and the public agenda: Talking about women and diversity in STEM fields. Review of Policy Research 26 (5):589–607. doi:10.1111/ropr.2009.26.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, J. 2012. Initiating STEM learning in libraries. Children & Libraries: The Journal of the Association for Library Service to Children 10 (2):53–55.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, T. S. 2016. The under-representation of African American women in the STEM fields within the academy: A historical profile and current perceptions. Ph.D., Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, S. A., M. C. Juhas, and J. M. Herbers. 2014. Academic women: Overlooked entrepreneurs. Peer Review 16 (2):17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. M. 2010. The process of choosing science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers by undergraduate women: A narrative life history analysis. Ph.D., The Florida State University.
   Google Scholar
• Hurlock, A. J. 2014. Patching the leaky STEM pipeline: Identifying institutional factors that influence a STEM qualified female undergraduate’s choice of institution. M.A., Chapman University.
   Google Scholar
• Inkelas, K. K. 2011. Living-learning programs for women in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research 2011 (152):27–37. doi:10.1002/ir.406.
   Google Scholar
• Iskander, E. T., P. A. Gore Jr., C. Furse, and A. Bergerson. 2013. Gender differences in expressed interests in engineering-related fields ACT 30-year data analysis identified trends and suggested avenues to reverse trends. Journal of Career Assessment 21 (4):599–613. doi:10.1177/1069072712475290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. L. 2013. Making the connection: The impact of support systems on female transfer students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The Community College Enterprise 19 (1):19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. L. 2010. Transfer students in STEM majors: Gender differences in the socialization factors that influence academic and social adjustment. Ph.D., Iowa State University.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. M., A. L. Hillard, and T. R. Schneider. 2014. Using implicit bias training to improve attitudes toward women in STEM. Social Psychology of Education 17 (3):419–38. doi:10.1007/s11218-014-9259-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquot, C. 2009. Gender differences in science, math, and engineering doctoral candidates’ mental models regarding intent to pursue an academic career. Ph.D., The University of Texas at Arlington.
   Google Scholar
• Jaladanki, V. S. 2016. In the footsteps of Madame Curie: A cross-case study of female undergraduate physics majors. Ph.D., Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, F. L. 2012. Career commitment and African American women in undergraduate STEM majors: The role of science/math self-efficacy, department climate, and campus climate at the intersection of race and gender. Ph.D., North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. R. 2007. Sense of belonging among women of color in science, technology, engineering, and math majors: Investigating the contributions of campus racial climate perceptions and other college environments. Ph.D., University of Maryland, College Park.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. R. 2011. Women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). New Directions for Institutional Research 2011:75–85. doi:10.1002/ir.v2011.152.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. R. 2012. Campus racial climate perceptions and overall sense of belonging among racially diverse women in STEM majors. Journal of College Student Development 53 (2):336–46. doi:10.1353/csd.2012.0028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., C. Ruff, and M. C. Paretti. 2013. The impact of engineering identification and stereotypes on undergraduate women’s achievement and persistence in engineering. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal 16 (3):471–93. doi:10.1007/s11218-013-9222-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorstad, J. 2015. STEM aspiration: The influence of social capital and chilly climate on female community college students. Ph.D., Iowa State University.
   Google Scholar
• Kachchaf, R., L. Ko, A. Hodari, and M. Ong. 2015. Career–life balance for women of color: Experiences in science and engineering academia. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 8 (3):175–91. doi:10.1037/a0039068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpman, D. 2015. Leaning into engineering: Tenured women faculty and the policies and programs that support them. Ed.D., University of California, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, L. A., K. M. Aloisio, N. J. Horton, L. Minh, S. Pruss, K. Queeney, C. Rowen, and D. Patricia Marten. 2017. A program aimed toward inclusive excellence for underrepresented undergraduate women in the sciences. Cell Biology Education 16 (1):ar11. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-01-0029.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, B. A., K. D. Multon, M. L. Syme, N. M. Fry, R. Owens, M. Hammond, and S. Robinson-Kurpius. 2012. Development of the distance from privilege measures: A tool for understanding the persistence of talented women in STEM. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 30 (1):88–102. doi:10.1177/0734282911428198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincaid, S. D. 2015. Factors that promote success in women enrolled in STEM disciplines in rural North Carolina community colleges. Ed.D., Western Carolina University, NC.
   Google Scholar
• King, D. 2013. African American faculty women experiences of underrepresentation in computer technology positions in higher education. Ph.D., Walden University.
   Google Scholar
• King, J. 2016. The younger games. Public Libraries 55 (3):12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Koester, A. 2014. Get STEAM rolling! Children and Libraries: the Journal of the Association for Library Service to Children 12 (3):22–25. doi:10.5860/cal.12n3.22.
   Google Scholar
• Kolo, Y. I. 2016. Experiences of African American young women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. Ph.D., Walden University.
   Google Scholar
• Krome, L. R. 2016. Attracting women to STEM programs: The influence of goal-orientations and the use of gendered wording in recruitment materials. Ph.D., Kansas State University.
   Google Scholar
• Kulturel-Konak, S., M. Lou D’Allegro, and S. Dickinson. 2011. Review of gender differences in learning styles: Suggestions for STEM education. Contemporary Issues in Education Research 4 (3):9–18. doi:10.19030/cier.v4i3.4116.
   Google Scholar
• Kuntz, V. L. 2009. The effect of required cooperative education (co-op) on the pursuit of an undergraduate engineering degree for female students. Ph.D., The University of Toledo.
   Google Scholar
• LaCosse, J., D. Sekaquaptewa, and J. Bennett. 2016. STEM stereotypic attribution bias among women in an unwelcoming science setting. Psychology of Women Quarterly 40 (3):378–97. doi:10.1177/0361684316630965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambertus, A. J. 2010. Characterizing gender diverse graduate mathematics departments as communities of practice. Ph.D., North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• LaMotte, E. M. D. 2016. Unique and diverse voices of African American women in engineering at predominately white institutions: Unpacking individual experiences and factors shaping degree completion. Ed.D., University of Massachusetts Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, T. B. 2015.‘It’s not just one thing!’ examining the role of a STEM enrichment program in facilitating college readiness and retention among underserved students of color. Ph.D., Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, S. A. 2008. Stories of staying and leaving: A mixed methods analysis of biology undergraduate choice, persistence, and departure. Ph.D., The University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Leavey, N. 2016. Mentoring women in STEM: A collegiate investigation of mentors and protégés. Ph.D., State University of New York at Stony Brook.
   Google Scholar
• Le, H., and S. B. Robbins. 2016. Building the STEM pipeline: Findings of a 9-year longitudinal research project. Journal of Vocational Behavior 95–96:21–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. 2016. Raising STEM daughters. Working Mother 39 (1):48–52.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. A. 2008. Gender equity issues in technology education: A qualitative approach to uncovering the barriers. Ed.D., North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. E. 2013. Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields: The importance of the need to belong and self-esteem on the intention to leave a job. M.A., San Jose State University.
   Google Scholar
• Leggon, C. B. 2010. Diversifying science and engineering faculties: Intersections of race, ethnicity, and gender. American Behavioral Scientist 53 (7):1013–28. doi:10.1177/0002764209356236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman, K. J., L. J. Sax, and H. B. Zimmerman. 2017. Women planning to major in computer science: Who are they and what makes them unique? Computer Science Education 26 (4):277–98. doi:10.1080/08993408.2016.1271536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, J., A. Yamanaka, and B. Struthers. 2016. Gender microaggressions and learning environments: The role of physical space in teaching pedagogy and communication. Community College Journal of Research & Practice 40 (11):909–26. doi:10.1080/10668926.2015.1133333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liggett, J. B. 2014. Geek as a constructed identity and a crucial component of STEM persistence. M.S., University of North Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Linley, J. L., and C. George-Jackson. 2013. Addressing underrepresentation in STEM fields through undergraduate interventions. New Directions for Student Services 2013 (144):97–102. doi:10.1002/ss.20073.
   Google Scholar
• Litzler, E. 2010. Sex segregation in undergraduate engineering majors. Ph.D., University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Litzler, E., C. C. Samuelson, and J. A. Lorah. 2014. Breaking it down: Engineering student STEM confidence at the intersection of race/ethnicity and gender. Research in Higher Education 55 (8):810–32. doi:10.1007/s11162-014-9333-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lock, R. M., and Z. Hazari. 2016. Discussing underrepresentation as a means to facilitating female students’ physics identity development. Physical Review Physics Education Research 12 (2):020101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London, B., L. Rosenthal, and A. Gonzalez. 2011. Assessing the role of gender rejection sensitivity, identity, and support on the academic engagement of women in nontraditional fields using experience sampling methods. Journal of Social Issues 67 (3):510–30. doi:10.1111/josi.2011.67.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luong, K. T., and S. Knobloch-Westerwick. 2017. Can the media help women be better at math? Stereotype threat, selective exposure, media effects, and women’s math performance. Human Communication Research 43 (2):193–213. doi:10.1111/hcre.2017.43.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, L. A. 2013. Sociocultural influences on undergraduate women’s entry into a computer science major. Ph.D., University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Y. 2011. Gender differences in the paths leading to a STEM baccalaureate [my pathway]. Social Science Quarterly 92 (5):1169–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, K., C. Rankins, and K. Woodson. 2013. From graduate school to the STEM workforce: An entropic approach to career identity development for STEM women of color. New Directions for Higher Education 2013 (163):23–34. doi:10.1002/he.20062.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, E. 2014. Academic libraries and outreach to the sciences: Taking a closer look at research groups. Science & Technology Libraries 33 (2):165–75. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2014.914011.
   Google Scholar
• MacPhee, D., S. Farro, and S. S. Canetto. 2013. Academic self-efficacy and performance of underrepresented STEM majors: Gender, ethnic, and social class patterns. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 13 (1):347 369. doi:10.1111/asap.12033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahfood, D. M. 2014. Uncovering black/African American and Latina/o students’ motivation to learn science: Affordances to science identity development. Ph.D., Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Malcom, S. M., J. W. Brown, and P. Q. Hall. 1976. The Double Bind: The price of being a minority woman in science: Report of a conference of minority women scientists, Airlie House, Warrenton, Virginia, December 1975. AAAS Publication, 76-R-3. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Maltby, J. L., C. Brooks, M. Horton, and H. Morgan. 2016. Long term benefits for women in a science, technology, engineering, and mathematics living-learning community. Learning Communities: Research & Practice 4:(1), Article 2.
   Google Scholar
• Maltese, A. V., and R. H. Tai. 2011. Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among US students. Science Education 95 (5):877–907. doi:10.1002/sce.v95.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandernach, M. A., and B. A. Reisner. 2012. Embedding chemistry information literacy skills into the curriculum at James Madison University. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society 243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, A., and T. A. DiPrete. 2013. Trends in gender segregation in the choice of science and engineering majors. Social Science Research 42 (6):1519–41. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.07.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez Ortiz, A., and V. Sriraman. 2015. Exploring faculty insights into why undergraduate college students leave STEM fields of study- A three-part organizational self-study. American Journal of Engineering Education 6 (1):43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Master, A., S. Cheryan, and A. N. Meltzoff. 2016. Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science. Journal of Educational Psychology 108 (3):424–37. doi:10.1037/edu0000061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, R. R., and J. Berger. 2008. Moving beyond cultural barriers: Successful strategies of female technology education teachers. Journal of Technology Education 19 (2):65–79.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, S. I., and K. J. Holland. 2015. You, me, or her: Leaders’ perceptions of responsibility for increasing gender diversity in STEM departments. Psychology of Women Quarterly 39 (2):210–25. doi:10.1177/0361684314537997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClendon, N. K. 2012. The influence of math and natural science discourse on black women’s performance, and retention in math and natural science. M.A., American University.
   Google Scholar
• McCullough, L. 2011. Women’s leadership in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Barriers to participation. Forum on Public Policy Online 2011:2.
   Google Scholar
• McCullough, S. R. 2016. Social-Cognitive Gains in Female Undergraduate Peer Instructors in STEM Disciplines. Ph.D., Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, M. R. 2016. STEM-themed schools: A case study of its effect on student educational pathways. Ed.D., Pepperdine University.
   Google Scholar
• McNeely, C. L., and S. Vlaicu. 2010. Exploring institutional hiring trends of women in the U.S. STEM professoriate. Review of Policy Research 27 (6):781–93. doi:10.1111/ropr.2010.27.issue-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, E. M. 2012. Undergraduate African American women’s narratives on persistence in science majors at a PWI. Ph.D., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Means, B., H. Wang, V. Young, V. L. Peters, and S. J. Lynch. 2016. STEM-focused high schools as a strategy for enhancing readiness for postsecondary STEM programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53 (5):709–36. doi:10.1002/tea.v53.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mervis, J. 2011. Weed-out courses hamper diversity. Science 334 (6061):1333. doi:10.1126/science.334.6061.1333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M., A. Cimpian, and S.-J. Leslie. 2015. Women are underrepresented in fields where success is believed to require brilliance. Frontiers in Psychology 6:235. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milesi, C., L. Perez-Felkner, K. Brown, and B. Schneider. 2017. Engagement, persistence, and gender in computer science: Results of a smartphone ESM study. Frontiers in Psychology 8:602. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. I., and J. Wai. 2015. The bachelor’s to Ph.D. STEM pipeline no longer leaks more women than men: A 30-year analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1–10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, E. 2014. Trending tech services: Library and it curriculum integration part I. The case for a designed curriculum. Technical Services Quarterly 31 (2):161–72. doi:10.1080/07317131.2014.875380.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. L., D. Gelbgiser, and K. A. Weeden. 2013. Feeding the pipeline: Gender, occupational plans, and college major selection. Social Science Research 42 (4):989–1005. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.03.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morganson, V. J., M. P. Jones, and D. A. Major. 2010. Understanding Women’s underrepresentation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: The role of social coping. The Career Development Quarterly 59 (2):169–79. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)2161-0045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morganson, V. J., D. A. Major, V. N. Streets, M. L. Litano, and D. P. Myers. 2015. Using embeddedness theory to understand and promote persistence in STEM majors. The Career Development Quarterly 63 (4):348–62. doi:10.1002/cdq.2015.63.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, B. M. K. 2013. Development of American and foreign-national female graduate students in engineering at research universities. Ph.D., Washington State University.
   Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin, C. A., A. K. Molenda, and C. R. Cramer. 2015. Can evidence impact attitudes? Public reactions to evidence of gender bias in STEM fields. Psychology of Women Quarterly 39 (2):194–209. doi:10.1177/0361684314565777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, M. A. 2016. Identity compatibility, career adaptability, and adaptive coping as predictors of college women’s commitment in STEM majors. Ph.D., State University of New York at Albany.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, D. P. 2015. The differential effect of anticipated work-family conflict on the STEM major embeddedness of men and women. M.S., Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S., and J. Huss. 2013. Playgrounds for the mind. Children & Libraries: The Journal of the Association for Library Service to Children 11 (3):42–46.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. 2017. About the National Science Foundation. Accessed on July 10, 2017. https://www.nsf.gov/about/
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, D. 2016. Employing relaxation techniques for female STEM majors to reduce anxiety. M.A., Saint Mary’s College of California.
   Google Scholar
• Nix, S., L. Perez-Felkner, and K. Thomas. 2015. Perceived mathematical ability under challenge: A longitudinal perspective on sex segregation among STEM degree fields. Frontiers in Psychology 6:530. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Bannon, D. J., L. Garavalia, D. O. Renz, and S. M. McCarther. 2010. Successful Leadership development for women STEM faculty. Leadership & Management in Engineering 10 (4):167–73. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000080.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, L. T., G. Adams, A. Blodorn, D. M. Garcia, and E. Hammer. 2015a. Ethnic variation in gender-STEM stereotypes and STEM participation: An intersectional approach. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology 21 (2):169–80. doi:10.1037/a0037944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, L. T., D. M. Garcia, G. Adams, J. G. Villalobos, E. Hammer, and P. Gilbert. 2015b. The threat of sexism in a STEM educational setting: The moderating impacts of ethnicity and legitimacy beliefs on test performance. Social Psychology of Education 18 (4):667–84. doi:10.1007/s11218-015-9310-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, A. 2014. Women’s persistence in computer science: A longitudinal qualitative study. Ph.D., University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, C., and B. Cunningham. 2015. Women in physics: Reducing the gender gap at the college level.. AIP Conference Proceedings 1697 (1):1–2.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, E. 2017. Academic librarians as STEM retention partners. Journal of College Science Teaching 46 (5):6–7.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, K. R., and M. R. Hebl. 2008. Great expectations in academia: Realistic job previews on jobs and work-family balance. Gender in Management 30 (6):457–78. doi:10.1108/GM-02-2014-0014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of Science and Technology Policy. 2016. STEM depiction opportunities. The White House President Barack Obama. Accessed June 28, 2017. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/imageofstemdepictiondoc_02102016_clean.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Press Secretary. September 16, 2010. President Obama to announce major expansion of ‘Educate to Innovate’ Campaign to improve science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) education. The White House Briefing Room. Accessed June 28, 2017. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2010/09/16/president-obama-announce-major-expansion-educate-innovate-campaign-impro.
   Google Scholar
• Olund, J. K. 2012. Women of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: A qualitative exploration into factors of success. Ph.D., California Institute of Integral Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, M. 2005. Body projects of young women of color in physics: Intersections of gender, race, and science. Social Problems 52 (4):593–617. doi:10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, M., C. Wright, L. L. Espinosa, and G. Orfield. 2011. Inside the Double Bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review 81 (2):172–209. doi:10.17763/haer.81.2.t022245n7x4752v2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opare, P. B. 2012. Factors that female higher education faculty in select science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields perceive as being influential to their success and persistence in their chosen professions. Ph.D., Old Dominion University.
   Google Scholar
• Osei-Kofi, N., and L. E. Torres. 2015. College admissions viewbooks and the grammar of gender, race, and STEM. Cultural Studies of Science Education 10 (2):527–44. doi:10.1007/s11422-014-9656-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packard, B. W.-L., J. L. Gagnon, O. LaBelle, K. Jeffers, and E. Lynn. 2011. Women’s experiences in the STEM community college transfer pathway. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 17 (2):129–47. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v17.i2.
   Google Scholar
• Packard, B. W.-L., J. L. Gagnon, and A. J. Senas. 2012. Navigating community college transfer in science, technical, engineering, and mathematics fields. Community College Journal of Research & Practice 36 (9):670–83. doi:10.1080/10668926.2010.495570.
   Google Scholar
• Palumbo, L. 2016. Championing institutional goals: Academic libraries supporting graduate women in STEM. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 42 (3):192–99. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2016.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, L. E., A. F. Young, P. W. Eastwick, J. D. Troisi, and L. Streamer. 2016. Desirable but not smart: Preference for smarter romantic partners impairs women’s STEM outcomes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 46 (3):158–79. doi:10.1111/jasp.12354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, A. D. 2013. Family matters: Familial support and science identity formation for African American female STEM majors. Ph.D., The University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
   Google Scholar
• Parson, L. 2016a. Are STEM syllabi gendered? A feminist critical discourse analysis. Qualitative Report 21 (1):102–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parson, L. J. 2016b. Science, technology, engineering, math (STEM) in higher education from the perspective of female students: An institutional ethnography. Ph.D., The University of North Dakota.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, D. E., and K. L. Minnotte. 2017. Workplace climate and STEM Faculty women’s job burnout. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy 29 (1–2):45–65. doi:10.1080/08952833.2016.1230987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedone, M. H. 2016. Persistence of undergraduate women in STEM fields. Ed.D., Temple University.
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Felkneri, L., S. Nix, and K. Thomas. 2017. Gendered pathways: How mathematics ability beliefs shape secondary and postsecondary course and degree field choices. Frontiers in Psychology 8:386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perna, L., V. Lundy-Wagner, N. D. Drezner, M. Gasman, S. Yoon, E. Bose, and S. Gary. 2009. The contribution of HBCUS to the preparation of African American women for STEM careers: A case study. Research in Higher Education 50 (1):1–23. doi:10.1007/s11162-008-9110-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, H. B. 2016. Information literacy in the sciences: Faculty perception of undergraduate student skill. College & Research Libraries. Pre-print. doi:10.5860/crl.0.0.16618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, A. M. 2014. Females and STEM: Determining the K-12 experiences that influenced women to pursue STEM fields. Ph.D., The College of William and Mary.
