An Investigation of Marine Taxa Referenced in Thesis Titles and Abstracts as a Collection Development Tool

References

• Aksnes, D. W., and H. I. Browman. 2016. An overview of global research effort in fisheries science. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal Du Conseil 73 (4):1004–11. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsv248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K., and J. Maclean. 1997. A Genre analysis study of 80 medical abstracts. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics 8: 1–23. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED409710.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, P. G., F. O. Mesquita, and R. J. Young. 2010. Fishing for gaps in science: A bibliographic analysis of brazilian freshwater ichthyology from 1986 to 2005. Journal of Fish Biology 76 (9):2177–93. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02668.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett-Ellis, P., and Y. Tang. 2016. User-centered collection development: A citation analysis of graduate biology theses. Collection Management 41 (1):3–22. doi:10.1080/01462679.2016.1145088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burright, M. A., T. Hahn, and M. J. Antonisse. 2005. Understanding information use in a multidisciplinary field: A local citation analysis of neuroscience research. College & Research Libraries 66 (3):198–210. doi:10.5860/crl.66.3.198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caffarella, E. P. 1999. The major themes and trends in doctoral dissertation research in educational technology from 1977 through 1998. In Selected research and development papers presented at the national convention of the association for educational communications and technology, February 10–14, 1999 483–90. Washington, DC, Houston, TX: ERIC Clearinghouse. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED436178.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, F. P. A., W. C. Valenti, M. Planas, and R. Calado. 2017. Seahorse aquaculture, biology and conservation: Knowledge gaps and research opportunities. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture 25 (1):100–11. doi:10.1080/23308249.2016.1237469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• College of Charleston. n.d. Grad student profiles 2017–2018 - college of charleston. Accessed August 7 2018. http://marinebiology.cofc.edu/current-students/students/index.php.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, H. H. 2012. Titles, a Treatise On. College Composition and Communication 27 (4):387–91. doi:10.2307/356303.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, C., and C. Oppenheim. 2006. A genre analysis of scientific abstracts. Journal of Documentation 62 (4):428–46. doi:10.1108/00220410610700953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi, S. F., and S. H. Chan. 2015. Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and economics: Functional analysis of the grammatical subject. Australian Journal of Linguistics 35 (4):381–97. doi:10.1080/07268602.2015.1070660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, P. L. K., and E. M. Gross. 1927. College libraries and chemical education. Science 66 (1713):385–89. doi:10.1126/science.66.1721.620.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffmann, K., and L. Doucette. 2012. A review of citation analysis methodologies for collection management. College & Research Libraries 73 (4):321–35. doi:10.5860/crl-254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarić, I., G. Cvijanović, J. Knežević-Jarić, and M. Lenhardt. 2012. Trends in fisheries science from 2000 to 2009: A bibliometric study. Reviews in Fisheries Science 20 (2):70–79. doi:10.1080/10641262.2012.659775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball, R., J. Stephens, D. Hubbard, and C. Pickett. 2013. A citation analysis of atmospheric science publications by faculty at Texas A&M University. College & Research Libraries 74 (4):356–67. doi:10.5860/crl-351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, O. J., S. H. Kim, H. G. Kim, K. J. Lee, and Y. S. Lee. 1994. A statistical study on the key words in the titles of nursing related theses. The Journal of Nurses Academic Society 24 (1):58–69. doi:10.4040/jnas.1994.24.1.58.
   Google Scholar
• Kuruppu, P. U., and D. C. Moore. 2008. Information use by PhD students in agriculture and biology: A dissertation citation analysis. Portal: Libraries & the Academy 8 (4):387–405. doi:10.1353/pla.0.0024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, L. N. 2011. Local citation analysis of graduate biology theses: Collection development implications. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship 64 (Winter). doi: 10.5062/F4RF5RZZ.
   Google Scholar
• Nabe, J., and A. Imre. 2008. Dissertation citations in organizmal biology at Southern Illinois University at carbondale: Implications for collection development. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship 55 (Fall). doi: 10.5062/F46W980N.
   Google Scholar
• Natale, F., G. Fiore, and J. Hofherr. 2012. Mapping the research on aquaculture. A bibliometric analysis of aquaculture literature. Scientometrics 90 (3):983–99. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0562-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolic, N., J.-L. Baglinière, C. Rigaud, C. Gardes, M. L. Masquilier, and C. Taverny. 2011. Bibliometric analysis of diadromous fish research from 1970s to 2010: A case study of seven species. Scientometrics 88 (3):929–47. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0422-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, K., and J. A. Moreiro. 1996. The growth and development of research in the field of ecology. Scientometrics 35 (1):59–70. doi:10.1007/BF02018233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossmann, D. 2013. An assessment of the relationships between resource development decisions, library collection usage, and user perceptions. Serials Librarian 65 (2):202–12. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2013.781977.
