References
- Budd, J. M., M. Sievert, and T. R. Schultz. 1998. Phenomena of retraction: Reasons for retraction and citations to the publications. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association 280 (3):296–97. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.296.
- Budd, J. M., M. Sievert, T. R. Schultz, and C. Scoville. 1999. Effects of article retraction on citation and practice in medicine. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 87 (4):437–43.
- Caut, S., E. Guirlet, E. Angulo, K. Das, and M. Girondot. 2008. Isotope analysis reveals foraging area dichotomy for Atlantic leatherback turtles. PLOS ONE 3 (3):e1845. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001845.
- Committee on Publication Ethics. 2011. Code of conduct and best practice guidelines for journal editors. Accessed May 28, 2018. http://publicationethics.org/resources/code-conduct.
- Correction. 2012. Journal of the Medical Library Association 100 (4):329. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.100.4.027.
- Davis, P. M. 2012. The persistence of error: A study of retracted articles on the internet and in personal libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association 100 (3):184–89. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.100.3.008.
- Fanelli, D. 2013. Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign. PLOS Medicine 10 (12):e1001563. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001563.
- Furman, J. L., K. Jensen, and F. Murray. 2012. Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine. Research Policy 41 (2):276–90. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.11.001.
- Garfield, E. 1987. How to avoid spreading error: Scientists must search for corrections. The Scientist 1 (19):9.
- Grcar, J. F. 2013. Comments and corrigenda in scientific literature. American Scientist 101 (1):16–18. doi:10.1511/2013.100.16.
- Hauptman, P. J., E. S. Armbrecht, J. T. Chibnall, C. Guild, J. P. Timm, and M. W. Rich. 2014. Errata in medical publications. The American Journal of Medicine 127 (8):779–785.e1. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.03.012.
- Hubbard, D. E. 2010. Corrections in the chemical literature: Their number and nature. Science & Technology Libraries 29 (1–2):130–43. doi:10.1080/01942620903579427.
- Jones, D. A., M. M. Watson, M. Comegys, A. Burnett, and B. Tucker. 2003. Errata and retractions in electronic journals: Notification practices. Journal of Hospital Librarianship 3 (2):19–27. doi:10.1300/J186v03n02_02.
- Kortelainen, T., and M. Katvala. 2012. “Everything is plentiful—Except attention”. Attention data of scientific journals on social web tools. Journal of Informetrics 6 (4):661–68. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.06.004.
- Lu, S. F., G. Z. Jin, B. Uzzi, and B. Jones. 2013. The retraction penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science. Scientific Reports 3:3146. doi:10.1038/srep03146.
- Meyer, C. A. 2011. What’s JAV got to do with it? Indicating versions of record with CrossMark. Against the Grain 23 (2). doi: 10.7771/2380-176X.5784.
- Molckovsky, A., M. M. Vickers, and P. A. Tang. 2011. Characterization of published errors in high-impact oncology journals. Current Oncology 18 (1):26–32. doi:10.3747/co.v18i1.707.
- Nature Publishing Group. 2015. Tips for promoting your research paper. Accessed June 4, 2018. https://www.nature.com/content/authortips/index.html.
- Peterson, G. M. 2010. The effectiveness of the practice of correction and republication in the biomedical literature. Journal of the Medical Library Association 98 (2):135–39. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.98.2.005.
- Pfeifer, M. P., and G. L. Snodgrass. 1990. The continued use of retracted, invalid scientific literature. JAMA 263 (10):1420–23. doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03440100140020.
- PLOS [Public Library of Science]. n.d.a. ALM reports. Accessed May 27, 2018. http://almreports.plos.org. (Licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International - CC by 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.)
- PLOS [Public Library of Science]. n.d.b. Article-level metrics: PLOS ALM data. Accessed June 20, 2015. http://article-level-metrics.plos.org/plos-alm-data/.
- PLOS [Public Library of Science]. n.d.c. PLOS Clinical Trials: Archive. Accessed June 4, 2018. http://collections.plos.org/plos-clinical-trials.
- PLOS [Public Library of Science]. n.d.d. Track impact with ALMs. Accessed May 28, 2018. https://www.plos.org/article-level-metrics.
- PLOS ONE. n.d. Corrections and retractions. Accessed June 4, 2018. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/corrections-and-retractions.
- Poworoznek, E. L. 2003. Linking of errata: Current practices in online physical sciences journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54 (12):1153–59. doi:10.1002/asi.10320.
- Priem, J., D. Taraborelli, P. Groth, and C. Neylon. 2010. Altmetrics: A manifesto. Accessed June 4, 2018. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto.
- Royle, P., and N. Waugh. 2004. Should systematic reviews include searches for published errata? Health Information & Libraries Journal 21 (1):14–20. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2004.00459.x.
- Seal, L. 2007. Corrections and the online edition. Editors’ Bulletin 3 (3):101–02. doi:10.1080/17521740701778834.
- Thomsen, M., and D. Resnik. 1995. The effectiveness of the erratum in avoiding error propagation in physics. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (3):231–40. doi:10.1007/BF02628800.
- Trikalinos, T. A. 2009. Does it mean anything if your own name is wrong in your published paper? The FASEB Journal 23 (8):2345–48. doi:10.1096/fj.09-130922.
- United States National Library of Medicine. 2018. Errata, retractions, and other linked citations in PubMed. Accessed June 4, 2018. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/policy/errata.html.
- Woolston, C. 2014. Unusual reference attracts notoriety. Nature News & Comment. November 19. doi: 10.1038/nature.2014.16364.