   Google Scholar
• Pistilli, M. D. 2009. How female learning community students from the colleges of engineering, science, and technology experience Purdue university: A qualitative dissertation. Ph.D., Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Prime, D. R., B. L. Bernstein, K. G. Wilkins, and J. M. Bekki. 2015. Measuring the advising alliance for female graduate students in science and engineering: An emerging structure. Journal of Career Assessment 23 (1):64–78. doi:10.1177/1069072714523086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, P. A. 2010. The embedded science librarian: Partner in curriculum design and delivery.”. Journal of Library Administration 50 (4):373–96. doi:10.1080/01930821003667054.
   Google Scholar
• Public libraries and STEM: An interview with Paul Dusenbery and Keliann LaConte. 2016. Young Adult Library Services 14 (2):10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, L. R. 2011. A pyramidal model of sex stereotyping: Examining patterns of associations in the context of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields. Ph.D., University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, L. R., D. E. Betz, and D. Sekaquaptewa. 2013. The effects of an academic environment intervention on science identification among women in STEM. Social Psychology of Education 16 (3):377–97. doi:10.1007/s11218-013-9218-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rask, K. 2010. Attrition in STEM fields at a liberal arts college: The importance of grades and pre-collegiate preferences. Economics of Education Review 29 (6):892–900. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, T. M. 2016. A preliminary study investigating the factors influencing STEM major selection by African American females. Ph.D., Old Dominion University.
   Google Scholar
• Rea, J. N. 2015. See your way to success: Imagery perspective influences performance under stereotype threat. Ph.D., The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Redmond-Sanogo, A., J. Angle, and E. Davis. 2016. Kinks in the STEM pipeline: Tracking STEM graduation rates using science and mathematics performance. School Science and Mathematics 116 (7):378–88. doi:10.1111/ssm.2016.116.issue-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reighard, C., M. Torres-Crespo, and J. Vogel. 2016. STEM Curiosity Academy. Children & Libraries: The Journal of the Association for Library Service to Children 14 (4):32–35. doi:10.5860/cal.14n4.32.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoton, L. A. 2011. Distancing as a gendered barrier: Understanding women scientists’ gender practices. Gender & Society 25 (6):696–716. doi:10.1177/0891243211422717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoton, L. A. 2009. Practicing gender or practicing science? Gender practices of women scientists. Ph.D., Iowa State University.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, D., and M. Alfred. 2014. Personal and structural elements of support for African American female engineers. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 15 (2):40–49.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, K. G., M. E. Ray, D. E. Davis, C. DeBlaere, and J. S. Ashby. 2015. Perfectionism and longitudinal patterns of stress for STEM majors: Implications for academic performance. Journal of Counseling Psychology 62 (4):718–31. doi:10.1037/cou0000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riegle-Crumb, C., B. King, E. Grodsky, and C. Muller. 2012. The more things change, the more they stay the same? Prior achievement fails to explain gender inequality in entry into STEM college majors over time. American Educational Research Journal 49 (6):1048–73. doi:10.3102/0002831211435229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riegle-Crumb, C., B. King, and C. Moore. 2016. Do they stay or do they go? The switching decisions of individuals who enter gender atypical college majors. Sex Roles 74 (9–10):436–49. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0583-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rincón, B. E., and C. E. George-Jackson. 2016. Examining department climate for women in engineering: The role of STEM interventions. Journal of College Student Development 57 (6):742–47. doi:10.1353/csd.2016.0072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberson, T. L. 2015. STEM-ulating young minds: Creating science-based programming @ your library. Journal of Library Administration 55 (3):192–201. doi:10.1080/01930826.2015.1034041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. 2012. The characteristics and experiences of successful undergraduate Latina students who persist in engineering. Ed.D., Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, L. J. 2007. Females, functions and finite: Women’s use of group mathematics tutoring and its impact on major choice. Ph.D., Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Robnett, R. “The role of peer support for girls and women in the STEM pipeline: Promoting identification with STEM and mitigating the negative effects of sexism.” Ph.D., University of California, Santa Cruz, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Robnett, R. D. 2016. Gender bias in STEM fields. Psychology of Women Quarterly 40 (1):65–79. doi:10.1177/0361684315596162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rong, S., and J. Rounds. 2015. All STEM fields are not created equal: People and things interests explain gender disparities across STEM fields. Frontiers in Psychology 6:189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, K. D. D. 2013. Gender, ethnicity, and physics education: Understanding how black women build their identities as scientists. Ph.D., Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Rosbottom, S. R. 2016. Engineering success: Undergraduate Latina women’s persistence in an undergraduate engineering program. Ed.D., The University of Texas at San Antonio.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, L., B. London, S. R. Levy, and M. Lobel. 2011. The roles of perceived identity compatibility and social support for women in a single-sex STEM program at a co-educational university. Sex Roles 65 (9–10):725–36. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9945-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, E. C. 2013. Motivating Latina doctoral students in STEM disciplines. New Directions for Higher Education 2013 (163):35–42. doi:10.1002/he.v2013.163.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. 2014. Who is like a scientist? A self-prototype matching approach to women’s underrepresentation in STEM fields. Ph.D., University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, P. M., G. Sonnert, Z. Hazari, and R. Tai. 2012. Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education 96 (3):411–27. doi:10.1002/sce.21007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago, C. 2012. Faculty as institutional agents for low-income Latino students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields at a Hispanic-serving institution. Ed.D., University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar
• Saucerman, J., and K. Vasquez. 2014. Psychological barriers to STEM participation for women over the course of development. Adultspan Journal 13 (1):46–64. doi:10.1002/adsp.2014.13.issue-1.
   Google Scholar
• Saville, K. A. 2014. Women in STEM: Underrepresentation and equity in professional research organizations. Ph.D., Washington State University.
   Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., M. Allison Kanny, T. A. Riggers-Piehl, H. Whang, and L. N. Paulson. 2015. “But I’m not good at math”: The changing salience of mathematical self-concept in shaping women’s and men’s STEM aspirations. Research in Higher Education 56 (8):813–42. doi:10.1007/s11162-015-9375-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., K. J. Lehman, R. S. Barthelemy, and G. Lim. 2016. Women in physics: A comparison to science, technology, engineering, and math education over four decades. Physical Review Physics Education Research 12 (2):20108. doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., K. J. Lehman, J. A. Jacobs, M. Allison Kanny, G. Lim, L. Monje-Paulson, and H. B. Zimmerman. 2017. Anatomy of an enduring gender gap: The evolution of women’s participation in computer science. The Journal of Higher Education 88 (2):258–93. doi:10.1080/00221546.2016.1257306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarmozzino, J. M. 2010. Integrating STEM information competencies into an undergraduate curriculum. Journal of Library Administration 50 (4):315–33. doi:10.1080/01930821003666981.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, J. 2010. Impact of undergraduates’ stereotypes of scientists on their intentions to pursue a career in science. Ph.D., North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster, C., and S. Martiny. 2016. Not feeling good in STEM: Effects of stereotype activation and anticipated affect on women’s career aspirations. Sex Roles 76 (1–2):40–55. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0665-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaton, G. A. 2011. Belonging uncertainty and psychological capital: An investigation of antecedents of the leaky pipeline in STEM. M.S., Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Settles, I. H., L. M. Cortina, N. T. Buchanan, and K. Miner. 2013. Derogation, discrimination, and (dis)satisfaction with jobs in science: A gendered analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly 37 (2):179–91. doi:10.1177/0361684312468727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settles, I. H., R. C. O’Connor, and S. C. Yep. 2016. Climate perceptions and identity interference among undergraduate women in STEM. Psychology of Women Quarterly 40 (4):488–503. doi:10.1177/0361684316655806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, E. S., D. M. Marx, and R. Prislin. 2013. Mind the gap: Framing of women’s success and representation in STEM affects women’s math performance under threat. Sex Roles 68 (7–8):454–63. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0252-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, C. A., and L. J. Sax. 2011. Major selection and persistence for women in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research 2011:5–18. doi:10.1002/ir.v2011.152.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, C. A. E. 2011. The relationship between the proportion of same-major friendships and academic and affective outcomes for women and men in STEM. Ph.D., University of California, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J. R., and A. M. Williams. 2012. The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls’ and women’s performance and interest in STEM fields. Sex Roles 66 (3–4):175–83. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0051-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shedlosky-Shoemaker, R., and J. M. Fautch. 2015. Who leaves, who stays? Psychological predictors of undergraduate chemistry students’ persistence. Journal of Chemical Education 92 (3):408–14. doi:10.1021/ed500571j.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheltzer, J. M., and J. C. Smith. 2014. Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (28):10107–12. doi:10.1073/pnas.1403334111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, J. E. L., S. R. Levy, and B. London. 2016. Effects of role model exposure on STEM and non-STEM student engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 46 (7):410–27. doi:10.1111/jasp.2016.46.issue-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, R. M., A. Wagner, and B. Killion. 2017. Gender and choosing a STEM major in college: Femininity, masculinity, chilly climate, and occupational values. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 54 (3):299–323. doi:10.1002/tea.v54.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsen, J., L. Sare, and S. Bankston. 2017. Creating and assessing an information literacy component in an undergraduate specialized science class. Science & Technology Libraries 36 (2):200–18. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2017.1320261.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, A., and A. Maltese. 2017. Failure is a major component of learning anything”: The Role of failure in the development of STEM professionals. Journal of Science Education and Technology 26 (2):223–2. doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9674-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. L., I. M. Handley, A. V. Zale, S. Rushing, and M. A. Potvin. 2015. Now hiring! Empirically testing a three-step intervention to increase faculty gender diversity in STEM. Bioscience 65 (11):1084–87. doi:10.1093/biosci/biv138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. L., K. L. Lewis, L. Hawthorne, and S. D. Hodges. 2013. When trying hard isn’t natural: Women’s belonging with and motivation for male-dominated STEM fields as a function of effort expenditure concerns. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 39 (2):131–43. doi:10.1177/0146167212468332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, F. L., and B. A. Nosek. 2015. On the gender-science stereotypes held by scientists: Explicit accord with gender-ratios, implicit accord with scientific identity. Frontiers in Psychology 6:415. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snead-McDaniel, K. 2010. Exploration of the lived experiences of undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics minority students. Ed.D., University of Phoenix.
   Google Scholar
• Sobel, M., J. Gilmartin, and P. Sankar. 2016. Class size and confidence levels among female STEM students [Impact]. IEEE Technology & Society Magazine 35 (1):23–26. doi:10.1109/MTS.2016.2518251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soldner, M., H. Rowan-Kenyon, K. K. Inkelas, J. Garvey, and C. Robbins. 2012. Supporting students’ intentions to persist in STEM disciplines: The role of living-learning programs among other social-cognitive factors. The Journal of Higher Education 83 (3):311–36. doi:10.1080/00221546.2012.11777246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, M. 2014. Women of color faculty in STEM: Successfully navigating the promotion and tenure process. Ph.D., Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Spackman, E. 2007. Utilizing focus groups to evaluate an information literacy program in a general biology course. Science & Technology Libraries 27 (3):3–28. doi:10.1300/J122v27n03_02.
   Google Scholar
• Speer, J. D. 2017. The gender gap in college major: Revisiting the role of pre-college factors. Labour Economics 44:69–88. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2016.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires, S. M. 2015. A study of the lived experiences of African American women STEM doctoral degree completers. Ph.D., Hampton University.
   Google Scholar
• Stamm, K. E. 2009. Stereotype threat and implicit attitudes: Implications for the leaky pipeline of women in science. Ph.D., University of Rhode Island.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. 2008. Reference, in-depth research assistance, and administrative assistance. Science & Technology Libraries 28 (1–2):23–43. doi:10.1080/01942620802096846.
   Google Scholar
• Stets, J. E., P. S. Brenner, P. J. Burke, and R. T. Serpe. 2017. The science identity and entering a science occupation. Social Science Research 64:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.10.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine, M. L. 2010. The power of numbers: Grades and female density in influencing the persistence of women in engineering majors. Ph.D., The Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., and M.A. McManus. 2011. STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100(2):255–270. doi:10.1037/a0021385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, J. G., V. A. Grunberg, and T. A. Ito. 2016. Gender roles and stereotypes about science careers help explain women and men’s science pursuits. Sex Roles 75 (9–10):490–99. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0647-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streets, V. N. 2016. Reconceptualizing women’s STEM experiences: Building a theory of positive marginality. Ph.D., Old Dominion University.
   Google Scholar
• Su, R., and J. Rounds. 2015. All STEM fields are not created equal: People and things interests explain gender disparities across STEM fields. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 189. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, X., and B. Bozeman. 2016. Family friendly policies in STEM departments: Awareness and determinants. Research in Higher Education: Journal of the Association for Institutional Research 57 (8):990–1009. doi:10.1007/s11162-016-9412-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syed, M., and M. M. Chemers. 2011. Ethnic minorities and women in STEM: Casting a wide net to address a persistent social problem. Journal of Social Issues 67 (3):435–41. doi:10.1111/josi.2011.67.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szelényi, K., K. Bresonis, and M. M. Mars. 2016. Who Am I versus Who Can I Become? Exploring women’s science identities in STEM Ph.D. programs. The Review of Higher Education 40 (1):1–31. doi:10.1353/rhe.2016.0036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szelényi, K., N. Denson, and K. K. Inkelas. 2013. Women in STEM majors and professional outcome expectations: The role of living-learning programs and other college environments. Research in Higher Education 54 (8):851–73. doi:10.1007/s11162-013-9299-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szelényi, K., and K. K. Inkelas. 2011. The role of living-learning programs in women’s plans to attend graduate school in STEM fields. Research in Higher Education 52 (4):349–69. doi:10.1007/s11162-010-9197-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talley, K. G., and A. Martinez Ortiz. 2017. Women’s interest development and motivations to persist as college students in STEM: A mixed methods analysis of views and voices from a Hispanic-serving institution. International Journal of STEM Education 4 (1):1–24. doi:10.1186/s40594-017-0059-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenbaum, C. 2015. The early career pathways of female STEM doctorates: Do gendered, minoritized, and intersectional identities within discipline-specific structural locations matter? Ed.D., The George Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Thackeray, S. L. 2016. Overcoming the toxic influence of subtle messaging: Utah women who persist in STEM. Ed.D., Northeastern University.
   Google Scholar
• Thoman, D. B., P. H. White, N. Yamawaki, and H. Koishi. 2008. Variations of gender-math stereotype content affect women’s vulnerability to stereotype threat. Sex Roles 58 (9–10):702–12. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9390-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoman, D. B., J. A. Arizaga, J. L. Smith, T. S. Story, and G. Soncuya. 2013. The grass is greener in non-science, technology, engineering, and math classes: Examining the role of competing belonging to undergraduate women’s vulnerability to being pulled away from science. Psychology of Women Quarterly 38 (2):246–58. doi:10.1177/0361684313499899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, N., J. Bystydzienski, and A. Desai. 2015. Changing institutional culture through peer mentoring of women STEM faculty. Innovative Higher Education 40 (2):143–57. doi:10.1007/s10755-014-9300-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, L. E. 2012. Lost in the numbers: Gender equity discourse and women of color in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). International Journal of Science in Society 3 (4):33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, M. C. 2011. How can students be scientists and still be themselves: Understanding the intersectionality of science identity and multiple social identities through graduate student experiences. Ph.D., University of California, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Valentino, L., S. Moller, E. Stearns, and R. Mickelson. 2016. Perceptions of future career family flexibility as a deterrent from majoring in STEM. Social Currents 3 (3):273–92. doi:10.1177/2329496515604636.
   Google Scholar
• Valla, J. M., and W. M. Williams. 2012. Increasing achievement and higher-education representation of under-represented groups in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields: A review of current K-12 intervention programs. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 18 (1):21–53. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v18.i1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Lacum, E. B., M. A. Ossevoort, and M. J. Goedhart. 2014. A teaching strategy with a focus on argumentation to improve undergraduate students’ ability to read research articles. CBE-Life Sciences Education 13 (2):253–64. doi:10.1187/cbe.13-06-0110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazquez-Akim, J. A. 2014. Crack in the pipeline: Why female underrepresented racial minority college students leave engineering. Ed.D., University of California, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Vielma, K. I. 2016. STEMujeres: A case study of the life stories of first-generation Latina engineers and scientists. Ed.D., The University of Texas at San Antonio.
   Google Scholar
• Vieyra, M., J. Gilmore, and B. Timmerman. 2011. Requiring research may improve retention in STEM fields for underrepresented women. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly 32 (1):13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, A. B. 2015. Personal outreach in a virtual world. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 81. http://istl.org/15-summer/tips.html
   Google Scholar
• Walton, G. M., C. Logel, J. M. Peach, S. J. Spencer, and M. P. Zanna. 2015. Two brief interventions to mitigate a “chilly climate” transform women’s experience, relationships, and achievement in engineering. Journal of Educational Psychology 107 (2):468–85. doi:10.1037/a0037461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M.-T., and J. L. Degol. 2016. Gender Gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review 29 (1):119–40. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M.-T., and J. Degol. 2013. Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy-value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields. Developmental Review 33 (4):304–40. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. 2013. Modeling entrance into STEM fields of study among students beginning at community colleges and four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education 54 (6):664–92. doi:10.1007/s11162-013-9291-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. 2016. Course-taking patterns of community college students beginning in STEM: Using data mining techniques to reveal viable STEM transfer pathways. Research in Higher Education 57 (5):544–69. doi:10.1007/s11162-015-9397-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., H.-Y. Chan, S. J. Soffa, and B. R. Nachman. 2017. A nuanced look at women in STEM fields at two-year colleges: Factors that shape female students’ transfer intent. Frontiers in Psychology 8:146. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalen, D. F., and M. C. Shelley II. 2010. Academic success for STEM and non-STEM majors. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 11 (1/2):45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Whitson, M. L. 2008. The influence of stereotype threat on women’s self-efficacy, outcome expectations and interests about math and science careers. Ph.D., Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Wickersham, K., and X. Wang. 2016. What’s life got to do with it? The role of life experiences in shaping female community college students’ transfer intent in STEM fields of study. Community College Journal of Research & Practice 40 (12):1001. doi:10.1080/10668926.2016.1211039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilker, J. 2017. Women in STEM: The effect of undergraduate research on persistence. Ed.D., Walden University.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, A. N. 2014. Pursuit of STEM: Factors shaping degree completion for African American females in STEM. M.S., California State University, Long Beach.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. C., K. W. Phillips, and E. V. Hall. 2016. Tools for change: Boosting the retention of women in the STEM pipeline. Journal of Research in Gender Studies 6 (1):11–75. doi:10.22381/JRGS6120161.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, W. M., and S. J. Ceci. 2015. National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112 (17):5360–65. doi:10.1073/pnas.1418878112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. S. 2016. Understanding the experiences and perceptions of African American female STEM majors at a single-sex HBCU. Ed.D., Morgan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, J. B. 2007. Testing a theory that explains how self-efficacy beliefs are formed: Predicting self-efficacy appraisals across recreation activities. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 26 (7):841–48. doi:10.1521/jscp.2007.26.7.841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wladis, C., A. C. Hachey, and K. M. Conway. 2015. The representation of minority, female, and non-traditional STEM majors in the online environment at community colleges: A nationally representative study. Community College Review 43 (1):89–114. doi:10.1177/0091552114555904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, L., and W. Jing. 2011. Asian women in STEM careers: An invisible minority in a double bind. Issues in Science & Technology 28 (1):82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., M. Fang, and K. Shauman. 2015. STEM education. Annual Review of Sociology 41 (41):331–57. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y. J. 2008. Gender disparity in STEM disciplines: A study of faculty attrition and turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education 49 (7):607–24. doi:10.1007/s11162-008-9097-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y. J. 2017. Attrition of women in STEM: Examining job/major congruence in the career choices of college graduates. Journal of Career Development 44 (1):3–19. doi:10.1177/0894845316633787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., and C. Martin. 2011. Gender differences in STEM disciplines: From the aspects of informal professional networking and faculty career development. Gender Issues 28 (3):134–54. doi:10.1007/s12147-011-9104-5.
   Google Scholar
• Yen, J. W., K. Quinn, C. Carrigan, E. Litzler, and E. A. Riskin. 2007. The advance mentoring-for-leadership lunch series for women faculty in STEM at the University of Washington. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 13 (3):191–206. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v13.i3.10.
   Google Scholar
• Zamudio, R. 2015. From community college to 4-year institutions: Latinas’ successful completion of STEM baccalaureate degrees. M.S., California State University, Long Beach.
   Google Scholar