   Google Scholar
• Rotgans, J. I. 2012. The themes, institutions, and people of medical education research 1988–2010: Content analysis of abstracts from six journals. Advances in Health Sciences Education 17 (4):515–27. doi:10.1007/s10459-011-9328-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scalfani, V. F. 2017. Text analysis of chemistry thesis and dissertation titles. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 86. (Spring). doi:10.5062/F4TD9VBX.
   Google Scholar
• SCDNR (South Carolina Department of Natural Resources). 2014a. 2015 state wildlife action plan swap – Appendix 1-B: Freshwater priority species and their habitats. Accessed August 15, 2018. http://dnr.sc.gov/swap/main/app1-b-ecobasins.xlsx.
   Google Scholar
• SCDNR (South Carolina Department of Natural Resources). 2014b. 2015 state wildlife action plan – Appendix 1-c: Marine priority species and their habitats. Accessed August 15, 2018. http://dnr.sc.gov/swap/main/app1-c-marinehabitats.xlsx.
   Google Scholar
• SCDNR (South Carolina Department of Natural Resources). 2014c. 2015 state wildlife action plan – Appendix 1-D: Plant priority species and their habitats. Accessed August 15, 2018. http://dnr.sc.gov/swap/main/app1-d-plantshabitats.xlsx.
   Google Scholar
• SCDNR (South Carolina Department of Natural Resources). n.d.a. Fisheries research at MRRI – Coastal shark studies. Accessed August 6, 2018. http://www.dnr.sc.gov/marine/mrri/shark.html.
   Google Scholar
• SCDNR (South Carolina Department of Natural Resources). n.d.b. 2018 – 2019 saltwater fishing regulations. Accessed September 15, 2018. http://www.dnr.sc.gov/regs/saltwaterfish.html.
   Google Scholar
• SCDNR (South Carolina Department of Natural Resources). n.d.c. Wildlife information - Rare, threatened & endangered species inventory. Accessed August 15, 2018. http://www.dnr.sc.gov/species/state.html.
   Google Scholar
• SERTC (Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center). n.d.a. Invasive species information – nonindigenous aquatic invertebrate species reported from South Carolina. Accessed August 15, 2018. http://www.dnr.sc.gov/marine/sertc/invasive-inverts.htm.
   Google Scholar
• SERTC (Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center). n.d.b. Invasive species information – nonindigenous aquatic plant species reported from South Carolina. Accessed August 16, 2018. http://www.dnr.sc.gov/marine/sertc/invasive-plants.htm.
   Google Scholar
• SERTC (Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center). n.d.c. Invasive species information – nonindigenous fish species reported from South Carolina. Accessed August 15, 2018. http://www.dnr.sc.gov/marine/sertc/invasive-fish.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. T. 2003. Assessing collection usefulness: An investigation of library ownership of the resources graduate students use. College & Research Libraries 64 (5):344–55. doi:10.5860/crl.64.5.344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soler, V. 2007. Writing titles in science: An exploratory study. English for Specific Purposes 26 (1):90–102. doi:10.1016/J.ESP.2006.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stotesbury, H. 2003. Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2 (4):327–41. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00049-3.
   Google Scholar
• Syed, S., and C. T. Weber. 2018. Using machine learning to uncover latent research topics in fishery models. Reviews in Fisheries Science and Aquaculture 26 (3):319–36. doi:10.1080/23308249.2017.1416331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timms, G. P. 2018. Citations and citation metrics in a serial assessment using master’s theses. Collection Management 43 (3):177–97. doi:10.1080/01462679.2018.1451794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., S. Xie, and Y.-S. Ho. 2010. A bibliometric analysis of world volatile organic compounds research trends. Scientometrics 83 (2):477–92. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0065-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipp, L. S. 1996. Thesis and dissertation citations as indicators of faculty research use of university library journal collections. Library Resources & Technical Services 40 (4):335–42. doi:10.5860/lrts.40n4.335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong, Q.-J., H.-Z. Shen, Q.-J. Yuan, X.-W. Hu, Z.-P. Hou, and S.-G. Deng. 2013. Doctoral dissertations of library and information science in China: A co-word analysis. Scientometrics 94 (2):781–99. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0799-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar